Studies of SpoIIAB mutant proteins elucidate the mechanisms that regulate the developmental transcription factor sigmaF in Bacillus subtilis

Structural Analysis of the Hanks-Type Protein Kinase YabT From Bacillus subtilis Provides New Insights in its DNA-Dependent Activation

YabT is a serine/threonine kinase of the Hanks family from Bacillus subtilis, which lacks the canonical extracellular signal receptor domain but is anchored to the membrane through a C-terminal transmembrane helix. A previous study demonstrated that a basic juxtamembrane region corresponds to a DNA-binding motif essential for the activation of YabT trans-autophosphorylation. YabT is expressed during spore development and localizes to the asymmetric septum where it specifically phosphorylates essential proteins involved in genome maintenance, such as RecA, SsbA, and YabA. YabT has also been shown to phosphorylate proteins involved in protein synthesis, such as AbrB and Ef-Tu, suggesting a possible regulatory role in the progressive metabolic quiescence of the forespore. Finally, cross phosphorylations with other protein kinases implicate YabT in the regulation of numerous other cellular processes. Using an artificial protein scaffold as crystallization helper, we determined the first crystal structure of this DNA-dependent bacterial protein kinase. This allowed us to trap the active conformation of the kinase domain of YabT. Using NMR, we showed that the basic juxtamembrane region of YabT is disordered in the absence of DNA in solution, just like it is in the crystal, and that it is stabilized upon DNA binding. In comparison with its closest structural homolog, the mycobacterial kinase PknB allowed us to discuss the dimerization mode of YabT. Together with phosphorylation assays and DNA-binding experiments, this structural analysis helped us to gain new insights into the regulatory activation mechanism of YabT.

Differential mechanisms of binding of anti-sigma factors Escherichia coli Rsd and bacteriophage T4 AsiA to E. coli RNA polymerase lead to diverse physiological consequences

Anti-sigma factors Escherichia coli Rsd and bacteriophage T4 AsiA bind to the essential housekeeping sigma factor, sigma(70), of E. coli. Though both factors are known to interact with the C-terminal region of sigma(70), the physiological consequences of these interactions are very different. This study was undertaken for the purpose of deciphering the mechanisms by which E. coli Rsd and bacteriophage T4 AsiA inhibit or modulate the activity of E. coli RNA polymerase, which leads to the inhibition of E. coli cell growth to different amounts. It was found that AsiA is the more potent inhibitor of in vivo transcription and thus causes higher inhibition of E. coli cell growth. Measurements of affinity constants by surface plasmon resonance experiments showed that Rsd and AsiA bind to sigma(70) with similar affinity. Data obtained from in vivo and in vitro binding experiments clearly demonstrated that the major difference between AsiA and Rsd is the ability of AsiA to form a stable ternary complex with RNA polymerase. The binding patterns of AsiA and Rsd with sigma(70) studied by using the yeast two-hybrid system revealed that region 4 of sigma(70) is involved in binding to both of these anti-sigma factors; however, Rsd interacts with other regions of sigma(70) as well. Taken together, these results suggest that the higher inhibition of E. coli growth by AsiA expression is probably due to the ability of the AsiA protein to trap the holoenzyme RNA polymerase rather than its higher binding affinity to sigma(70).

Signalling network with a bistable hysteretic switch controls developmental activation of the sigma transcription factor in Bacillus subtilis

The sporulation process of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis unfolds by means of separate but co-ordinated programmes of gene expression within two unequal cell compartments, the mother cell and the smaller forespore. sigmaF is the first compartment-specific transcription factor activated during this process, and it is controlled at the post-translational level by a partner-switching mechanism that restricts sigmaF activity to the forespore. The crux of this mechanism lies in the ability of the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB (AB) to form alternative complexes either with sigmaF, holding it in an inactive form, or with the anti-anti-sigma factor SpoIIAA (AA) and a nucleotide, either ATP or ADP. In the complex with AB and ATP, AA is phosphorylated on a serine residue and released, making AB available to capture sigmaF in an inactive complex. Subsequent activation of sigmaF requires the intervention of the SpoIIE serine phosphatase to dephosphorylate AA, which can then attack the AB-sigmaF complex to induce the release of sigmaF. By incorporating biochemical, biophysical and genetic data from the literature we have constructed an integrative mathematical model of this partner-switching network. The model predicts that the self-enhancing formation of a long-lived complex of AA, AB and ADP transforms the network into an essentially irreversible hysteretic switch, thereby explaining the sharp, robust and irreversible activation of sigmaF in the forespore compartment. The model also clarifies the contributions of the partly redundant mechanisms that ensure correct spatial and temporal activation of sigmaF, reproduces the behaviour of various mutants and makes strong, testable predictions.

