Aggregation-induced phosphorescence of an anthraquinone based emitter

Benchmark Study on Phosphorescence Energies of Anthraquinone Compounds: Comparison between TDDFT and UDFT

Phosphorescent material is widely used in light-emitting devices and in the monitoring of cell phenomena. Anthraquinone compounds (AQs), as important phosphorescent materials, have potential applications as emitters for highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). Therefore, the accurate calculation of the phosphorescence energy of anthraquinone compounds is particularly important. This study mainly analyzes the phosphorescence energy calculation method of anthraquinone compounds. The time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) and the unrestricted density functional theory (UDFT) with seven functionals are selected to calculate the phosphorescence of AQs, taking the high-precision coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CC2) method as a reference. The results showed that the mean unsigned error (MUE) of UDFT was 0.14 eV, which was much smaller than that of TDDFT at 0.29 eV. Therefore, UDFT was more suitable for calculating the phosphorescence energy of AQs. The results obtained by different functionals indicate that the minimum MUE obtained by M06-2X was 0.14 eV. More importantly, the diffuse function in the basis set played an important role in calculating the phosphorescence energy in the M06-HF functional. In the BDBT, FBDBT, and BrBDBT, when M06-HF selected the basis set containing a diffuse function, the differences with CC2 was 0.02 eV, which is much smaller than the one obtained without a diffuse function at 0.80 eV. These findings might be of great significance for the future study of the phosphorescence energy of organic molecules.

Structures and Chromogenic Ion-Pair Recognition of a Catechol-Functionalized 1,8-Anthraquinone Macrocycle in Dimethyl Sulfoxide

A lariat anthraquinone macrocycle functionalized with catechol (H₂L) was synthesized via the Mannich reaction. The Mannich base H₂L can be partially decomposed into L1·3H₂O and HL1·NO₃·2H₂O in the presence of tetrabutylammonium hydroxide/Al(NO₃)₃·9H₂O in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Free L1·3H₂O is essentially coplanar, while protonated HL1·NO₃·2H₂O is highly distorted. Dark-green FeCl₃·H₂L·2H₂O powder and Fe₂(HL)₂Cl₄ crystal can be isolated from ethanol (C₂H₅OH) in high/low H₂L concentration. Anthraquinone in H₂L is essentially coplanar but distorted in Fe₂(HL)₂Cl₄. The Fe(III) ion in Fe₂(HL)₂Cl₄ adopts a less common five-coordination with three catecholate O and two Cl atoms in the dimer. The distortion of inbound C═O is much higher than that of outbound C═O in anthraquinone in all of these compounds. H₂L responds to chlorides of Li⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, Cs⁺, Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, Sr²⁺, Ba²⁺, Fe³⁺, Cu²⁺, Zn²⁺, and Al³⁺ in a DMSO solution, which can be observed by differential pulse voltammetry, UV-vis, and ¹H NMR. All of these metal ions shift E_p of anthraquinone to positive, especially the second reduction peak of anthraquinone. Fe³⁺, Zn²⁺, and Al³⁺ change the reduction of catechol fundamentally. H₂L (0.50 mM) shows a chromogenic response to FeCl₃ and Fe(NO₃)₃ to form uncommon 2:1 and 3:2 (H₂L/Fe) complexes, both peaking at 748 nm in DMSO. In the presence of 2 equiv of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), the 748 nm absorbance shifts to 777 nm, identical with Fe₂(HL)₂Cl₄ in DMSO. Different from the fast reaction between H₂L and FeCl₃, Fe(NO₃)₃ reacts with H₂L rather slowly in DMSO. Catechol can coordinate to FeCl₃ without any deprotonation in C₂H₅OH and DMSO. H₂L also shows a chromogenic response to fluorides and hydroxides, which peak at 670 and 684 nm, respectively, in DMSO. The binding ratio between H₂L and F^-/OH^- is 1:2. In a higher concentration of hydroxides, a 684 nm greenish-blue 1:2 complex forms immediately, which gradually transforms to a red complex and peaks at ∼530 nm in minutes at room temperature. No color change can be observed in an C₂H₅OH solution in the presence of OH^-.