Key interactions of RNA polymerase with 6S RNA and secondary channel factors during pRNA synthesis

Small non-coding 6S RNA mimics DNA promoters and binds to the σ70 holoenzyme of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) to suppress transcription of various genes mainly during the stationary phase of cell growth or starvation. This inhibition can be relieved upon synthesis of short product RNA (pRNA) performed by RNAP from the 6S RNA template. Here, we have shown that pRNA synthesis depends on specific contacts of 6S RNA with RNAP and interactions of the σ finger with the RNA template in the active site of RNAP, and is also modulated by the secondary channel factors. We have adapted a molecular beacon assay with fluorescently labeled σ70 to analyze 6S RNA release during pRNA synthesis. We found the kinetics of 6S RNA release to be oppositely affected by mutations in the σ finger and in the CRE pocket of core RNAP, similarly to the reported role of these regions in promoter-dependent transcription. Secondary channel factors, DksA and GreB, inhibit pRNA synthesis and 6S RNA release from RNAP, suggesting that they may contribute to the 6S RNA-mediated switch in transcription during stringent response. Our results demonstrate that pRNA synthesis depends on a similar set of contacts between RNAP and 6S RNA as in the case of promoter-dependent transcription initiation and reveal that both processes can be regulated by universal transcription factors acting on RNAP.

Structural Insight into the Mechanism of σ32-Mediated Transcription Initiation of Bacterial RNA Polymerase

Bacterial RNA polymerases (RNAP) form distinct holoenzymes with different σ factors to initiate diverse gene expression programs. In this study, we report a cryo-EM structure at 2.49 Å of RNA polymerase transcription complex containing a temperature-sensitive bacterial σ factor, σ³² (σ³²-RPo). The structure of σ³²-RPo reveals key interactions essential for the assembly of E. coli σ³²-RNAP holoenzyme and for promoter recognition and unwinding by σ³². Specifically, a weak interaction between σ³² and -35/-10 spacer is mediated by T128 and K130 in σ³². A histidine in σ³², rather than a tryptophan in σ⁷⁰, acts as a wedge to separate the base pair at the upstream junction of the transcription bubble, highlighting the differential promoter-melting capability of different residue combinations. Structure superimposition revealed relatively different orientations between βFTH and σ₄ from other σ-engaged RNAPs and biochemical data suggest that a biased σ₄-βFTH configuration may be adopted to modulate binding affinity to promoter so as to orchestrate the recognition and regulation of different promoters. Collectively, these unique structural features advance our understanding of the mechanism of transcription initiation mediated by different σ factors.

Universal functions of the σ finger in alternative σ factors during transcription initiation by bacterial RNA polymerase

The bacterial σ factor plays the central role in promoter recognition by RNA polymerase (RNAP). The primary σ factor, involved in transcription of housekeeping genes, was also shown to participate in the initiation of RNA synthesis and promoter escape by RNAP. In the open promoter complex, the σ finger formed by σ region 3.2 directly interacts with the template DNA strand upstream of the transcription start site. Here, we analysed the role of the σ finger in transcription initiation by four alternative σ factors in Escherichia coli, σ³⁸, σ³², σ²⁸ and σ²⁴. We found that deletions of the σ finger to various extent compromise the activity of RNAP holoenzymes containing alternative σ factors, especially at low NTP concentrations. All four σs are able to utilize NADH as a noncanonical priming substrate but it has only mild effects on the efficiency of transcription initiation. The mediators of the stringent response, transcription factor DksA and the alarmone ppGpp decrease RNAP activity and promoter complex stability for all four σ factors on tested promoters. For all σs except σ³⁸, deletions of the σ finger conversely increase the stability of promoter complexes and decrease their sensitivity to DksA and ppGpp. The result suggests that the σ finger plays a universal role in transcription initiation by alternative σ factors and sensitizes promoter complexes to the action of global transcription regulators DksA and ppGpp by modulating promoter complex stability.

