On Accelerating Substrate Optimization Using Computational Gibbs Energy Barriers: A Numerical Consideration Utilizing a Computational Data Set

Substrate optimization is a time- and resource-consuming step in organic synthesis. Recent advances in chemo- and materials-informatics provide systematic and efficient procedures utilizing tools such as Bayesian optimization (BO). This study explores the possibility of reducing the required experiments further by utilizing computational Gibbs energy barriers. To thoroughly validate the impact of using computational Gibbs energy barriers in BO-assisted substrate optimization, this study employs a computational Gibbs energy barrier data set in the literature and performs an extensive numerical investigation virtually regarding the Gibbs energy barriers as virtual experimental results and those with systematic and random noises as virtual computational results. The present numerical investigation shows that even the computational reactivity affected by noises of as much as 20 kJ/mol helps reduce the number of required experiments.

PAL 2.0: a physics-driven bayesian optimization framework for material discovery

The lack of efficient discovery tools for advanced functional materials remains a major bottleneck to enabling advances in the next-generation energy, health, and sustainability technologies. One main factor contributing to this inefficiency is the large combinatorial space of materials (with respect to material compositions and processing conditions) that is typically redolent of such materials-centric applications. Searches of this large combinatorial space are often influenced by expert knowledge and clustered close to material configurations that are known to perform well, thus ignoring potentially high-performing candidates in unanticipated regions of the composition-space or processing protocol. Moreover, experimental characterization or first principles quantum mechanical calculations of all possible material candidates can be prohibitively expensive, making exhaustive approaches to determine the best candidates infeasible. As a result, there remains a need for the development of computational algorithms that can efficiently search a large parameter space for a given material application. Here, we introduce PAL 2.0, a method that combines a physics-based surrogate model with Bayesian optimization. The key contributing factor of our proposed framework is the ability to create a physics-based hypothesis using XGBoost and Neural Networks. This hypothesis provides a physics-based "prior" (or initial beliefs) to a Gaussian process model, which is then used to perform a search of the material design space. In this paper, we demonstrate the usefulness of our approach on three material test cases: (1) discovery of metal halide perovskites with desired photovoltaic properties, (2) design of metal halide perovskite-solvent pairs that produce the best solution-processed films and (3) design of organic thermoelectric semiconductors. Our results indicate that the novel PAL 2.0 approach outperforms other state-of-the-art methods in its efficiency to search the material design space for the optimal candidate. We also demonstrate the physics-based surrogate models constructed in PAL 2.0 have lower prediction errors for material compositions not seen by the model. To the best of our knowledge, there is no competing algorithm capable of this useful combination for materials discovery, especially those for which data are scarce.