Role of 300 kDa complexes as intermediates in tubulin folding and dimerization: characterization of a 25 kDa cytosolic protein involved in the GTP-dependent release of monomeric tubulin

Tubulin cofactors and Arl2 are cage-like chaperones that regulate the soluble αβ-tubulin pool for microtubule dynamics

Microtubule dynamics and polarity stem from the polymerization of αβ-tubulin heterodimers. Five conserved tubulin cofactors/chaperones and the Arl2 GTPase regulate α- and β-tubulin assembly into heterodimers and maintain the soluble tubulin pool in the cytoplasm, but their physical mechanisms are unknown. Here, we reconstitute a core tubulin chaperone consisting of tubulin cofactors TBCD, TBCE, and Arl2, and reveal a cage-like structure for regulating αβ-tubulin. Biochemical assays and electron microscopy structures of multiple intermediates show the sequential binding of αβ-tubulin dimer followed by tubulin cofactor TBCC onto this chaperone, forming a ternary complex in which Arl2 GTP hydrolysis is activated to alter αβ-tubulin conformation. A GTP-state locked Arl2 mutant inhibits ternary complex dissociation in vitro and causes severe defects in microtubule dynamics in vivo. Our studies suggest a revised paradigm for tubulin cofactors and Arl2 functions as a catalytic chaperone that regulates soluble αβ-tubulin assembly and maintenance to support microtubule dynamics.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08811.001

Cells contain a network of protein filaments called microtubules. These filaments are involved in many biological processes; for example, they help cells keep the right shape, and they help to transport proteins and other materials inside cells.

Two proteins called α-tubulin and β-tubulin are the building blocks of microtubules. The filaments are very dynamic structures that can rapidly change length as individual tubulin units are either added or removed to the filament ends. Several proteins known as tubulin cofactors and an enzyme called Arl2 help to build a vast pool of tubulin units that are able attach to the microtubules. These units—called αβ-tubulin—are formed by α-tubulin and β-tubulin binding to each other, but it not clear exactly what roles the tubulin cofactors and Arl2 play in this process.

Nithianantham et al. used a combination of microscopy and biochemical techniques to study how the tubulin cofactors and Arl2 are organised, and their role in the assembly of microtubules in yeast. The experiments show that Arl2 and two tubulin cofactors associate with each other to form a stable ‘complex’ that has a cage-like structure. A molecule of αβ-tubulin binds to the complex, followed by another cofactor called TBCC. This activates the enzyme activity of Arl2, which releases the energy needed to alter the shape of the αβ-tubulin. Nithianantham et al. also found that yeast cells with a mutant form of Arl2 that lacked enzyme activity had problems forming microtubules.

Together, these findings show that the tubulin cofactors and Arl2 form a complex that regulates the assembly and maintenance of αβ-tubulin. The next challenge is to understand how this regulation influences the way that microtubules grow and shrink inside cells.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08811.002

Tubulin subunits exist in an activated conformational state generated and maintained by protein cofactors

The production of native alpha/beta tubulin heterodimer in vitro depends on the action of cytosolic chaperonin and several protein cofactors. We previously showed that four such cofactors (termed A, C, D, and E) together with native tubulin act on beta-tubulin folding intermediates generated by the chaperonin to produce polymerizable tubulin heterodimers. However, this set of cofactors generates native heterodimers only very inefficiently from alpha-tubulin folding intermediates produced by the same chaperonin. Here we describe the isolation, characterization, and genetic analysis of a novel tubulin folding cofactor (cofactor B) that greatly enhances the efficiency of alpha-tubulin folding in vitro. This enabled an integrated study of alpha- and beta-tubulin folding: we find that the pathways leading to the formation of native alpha- and beta-tubulin converge in that the folding of the alpha subunit requires the participation of cofactor complexes containing the beta subunit and vice versa. We also show that sequestration of native alpha-or beta-tubulins by complex formation with cofactors results in the destabilization and decay of the remaining free subunit. These data demonstrate that tubulin folding cofactors function by placing and/or maintaining alpha-and beta-tubulin polypeptides in an activated conformational state required for the formation of native alpha/beta heterodimers, and imply that each subunit provides information necessary for the proper folding of the other.