DksA-dependent regulation of RpoS contributes to Borrelia burgdorferi tick-borne transmission and mammalian infectivity

Throughout its enzootic cycle, the Lyme disease spirochete Borreliella (Borrelia) burgdorferi, senses and responds to changes in its environment using a small repertoire of transcription factors that coordinate the expression of genes required for infection of Ixodes ticks and various mammalian hosts. Among these transcription factors, the DnaK suppressor protein (DksA) plays a pivotal role in regulating gene expression in B. burgdorferi during periods of nutrient limitation and is required for mammalian infectivity. In many pathogenic bacteria, the gene regulatory activity of DksA, along with the alarmone guanosine penta- and tetra-phosphate ((p)ppGpp), coordinate the stringent response to various environmental stresses, including nutrient limitation. In this study, we sought to characterize the role of DksA in regulating the transcriptional activity of RNA polymerase and its role in the regulation of RpoS-dependent gene expression required for B. burgdorferi infectivity. Using in vitro transcription assays, we observed recombinant DksA inhibits RpoD-dependent transcription by B. burgdorferi RNA polymerase independent of ppGpp. Additionally, we determined the pH-inducible expression of RpoS-dependent genes relies on DksA, but this relationship is independent of (p)ppGpp produced by Rel_bbu. Subsequent transcriptomic and western blot assays indicate DksA regulates the expression of BBD18, a protein previously implicated in the post-transcriptional regulation of RpoS. Moreover, we observed DksA was required for infection of mice following intraperitoneal inoculation or for transmission of B. burgdorferi by Ixodes scapularis nymphs. Together, these data suggest DksA plays a central role in coordinating transcriptional responses in B. burgdorferi required for infectivity through DksA’s interactions with RNA polymerase and post-transcriptional control of RpoS.

Lyme disease, caused by the spirochete bacteria Borreliella (Borrelia) burgdorferi, is the most common vector-borne illness in North America. The ability of B. burgdorferi to establish infection is predicated by its ability to coordinate the expression of virulence factors in response to diverse environmental stimuli encountered within Ixodes ticks and mammalian hosts. Previous studies have shown an essential role for the alternative sigma factor RpoS in regulating the expression of genes required for the successful transmission of B. burgdorferi by Ixodes ticks and infection of mammalian hosts. The DnaK suppressor protein (DksA) is a global gene regulator in B. burgdorferi that contributes to the expression of RpoS-dependent genes. In this study, using in vitro transcription assays, we determined DksA exerts its gene regulatory function through direct interactions with the B. burgdorferi RNA polymerase and controls the expression of RpoS-dependent genes required for mammalian infection by post-transcriptionally regulating cellular levels of RpoS. Our results demonstrate the utility of in vitro transcription assays to determine how gene regulatory proteins like DksA control gene expression in B. burgdorferi and reveal a novel role for DksA in the infectious cycle of B. burgdorferi.

Role of Interactions of the CRE Region of Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase with Nontemplate DNA during Promoter Escape

RNA polymerase (RNAP) recognizes promoter DNA through many interactions that determine specificity of transcription initiation. In addition to the dedicated transcription initiation σ factor in bacteria, the core enzyme of RNAP can also participate in promoter recognition. In particular, guanine residue at the +2 position (+2G) of the nontemplate DNA strand is bound in the CRE pocket formed by the RNAP β subunit. Here, we analyzed the role of these contacts in the process of promoter escape by RNAP by studying point mutations in the β subunit of Escherichia coli RNAP that disrupted these interactions. We found that the presence of +2G in the promoter slowed down the rate of promoter escape and increased proportion of inactive complexes. Amino acid substitutions in the CRE pocket decreased the promoter complex stability and changed the pattern of short RNA products synthesized during initiation, but did not significantly affect the rate of transition to elongation, regardless of the presence of +2G. Thus, the contacts of the CRE pocket with +2G do not make a significant contribution to the kinetics of promoter escape by RNAP, while the observed changes in the efficiency of abortive synthesis are not directly related to the rate of promoter escape.

