Mixed-valence di-ruthenium(II,III) complexes of redox non-innocent N-aryl-o-phenylenediamine derivatives

A mononuclear ruthenium(ii), [(L1IQ)Ru2+(PPh3)2Cl2]·CHCl3 (1·CHCl3), a di-ruthenium(ii,ii), [(L2IQ)2Ru24+Cl4(PPh3)2] (2) and a mixed-valence di-ruthenium(ii,iii), [(L3IQ)Ru25+Cl5(PPh3)2]·MeOH (3·MeOH) complex, where L1IQ, L2IQ and L3IQ are, respectively, o-diiminobenzoquinone forms of redox non-innocent N-(5-nitropyridyl)-o-phenylenediamine (L1H2), N-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-o-phenylenediamine (L2H2) and N-(3-nitropyridyl)-o-phenylenediamine (L3H2) derivatives, were successfully isolated. The molecular and electronic structures of 1·CHCl3, 2 and 3·MeOH were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, EPR, UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopies and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Both 1·CHCl3 and 2 exhibited reversible anodic waves due to the Ru(iii)/Ru(ii) redox couple, while the cyclic voltammogram of 3·MeOH displayed two successive cathodic waves due to ruthenium(iii)/ruthenium(ii) and (L3IQ/L3ISQ) redox couples. EPR spectroscopy and DFT calculations inferred that 1+ is a ruthenium(iii) complex of L1IQ, [(L1IQ)Ru3+(PPh3)2Cl2]+, 2+ is a mixed-valence di-ruthenium(ii,iii) complex of L2IQ, [(L2IQ)2Ru25+Cl4(PPh3)2]+ and 3- is a di-ruthenium(ii,ii) complex, [(L3IQ)Ru24+Cl5(PPh3)2]-, while 32- is a di-ruthenium(ii,ii) complex of L3ISQ, [(L3ISQ)Ru24+Cl5(PPh3)2]2-, where L3ISQ is the o-diiminobenzosemiquinonate anion radical form of the L3H2 with a significant contribution of the mixed-valence di-ruthenium(iii,ii) form, [(L3AM)Ru25+Cl5(PPh3)2]2- (L3AM is the di-amido form of the L3H2 ligand). The spin density obtained from the Mulliken spin population analyses of the broken-symmetry (BS) DFT calculations was localized on Ru(2) in 3, while it was delocalized over both Ru(1) and the o-phenylenediamine fragment in 32-. The inter-valence charge-transfer (IVCT) transitions of 2+ and 3 were relatively weaker and occurred at 1680 and 1685 nm, respectively, while 32- exhibited a broader NIR absorption band at 1500-2000 nm. The calculated electronic-coupling parameters (Hab) using the Mulliken-Hush equation for 3 and 2+ ion, respectively, were 62 and 103 cm-1, defining these as Robin-Day class II mixed-valence systems.

A metastable RuIII azido complex with metallo-Staudinger reactivity

The metastable purple [(Py5Me2)RuIII(N3)]2+ ion reacts with PPh3 at room temperature to form the phosphinimine complex [(Py5Me2)RuII(N(H)PPh3)]2+ and free [H2NPPh3]+ in a combined 23% conversion. Mechanistic studies suggest that this is the first metallo-Staudinger reaction of a late transition metal that bypasses the nitrido mechanism and instead utilizes a Ru-N[double bond, length as m-dash]N[double bond, length as m-dash]N-PPh3 phosphazide intermediate.

