Development of computational models using omics data for the identification of effective cancer metabolic biomarkers

Identification of cancer risk groups through multi-omics integration using autoencoder and tensor analysis

Identifying cancer risk groups by multi-omics has attracted researchers in their quest to find biomarkers from diverse risk-related omics. Stratifying the patients into cancer risk groups using genomics is essential for clinicians for pre-prevention treatment to improve the survival time for patients and identify the appropriate therapy strategies. This study proposes a multi-omics framework that can extract the features from various omics simultaneously. The framework employs autoencoders to learn the non-linear representation of the data and applies tensor analysis for feature learning. Further, the clustering method is used to stratify the patients into multiple cancer risk groups. Several omics were included in the experiments, namely methylation, somatic copy-number variation (SCNV), micro RNA (miRNA) and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) from two cancer types, including Glioma and Breast Invasive Carcinoma from the TCGA dataset. The results of this study are promising, as evidenced by the survival analysis and classification models, which outperformed the state-of-the-art. The patients can be significantly (p-value<0.05) divided into risk groups using extracted latent variables from the fused multi-omics data. The pipeline is open source to help researchers and clinicians identify the patients' risk groups using genomics.

Prediction of metabolites associated with somatic mutations in cancers by using genome-scale metabolic models and mutation data

BACKGROUND

Oncometabolites, often generated as a result of a gene mutation, show pro-oncogenic function when abnormally accumulated in cancer cells. Identification of such mutation-associated metabolites will facilitate developing treatment strategies for cancers, but is challenging due to the large number of metabolites in a cell and the presence of multiple genes associated with cancer development.

RESULTS

Here we report the development of a computational workflow that predicts metabolite-gene-pathway sets. Metabolite-gene-pathway sets present metabolites and metabolic pathways significantly associated with specific somatic mutations in cancers. The computational workflow uses both cancer patient-specific genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) and mutation data to generate metabolite-gene-pathway sets. A GEM is a computational model that predicts reaction fluxes at a genome scale and can be constructed in a cell-specific manner by using omics data. The computational workflow is first validated by comparing the resulting metabolite-gene pairs with multi-omics data (i.e., mutation data, RNA-seq data, and metabolome data) from acute myeloid leukemia and renal cell carcinoma samples collected in this study. The computational workflow is further validated by evaluating the metabolite-gene-pathway sets predicted for 18 cancer types, by using RNA-seq data publicly available, in comparison with the reported studies. Therapeutic potential of the resulting metabolite-gene-pathway sets is also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Validation of the metabolite-gene-pathway set-predicting computational workflow indicates that a decent number of metabolites and metabolic pathways appear to be significantly associated with specific somatic mutations. The computational workflow and the resulting metabolite-gene-pathway sets will help identify novel oncometabolites and also suggest cancer treatment strategies.

A contribution of metabolic engineering to addressing medical problems: Metabolic flux analysis

Metabolic engineering has served as a systematic discipline for industrial biotechnology as it has offered systematic tools and methods for strain development and bioprocess optimization. Because these metabolic engineering tools and methods are concerned with the biological network of a cell with emphasis on metabolic network, they have also been applied to a range of medical problems where better understanding of metabolism has also been perceived to be important. Metabolic flux analysis (MFA) is a unique systematic approach initially developed in the metabolic engineering community, and has proved its usefulness and potential when addressing a range of medical problems. In this regard, this review discusses the contribution of MFA to addressing medical problems. For this, we i) provide overview of the milestones of MFA, ii) define two main branches of MFA, namely constraint-based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) and isotope-based MFA (iMFA), and iii) present successful examples of their medical applications, including characterizing the metabolism of diseased cells and pathogens, and identifying effective drug targets. Finally, synergistic interactions between metabolic engineering and biomedical sciences are discussed with respect to MFA.

Machine learning-guided evaluation of extraction and simulation methods for cancer patient-specific metabolic models

Genome-scale metabolic model (GEM) has been established as an important tool to study cellular metabolism at a systems level by predicting intracellular fluxes. With the advent of generic human GEMs, they have been increasingly applied to a range of diseases, often for the objective of predicting effective metabolic drug targets. Cancer is a representative disease where the use of GEMs has proved to be effective, partly due to the massive availability of patient-specific RNA-seq data. When using a human GEM, so-called context-specific GEM needs to be developed first by using cell-specific RNA-seq data. Biological validity of a context-specific GEM highly depends on both model extraction method (MEM) and model simulation method (MSM). However, while MEMs have been thoroughly examined, MSMs have not been systematically examined, especially, when studying cancer metabolism. In this study, the effects of pairwise combinations of three MEMs and five MSMs were evaluated by examining biological features of the resulting cancer patient-specific GEMs. For this, a total of 1,562 patient-specific GEMs were reconstructed, and subjected to machine learning-guided and biological evaluations to draw robust conclusions. Noteworthy observations were made from the evaluation, including the high performance of two MEMs, namely rank-based ‘task-driven Integrative Network Inference for Tissues’ (tINIT) or ‘Gene Inactivity Moderated by Metabolism and Expression’ (GIMME), paired with least absolute deviation (LAD) as a MSM, and relatively poorer performance of flux balance analysis (FBA) and parsimonious FBA (pFBA). Insights from this study can be considered as a reference when studying cancer metabolism using patient-specific GEMs.