Coligands Controlled Reactivities of Ruthenium(II) Precursors: Antiferromagnetically Coupled Ruthenium(III)-Phenoxyl versus Ruthenium(II)-Phenoxyl Forms

The study disclosed that the reactivities of [RuII (PPh3)3Cl2] and [RuII(PPh3)3(CO)(H)Cl] precursors toward a trimethoxyarylimino-phenol derivative are sensibly different. The former promotes methoxy demethylation reaction affording a [Phenolato-RuIII-Phenolato] unit, while the latter containing π-acidic CO and hydride as coligands leads to C-H activation reaction, generating a [Phenolato-RuII-Aryl] unit. Notably, the oxidized analogues of these two forms produce antiferromagnetically coupled [RuIII-phenoxyl] and paramagnetic [RuII-phenoxyl] forms, which exhibit diverse reactivities. Surprisingly, the magnetically coupled [RuIII-phenoxyl] form obtained from [Phenolato-RuIII-Phenolato] motif leads to coligand, PPh3 oxidation and undergoes dimerization, making a Ru-Ru bond (2.599(2) Å), while the [RuII-phenoxyl] form obtained from [Phenolato-RuII-Aryl] motif leads to C-C coupling and H abstraction reactions. The coupling reaction affords a 4,4'-dibenzosemiquinonate anion radical complex, but the H-abstraction of the phenoxyl form gives a [RuII-Phenol] complex. For comparison, [RuII(IQR 0)] and [RuII(ISQR·-)] complexes were also isolated, where IQR 0 and ISQR·- are p-R-o-iminobenzoquinone and p-R-o-iminobenzosemiquinonate anion radicals. However, they fail to promote any bond-formation reaction. The molecular and electronic structures of the ruthenium (II/III) complexes were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, EPR spectroscopy, and DFT calculations.

Mixed-valence di-ruthenium(II,III) complexes of redox non-innocent N-aryl-o-phenylenediamine derivatives

A mononuclear ruthenium(ii), [(L1IQ)Ru2+(PPh3)2Cl2]·CHCl3 (1·CHCl3), a di-ruthenium(ii,ii), [(L2IQ)2Ru24+Cl4(PPh3)2] (2) and a mixed-valence di-ruthenium(ii,iii), [(L3IQ)Ru25+Cl5(PPh3)2]·MeOH (3·MeOH) complex, where L1IQ, L2IQ and L3IQ are, respectively, o-diiminobenzoquinone forms of redox non-innocent N-(5-nitropyridyl)-o-phenylenediamine (L1H2), N-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-o-phenylenediamine (L2H2) and N-(3-nitropyridyl)-o-phenylenediamine (L3H2) derivatives, were successfully isolated. The molecular and electronic structures of 1·CHCl3, 2 and 3·MeOH were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, EPR, UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopies and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Both 1·CHCl3 and 2 exhibited reversible anodic waves due to the Ru(iii)/Ru(ii) redox couple, while the cyclic voltammogram of 3·MeOH displayed two successive cathodic waves due to ruthenium(iii)/ruthenium(ii) and (L3IQ/L3ISQ) redox couples. EPR spectroscopy and DFT calculations inferred that 1+ is a ruthenium(iii) complex of L1IQ, [(L1IQ)Ru3+(PPh3)2Cl2]+, 2+ is a mixed-valence di-ruthenium(ii,iii) complex of L2IQ, [(L2IQ)2Ru25+Cl4(PPh3)2]+ and 3- is a di-ruthenium(ii,ii) complex, [(L3IQ)Ru24+Cl5(PPh3)2]-, while 32- is a di-ruthenium(ii,ii) complex of L3ISQ, [(L3ISQ)Ru24+Cl5(PPh3)2]2-, where L3ISQ is the o-diiminobenzosemiquinonate anion radical form of the L3H2 with a significant contribution of the mixed-valence di-ruthenium(iii,ii) form, [(L3AM)Ru25+Cl5(PPh3)2]2- (L3AM is the di-amido form of the L3H2 ligand). The spin density obtained from the Mulliken spin population analyses of the broken-symmetry (BS) DFT calculations was localized on Ru(2) in 3, while it was delocalized over both Ru(1) and the o-phenylenediamine fragment in 32-. The inter-valence charge-transfer (IVCT) transitions of 2+ and 3 were relatively weaker and occurred at 1680 and 1685 nm, respectively, while 32- exhibited a broader NIR absorption band at 1500-2000 nm. The calculated electronic-coupling parameters (Hab) using the Mulliken-Hush equation for 3 and 2+ ion, respectively, were 62 and 103 cm-1, defining these as Robin-Day class II mixed-valence systems.