Sensitivity of the valence structure in diruthenium complexes as a function of terminal and bridging ligands

The compounds [(acac)2Ru(III)(μ-H2L(2-))Ru(III)(acac)2] (rac, 1, and meso, 1') and [(bpy)2Ru(II)(μ-H2L(•-))Ru(II)(bpy)2](ClO4)3 (meso, [2](ClO4)3) have been structurally, magnetically, spectroelectrochemically, and computationally characterized (acac(-) = acetylacetonate, bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, and H4L = 1,4-diamino-9,10-anthraquinone). The N,O;N',O'-coordinated μ-H2L(n-) forms two β-ketiminato-type chelate rings, and 1 or 1' are connected via NH···O hydrogen bridges in the crystals. 1 exhibits a complex magnetic behavior, while [2](ClO4)3 is a radical species with mixed ligand/metal-based spin. The combination of redox noninnocent bridge (H2L(0) → → → →H2L(4-)) and {(acac)2Ru(II)} → →{(acac)2Ru(IV)} or {(bpy)2Ru(II)} → {(bpy)2Ru(III)} in 1/1' or 2 generates alternatives regarding the oxidation state formulations for the accessible redox states (1(n) and 2(n)), which have been assessed by UV-vis-NIR, EPR, and DFT/TD-DFT calculations. The experimental and theoretical studies suggest variable mixing of the frontier orbitals of the metals and the bridge, leading to the following most appropriate oxidation state combinations: [(acac)2Ru(III)(μ-H2L(•-))Ru(III)(acac)2](+) (1(+)) → [(acac)2Ru(III)(μ-H2L(2-))Ru(III)(acac)2] (1) → [(acac)2Ru(III)(μ-H2L(•3-))Ru(III)(acac)2](-)/[(acac)2Ru(III)(μ-H2L(2-))Ru(II)(acac)2](-) (1(-)) → [(acac)2Ru(III)(μ-H2L(4-))Ru(III)(acac)2](2-)/[(acac)2Ru(II)(μ-H2L(2-))Ru(II)(acac)2](2-) (1(2-)) and [(bpy)2Ru(III)(μ-H2L(•-))Ru(II)(bpy)2](4+) (2(4+)) → [(bpy)2Ru(II)(μ-H2L(•-))Ru(II)(bpy)2](3+)/[(bpy)2Ru(II)(μ-H2L(2-))Ru(III)(bpy)2](3+) (2(3+)) → [(bpy)2Ru(II)(μ-H2L(2-))Ru(II)(bpy)2](2+) (2(2+)). The favoring of Ru(III) by σ-donating acac(-) and of Ru(II) by the π-accepting bpy coligands shifts the conceivable valence alternatives accordingly. Similarly, the introduction of the NH donor function in H2L(n) as compared to O causes a cathodic shift of redox potentials with corresponding consequences for the valence structure.

Bis(acetonitrile)bis(acetylacetonato)ruthenium(III) mediated chemical transformations of coordinated 2-methylthioanilide

Chemical reaction of [Ru(III)(acac)(2)(CH(3)CN)(2)]ClO(4) (1) with 2-methylthioaniline, HL(1) in ethanol under basic conditions yielded three new complexes Ru(II)(acac)(2)(L(1b)) (1b), (L(1b) = 4-imino-3-(methylsulfanyl)cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-one), Ru(III)(acac)(2)(L(1c)) (1c), (HL(1c) = N-(2-methylthiophenyl)formamide) and (acac)(2)Ru(II)(μ-L(1d))Ru(II)(acac)(2) (1d), (L(1d) = 1,4-bis(2-methylthioaniline)-1,4-diazabutadiene) via the intermediate Ru(III)(acac)(2)(L(1a)) (1a, L(1a) = (L(1))(-) = 2-methylthioanilide). The reaction proceeded through temperature induced valence tautomerisation between the Ru(III) center and its 2-methylthioanilide counterpart in 1a with concomitant reduction of ruthenium from +III to +II oxidation state and oxidation of ligand L(1a), resulting in aromatic ring hydroxylation, N-formylation and C-C bond formation reactions. All the complexes have been characterised by their single-crystal X-ray structure determination and various spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques. The identity of complex 1a has been confirmed by X-ray crystal structure determination of complex 2, a phenyl analogue of complex 1a. The complexes (1a-d) showed intense charge transfer (MLCT/LMCT) transition in the long wavelength region. The paramagnetic compounds, 1a and 1c, along with the diamagnetic compound 1b showed two one-electron responses in the ranges, -0.4 to -1.0 V and 0.3 to 1.1 V. The diamagnetic complex 1d displayed two successive one-electron reversible reductions (-1.31 and -1.55 V) and two one-electron reversible oxidation processes (-0.036 and 0.51 V). The redox processes are characterized by EPR spectroscopy and spectroelectrochemistry. The compound 1c has been found to exhibit solvatochromism and concentration dependent aggregation in solution.

