Mechanistic insights into H3B·NMeH2 dehydrogenation by Co-based complexes: a DFT perspective

Mechanistic insights into Co-catalyzed H3B·NMeH2 dehydrogenation and polyaminoborane formation are carefully investigated using density functional theory.

Dehydropolymerization of H3B·NMeH2 Mediated by Cationic Iridium(III) Precatalysts Bearing κ3-iPr-PNRP Pincer Ligands (R = H, Me): An Unexpected Inner-Sphere Mechanism

The dehydropolymerization of H₃B·NMeH₂ to form N-methylpolyaminoborane using neutral and cationic catalysts based on the {Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)} fragment [ⁱPr-PN^HP = κ³-(CH₂CH₂PⁱPr₂)₂NH] is reported. Neutral Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃ or Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₂Cl precatalysts show no, or poor and unselective, activity respectively at 298 K in 1,2-F₂C₆H₄ solution. In contrast, addition of [NMeH₃][BAr^F₄] (Ar^F = 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃) to Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃ immediately starts catalysis, suggesting that a cationic catalytic manifold operates. Consistent with this, independently synthesized cationic precatalysts are active (tested between 0.5 and 2.0 mol % loading) producing poly(N-methylaminoborane) with M_n ∼ 40,000 g/mol, Đ ∼1.5, i.e., dihydrogen/dihydride, [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)(H)₂(H₂)][BAr^F₄]; σ-amine-borane [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)(H)₂(H₃B·NMe₃)][BAr^F₄]; and [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)(H)₂(NMeH₂)][BAr^F₄]. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations probe hydride exchange processes in two of these complexes and also show that the barrier to amine-borane dehydrogenation is lower (22.5 kcal/mol) for the cationic system compared with the neutral system (24.3 kcal/mol). The calculations show that the dehydrogenation proceeds via an inner-sphere process without metal–ligand cooperativity, and this is supported experimentally by N–Me substituted [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^MeP)(H)₂(H₃B·NMe₃)][BAr^F₄] being an active catalyst. Key to the lower barrier calculated for the cationic system is the outer-sphere coordination of an additional H₃B·NMeH₂ with the N–H group of the ligand. Experimentally, kinetic studies indicate a complex reaction manifold that shows pronounced deceleratory temporal profiles. As supported by speciation and DFT studies, a key observation is that deprotonation of [Ir(ⁱPr-N^HP)(H)₂(H₂)][BAr^F₄], formed upon amine-borane dehydrogenation, by the slow in situ formation of NMeH₂ (via B–N bond cleavage), results in the formation of essentially inactive Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃, with a coproduct of [NMeH₃]⁺/[H₂B(NMeH₂)₂]⁺. While reprotonation of Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃ results in a return to the cationic cycle, it is proposed, supported by doping experiments, that reprotonation is attenuated by entrainment of the [NMeH₃]⁺/[H₂B(NMeH₂)₂]⁺/catalyst in insoluble polyaminoborane. The role of [NMeH₃]⁺/[H₂B(NMeH₂)]⁺ as chain control agents is also noted.

Iridium(III) bis(thiophosphinite) pincer complexes: synthesis, ligand activation and applications in catalysis

Iridium(III) bis(thiophosphinite) complexes of the type [(^RPSCSP^R)Ir(H)(Cl)(py)] (^RPSCSP^R = κ³-(2,6-SPR₂)C₆H₃) (R = tBu, iPr, Ph) can be prepared from the ligand precursors 1,3-(SPR₂)C₆H₄ by C-H activation at Ir using [Ir(COE)₂Cl]₂ or [Ir(COD)Cl]₂. Optimisation of the protocol for complexation showed that direct cyclometallation in the absence or presence of pyridine, as well as C-H activation in the presence of H₂ are viable options that, depending on the phosphine substituent furnish the five-coordinate Ir(III) hydride chloride complexes 2-R or the base stabilised species 3-R in good yields. In case of the ^PhPSCSP^Ph ligand, P-S activation results in the formation of a thiophosphine stabilised Ir(III) hydride complex [(^PhPSCSP^Ph)Ir(H)(Cl)(PPh₂SH)] (4). Reaction of 2-tBu with H₂ in the presence of base furnishes an Ir(III) dihydride complex (5) via a labile Ir(III) dihydride-dihydrogen complex (6). All complexes are inactive for transfer dehydrogenation of cyclooctane in the presence of NaOtBu and tert-butylethylene, likely due to decomposition of the Ir complex in the presence of base at higher temperature.

Controlled Synthesis of Well-Defined Polyaminoboranes on Scale Using a Robust and Efficient Catalyst

The air tolerant precatalyst, [Rh(L)(NBD)]Cl ([1]Cl) [L = κ³-(ⁱPr₂PCH₂CH₂)₂NH, NBD = norbornadiene], mediates the selective synthesis of N-methylpolyaminoborane, (H₂BNMeH)_n, by dehydropolymerization of H₃B·NMeH₂. Kinetic, speciation, and DFT studies show an induction period in which the active catalyst, Rh(L)H₃ (3), forms, which sits as an outer-sphere adduct 3·H₃BNMeH₂ as the resting state. At the end of catalysis, dormant Rh(L)H₂Cl (2) is formed. Reaction of 2 with H₃B·NMeH₂ returns 3, alongside the proposed formation of boronium [H₂B(NMeH₂)₂]Cl. Aided by isotopic labeling, Eyring analysis, and DFT calculations, a mechanism is proposed in which the cooperative "PNHP" ligand templates dehydrogenation, releasing H₂B═NMeH (ΔG^‡_calc = 19.6 kcal mol^-1). H₂B═NMeH is proposed to undergo rapid, low barrier, head-to-tail chain propagation for which 3 is the catalyst/initiator. A high molecular weight polymer is formed that is relatively insensitive to catalyst loading (M_n ∼71 000 g mol^-1; Đ, of ∼ 1.6). The molecular weight can be controlled using [H₂B(NMe₂H)₂]Cl as a chain transfer agent, M_n = 37 900-78 100 g mol^-1. This polymerization is suggested to arise from an ensemble of processes (catalyst speciation, dehydrogenation, propagation, chain transfer) that are geared around the concentration of H₃B·NMeH₂. TGA and DSC thermal analysis of polymer produced on scale (10 g, 0.01 mol % [1]Cl) show a processing window that allows for melt extrusion of polyaminoborane strands, as well as hot pressing, drop casting, and electrospray deposition. By variation of conditions in the latter, smooth or porous microstructured films or spherical polyaminoboranes beads (∼100 nm) result.

Mechanistic insights into dehydrocoupling of amine boranes using dinuclear zirconocene complexes

Catalytic dehydrocoupling of H₃B·NMe₂H using Cp₂Zr(Cl)(μ-Me₃SiC₃SiMe₃)Zr(Cl)Cp₂ (1)/MeLi was studied. Spectroscopic monitoring and stoichiometric experiments show the formation and interconversion of several catalytically active Zr species.