Rewiring of growth-dependent transcription regulation by a point mutation in region 1.1 of the housekeeping σ factor

In bacteria, rapid adaptation to changing environmental conditions depends on the interplay between housekeeping and alternative σ factors, responsible for transcription of specific regulons by RNA polymerase (RNAP). In comparison with alternative σ factors, primary σs contain poorly conserved region 1.1, whose functions in transcription are only partially understood. We found that a single mutation in region 1.1 in Escherichia coli σ⁷⁰ rewires transcription regulation during cell growth resulting in profound phenotypic changes. Despite its destabilizing effect on promoter complexes, this mutation increases the activity of rRNA promoters and also decreases RNAP sensitivity to the major regulator of stringent response DksA. Using total RNA sequencing combined with single-cell analysis of gene expression we showed that changes in region 1.1 disrupt the balance between the "greed" and "fear" strategies thus making the cells more susceptible to environmental threats and antibiotics. Our results reveal an unexpected role of σ region 1.1 in growth-dependent transcription regulation and suggest that changes in this region may facilitate rapid switching of RNAP properties in evolving bacterial populations.

CarD and RbpA modify the kinetics of initial transcription and slow promoter escape of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA polymerase

The pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the causative agent of tuberculosis, enacts unique transcriptional regulatory mechanisms when subjected to host-derived stresses. Initiation of transcription by the Mycobacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) has previously been shown to exhibit different open complex kinetics and stabilities relative to Escherichia coli (Eco) RNAP. However, transcription initiation rates also depend on the kinetics following open complex formation such as initial nucleotide incorporation and subsequent promoter escape. Here, using a real-time fluorescence assay, we present the first in-depth kinetic analysis of initial transcription and promoter escape for the Mtb RNAP. We show that in relation to Eco RNAP, Mtb displays slower initial nucleotide incorporation but faster overall promoter escape kinetics on the Mtb rrnAP3 promoter. Furthermore, in the context of the essential transcription factors CarD and RbpA, Mtb promoter escape is slowed via differential effects on initially transcribing complexes. Finally, based on their ability to increase the rate of open complex formation and decrease the rate of promoter escape, we suggest that CarD and RbpA are capable of activation or repression depending on the rate-limiting step of a given promoter's basal initiation kinetics.

Structures and mechanism of transcription initiation by bacterial ECF factors

Bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) forms distinct holoenzymes with extra-cytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factors to initiate specific gene expression programs. In this study, we report a cryo-EM structure at 4.0 Å of Escherichia coli transcription initiation complex comprising σE-the most-studied bacterial ECF σ factor (Ec σE-RPo), and a crystal structure at 3.1 Å of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcription initiation complex with a chimeric σH/E (Mtb σH/E-RPo). The structure of Ec σE-RPo reveals key interactions essential for assembly of E. coli σE-RNAP holoenzyme and for promoter recognition and unwinding by E. coli σE. Moreover, both structures show that the non-conserved linkers (σ2/σ4 linker) of the two ECF σ factors are inserted into the active-center cleft and exit through the RNA-exit channel. We performed secondary-structure prediction of 27,670 ECF σ factors and find that their non-conserved linkers probably reach into and exit from RNAP active-center cleft in a similar manner. Further biochemical results suggest that such σ2/σ4 linker plays an important role in RPo formation, abortive production and promoter escape during ECF σ factors-mediated transcription initiation.