Manifestations of noninnocent ligand behavior

The potential of redox-active ligands to behave "noninnocently" in transition-metal coordination compounds is reflected with respect to various aspects and situations. These include the question of establishing "correct" oxidation states, the identification and characterization of differently charged radical ligands, the listing of structural and other consequences of ligand redox reactions, and the distinction between barrierless delocalized "resonance" cases M(n)/L(n) ↔ M(n+1)L(n-1) versus separated valence tautomer equilibrium situations M(n)/L(n) ⇌ M(n+1)L(n-1). Further ambivalence arises for dinuclear systems with radical bridge M(n)(μ-L(•))M(n) versus mixed-valent alternatives M(n+1)(μ-L(-))M(n), for noninnocent ligand-bridged coordination compounds of higher nuclearity such as (μ(3)-L)M(3), (μ(4)-L)M(4), (μ-L)(4)M(4), or coordination polymers. Conversely, the presence of more than one noninnocently behaving ligand at a single transition-metal site in situations such as L(n)-M-L(n-1) or L(•)-M-L(•) may give rise to corresponding ligand-to-ligand interaction phenomena (charge transfer, electron hopping, and spin-spin coupling) and to redox-induced electron transfer with counterintuitive oxidation-state changes. The relationships of noninnocent ligand behavior with excited-state descriptions and perspectives regarding material properties and single-electron or multielectron reactivity are also illustrated briefly.

2,5-Dioxido-1,4-benzoquinonediimine (H2L2−), A Hydrogen-Bonding Noninnocent Bridging Ligand Related to Aminated Topaquinone: Different Oxidation State Distributions in Complexes [{(bpy)2Ru}2(μ-H2L)]n (n=0,+,2+,3+,4+) and [{(acac)2Ru}2(μ-H2L)]m (m=2−,−,0,+,2+)

The symmetrically dinuclear title compounds were isolated as diamagnetic [(bpy)2Ru(mu-H2L)Ru(bpy)2](ClO4)2 (1-(ClO4)2) and as paramagnetic [(acac)2Ru(mu-H2L)Ru(acac)2] (2) complexes (bpy=2,2'-bipyridine; acac- = acetylacetonate = 2,4-pentanedionato; H2L = 2,5-dioxido-1,4-benzoquinonediimine). The crystal structure of 22 H2O reveals an intricate hydrogen-bonding network: Two symmetry-related molecules 2 are closely connected through two NH(H2L2-)O(acac-) interactions, while the oxygen atoms of H2L2- of two such pairs are bridged by an (H2O)8 cluster at half-occupancy. The cluster consists of cyclic (H2O)6 arrangements with the remaining two exo-H2O molecules connecting two opposite sides of the cyclo-(H2O)6 cluster, and oxido oxygen atoms forming hydrogen bonds with the molecules of 2. Weak antiferromagnetic coupling of the two ruthenium(III) centers in 2 was established by using SQUID magnetometry and EPR spectroscopy. Geometry optimization by means of DFT calculations was carried out for 1(2+) and 2 in their singlet and triplet ground states, respectively. The nature of low-energy electronic transitions was explored by using time-dependent DFT methods. Five redox states were reversibly accessible for each of the complexes; all odd-electron intermediates exhibit comproportionation constants K(c)>10(8). UV-visible-NIR spectroelectrochemistry and EPR spectroscopy of the electrogenerated paramagnetic intermediates were used to ascertain the oxidation-state distribution. In general, the complexes 1n+ prefer the ruthenium(II) configuration with electron transfer occurring largely at the bridging ligand (mu-H2Ln-), as evident from radical-type EPR spectra for 13+ and (+. Higher metal oxidation states (iii, iv) appear to be favored by the complexes 2m; intense long-wavelength absorption bands and RuIII-type EPR signals suggest mixed-valent dimetal configurations of the paramagnetic intermediates 2+ and 2-.

