Biodegradation mechanism of polycaprolactone by a novel esterase MGS0156: a QM/MM approach

Biological Degradation of Plastics and Microplastics: A Recent Perspective on Associated Mechanisms and Influencing Factors

Plastic and microplastic pollution has caused a great deal of ecological problems because of its persistence and potential adverse effects on human health. The degradation of plastics through biological processes is of great significance for ecological health, therefore, the feasibility of plastic degradation by microorganisms has attracted a lot of attention. This study comprises a preliminary discussion on the biodegradation mechanism and the advantages and roles of different bacterial enzymes, such as PET hydrolase and PCL-cutinase, in the degradation of different polymers, such as PET and PCL, respectively. With a particular focus on their modes of action and potential enzymatic mechanisms, this review sums up studies on the biological degradation of plastics and microplastics related to mechanisms and influencing factors, along with their enzymes in enhancing the degradation of synthetic plastics in the process. In addition, biodegradation of plastic is also affected by plastic additives and plasticizers. Plasticizers and additives in the composition of plastics can cause harmful impacts. To further improve the degradation efficiency of polymers, various pretreatments to improve the efficiency of biodegradation, which can cause a significant reduction in toxic plastic pollution, were also preliminarily discussed here. The existing research and data show a large number of microorganisms involved in plastic biodegradation, though their specific mechanisms have not been thoroughly explored yet. Therefore, there is a significant potential for employing various bacterial strains for efficient degradation of plastics to improve human health and safety.

Mechanical, chemical, and bio-recycling of biodegradable plastics: A review

The extensive use of petroleum-based non-biodegradable plastics for various applications has led to global concerns regarding the severe environmental issues associated with them. However, biodegradable plastics are emerging as green alternatives to petroleum-based non-biodegradable plastics. Biodegradable plastics, which include bio-based and petroleum-based biodegradable polymers, exhibit advantageous properties such as renewability, biocompatibility, and non-toxicity. Furthermore, certain biodegradable plastics are compatible with existing recycling streams intended for conventional plastics and are biodegradable in controlled and/or predicted environments. Recycling biodegradable plastics before their end-of-life (EOL) degradation further enhances their sustainability and reduces their carbon footprint. Since the production of biodegradable plastic is increasing and these materials will coexist with conventional plastics for many years to come, it is essential to identify the optimal recycling options for each of the most prevalent biodegradable plastics. The substitution of virgin biodegradable plastics by their recyclates leads to higher savings in the primary energy demand and reduces global warming impact. This review covers the current state of the mechanical, chemical, and bio-recycling of post-industrial and post-consumer waste of biodegradable plastics and their related composites. The effects of recycling on the chemical structure and thermomechanical properties of biodegradable plastics are also reported. Additionally, the improvement of biodegradable plastics by blending them with other polymers and nanoparticles is comprehensively discussed. Finally, the status of bioplastic usage, life cycle assessment, EOL management, bioplastic market, and the challenges associated with the recyclability of biodegradable plastics are addressed. This review gives comprehensive insights into the recycling processes that may be employed for the recycling of biodegradable plastics.

Enzyme catalyzes ester bond synthesis and hydrolysis: The key step for sustainable usage of plastics

