The mechanistic origin of regiochemical changes in the nitrosative N-dealkylation of N,N-dialkyl aromatic amines

The regioselectivity of the nitrous acid mediated dealkylation of 4-substituted-N-ethyl-N-methylanilines is a function of the acidity of the reaction mixture. At high acidity deethylation predominates, whereas demethylation is the predominant reaction in nitrosamine formation at pH 2 and above. In some cases the regioselectivity of nitrosative dealkylation changes as the run proceeds. Through the use of the corresponding 4-nitroaniline as the primary substrate, CIDNP, kinetics, kinetic deuterium isotope effects and other transformations involving nitrosations with NO2 or NOBF4 in aprotic solvents, a new mechanism of tertiary amine nitrosation has been deduced and proposed to explain regioselective deethylation. The mechanism involves the oxidation of the substrate to the amine radical cation by NO+. This is followed by the abstraction of a hydrogen atom from the carbon adjacent to the amine nitrogen by NO2 to produce an iminium ion which reacts further to produce the corresponding aldehyde and the nitrosamine. Depending upon the acidity, this process competes with three other mechanistic pathways, two of which give the nitrosamine through the iminium ion, and one leads to the formation of C-nitro compounds. The competing pathways to nitrosamine formation involve NOH elimination from a nitrosammonium ion and deprotonation of the radical cation to give an alpha-amino radical which rapidly oxidized to the iminium ion. Predominant, but not highly regioselective demethylation occurs by these pathways. Nitro compound formation principally arises from the reaction of NO2 with the radical cation followed by deprotonation, but also occurs by para C-nitrosation followed by oxidation.

The reaction of Li[Al(OR)4] R = OC(CF3)2Ph, OC(CF3)3with NO/NO2giving NO[Al(OR)4], Li[NO3] and N2O. The synthesis of NO[Al(OR)4] from Li[Al(OR)4] and NO[SbF6] in sulfur dioxide solution

NO[Al(OC(CF(3))(2)Ph)(4)] 1 and NO[Al(OC(CF(3))(3))(4)] 2 were obtained by the metathesis reaction of NO[SbF(6)] and the corresponding Li[Al(OR)(4)] salts in liquid sulfur dioxide solution in ca 40% (1) and 85% (2) isolated yield. 1 and 2, as well as Li[NO(3)] and N(2)O, were also given by the reaction of an excess of mixture of (90 mol%) NO, (10 mol%) NO(2) with Li[Al(OR)(4)] followed by extraction with SO(2). The unfavourable disproportionation reaction of 2NO(2)(g) to [NO](+)(g) and [NO(3)](-)(g)[DeltaH degrees = +616.2 kJ mol(-1)] is more than compensated by the disproportionation energy of 3NO(g) to N(2)O(g) and NO(2)(g)[DeltaH degrees =-155.4 kJ mol(-1)] and the lattice energy of Li[NO(3)](s)[U(POT)= 862 kJ mol(-1)]. Evidence is presented that the reaction proceeds via a complex of [Li](+) with NO, NO(2)(or their dimers) and N(2)O. NO(2) and Li[Al(OC(CF(3))(3))(4)] gave [NO(3)(NO)(3)][Al(OC(CF(3))(3))(4)](2), NO[Al(OC(CF(3))(3))(4)] and (NO(2))[Al(OC(CF(3))(3))(4)] products. The aluminium complex [Li[AlF(OC(CF(3))(2)Ph)(3)]](2) 3 was prepared by the thermal decomposition of Li[Al(OC(CF(3))(2)Ph)(4)]. Compounds 1 and 3 were characterized by single crystal X-ray structural analyses, 1-3 by elemental analyses, NMR, IR, Raman and mass spectra. Solid 1 contains [Al(OC(CF(3))(2)Ph)(4)](-) and [NO](+) weakly linked via donor acceptor interactions, while in the SO(2) solution there is an equilibrium between the associated [NO](+)[Al(OC(CF(3))(2)Ph)(4)](-) and separated solvated ions. Solid 2 contains essentially ionic [NO](+) and [Al(OC(CF(3))(3))(4)](-). Complex 3 consists of two [Li[AlF(OC(CF(3))(2)Ph)(3)]] units linked via fluorine lithium contacts. Compound 1 is unstable in the SO(2) solution and decomposes to yield [AlF(OC(CF(3))(2)Ph)(3)](-), [(PhC(CF(3))(2)O)(3)Al(mu-F)Al(OC(CF(3))(2)Ph)(3)](-) anions as well as (NO)C(6)H(4)C(CF(3))(2)OH, while compound 2 is stable in liquid SO(2). The [small nu](NO(+)) in 1 and [NO](+)(toluene)[SbCl(6)] are similar, implying similar basicities of [Al(OC(CF(3))(2)Ph)(4)](-) and toluene.