Sensitive Oxidation State Ambivalence in Unsymmetrical Three-Center (M/Q/M) Systems [(acac)2Ru(μ-Q)Ru(acac)2]n, Q = 1,10-Phenanthroline-5,6-dione or 1,10-Phenanthroline-5,6-diimine (n = +, 0, −, 2−)

The new redox systems [(acac)2 Ru(mu-Q1)Ru(acac)2](n) (1(n)) and [(acac)2 Ru(mu-Q2)Ru(acac)2](n) (2(n)) with Q1 = 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione and Q2 = 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-diimine were studied for n = +, 0, -, and 2- using UV-Vis-NIR spectroelectrochemistry and, in part, EPR and susceptometry. The ligands can bind the first metal (left) through the phenanthroline nitrogen atoms and the second metal (right) at the o-quinonoid chelate site. The neutral compounds are already different: Compound 1 is formulated as a Ru(II)(mu-Q1)*- Ru(III) species with partially coupled semiquinone and ruthenium(III) centers. In contrast, a Ru(III)(mu-Q2)2- Ru(III) structure is assigned to 2, which shows a weak antiferromagnetic spin-spin interaction (J = -1.14 cm(-1)) and displays an intense half-field signal in the EPR spectrum. The one-electron reduced forms are also differently formulated as Ru(II)(mu-Q1)2- Ru(III) for 1(-) with a Ru(III)-typical EPR response and as Ru(II)(mu-Q2)*- Ru(II) for 2(-) with a radical-type EPR signal at g = 2.0020. In contrast, both 1(2-) and 2(2-) can only be described as Ru(II)(mu-Q)2- Ru(II) species. The monooxidized forms 1(+) and 2(+) show very similar spectroscopy, including a Ru(III)-type EPR signal. Although no unambiguous assignment was possible here for the alternatives Ru(II)(mu-Q)0Ru(III), Ru(III)(mu-Q)2- Ru(IV) or Ru(III)(mu-Q)*- Ru(III), the last description is favored. The reasons for identical or different oxidation state combinations are discussed.

The Redox Series [M(bpy)2(Q)]n+, M = Ru or Os, Q = 3,5-Di-tert-butyl-N-phenyl-1,2-benzoquinonemonoimine. Isolation and a Complete X and W Band EPR Study of the Semiquinone States (n = 1)

The complexes [M(bpy)(2)(Q)](PF(6)) (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridyl; M = Ru, Os; Q = 3,5-di-tert-butyl-N-phenyl-1,2-benzoquinonemonoimine) were isolated and studied by X and W band EPR in a dichloromethane solution at ambient temperatures and at 4 K. For M = Ru, the (14)N hyperfine splitting confirms the Ru(II)/semiquinone formulation, although at a > 1 mT, the (99,101)Ru satellite coupling is unusually high. W band EPR allowed us to determine the relatively small g anisotropy Delta g = g(1) - g(3) = 0.0665 for the ruthenium complex. The osmium analogue exhibits a much higher difference Delta g = 0.370, which is attributed not only to the larger spin-orbit coupling constant of Os versus that of Ru but also to a higher extent of metal contribution to the singly occupied molecular orbital. The difference Delta E between the oxidation and reduction potentials of the radical complexes is larger for the ruthenium compound (Delta E = 0.87 V) than for the osmium analogue (Delta E = 0.72), confirming the difference in metal/ligand interaction. The electrochemically generated states [M(bpy)(2)(Q)](n+), n = 0, 1, 2, and 3, were also characterized using UV-vis-near-infrared spectroelectrochemistry.