DNA template sequence control of bacterial RNA polymerase escape from the promoter

Promoter escape involves breaking of the favourable contacts between RNA polymerase (RNAP) and the promoter to allow transition to an elongation complex. The sequence of DNA template that is transcribed during promoter escape (ITS; Initially Transcribed Sequence) can affect promoter escape by mechanisms that are not yet fully understood. We employed a highly parallel strategy utilizing Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to collect data on escape properties of thousands of ITS variants. We show that ITS controls promoter escape through a combination of position-dependent effects (most prominently, sequence-directed RNAP pausing), and position-independent effects derived from sequence encoded physical properties of the template (for example, RNA/DNA duplex stability). ITS often functions as an independent unit affecting escape in the same manner regardless of the promoter from which transcription initiates. However, in some cases, a strong dependence of ITS effects on promoter context was observed suggesting that promoters may have 'allosteric' abilities to modulate ITS effects. Large effects of ITS on promoter output and the observed interplay between promoter sequence and ITS effects suggests that the definition of bacterial promoter should include ITS sequence.

Region 3.2 of the σ factor controls the stability of rRNA promoter complexes and potentiates their repression by DksA

The σ factor drives promoter recognition by bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) and is also essential for later steps of transcription initiation, including RNA priming and promoter escape. Conserved region 3.2 of the primary σ factor (‘σ finger’) directly contacts the template DNA strand in the open promoter complex and facilitates initiating NTP binding in the active center of RNAP. Ribosomal RNA promoters are responsible for most RNA synthesis during exponential growth but should be silenced during the stationary phase to save cell resources. In Escherichia coli, the silencing mainly results from the action of the secondary channel factor DksA, which together with ppGpp binds RNAP and dramatically decreases the stability of intrinsically unstable rRNA promoter complexes. We demonstrate that this switch depends on the σ finger that destabilizes RNAP–promoter interactions. Mutations in the σ finger moderately decrease initiating NTP binding but significantly increase promoter complex stability and reduce DksA affinity to the RNAP–rRNA promoter complex, thus making rRNA transcription less sensitive to DksA/ppGpp both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, destabilization of rRNA promoter complexes by the σ finger makes them a target for robust regulation by the stringent response factors under stress conditions.

The Role of Pyrophosphorolysis in the Initiation-to-Elongation Transition by E. coli RNA Polymerase

RNA polymerase can cleave a phosphodiester bond at the 3' end of a nascent RNA in the presence of pyrophosphate producing NTP. Pyrophosphorolysis has been characterized during elongation steps of transcription where its rate is significantly slower than the forward rate of NMP addition. In contrast, we report here that pyrophosphorolysis can occur in a millisecond time scale during the transition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase from initiation to elongation at the psbA2 promoter. This rapid pyrophosphorolysis occurs during productive RNA synthesis as opposed to abortive RNA synthesis. Dissociation of σ⁷⁰ or RNA extension beyond nine nucleotides dramatically reduces the rate of pyrophosphorolysis. We argue that the rapid pyrophosphorolysis allows iterative cycles of cleavage and re-synthesis of the 3' phosphodiester bond by the productive complexes in the early stage of transcription. This iterative process may provide an opportunity for the σ⁷⁰ to dissociate from the RNA exit channel of the enzyme, enabling RNA to extend through the channel.

Structural basis for transcription initiation by bacterial ECF σ factors

Bacterial RNA polymerase employs extra-cytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factors to regulate context-specific gene expression programs. Despite being the most abundant and divergent σ factor class, the structural basis of ECF σ factor-mediated transcription initiation remains unknown. Here, we determine a crystal structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) RNAP holoenzyme comprising an RNAP core enzyme and the ECF σ factor σ^H (σ^H-RNAP) at 2.7 Å, and solve another crystal structure of a transcription initiation complex of Mtb σ^H-RNAP (σ^H-RPo) comprising promoter DNA and an RNA primer at 2.8 Å. The two structures together reveal the interactions between σ^H and RNAP that are essential for σ^H-RNAP holoenzyme assembly as well as the interactions between σ^H-RNAP and promoter DNA responsible for stringent promoter recognition and for promoter unwinding. Our study establishes that ECF σ factors and primary σ factors employ distinct mechanisms for promoter recognition and for promoter unwinding.