The mechanism of cell differentiation in Bacillus subtilis

Sporulation in Bacillus subtilis serves as a model for the development of two different cell types from a single cell. Although much information has been accumulated about the mechanisms that initiate the developmental programmes, important questions remain that can be answered only by quantitative analysis. Here we develop, with the help of existing and new experimental results, a mathematical model that reproduces published in vitro experiments and explains how the activation of the key transcription factor is regulated. The model identifies the difference in volume between the two cell types as the primary trigger for determining cell fate. It shows that this effect depends on the allosteric behaviour of a key protein kinase and on a low rate of dephosphorylation by the corresponding phosphatase; both predicted effects are confirmed experimentally.

Differential gene expression in genetically identical sister cells: the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

Early in sporulation, the cell divides asymmetrically to give two sister compartments, a smaller prespore and a larger mother cell. Differential gene expression in these compartments depends on the regulation of the first sporulation-specific sigma factor, sigma(F), which is activated only in the prespore. Regulation relies on the interactions of four proteins -sigma(F), its antisigma SpoIIAB (which also has protein kinase activity), the anti-antisigma SpoIIAA and the protein phosphatase SpoIIE. Before asymmetric division, and in the mother cell after division, sigma(F) is held in an inactive complex with SpoIIAB and ATP; SpoIIAA is in its phosphorylated form. To disrupt the complex so as to liberate sigma(F) in the prespore, dephosphorylated SpoIIAA is needed, and this is made available by SpoIIE. Thereafter, SpoIIAB and SpoIIE are active simultaneously in the prespore, cycling SpoIIAA through phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms. This cycle detains SpoIIAB in a state in which it cannot inhibit sigma(F). Results from biophysical techniques, mathematical simulations and enzyme kinetics have now helped to elucidate the dynamics of the protein-protein interactions involved. An understanding of these dynamics largely accounts for the regulation of sigma(F). We show that the system is tuned to be highly efficient in its use of components and extremely economical in conserving ATP.

Survey of the year 2004 commercial optical biosensor literature

The year 2004 represents a milestone for the biosensor research community: in this year, over 1000 articles were published describing experiments performed using commercially available systems. The 1038 papers we found represent an approximately 10% increase over the past year and demonstrate that the implementation of biosensors continues to expand at a healthy pace. We evaluated the data presented in each paper and compiled a 'top 10' list. These 10 articles, which we recommend every biosensor user reads, describe well-performed kinetic, equilibrium and qualitative/screening studies, provide comparisons between binding parameters obtained from different biosensor users, as well as from biosensor- and solution-based interaction analyses, and summarize the cutting-edge applications of the technology. We also re-iterate some of the experimental pitfalls that lead to sub-optimal data and over-interpreted results. We are hopeful that the biosensor community, by applying the hints we outline, will obtain data on a par with that presented in the 10 spotlighted articles. This will ensure that the scientific community at large can be confident in the data we report from optical biosensors.

Efficient regulation of sigmaF, the first sporulation-specific sigma factor in B.subtilis

Differential gene expression is established in the prespore and mother-cell compartments of Bacillus subtilis through the successive activation of a series of cell-type-specific sigma factors. Crucial to the success of this process is the control of the first prespore-specific sigma factor, sigmaF. sigmaF is regulated by the proteins SpoIIAB, SpoIIAA and SpoIIE. SpoIIAB forms an inhibitory complex with sigmaF, which can be dissociated by interaction with SpoIIAA. During this interaction SpoIIAA is phosphorylated. SpoIIE is a membrane-bound phosphatase that dephosphorylates SpoIIAA, thereby re-activating it. It is not understood how sigmaF is activated specifically in the prespore but not in the mother cell. Here, we use a recently developed fluorescence spectroscopy technique to follow in real time the formation of sigmaF.SpoIIAB complexes and their dissociation by SpoIIAA. We show that complete activation of sigmaF is induced by a tenfold increase in SpoIIE activity. This result demonstrates that relatively small changes in SpoIIE activity, which could arise from asymmetric septation, can achieve the all-or-nothing response in sigmaF activity required by the cell. For long-term sigmaF activation, we find that sustained SpoIIE activity is required to counteract the activity of SpoIIAB. Even though the continual phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of SpoIIAA by these two enzymes will expend some ATP, the formation of SpoIIAA.SpoIIAB.ADP complexes greatly diminishes the rate of the phosphorylation reaction, and thus minimizes the wastage of energy. These features provide a very efficient system for regulating sigmaF.