Enhanced podocyte differentiation and changing drug toxicity sensitivity through pressure-controlled mechanical filtration stress on a glomerulus-on-a-chip

Epigenetics of Hypertensive Nephropathy

Hypertensive nephropathy (HN) is a leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), contributing to significant morbidity, mortality, and rising healthcare costs. In this review article, we explore the role of epigenetic mechanisms in HN progression and their potential therapeutic implications. We begin by examining key epigenetic modifications-DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs-observed in kidney disease. Next, we discuss the underlying pathophysiology of HN and highlight current in vitro and in vivo models used to study the condition. Finally, we compare various types of HN-induced renal injury and their associated epigenetic mechanisms with those observed in other kidney injury models, drawing inferences on potential epigenetic therapies for HN. The information gathered in this work indicate that epigenetic mechanisms can drive the progression of HN by regulating key molecular signaling pathways involved in renal damage and fibrosis. The limitations of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) inhibitors underscore the need for alternative treatments targeting epigenetic pathways. This review emphasizes the importance of further research into the epigenetic regulation of HN to develop more effective therapies and preventive strategies. Identifying novel epigenetic markers could provide new therapeutic opportunities for managing CKD and reducing the burden of ESRD.

Straddling the Line Between In Vitro and Ex Vivo Investigations

Tissue engineering research fundamentally relies on experiments to advance knowledge, utilizing various models for research on both humans and animals. With scientific progress, experimental models have become increasingly complex over time. This complexity sometimes blurs the distinction between categories, making terminology less consistent. In biomedical research, three overarching terms are commonly used to characterize experimental environments: in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo. While in vitro translates from Latin as "in glass," referring historically to experimental conditions in a test tube or petri dish, in vivo experiments occur within a living organism's natural environment. Conversely, ex vivo originates from living tissue outside its host environment while striving to maintain conditions as close to the host surroundings as possible. In the tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TE&RM) community, there needs to be more clarity between in vitro and ex vivo terminology, with historical definitions sometimes disregarded and new terms often introduced without rigorous scientific justification. At this juncture, the question arises of when to refer to experiments as in vitro or ex vivo or whether the terms may be used synonymously in some instances. Moreover, what criteria must ex vivo experiments meet to be legitimately defined as such? This perspective is intended to address questions that would assist the TE&RM community in better understanding the differences between in vitro and ex vivo models. Impact Statement In the tissue engineering & regenerative medicine literature, the terms "in vitro" and "ex vivo" are often used interchangeably to describe experiments. This interchangeable usage can lead to a compromised interpretation of research results and, consequently, misleading scientific conclusions and teachings. This perspective aims to provide clarity on the various definitions of experimental designs. It also highlights the issue of using terms with inconsistent meanings that have origins dating back to the distant past. It's important to note that scientific definitions constantly evolve, and there is a scientifically rooted responsibility to evaluate and rethink the current state of affairs critically.

Revolutionizing renal research: The future of kidney-on-a-chip in biotechnology

In vitro models of kidneys have limited effectiveness owing to the complex structure and functions of the kidney when compared with other organs. Therefore many renal function evaluations are currently being carried out through animal experiments. In contrast, efforts are being made to apply biomimetic systems, such as organ-on-a-chip, which is based on microfluidic device technology, to serve as an in vitro model for the kidney. These systems aimed to recreate a physiological cultivation environment. This review has provided an overview of organ-on-a-chip research focused on glomeruli and tubules as in vitro models for the kidney and discusses future prospects.

Revolutionizing nephrology research: expanding horizons with kidney-on-a-chip and beyond