Electronic Structure and Spectra of Linkage Isomers of Bis(bipyridine)(1,2-dihydroxy-9,10-anthraquinonato)ruthenium(II) and Their Redox Series

Linkage isomers of bis(bipyridine)(1,2-dihydroxy-9,10-anthraquinonato)ruthenium(II), 1,2- and 1,9-coordinated complexes, and several of their oxidation products have been prepared chemically and/or electrochemically. For the 1,2-coordinated complex, the one- and two-electron oxidized species have been characterized, and for the 1,9-coordinated complex, the one-electron oxidized species has been characterized. The rich redox activity of these complexes leads to ambiguity in assessing the electronic structure. This paper reports EPR spectra of odd-electron species and detailed analyses of electronic spectra and structure of the complexes, based on INDO molecular orbital calculations. Results of calculations on the related 1-hydroxyanthraquinone complex and the free ligands,1,2-dihydroxy-9,10-anthraquinone (alizarin) and 1-hydroxyanthraquinone, are also briefly discussed.

{(μ-L)[RuII(acac)2]2}n, n = 2+, +, 0, −, 2−, with L = 3,3′,4,4′-tetraimino-3,3′,4,4′-tetrahydrobiphenyl. EPR-supported assignment of NIR absorptions for the paramagnetic intermediates

A complete EPR and UV-Vis-NIR spectroelectrochemical characterisation has been carried out for the series 1(2+/+/0/-/2-) where is the 1 new complex [(mu-L)[Ru(II)(acac)2]2], L = 3,3',4,4'-tetraimino-3,3',4,4'-tetrahydrobiphenyl. The paramagnetic intermediates are identified as the anion radical (L*-) complex 1*- with a long-wavelength intra-ligand transition at 2160 nm and as the weakly coupled diruthenium(II,III) species 1+ (Kc= 10(3)) with a low-intensity intervalence charge transfer (IVCT) band at 1570 nm. DFT calculations using ADF and Gaussian 03 programs support these assignments.

Separating Innocence and Non-Innocence of Ligands and Metals in Complexes [(L)Ru(acac)2]n (n = −1, 0, +1; L = o-Iminoquinone or o-Iminothioquinone)

The diamagnetic title complexes were obtained from Ru(acac)(2)(CH(3)CN)(2) and 2-aminophenol or 2-aminothiophenol. X-ray structure analysis of (L(1))Ru(acac)(2) (L(1) = o-iminoquinone) revealed C-C intra-ring, C-O, and C-N distances which suggest a Ru(III)-iminosemiquinone oxidation state distribution with antiparallel spin-spin coupling. One-electron oxidation and reduction of both title compounds to paramagnetic monocations [(L)Ru(acac)(2)](+) or monoanions [(L)Ru(acac)(2)](-) occurs reversibly at widely separated potentials (deltaE > 1.3 V) and leads to low-energy shifted charge transfer bands. In comparison with clearly established Ru(II)-semiquinone or Ru(III)-catecholate systems the g tensor components 2.23 > g(1) > 2.09, 2.16 > g(2) > 2.07, and 1.97 > g(3) > 1.88 point to considerable metal contributions to the singly occupied MO, corresponding to Ru(III) complexes with either o-quinonoid (--> cations) or catecholate-type ligands (--> anions) and only minor inclusion of Ru(IV)- or Ru(II)-iminosemiquinone formulations, respectively. The preference for the Ru(III) oxidation state for all accessible species is partially attributed to the monoanionic 2,4-pentanedionate (acac) co-ligands which favor a higher metal oxidation state than, e.g., neutral 2,2'-bipyridine (bpy).