A simple and reliable analytical method for simultaneous quantification of first line antitubercular drugs in human plasma by LCMS/MS

Push forward LC-MS-based therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacometabolomics for anti-tuberculosis precision dosing and comprehensive clinical management

The spread of tuberculosis (TB), especially multidrug-resistant TB and extensively drug-resistant TB, has strongly motivated the research and development of new anti-TB drugs. New strategies to facilitate drug combinations, including pharmacokinetics-guided dose optimization and toxicology studies of first- and second-line anti-TB drugs have also been introduced and recommended. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has arguably become the gold standard in the analysis of both endo- and exo-genous compounds. This technique has been applied successfully not only for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) but also for pharmacometabolomics analysis. TDM improves the effectiveness of treatment, reduces adverse drug reactions, and the likelihood of drug resistance development in TB patients by determining dosage regimens that produce concentrations within the therapeutic target window. Based on TDM, the dose would be optimized individually to achieve favorable outcomes. Pharmacometabolomics is essential in generating and validating hypotheses regarding the metabolism of anti-TB drugs, aiding in the discovery of potential biomarkers for TB diagnostics, treatment monitoring, and outcome evaluation. This article highlighted the current progresses in TDM of anti-TB drugs based on LC-MS bioassay in the last two decades. Besides, we discussed the advantages and disadvantages of this technique in practical use. The pressing need for non-invasive sampling approaches and stability studies of anti-TB drugs was highlighted. Lastly, we provided perspectives on the prospects of combining LC-MS-based TDM and pharmacometabolomics with other advanced strategies (pharmacometrics, drug and vaccine developments, machine learning/artificial intelligence, among others) to encapsulate in an all-inclusive approach to improve treatment outcomes of TB patients.

A high-throughput LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of isoniazid, ethambutol and pyrazinamide in human plasma

RATIONALE

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a challenging global infectious disease, mainly affecting the lungs. First-line anti-TB drugs play a crucial role in slowing down the rapid spread of TB. In addition, the patient might benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring since it has become an accepted clinical tool for optimizing TB treatment.

METHODS

A simple and sensitive liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method was developed to monitor the plasma level of isoniazid, ethambutol and pyrazinamide in plasma samples. A one-step extraction procedure using an Ostro™ plate was applied, and extracts were analyzed by gradient elution followed by detection on a mass spectrometer by multiple reaction monitoring mode.

RESULTS

The analytes were separated within 4.2 min and over the concentration range of 0.2-10 μg/ml for isoniazid and ethambutol and 1-65 μg/ml for pyrazinamide. The method was successfully validated according to the European Medicine Agency guideline for the selectivity, linearity and lower limit of detection, precision and accuracy, matrix effect, extraction recovery, carryover, dilution integrity and stability, and applied for quantification of analytes in clinical samples from TB patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented method allows sensitive and reproducible determination of selected anti-TB drugs with advantages such as low sample volume requirement, short run time of analysis, one-step sample preparation procedure with capabilities for phospholipids removal, and a low quantification limit as well as a high degree of selectivity.

Chromatographic Methods for the Determination of Rifampicin, Isoniazid, Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol, and Main Metabolites in Biological Samples: A Review

Bioanalytical methods are used to quantify drugs and their metabolites in biological samples in order to determine bioequivalence, perform pharmacokinetic and bioavailability studies, and complete therapeutic drug monitoring. The objective of this review paper is to describe bioanalytical methods based on Liquid Chromatography that are used to quantify antitubercular drugs and their metabolites in different biological samples, utilizing scientific literature from 1992 to 2021.

Plasma drug concentrations of 4-drug fixed-dose combination regimen and its efficacy for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis under National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme: A prospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

The thrice weekly dosing regimen of DOTS has shown low rifampicin plasma concentrations as an independent risk factor for unfavourable tuberculosis (TB) outcome. With introduction of daily regimen using fixed dose combinations (FDC) under National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP) the existence of suboptimal plasma levels of first-line antitubercular drugs and its clinical significance remain poorly understood.

METHOD

We included a prospective cohort of newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients receiving 4-FDC daily regimen under NTEP. Plasma concentration at 2 hours (C_2h) of each drug was determined after two weeks of treatment using liquid chromatography (LCMS/MS) developed by us. TB card and laboratory reports were reviewed for baseline characteristics and clinical status at 2, 4 and 6 months after the initiation of treatment. At a 1 year follow-up, therapy failure was defined as death or a relapse of tuberculosis.

RESULTS

Among 40 PTB patients, the C_2h post dose plasma concentrations of H, R and E were suboptimal in 25%, 60% and 10% respectively. The C_2h of H, R, Z and E were respectively 4.2 ± 2.0, 7.3 ± 2.8, 39.2 ± 8.8 and 3.5 ± 1.2 μg/ml; 60% of the patients had suboptimal plasma concentrations and commonly it was observed with H and R. C_2h were lower than expected for at least two drugs i.e. H and R in 25% (10/40) of the patients. Plasma concentration of isoniazid and rifampicin has always been considered important for microbiological response and treatment outcome and low concentrations has been associated with poor treatment response. These patients may require a two year follow up and critical evaluation for prevention of MDR-TB. However, all the TB patients were cured and none of them had recurrence within one year follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

All the pulmonary TB patients administering 4-FDC daily regimen under programmatic settings were cured despite the suboptimal levels of isoniaizd and rifampicin. All the patients achieved pyrazinamide plasma levels and probably this could be the reason behind favourable outcome. Further study is required on large sample size with various subset of population to understand the need of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotic Drugs: The Role of the Clinical Laboratory

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-infective drugs is an increasingly complex field, given that in addition to the patient and drug as 2 usual determinants, its success is driven by the pathogen. Pharmacodynamics is related both to the patient (toxicity) and bacterium (efficacy or antibiotic susceptibility). The specifics of TDM of antimicrobial drugs stress the need for multidisciplinary knowledge and expertise, as in any other field. The role and the responsibility of the laboratory in this interplay are both central and multifaceted. This narrative review highlights the role of the clinical laboratory in the TDM process.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar, focusing on the past 5 years (studies published since 2016) to limit redundancy with previously published review articles. Furthermore, the references cited in identified publications of interest were screened for additional relevant studies and articles.

RESULTS

The authors addressed microbiological methods to determine antibiotic susceptibility, immunochemical and chromatographic methods to measure drug concentrations (primarily in blood samples), and endogenous clinical laboratory biomarkers to monitor treatment efficacy and toxicity. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods are critically discussed, along with existing gaps and future perspectives on strategies to provide clinicians with as reliable and useful results as possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Although interest in the field has been the driver for certain progress in analytical technology and quality in recent years, laboratory professionals and commercial providers persistently encounter numerous unresolved challenges. The main tasks that need tackling include broadly and continuously available, easily operated, and cost-effective tests that offer short turnaround times, combined with reliable and easy-to-interpret results. Various fields of research are currently addressing these features.