Proteolytic fragmentation of tetanus toxin by subcellular fractions of JY, a B lymphoblastoid cell line

The structure of the tetanus toxin reveals pH-mediated domain dynamics

The tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) is a highly potent toxin produced by Clostridium tetani that inhibits neurotransmission of inhibitory interneurons, causing spastic paralysis in the tetanus disease. TeNT differs from the other clostridial neurotoxins by its unique ability to target the central nervous system by retrograde axonal transport. The crystal structure of the tetanus toxin reveals a "closed" domain arrangement stabilised by two disulphide bridges, and the molecular details of the toxin's interaction with its polysaccharide receptor. An integrative analysis combining X-ray crystallography, solution scattering and single particle electron cryo-microscopy reveals pH-mediated domain rearrangements that may give TeNT the ability to adapt to the multiple environments encountered during intoxication, and facilitate binding to distinct receptors.

Tetanus toxin L chain is processed by major histocompatibility complex class I and class II pathways and recognized by CD8+ or CD4+ T lymphocytes

Tetanus toxin (TeNT) is a heterodimeric protein antigen, whose light chain (L) is translocated in the cytosol of neuronal target cells specifically to cleave its substrates, vesicle-associated membrane protein-2 (VAMP-2, or synaptobrevin) or cellubrevin. We report that the L chain behaves as a nominal antigen recognized by specific T-cell clones upon either class I- or II-restricted presentation. Three types of responses are observed: (i) a TeNT- and L-specific CD8+ T-cell response, that can be inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by the proteasome inhibitor clasto-Lactacystin beta-lactone; (ii) a CD4+ T-cell response specific for L but not TeNT, with recognition of a determinant processed in a chloroquine-sensitive and brefeldin A-resistant compartment; (iii) a CD4+ T-cell response against both L and TeNT, with processing in a brefeldin A-sensitive compartment. The L chain processing was investigated in U937 cells by internalization and localization of L chain by separation of the cell content by differential centrifugation experiments. After incubation with TeNT or L chain in the presence of H chain, the L chain was predominantly distributed in the cytosolic fraction, whereas incubation with L alone led to localization in a lysosome/membrane fraction. The distribution of the TeNT L chain in both cytosolic and endocytic compartments of the antigen-presenting cell accounted for its processing by both class I and class II pathways. Furthermore, an epitope overlapping with the zinc-binding region was recognized by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

OH. treatment of tetanus toxin reduces its susceptibility to limited proteolysis with more efficient presentation to specific T cells

At inflammatory sites, before their processing, antigens are exposed to oxygen free radicals released by activated cells. The effect of hydroxyl radicals (OH.) on the structure of a protein antigen, tetanus toxin (TT) was investigated, as well as the consequences on processing and presentation. A chemical system composed of Fe-EDTA, ascorbate and H2O2 was used to produce physiological amounts of OH. radicals. TT exposed to OH. radicals presented a marked decrease of its intrinsic fluorescence with a concomitant increase of the content of bityrosine, but no fragmentation of the protein was detected by SDS-PAGE. Processing of the modified TT was analysed, by incubating TT at acidic pH with fractions enriched in plasma membranes and lysosomes obtained from a lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL). Proteolysis of OH.-treated TT was less important than proteolysis of native TT, especially upon prolonged incubations. Oxidized TT presented by LCL cells induced a greater proliferation of three different TT specific T cell clones, compared to native TT. When proteolytic digests of TT were presented by fixed LCL cells to a homologous T cell line, the proliferative response obtained in the presence of digests of OH.-treated TT was sustained, even in the case of prolonged proteolysis, whereas the response to digests of native TT fell rapidly. The relative resistance of OH.-treated TT to proteolysis appears thus responsible for its greater presentation to specific T cells, probably by protecting epitopes.