Understanding exo-selective Diels-Alder reactions involving Fischer-type carbene complexes

Concerted [4 + 2] and Stepwise (2 + 2) Cycloadditions of Tetrafluoroethylene with Butadiene: DFT and DLPNO-UCCSD(T) Explorations

Tetrafluoroethylene and butadiene form the 2 + 2 cycloadduct under kinetic control, but the Diels–Alder cycloadduct is formed under thermodynamic control. Borden and Getty showed that the preference for 2 + 2 cycloaddition is due to the necessity for syn-pyramidalization of the two CF₂ groups in the 4 + 2 transition state. We have explored the full potential energy surface for the concerted and stepwise reactions of tetrafluoroethylene and butadiene with density functional theory, DFT (B3LYP and M06-2X), DLPNO-UCCSD(T), and CASSCF-NEVPT2 methods and with the distortion/interaction–activation strain model to explain the energetics of different pathways. The 2 + 2 cycloadduct is formed by an anti-transition state followed by two rotations and a final bond formation transition state. Energetics are compared to the reaction of maleic anhydride and ethylene.

Looking at the big picture in activation strain model/energy decomposition analysis: the case of the ortho-para regioselectivity rule in Diels-Alder reactions

The regioselectivity of the Diels-Alder reaction is predicted by the ortho-para rule which has been explained from FMO theory. Using DFT calculations, the activation-strain model and energy decomposition analysis we studied the reaction of methyl acrylate with four unsymmetrical dienes. We found that if the analysis is carried out considering the TS structures, the selectivity would not be explained by the interaction energy as expected considering the FMO arguments. However, a thorough analysis along the reaction path revealed that the interaction energy is responsible for the regioselectivity. A deeper analysis with the EDA model showed that the decisive term that accounts for the HOMO-LUMO interactions favors the ortho and para paths, as predicted by FMO arguments.