Organs-on-a-chip (OoC) is a microengineered three-dimensional cell culture system developed for decades. Utilizing microfluidic technology, OoC cultivates cells on perfusable channels to construct in vitro organ models, enabling the simulation of organ-level functions under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. The superior simulation capabilities compared to traditional animal experiments and two-dimensional cell cultures, making OoC a valuable tool for in vitro research. Recently, the application of OoC has extended to the field of nephrology, where it replicates various functional units, including glomerulus-on-a-chip, proximal tubule-on-a-chip, distal tubule-on-a-chip, collecting duct-on-a-chip, and even the entire nephron-on-a-chip to precisely emulate the structure and function of nephrons. Moreover, researchers have integrated kidney models into multi-organ systems, establishing human body-on-a-chip platforms. In this review, the diverse functional kidney units-on-a-chip and their versatile applications are outlined, such as drug nephrotoxicity screening, renal development studies, and investigations into the pathophysiological mechanisms of kidney diseases. The inherent advantages and current limitations of these OoC models are also examined. Finally, the synergy of kidney-on-a-chip with other emerging biomedical technologies are explored, such as bioengineered kidney and bioprinting, and a new insight for chip-based renal replacement therapy in the future are prospected.

Standalone cell culture microfluidic device-based microphysiological system for automated cell observation and application in nephrotoxicity tests

Microphysiological systems (MPS) offer an alternative method for culturing cells on microfluidic platforms to model organ functions in pharmaceutical and medical sciences. Although MPS hardware has been proposed to maintain physiological organ function through perfusion culture, no existing MPS can automatically assess cell morphology and conditions online to observe cellular dynamics in detail. Thus, with this study, we aimed to establish a practical strategy for automating cell observation and improving cell evaluation functions with low temporal resolution and throughput in MPS experiments. We developed a versatile standalone cell culture microfluidic device (SCCMD) that integrates microfluidic chips and their peripherals. This device is compliant with the ANSI/SLAS standards and has been seamlessly integrated into an existing automatic cell imaging system. This integration enables automatic cell observation with high temporal resolution in MPS experiments. Perfusion culture of human kidney proximal tubule epithelial cells using the SCCMD improves cell function. By combining the proximal tubule MPS with an existing cell imaging system, nephrotoxicity studies were successfully performed to automate morphological and material permeability evaluation. We believe that the concept of building the ANSI/SLAS-compliant-sized MPS device proposed herein and integrating it into an existing automatic cell imaging system for the online measurement of detailed cell dynamics information and improvement of throughput by automating observation operations is a novel potential research direction for MPS research.

Tailoring biomaterials for biomimetic organs-on-chips

Organs-on-chips are microengineered microfluidic living cell culture devices with continuously perfused chambers penetrating to cells. By mimicking the biological features of the multicellular constructions, interactions among organs, vascular perfusion, physicochemical microenvironments, and so on, these devices are imparted with some key pathophysiological function levels of living organs that are difficult to be achieved in conventional 2D or 3D culture systems. In this technology, biomaterials are extremely important because they affect the microstructures and functionalities of the organ cells and the development of the organs-on-chip functions. Thus, herein, we provide an overview on the advances of biomaterials for the construction of organs-on-chips. After introducing the general components, structures, and fabrication techniques of the biomaterials, we focus on the studies of the functions and applications of these biomaterials in the organs-on-chips systems. Applications of the biomaterial-based organs-on-chips as alternative animal models for pharmaceutical, chemical, and environmental tests are described and highlighted. The prospects for exciting future directions and the challenges of biomaterials for realizing the further functionalization of organs-on-chips are also presented.

Bio-Microfabrication of 2D and 3D Biomimetic Gut-on-a-Chip

Traditional goal of microfabrication was to limitedly construct nano- and micro-geometries on silicon or quartz wafers using various semiconductor manufacturing technologies, such as photolithography, soft lithography, etching, deposition, and so on. However, recent integration with biotechnologies has led to a wide expansion of microfabrication. In particular, many researchers studying pharmacology and pathology are very interested in producing in vitro models that mimic the actual intestine to study the effectiveness of new drug testing and interactions between organs. Various bio-microfabrication techniques have been developed while solving inherent problems when developing in vitro micromodels that mimic the real large intestine. This intensive review introduces various bio-microfabrication techniques that have been used, until recently, to realize two-dimensional and three-dimensional biomimetic experimental models. Regarding the topic of gut chips, two major review subtopics and two-dimensional and three-dimensional gut chips were employed, focusing on the membrane-based manufacturing process for two-dimensional gut chips and the scaffold-based manufacturing process for three-dimensional gut chips, respectively.