Aggregation Dynamics Characteristics of Seven Different Aβ Oligomeric Isoforms-Dependence on the Interfacial Interaction

The aggregation of β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides has been confirmed to be associated with the onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Among the three phases of Aβ aggregation, the lag phase has been considered to be the best time for early Aβ pathological deposition clinical intervention and prevention for potential patients with normal cognition. Aβ peptide exists in various lengths in vivo, and Aβ oligomer in the early lag phase is neurotoxic but polymorphous and metastable, depending on Aβ length (isoform), molecular weight, and specific phase, and therefore hardly characterized experimentally. To cope with the problem, molecular dynamics simulation was used to investigate the aggregation process of five monomers for each of the seven common Aβ isoforms during the lag phase. Results showed that Aβ(1-40) and Aβ(1-38) monomers aggregated faster than their truncated analogues Aβ(4-40) and Aβ(4-38), respectively. However, the aggregation rate of Aβ(1-42) was slower than that of its truncated analogues Aβ(4-42) rather than that of Aβpe(3-42). More importantly, Aβ(1-38) is first predicted as more likely to form stable hexamer than the remaining five Aβ isoforms, as Aβ(1-42) does. It is hydrophobic interaction mainly (>50%) from the interfacial β1 and β2 regions of two reactants, pentamer and monomer, aggregated by Aβ(1-38)/Aβ(1-42) rather than by other Aβ isoforms, that drives the hexamer stably as a result of the formation of the effective hydrophobic collapse. This paper provides new insights into the aggregation characteristics of Aβ with different lengths and the conditions necessary for Aβ to form oligomers with a high molecular weight in the early lag phase, revealing the dependence of Aβ hexamer formation on the specific interfacial interaction.

Origin of stronger binding of ionic pair (IP) inhibitor to Aβ42 than the equimolar neutral counterparts: synergy mechanism of IP in disrupting Aβ42 protofibril and inhibiting Aβ42 aggregation under two pH conditions

Fibrous aggregates of beta-amyloid (Aβ) is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Several major strategies of drugs or inhibitors, including neutral molecules, positive or negative ions, and dual-inhibitor, are used to inhibit the misfolding or aggregation of Aβ42, among which a kind of dual-inhibitor composed of a pair of positive and negative ions is emerging as the most powerful candidate. This knowledge lacks the origin of the strong inhibitory effect and synergy mechanisms blocking the development and application of such inhibitors. To this end, we employed 1 : 1 ionic pairs (IP) of oppositely charged benzothiazole molecules (+)BAM1-EG6 (Pos) and (-)BAM1-EG6 (Neg) as well as equimolar neutral BAM1-EG6 (Neu) counterpart at two pH conditions (5.5 and 7.0) to bind Aβ42 targets, Aβ42 monomer (AβM), soluble pentamer (AβP), and pentameric protofibril (AβF) models, respectively, corresponding to the products of three toxic Aβ42 development pathways, lag, exponential and fibrillation phases. Simulated results illustrated the details of the inhibitory mechanisms of IP and Neu for the AβY (Y = M, P, or F) in the three different phases, characterizing the roles of Pos and Neg of IP as well as their charged, hydrophobic groups and linker playing in the synergistic interaction, and elucidated a previously unknown molecular mechanism governing the IP-Aβ42 interaction. Most importantly, we first revealed the origin of the stronger binding of IP inhibitors to Aβ42 than that of the equimolar neutral counterparts, observing a perplexing phenomenon that the physiological condition (pH = 7.0) than the acidic one (pH = 5.5) is more favorable to the enhancement of IP binding, and finally disclosed that solvation is responsible to the enhancement because at pH 7.0, AβP and AβF act as anionic membranes, where solvation plays a critical role in the chemoelectromechanics. The result not only provides a new dimension in dual-inhibitor/drug design and development but also a new perspective for uncovering charged protein disaggregation under IP-like inhibitors.

Aβ40 Aggregation under Changeable Conditions

Homeostasis is crucial for cell function, and disturbances in homeostasis can lead to health disorders. Under normal conditions, intracellular pH is maintained between 7.35 and 7.45. Altered endosomal and lysosomal pH together with a general drop in brain pH are associated with the aggregation of amyloid-β-peptide (Aβ) and the development of Alzheimer's disease. Under acidic conditions, close to the Aβ isoelectric point, the absence of charges favors the formation of intermolecular contacts and promotes aggregation. Here, we analyzed how pH levels affect the aggregation of Aβ40 considering the variations in brain pH and the coexistence of different aggregated conformations. Our results suggest that different macromolecular conformations can interact with each other and influence the aggregation process. In addition, we showed that neutral pH and physiological salt concentrations favor a slow aggregation, resulting in ordered, stable fibrils, with low cytotoxic effects. Overall, we highlight the complexity of the aggregation processes occurring in different physiological and pathological environments.

Small-Molecule Targeted Aβ42 Aggregate Degradation: Negatively Charged Small Molecules Are More Promising than the Neutral Ones

Heavy evidence has confirmed that Aβ42 oligomers are the most neurotoxic aggregates and play a critical role in the occurrence and development of Alzheimer's disease by causing functional neuron death, cognitive damage, and dementia. Disordered Aβ42 oligomers are challenging therapeutic targets, and no drug is currently in clinical use that modifies the properties of their monomeric states. Here, a negatively charged molecule (ER), rather than the neutral TS1 one, is identified by a molecular dynamics simulation method to be more capable of binding and sequestering the intrinsically disordered amyloid-β peptide Aβ42 in its soluble pentameric state as well as its monomeric components. Results reveal that the ERs interact with Aβ and inhibit the primary nucleation pathways in its aggregation process in entropic expansion mechanism for both Aβ42 and Aβ40 oligomers but with opposite characteristics of hydrophobic surface area (HSA). The interaction between Aβ42 oligomer and either charged ER or neutral TS1/TS0 characterizes decreased HSA, and the decrease in ER-involved case is highly visible, consistent with the observations from in silico and in vitro studies. By contrast, the presence of these inhibitors causes the HSA of Aβ40 oligomer to change undetectably and there is even a bit of increase in the histidine isomerized Aβ40 oligomer. The HSA distinction between Aβ42 and Aβ40 oligomer is possibly derived from the different effects of M35-inhibitor interaction, which is analogous to the effect of M35 oxidation. In comparison with the neutral TS1/TS0 inhibitors, ER is more prone to bind the residues located in the central (β1) and C-terminal (β2) regions of Aβ42 peptide, two key nucleation regions for Aβ intramolecular folding, intermolecular aggregation, and assembly. Notably, ER can strongly bind the charged residues, such as K16, K28, D23, to greatly disturb the potential stabilizer (e.g., salt-bridge, etc.) in metastable Aβ42 oligomers and protofibrils. These results illustrate the strategy of overcoming Alzheimer's disease from inhibiting its early stage Aβ aggregation with two kinds of small molecules to alter their behavior for therapeutic purposes and strongly recommend paying more attention to the engineering and development of negatively charged inhibitors, the long-term underappreciated ones, targeting the early stage Aβ aggregates.