Heterochiral coupling to bilateral β-turn structured azapeptides bearing two remote chiral centers

Enantioselective synthesis governed by chiral catalysts has been extensively developed, but that without any chiral auxiliaries or chiral catalysts is rare, particularly when remote stereogenic centers are involved. Here we report an enantioselectivity of heterochiral coupling in the one-pot reaction of racemic hydrazides with achiral 1,4-bis(isothiocyanine)benzene, yielding preferentially the heterochiral bilateral azapeptides over the homochiral ones. Despite bearing two hydrogen-bonded β-turn structures that allow intramolecular chiral transfer, the bilateral azapeptide products have two chiral centers separated by 14 atoms or 15 bonds, which prevent the direct intramolecular asymmetric communication between the two chiral centers. Interestingly, the heterochiral azapeptides feature intermolecular hydrogen bonding stacking between homochiral β-turns to form a superstructure of alternative M- and P-helices in the crystals. In contrast, the homochiral azapeptide counterparts adopt a β-sheet-like structure, which is less favorable compared to the helical-like superstructure from heterochiral azapeptides, accounting for the favored heterochiral coupling of the one-pot reaction. This work demonstrates enantioselective synthesis involving distant chiral centers through the formation of biomimetic superstructures, opening up new possibilities for the regulation of enantioselectivity.

Simultaneous formation of helical and sheet-like assemblies from short azapeptides enables spontaneous resolution

As determined by the homochirality of amino acid building units, protein secondary structures α-helix and β-sheet are single-handed chiral superstructures extending in one and quasi-two dimensions, respectively. Synthetic molecular assemblies that mimic the structural homochirality of proteins would provide insights into the origin of biological homochirality and inform the development of chiral separation techniques. Here we fabricated a homochiral 3D assembly consisting of 1D helical and 2D sheet-like assemblies that feature molecular packings resembling α-helix and β-sheet, respectively. This was achieved by using an alanine derivative, a β-turn structured short azapeptide from p-iodobenzoylalanine-based N-amido-N'-phenylthiourea. While N-H⋯SC/OC hydrogen bonds between the β-turn scaffolds afford a 2D pleated sheet-like structure, the head-to-tail C-I⋯π halogen bonds, together with the N-H⋯OC hydrogen bonds, support a 1D helical-like assembly, serving as linkers to connect the 2D sheet-like structures into a 3D superstructure. The two biomimetic assembly modes share the N-H⋯OC hydrogen bonds and can allow 3D homochiral elongation, driving spontaneous resolution of the short azapeptides to generate conglomerate crystals.

Evolution of Peptidomimetics-Based Chiral Assemblies of β-Sheet, α-Helix, and Double Helix Involving Chalcogen Bonds

Developing chiral assemblies that mimic biological secondary structures, e.g., protein β-sheet, α-helix, and DNA double helix, is a captivating goal in supramolecular chemistry. Here, we create a family of biomimetic chiral assemblies from alanine-based peptidomimetics, wherein the incorporation of N-terminal 2,1,3-benzoselenadiazole groups enables the rarely utilized chalcogen bonding as the adhesive interaction. While the alanine-based acylhydrazine molecule 1L was designed as a building unit with an extended conformation, simple derivatization of 1L affords folded unilateral N-amidothiourea 2L with one β-turn and bilateral N-amidothiourea 3L with two β-turns. This derivatization leads to the evolution of molecular assemblies from β-sheet organization (1L) to single helix (α-helix mimic, 2L) and ultimately to double helix (3L), illustrating an evolutionary route relating the structures and superstructures. In the case of the double helix formed by 3L, an unexpected cis-form that brings the two β-turns into one side was observed, stabilized via the π···π interaction between two N-terminal 2,1,3-benzoselenadiazole groups. This conformation allows double-crossed N-Se···S═C chalcogen bonds to support a DNA-like P-double helix featuring intrastrand noncovalent interactions and interstrand covalent linkages, surviving in both the solid state and in dilute acetonitrile solution phase.

Achiral Solvent Inversed Helical Pathway and Cosolvent Controlled Excited-State "Majority Rule" in Enantiomeric Dansulfonamide Assemblies

Achiral solvents are commonly utilized to induce the self-assembly of chiral molecules. This study demonstrates that achiral solvents can trigger helicity inversion in the assemblies of dansyl amphiphiles and control the excited-state "majority rule" in assemblies composed of pure enantiomers, through variation of the cosolvent ratio. Specifically, enantiomers of dansyl amphiphiles self-assemble into helical structures with opposite handedness in methanol (MeOH) and acetonitrile (MeCN), together with inversed circular dichroism and circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) signals. When a mixture of MeOH and MeCN is employed, the achiral cosolvents collectively affect the CPL of the assemblies in a way similar to that of "mixed enantiomers". The dominant cosolvent governs the CPL signal. As the cosolvent composition shifts from pure MeCN to MeOH, the CPL signals undergo a significant inversion and amplification, with two maxima observed at ≈20% MeOH and 20% MeCN. This study deepens the comprehension of how achiral solvents modulate helical nanostructures and their excited-state chiroptical properties.

Multiple non-covalent-interaction-directed supramolecular double helices: the orthogonality of hydrogen, halogen and chalcogen bonding

In this study, a benzoselenadiazole- and pyridine-bifunctionalized hydrogen-bonded arylamide foldamer was synthesized. A co-crystallization experiment with 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene showed that a new type of supramolecular double helices, which were induced by three orthogonal interactions, namely, three-center hydrogen bonding (O⋯H⋯O), I⋯N halogen bonding and Se⋯N chalcogen bonding, have been constructed in the solid state. This work presents a novel instance of multiple non-covalent interactions that work together to construct supramolecular architectures.

Noncovalent interaction network of chalcogen, halogen and hydrogen bonds for supramolecular β-sheet organization

An alanine-based bilateral building block, linked by 2,5-thiophenediamide motifs and equipped with C-terminal 4-iodoaniline groups, was designed, allowing a noncovalent interaction network consisting of intramolecular chalcogen bonds and intermolecular halogen/hydrogen bonds, which cooperatively maintain a supramolecular β-sheet organization in the solid state, as well as in dilute CH3CN solution with a high g factor of -0.017.

Supramolecular helices from helical building blocks via head-to-tail intermolecular interactions

Supramolecular helices from helical building blocks represent an emerging analogue of the α-helix. In cases where the helicity of the helical building block is well propagated, the head-to-tail intermolecular interactions that lead to the helix could be enhanced to promote the formation and the stability of the supramolecular helix, wherein homochiral elongation dominates and functional helical channel structures could also be generated. This feature article outlines the supramolecular helices built from helical building blocks, i.e., helical aromatic foldamers and helical short peptides that are held together by intermolecular π-π stacking, hydrogen/halogen/chalcogen bonding, metal coordination, dynamic covalent bonding and solvophobic interactions, with emphasis on the influence of efficient propagation of helicity during assembly, favouring homochirality and channel functions.

Chalcogen bonding mediates the formation of supramolecular helices of azapeptides in crystals

To explore whether chalcogen bonding was able to drive the formation of supramolecular helices, alanine-based azapeptides containing a β-turn structure, with a thiophene group, respectively, incorporated in the N- or C-terminus, were employed as helical building blocks. While the former derivative formed a supramolecular M-helix via intermolecular SS chalcogen bonding in crystals, the latter formed P-helix via intermolecular SO chalcogen bonding.