The third member of the Tetrahymena CCT subunit gene family, TpCCT alpha, encodes a component of the hetero-oligomeric chaperonin complex

The sequence of a third member of the Tetrahymena pyriformis chaperonin CCT ('chaperonin containing TCP1') subunit gene family is presented. This gene, designated TpCCT alpha, is the orthologue of the mouse chaperonin gene TCP1/CCT alpha. To characterize the CCT complex in this ciliate, we have produced polyclonal antibodies against synthetic peptides based on C-terminal sequences deduced from the primary sequences of the TpCCT alpha, TpCCT gamma and TpCCT eta subunits. We have also used polyclonal antibodies produced against recombinant yeast CCT alpha and CCT beta subunits. Using these antibodies, we show that Tetrahymena cells contain a hetero-oligomeric CCT chaperonin comprising at least seven distinct subunits. Three of these were assigned to specific TpCCT genes, whereas a fourth was recognized by the polyclonal antibody against yeast CCT beta, suggesting that this gene is also present in the ciliate. The CCT complex also contains other unidentified proteins that were recognized by the polyclonal antibody UM-1, raised against the putative ATP binding domain of the chaperonin proteins. TpCCT alpha gene expression was shown in exponentially growing cells and cells regenerating their cilia for different periods to have a similar pattern to the previously identified genes TpCCT gamma and TpCCT eta, and also to tubulin genes.

Newly-synthesized beta-tubulin demonstrates domain-specific interactions with the cytosolic chaperonin

Tubulin folding requires two chaperone systems, i.e., the 900 kDa cytosolic chaperonin referred to as the TCP-1 complex or TRiC which facilitates folding of the alpha- and beta-tubulin subunits and a ca. 180 kDa complex which facilitates further assembly into heterodimer. beta-Tubulin mutants were expressed in rabbit reticulocyte lysates, and the effect of C-terminal, N-terminal, and internal deletions on the binding of beta-tubulin polypeptides to the 900 and 180 kDa complexes was ascertained. Proteolytic studies of chaperonin-bound beta-tubulin were also implemented. These studies support the concept of quasi-native chaperonin-bound intermediates [Tian et al. J. Biol. Chem. (1995) 270, 1-4]. Three "domains" similar in size to the domains in the native protein were implicated in facilitated folding: i.e., an internal or "M-domain" composed of residues approximately 140-260 which binds to TRiC; a "C-domain" composed of residues approximately 300-445 which interacts less strongly with TRiC and may contain regulatory sequences for tubulin release from the chaperonin; and an "N-domain" composed of residues approximately 1-140 which apparently does not interact with TRiC but does interact with the 180 kDa complex. The major TRiC-interacting region, residues approximately 150-350 (the "interactive core"), overlapped portions of the M- and C-domains and included a putative hydrophobic-rich interdomain segment which may be a preferential site of interaction with TRiC. This segment may also be important for microtubule assembly and/or tubulin dimer formation. Removal of two residues from the N-terminal end or ca. 27 residues from the C-terminal and caused the polypeptide to arrest on TRiC. It is proposed that N- and C-terminal regions of beta-tubulin structurally interact with TRiC-binding region approximately 150-350 to inhibit binding to TRiC.

Pathway leading to correctly folded beta-tubulin

We describe the complete beta-tubulin folding pathway. Folding intermediates produced via ATP-dependent interaction with cytosolic chaperonin undergo a sequence of interactions with four proteins (cofactors A, D, E, and C). The postchaperonin steps in the reaction cascade do not depend on ATP or GTP hydrolysis, although GTP plays a structural role in tubulin folding. Cofactors A and D function by capturing and stabilizing beta-tubulin in a quasi-native conformation. Cofactor E binds to the cofactor D-beta-tubulin complex; interaction with cofactor C then causes the release of beta-tubulin polypeptides that are committed to the native state. Sequence analysis identifies yeast homologs of cofactors D (cin1) and E (pac2), characterized by mutations that affect microtubule function.

The chaperonin containing t-complex polypeptide 1 (TCP-1). Multisubunit machinery assisting in protein folding and assembly in the eukaryotic cytosol

Many proteins in the cell require assistance from molecular chaperones at stages in their life cycles in order to attain correctly folded states and functional conformations during protein synthesis or during recovery from denatured states. A recently discovered molecular chaperone, which is abundant in the eukaryotic cytosol and is called the chaperonin containing TCP-1 (CCT), has been shown to assist the folding of some proteins in cytosol. This chaperone is a member of the chaperonin family which includes GroEL, 60-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp60), Rubisco subunit binding protein (RBP) and thermophilic factor 55 (TF55), but is distinct from the other members in several respects. Presently the most intriguing feature is the hetero-oligomeric nature of the CCT; at least eight subunit species which are encoded by independent and highly diverged genes are known. These genes are calculated to have diverged around the starting point of the eukaryotic lineage and they are maintained in all eukaryotes investigated, suggesting a specific function for each subunit species. The amino acid sequences of these subunits share approximately 30% identity and have some highly conserved motifs probably responsible for ATPase function, suggesting this function is common to all subunits. Thus, each subunit is thought to have both specific and common functions. These observations, in conjunction with biochemical and genetic analysis, suggest that CCT functions as a very complex machinery for protein folding in the eukaryotic cell and that its chaperone activity may be essential for the folding and assembly of various newly synthesized polypeptides. This complex behaviour of CCT may have evolved to cope with the folding and assembly of certain highly evolved proteins in eukaryotic cells.