Petro-plastic wastes cause serious environmental contamination that require effective solutions. Developing alternatives to petro-plastics and exploring feasible degrading methods are two solving routes. Bio-plastics like polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), polylactic acid (PLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (butylene succinate) (PBS), poly (ethylene furanoate) s (PEFs) and poly (ethylene succinate) (PES) have emerged as promising alternatives. Meanwhile, biodegradation plays important roles in recycling plastics (e.g., bio-plastics PHAs, PLA, PCL, PBS, PEFs and PES) and petro-plastics poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and plasticizers in plastics (e.g., phthalate esters, PAEs). All these bio- and petro-materials show structure similarity by connecting monomers through ester bond. Thus, this review focused on bio-plastics and summarized the sequences and structures of the microbial enzymes catalyzing ester-bond synthesis. Most of these synthetic enzymes belonged to α/β-hydrolases with conserved serine catalytic active site and catalyzed the polymerization of monomers by forming ester bond. For enzymatic plastic degradation, enzymes about PHAs, PBS, PCL, PEFs, PES and PET were discussed, and most of the enzymes also belonged to the α/β hydrolases with a catalytic active residue serine, and nucleophilically attacked the ester bond of substrate to generate the cleavage of plastic backbone. Enzymes hydrolysis of the representative plasticizer PAEs were divided into three types (I, II, and III). Type I enzymes hydrolyzed only one ester-bond of PAEs, type II enzymes catalyzed the ester-bond of mono-ester phthalates, and type III enzymes hydrolyzed di-ester bonds of PAEs. Divergences of catalytic mechanisms among these enzymes were still unclear. This review provided references for producing bio-plastics, and degrading or recycling of bio- and petro-plastics from an enzymatic point of view.

Structural screening into the recognition of a potent inhibitor against non-structural protein 16: a molecular simulation to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection

COVID-19 infection is caused by endemic crown infection (SARS-CoV-2) and is associated with lung damage and severe immune response. Non-Structural Proteins are the central components of coronaviral transcription and replication machinery in SARS-CoV-2 and also stimulate mRNA cap methylation to avoid the immune response. Non-Structural Protein 16 (NSP16) is one of the primary targets for the drug discovery of coronaviruses. Discovering an effective inhibitor against the NSP16 in comparison with Sinefungin was the main purpose of this investigation. Binding free-energy calculations, computational methods of molecular dynamics, docking, and virtual screening were utilized in this study. The ZINC and PubChem databases were applied to screen some chemical compounds regarding Sinefungin as a control inhibitor. Based on structural similarity to Sinefungin, 355 structures were obtained from the mentioned databases. Subsequently, this set of compounds were monitored by AutoDock Vina software, and ultimately the potent inhibitor (PUBCHEM512713) was chosen. At the next stage, molecular dynamics were carried out by GROMACS software to evaluate the potential elected compounds in a simulated environment and in a timescale of 100 nanoseconds. MM-PBSA investigation exhibited that the value of binding free energy for PUBCHEM512713 (-30.829 kJ.mol^-1) is more potent than Sinefungin (-11.941 kJ.mol^-1). Furthermore, the results of ADME analysis illustrated that the pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness, and lipophilicity parameters of PUBCHEM512713 are admissible for human utilization. Finally, our data suggested that PUBCHEM512713 is an effective drug candidate for inhibiting the NSP16 and is suitable for in vitro and in vivo studies.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Hydrolysis Mechanism of Carbamate Methomyl by a Novel Esterase PestE: A QM/MM Approach

Methomyl is one of the most important carbamates that has caused potential hazardous effects on both human beings and the environment. Here, we systematically investigated the hydrolysis mechanism of methomyl catalyzed by esterase PestE using molecular dynamics simulations (MD) and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations. The hydrolysis mechanism involves two elementary steps: (Ⅰ) serine-initiated nucleophilic attack and (Ⅱ) C-O bond cleavage. Our work elicits the atomic level details of the hydrolysis mechanism and free energy profiles along the reaction pathway. The Boltzmann-weighted average potential barriers are 19.1 kcal/mol and 7.5 kcal/mol for steps Ⅰ and Ⅱ, respectively. We identified serine-initiated nucleophilic attack as the rate determining-step. The deep learning-based k_cat prediction model indicated that the barrier of the rate-determining step is 15.4 kcal/mol, which is in good agreement with the calculated results using Boltzmann-weighted average method. We have elucidated the importance of the protein-substrate interactions and the roles of the key active site residues during the hydrolysis process through noncovalent interactions analysis and electrostatic potential (ESP) analysis. The results provide practical value for achieving efficient degradation of carbamates by hydrolases.