Duda DP, Edwards KC, Dixon DA. Phosphine versus Carbene Metal Interactions: Bond Energies.
Inorg Chem 2024;
63:14525-14538. [PMID:
39037441 DOI:
10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c01796]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
A variety of different ground-state structures of carbene and phosphine groups 1 and 2 cationic, group 11 cationic, and group 10 neutral complexes were studied using density functional theory (DFT) and correlated molecular orbital theory (CCSD(T)) methods. Geometries of complexes with phosphines were studied and compared to available experimental data. Among the three analyzed phosphine ligands, PH3, PMe3, and PPh3, PH3 was found to have noticeably smaller ligand binding energies (LBEs, ΔH298 K). PPh3 has the greatest LBEs with group 2 dications. The difference in LBEs for PMe3 and PPh3 in complexes with group 1 monocations and transition-metal (TM) complexes was significantly less pronounced. The stability and reactivity of phosphine complexes were analyzed and compared with those of previously studied N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHC). PH3 has smaller LBEs compared to NHC carbenes. The lower LBEs correlate with the hardness for M(11)+ complexes and correlate with both the hardness and ionic radii for the M(1)+ and M(2)2+ complexes. The presence of additional PH3 substituents on the metal center makes the LBE smaller compared to their unsubstituted or less substituted analogs. The presence of NH3 in a structure causes a smaller effect on binding, and, except for carbene-PtNH3, an increase in LBE was observed. Composite-correlated molecular orbital theory (G3MP2) was used to predict the LBE of various Lewis acidic ligands with PH3 and NHCs to contrast their binding behavior. Binding either phosphine or carbene to metal diamine complexes caused ligand exchange and transfer of NH3 to an outer coordination sphere.
Collapse