Expression of an enzymically active glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored form of neutral endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.11) in Cos-1 cells

Effect of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) or troglitazone, as an inducer of osteogenic cells or adipocytes, on differentiation of a bone marrow mesenchymal progenitor cell line established from temperature-sensitive (ts) simian virus (SV) 40 T-antigen gene transgenic mice

TBR31-2 is one of the bone marrow stromal cell lines. Differentiation toward osteogenic cells and calcification was observed when TBR31-2 cells were cultured for 4 weeks. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) stimulated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in a dose- and time-dependent manner. On the other hand, troglitazone increased oil droplet accumulation in a dose-dependent manner. In the presence of BMP-2, an increase of expression in osteogenic cell differentiation marker genes and a decrease of expression in adipocyte differentiation marker genes were observed with the exception of the induced expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma), however, troglitazone, a ligand of PPARgamma treatment exhibited the opposite tendency. Interestingly, treatment with both BMP-2 and troglitazone resulted in a decrease of ALP activity and an increase of oil droplet accumulation. Reverse tanscription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis also indicated that osteogenic differentiation markers decreased and that adipocyte differentiation markers increased. Thus, when the cells were cultured with BMP-2, osteogenic differentiation was enhanced while the expression of PPARgamma was maintained, and the addition of troglitazone caused a significant number of differentiated cells into adipocytes. These findings indicate that BMP-2 enhanced osteogenic differentiation and the expression of adipogenic transcription factor (PPARgamma) followed by osteogenic differentiation without activation of PPARgamma by its ligand.

Modification of a recombinant GPI-anchored metalloproteinase for secretion alters the protein glycosylation

The N-linked glycans of recombinant leishmanolysin (GP63) expressed as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored membrane protein or modified for secretion in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were analyzed by fast atom bombardment-mass spectrometry (FAB-MS). The glycans isolated from both membrane and secreted protein were predominantly complex biantennary structures. However other aspects of the glycan profiles showed striking differences. The degree of sialylation of the membrane form was greatly reduced and the core fucosylation of biantennary structures was increased compared to the secreted form. Glycans isolated from membrane expressed protein also contained a higher proportion of lactosamine repeats. Residence times in the secretory pathway were similar for both secreted and membrane protein. Glycosylation differences may therefore be due to differences in protein conformation and accessibility to glycosyltransferases or glycosidases. These differences in glycosylation represent an important factor when considering modifying membrane expressed proteins for secreted production.

Interaction of mammalian neprilysin with binding protein and calnexin in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Neutral endopeptidase (neprilysin or NEP, EC 3.4.24.11) is a zinc metallo-endopeptidase expressed in many eukaryotic cell types and displaying several important physiological roles. In the brain (and central nervous system), this enzyme is involved in the molecular mechanism of pain by its action in the degradation of enkephalin molecules. In the kidney, NEP is implicated in the degradation of regulatory factors involved in the control of arterial pressure, including atrial natriuretic peptide and bradykinin. In this study we assessed the potential of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe to overproduce rabbit NEP and secreted NEP (sNEP, a soluble derivative of this integral membrane protein). Both recombinant NEP and sNEP were produced at high levels (5 mg/l) in this system. Enzymic studies revealed that these recombinant proteins were fully active and exhibit kinetic parameters similar to those of the bona fide enzyme. Immunofluorescence microscopy and enzymic assays demonstrated that recombinant NEP is correctly targeted to the cell membrane. Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation studies showed that folding intermediates of NEP and sNEP, produced in S. pombe, interact in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) with binding protein (BiP) and calnexin (Cnx1p). The amount of sNEP coprecipitated with both BiP and Cnx1p augmented when cells were subjected to various stresses causing the accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER. The interactions of NEP with BiP and Cnx1p were, however, more refractive to the same stresses.

Role of the glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor in the intracellular transport of a transmembrane protein in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells

In order to compare the trafficking of proteins with different membrane anchors, we have constructed and expressed three different recombinant forms of neutral endopeptidase (NEP) in MDCK cells. The wild type form of NEP (WT-NEP) is attached to the plasma membrane by a single N-terminal membrane spanning domain, whereas the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored form of the protein (GPI-NEP) contains a C-terminal GPI anchor. A double anchored form of NEP (DA-NEP) was also constructed, that contains both the original N-terminal membrane spanning domain and a C-terminal GPI anchor. We show here that WT-NEP, GPI-NEP and DA-NEP, which are all apically targeted in MDCK cells, behave differently when subjected to Triton X-100 solubilisation: despite the presence of the transmembrane anchor DA-NEP behaves as a GPI-anchored protein. This suggests that the GPI anchor of DA-NEP is dominant over the transmembrane anchor of the native protein to determine its pattern of solubility in Triton X-100.

Secretion of a type II integral membrane protein induced by mutation of the transmembrane segment

Signal peptide/membrane anchor (SA) domains of type II membrane proteins initiate the translocation of downstream polypeptides across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. In contrast with signal peptides, however, SA domains are not cleaved by signal peptidase and thus anchor the protein in the membrane. In the present study we have introduced mutations in the SA domain of neprilysin (neutral endopeptidase-24.11; NEP) to identify structural elements that would favour the processing of SA domains by signal peptidase. Mutants of full-length and truncated (without cytoplasmic domain) protein were constructed by substitution of the sequences SQNS, QQTT or YPGY for VTMI starting at position 15 of the NEP SA domain. In addition, a Pro residue was substituted for Thr at position 16 of the SA domain. The rationale for the use of these sequences was decided from our previous observation that substitution in the NEP SA domain of the sequence SQNS, which is polar and has alpha-helix-breaking potential, could promote SA domain processing under certain conditions (Roy, Chatellard, Lemay, Crine and Boileau (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268. 2699-2704; Yang. Chatellard, Lazure, Crine and Boileau (1994) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 315, 382-386). The QQTT sequence is polar but, according to secondary structure predictions, is compatible with the alpha-helix structure of the NEP SA domain. The YPGY sequence and single Pro residue are less polar and have alpha-helix-breaking potential. The predicted effects of these mutations on the structure of the NEP SA domain were confirmed by CD analysis of 42-residue peptides encompassing the hydrophobic segment and flanking regions. Wild-type and mutated proteins were expressed in COS-I cells and their fate (membrane-bound or secreted) was determined by immunoblotting and by endoglycosidase digestions. Our biochemical and structural data indicate that: (I) the cytosolic domain of NEP restricts the conformation of the SA domain because mutants not secreted in their full-length form are secreted in their truncated form; (2) alpha-helix-breaking residues are not a prerequisite for cleavage; (3) the presence, in close proximity to a putative signal peptidase cleavage site, of a polar sequence that maintains the alpha-helical structure of the SA domain is sufficient to promote cleavage. Furthermore pulse chase studies suggest that cleavage is performed in the ER by signal peptidase and indicate that cleavage is not a limiting step in the biosynthesis of the soluble form of the protein.