Accounting for the instantaneous disorder in the enzyme-substrate Michaelis complex to calculate the Gibbs free energy barrier of an enzyme reaction

Impacts of QM region sizes and conformation numbers on modelling enzyme reactions: a case study of polyethylene terephthalate hydrolase

A quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) approach is a broadly used tool in computational enzymology. Treating the QM region with a high-level DFT method is one of the important branches. Here, taking leaf-branch compost cutinase-catalyzed polyethylene terephthalate depolymerization as an example, the convergence behavior of energy barriers as well as key structural and charge features with respect to the size of the QM region (up to 1000 atoms) is systematically investigated. BP86/6-31G(d)//CHARMM and M06-2X/6-311G(d,p)//CHARMM level of theories were applied for geometry optimizations and single-point energy calculations, respectively. Six independent enzyme conformations for all the four catalytic steps (steps (i)-(iv)) were considered. Most of the twenty-four cases show that at least 500 QM atoms are needed while only two rare cases show that ∼100 QM atoms are sufficient for convergence when only a single conformation was considered. This explains why most previous studies showed that 500 or more QM atoms are required while a few others showed that ∼100 QM atoms are sufficient for DFT/MM calculations. More importantly, average energy barriers and key structural/charge features from six conformations show an accelerated convergence than that in a single conformation. For instance, to reach energy barrier convergence (within 2.0 kcal mol-1) for step (ii), only ∼100 QM atoms are required if six conformations are considered while 500 or more QM atoms are needed with a single conformation. The convergence is accelerated to be more rapid if hundreds and thousands of conformations were considered, which aligns with previous findings that only several dozens of QM atoms are required for convergence with semi-empirical QM/MM MD simulations.

Hydroperoxidation of Docosahexaenoic Acid by Human ALOX12 and pigALOX15-mini-LOX

Human lipoxygenase 12 (hALOX12) catalyzes the conversion of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) into mainly 14S-hydroperoxy-4Z,7Z,10Z,12E,16Z,19Z-docosahexaenoic acid (14S-H(p)DHA). This hydroperoxidation reaction is followed by an epoxidation and hydrolysis process that finally leads to maresin 1 (MaR1), a potent bioactive specialized pro-resolving mediator (SPM) in chronic inflammation resolution. By combining docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations, we have computed the potential energy profile of DHA hydroperoxidation in the active site of hALOX12. Our results describe the structural evolution of the molecular system at each step of this catalytic reaction pathway. Noteworthy, the required stereospecificity of the reaction leading to MaR1 is explained by the configurations adopted by DHA bound to hALOX12, along with the stereochemistry of the pentadienyl radical formed after the first step of the mechanism. In pig lipoxygenase 15 (pigALOX15-mini-LOX), our calculations suggest that 14S-H(p)DHA can be formed, but with a stereochemistry that is inadequate for MaR1 biosynthesis.

Portable Models for Entropy Effects on Kinetic Selectivity

Differences in entropies of competing transition states can direct kinetic selectivity. Understanding and modeling such entropy differences at the molecular level is complicated by the fact that entropy is statistical in nature; i.e., it depends on multiple vibrational states of transition structures, the existence of multiple dynamically accessible pathways past these transition structures, and contributions from multiple transition structures differing in conformation/configuration. The difficulties associated with modeling each of these contributors are discussed here, along with possible solutions, all with an eye toward the development of portable qualitative models of use to experimentalists aiming to design reactions that make use of entropy to control kinetic selectivity.