Evolving aprotic Li-air batteries

Lithium-air batteries (LABs) have attracted tremendous attention since the proposal of the LAB concept in 1996 because LABs have a super high theoretical/practical specific energy and an infinite supply of redox-active materials, and are environment-friendly. However, due to the lack of critical electrode materials and a thorough understanding of the chemistry of LABs, the development of LABs entered a germination period before 2010, when LABs research mainly focused on the development of air cathodes and carbonate-based electrolytes. In the growing period, i.e., from 2010 to the present, the investigation focused more on systematic electrode design, fabrication, and modification, as well as the comprehensive selection of electrolyte components. Nevertheless, over the past 25 years, the development of LABs has been full of retrospective steps and breakthroughs. In this review, the evolution of LABs is illustrated along with the constantly emerging design, fabrication, modification, and optimization strategies. At the end, perspectives and strategies are put forward for the development of future LABs and even other metal-air batteries.

OUP accepted manuscript

Aprotic lithium–oxygen (Li–O₂) batteries are receiving intense research interest by virtue of their ultra-high theoretical specific energy. However, current Li–O₂ batteries are suffering from severe barriers, such as sluggish reaction kinetics and undesired parasitic reactions. Recently, molecular catalysts, i.e. redox mediators (RMs), have been explored to catalyse the oxygen electrochemistry in Li–O₂ batteries and are regarded as an advanced solution. To fully unlock the capability of Li–O₂ batteries, an in-depth understanding of the catalytic mechanisms of RMs is necessary. In this review, we summarize the working principles of RMs and their selection criteria, highlight the recent significant progress of RMs and discuss the critical scientific and technical challenges on the design of efficient RMs for next-generation Li–O₂ batteries.

Dissociation of (Li2O2)0,+ on graphene and boron-doped graphene: insights from first-principles calculations

Reducing charge overpotential is of great significance to enhance the efficiency and cyclability of Li-O₂ batteries. Here, a dramatically reduced charge overpotential via boron-doped graphene as a catalytic substrate is successfully predicted. By first-principles calculations, from the perspective of reaction thermodynamics and kinetics, the results show that the electrochemical oxidation of the Li₂O₂⁺ cation is easier than the chemical oxidation of the neutral Li₂O₂ molecule, and the oxidation of (Li₂O₂)^0,+ is facilitated by boron-doping in pristine graphene. More importantly, the results reveal the oxidation mechanism of (Li₂O₂)^0,+: two-step dissociation with the LiO₂ molecule as a reactive intermediate has advantages over one-step dissociation; the rate-determining step for the dissociation of (Li₂O₂⁺)_G is the oxygen evolution process, while the lithium removal process is the rate-determining step for the dissociation of (Li₂O₂⁰)_G, (Li₂O₂⁰)_BG, and (Li₂O₂⁺)_BG.

Lithium-Oxygen Batteries and Related Systems: Potential, Status, and Future

The goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C requires a drastic reduction in CO₂ emissions across many sectors of the world economy. Batteries are vital to this endeavor, whether used in electric vehicles, to store renewable electricity, or in aviation. Present lithium-ion technologies are preparing the public for this inevitable change, but their maximum theoretical specific capacity presents a limitation. Their high cost is another concern for commercial viability. Metal-air batteries have the highest theoretical energy density of all possible secondary battery technologies and could yield step changes in energy storage, if their practical difficulties could be overcome. The scope of this review is to provide an objective, comprehensive, and authoritative assessment of the intensive work invested in nonaqueous rechargeable metal-air batteries over the past few years, which identified the key problems and guides directions to solve them. We focus primarily on the challenges and outlook for Li-O₂ cells but include Na-O₂, K-O₂, and Mg-O₂ cells for comparison. Our review highlights the interdisciplinary nature of this field that involves a combination of materials chemistry, electrochemistry, computation, microscopy, spectroscopy, and surface science. The mechanisms of O₂ reduction and evolution are considered in the light of recent findings, along with developments in positive and negative electrodes, electrolytes, electrocatalysis on surfaces and in solution, and the degradative effect of singlet oxygen, which is typically formed in Li-O₂ cells.