Supramolecular membrane-associated assemblies of RNA metabolic proteins in Escherichia coli

New insight into the structure and function of Hfq C-terminus

Accumulating evidence indicates that RNA metabolism components assemble into supramolecular cellular structures to mediate functional compartmentalization within the cytoplasmic membrane of the bacterial cell. This cellular compartmentalization could play important roles in the processes of RNA degradation and maturation. These components include Hfq, the RNA chaperone protein, which is involved in the post-transcriptional control of protein synthesis mainly by the virtue of its interactions with several small regulatory ncRNAs (sRNA). The Escherichia coli Hfq is structurally organized into two domains. An N-terminal domain that folds as strongly bent β-sheets within individual protomers to assemble into a typical toroidal hexameric ring. A C-terminal flexible domain that encompasses approximately one-third of the protein seems intrinsically unstructured. RNA-binding function of Hfq mainly lies within its N-terminal core, whereas the function of the flexible domain remains controversial and largely unknown. In the present study, we demonstrate that the Hfq-C-terminal region (CTR) has an intrinsic property to self-assemble into long amyloid-like fibrillar structures in vitro. We show that normal localization of Hfq within membrane-associated coiled structures in vivo requires this C-terminal domain. This finding establishes for the first time a function for the hitherto puzzling CTR, with a plausible central role in RNA transactions.

We showed that Hfq C-terminal region (CTR) has an intrinsic property to self-assemble into amyloid-like fibrils. This region is required for cellular assembly of Hfq into membrane-associated coiled structures. The work establishes a new function for this naturally unstructured Hfq domain.

Cellular localization of RNA degradation and processing components in Escherichia coli

The ability to study the localization and organization of proteins within the tiny cells of bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, has paved the way for a new and exciting era of prokaryotic cellular biology. Previously unrecognized levels of spatiotemporal and supramolecular organization of proteins have been revealed within the prokaryotic cell that had long been assumed as a "bag of enzymes." Immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy, which involves cellular immunostaining of native proteins with fluorescently labeled antibodies, is relatively laborious and requires cell fixation and highly specific antibodies. However, IF microscopy allows localization studies of native proteins expressed to their normal cellular levels, as opposed to labeling proteins with large fluorescent tag that can alter protein abundance dependent on changes in mRNAs and/or proteins stability, or whose detection can require overexpression of labeled proteins. In addition, when antibodies against native proteins are not available or lack specificity, epitope tags such as hemagglutinin (HA) or Flag can be used to label chromosomally expressed proteins. The short Flag- and HA-tag, eight or nine amino acids, are unlikely to interfere with the localization or function of the proteins. We describe and discuss here the use of fluorescence microscopy for determination of cellular organization of protein components of the E. coli RNA processing and degradation machinery. We present examples of cellular organization patterns visualized by light microscopy, either by IF microscopy of native and epitope-tagged proteins in fixed cells, or by fluorescence labeling of the proteins in live cells.

The Escherichia coli major exoribonuclease RNase II is a component of the RNA degradosome

Multiprotein complexes that carry out RNA degradation and processing functions are found in cells from all domains of life. In Escherichia coli, the RNA degradosome, a four-protein complex, is required for normal RNA degradation and processing. In addition to the degradosome complex, the cell contains other ribonucleases that also play important roles in RNA processing and/or degradation. Whether the other ribonucleases are associated with the degradosome or function independently is not known. In the present work, IP (immunoprecipitation) studies from cell extracts showed that the major hydrolytic exoribonuclease RNase II is associated with the known degradosome components RNaseE (endoribonuclease E), RhlB (RNA helicase B), PNPase (polynucleotide phosphorylase) and Eno (enolase). Further evidence for the RNase II-degradosome association came from the binding of RNase II to purified RNaseE in far western affinity blot experiments. Formation of the RNase II–degradosome complex required the degradosomal proteins RhlB and PNPase as well as a C-terminal domain of RNaseE that contains binding sites for the other degradosomal proteins. This shows that the RNase II is a component of the RNA degradosome complex, a previously unrecognized association that is likely to play a role in coupling and coordinating the multiple elements of the RNA degradation pathways.

Regulation of transcription by 6S RNAs: insights from the Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis model systems

Whereas, the majority of bacterial non-coding RNAs and functional RNA elements regulate post-transcriptional processes, either by interacting with other RNAs via base-pairing or through binding of small ligands (riboswitches), 6S RNAs affect transcription itself by binding to the housekeeping holoenzyme of RNA polymerase (RNAP). Remarkably, 6S RNAs serve as RNA templates for bacterial RNAP, giving rise to the de novo synthesis of short transcripts, termed pRNAs (product RNAs). Hence, 6S RNAs prompt the enzyme to act as an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP). Synthesis of pRNAs exceeding a certain length limit (~13 nt) persistently rearrange the 6S RNA structure, which in turn, disrupts the 6S RNA:RNAP complex. This pRNA synthesis-mediated "reanimation" of sequestered RNAP molecules represents the conceivably fastest mechanism for resuming transcription in cells that enter a new exponential growth phase. The many different 6S RNAs found in a wide variety of bacteria do not share strong sequence homology but have in common a conserved rod-shaped structure with a large internal loop, termed the central bulge; this architecture mediates specific binding to the active site of RNAP. In this article, we summarize the overall state of knowledge as well as very recent findings on the structure, function, and physiological effects of 6S RNA examples from the two model organisms, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Comparison of the presently known properties of 6S RNAs in the two organisms highlights common principles as well as diverse features.