Signalling mechanisms regulating phenotypic changes in breast cancer cells

Metabolic pathways in obesity-related breast cancer

This Review focuses on the mechanistic evidence for a link between obesity, dysregulated cellular metabolism and breast cancer. Strong evidence now links obesity with the development of 13 different types of cancer, including oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. A number of local and systemic changes are hypothesized to support this relationship, including increased circulating levels of insulin and glucose as well as adipose tissue-derived oestrogens, adipokines and inflammatory mediators. Metabolic pathways of energy production and utilization are dysregulated in tumour cells and this dysregulation is a newly accepted hallmark of cancer. Dysregulated metabolism is also hypothesized to be a feature of non-neoplastic cells in the tumour microenvironment. Obesity-associated factors regulate metabolic pathways in both breast cancer cells and cells in the breast microenvironment, which provides a molecular link between obesity and breast cancer. Consequently, interventions that target these pathways might provide a benefit in postmenopausal women and individuals with obesity, a population at high risk of breast cancer.

The vital role of ATP citrate lyase in chronic diseases

Chronic or non-communicable diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide; they usually result in long-term illnesses and demand long-term care. Despite advances in molecular therapeutics, specific biomarkers and targets for the treatment of these diseases are required. The dysregulation of de novo lipogenesis has been found to play an essential role in cell metabolism and is associated with the development and progression of many chronic diseases; this confirms the link between obesity and various chronic diseases. The main enzyme in this pathway-ATP-citrate lyase (ACLY), a lipogenic enzyme-catalyzes the critical reaction linking cellular glucose catabolism and lipogenesis. Increasing lines of evidence suggest that the modulation of ACLY expression correlates with the development and progressions of various chronic diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, obesity, inflammation, and cancer. Recent studies suggest that the inhibition of ACLY activity modulates the glycolysis and lipogenesis processes and stimulates normal physiological functions. This comprehensive review aimed to critically evaluate the role of ACLY in the development and progression of different diseases and the effects of its downregulation in the prevention and treatment of these diseases.

Long noncoding RNA GAS6-AS2 sponges microRNA-493, thereby enhancing the malignant characteristics of breast cancer cells via upregulation of FUT4

Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) GAS6-AS2 serves as an oncogenic lncRNA in various types of human cancer. In this study, we attempted to examine the functions of GAS6-AS2 in breast cancer (BC) and explore the potential mechanisms involved. Reverse-transcription quantitative PCR was carried out to determine GAS6-AS2 expression in BC tissues and cell lines. Multiple functional experiments, including a Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, Transwell migration and invasion assays, and an in vivo nude-mouse xenograft experiment, were conducted to evaluate the effects of GAS6-AS2 in BC cells. GAS6-AS2 expression was high in BC tumors, manifesting a strong correlation with tumor size, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, and shorter overall survival in patients with BC. A knockdown of GAS6-AS2 restricted BC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and retarded tumor growth in vivo. With regard to its mechanism, GAS6-AS2 acted as a competing endogenous RNA that sponged microRNA-493 (miR-493), thereby increasing the expression of fucosyltransferase IV (FUT4). Either miR-493 inhibition or FUT4 upregulation abrogated the consequences of GAS6-AS2 knockdown in BC cells. These results revealed that GAS6-AS2 sponges miR-493 to enhance the malignant characteristics of BC in vitro and in vivo by increasing FUT4 expression. Thus, this lncRNA is an effective therapeutic target in BC and a promising diagnostic biomarker of this cancer.

MicroRNA-876 is sponged by long noncoding RNA LINC00707 and directly targets metadherin to inhibit breast cancer malignancy

Background: MicroRNA-876-5p (miR-876) dysregulation contributes to the aggressiveness of various types of human cancer. This study was aimed at measuring miR-876 expression in breast cancer, determining the specific roles of miR-876 in the progression of breast cancer and understanding the corresponding molecular mechanisms.

Materials and methods: miR-876 expression in breast cancer tissues and cell lines was quantified via RT-qPCR. The effect of miR-876 upregulation on the malignant phenotype of breast cancer cells was investigated using CCK-8 assays, flow cytometry, Transwell migration and invasion assays and tumor xenograft experiments. The mechanisms underlying the tumor-suppressive action of miR-876 in breast cancer cells were explored using bioinformatic analysis, luciferase reporter assays, RT-qPCR and Western blot analysis.

Results: miR-876 was found to be underexpressed in breast cancer tissues and cell lines. Decreased miR-876 expression notably correlated with lymphatic invasion metastasis, TNM stage and differentiation grade. Overall survival was lower among patients with breast cancer and low miR-876 expression than in patients with high miR-876 expression. Restoration of miR-876 expression decreased breast cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro and restricted tumor growth in vivo as well as increased cell apoptosis. Metadherin (MTDH) was identified as a novel target of miR-876 in breast cancer cells. Furthermore, long intergenic nonprotein-coding RNA 707 (LINC00707) acted as a molecular sponge for miR-876, thereby regulating MTDH expression in breast cancer. Finally, silencing miR-876 expression attenuated the influence of a LINC00707 knockdown on the malignancy of breast cancer cells.

Conclusion: This study, thus, revealed the vital functions of the LINC00707–miR-876–MTDH pathway in breast cancer and provided attractive targets and markers for its treatment.

MicroRNA-421-targeted PDCD4 regulates breast cancer cell proliferation

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are expressed aberrantly in various types of cancer, and negatively regulate the expression of target genes which may be useful in therapeutic strategies in several biological processes. In the present study, the expression levels and the effects of miRNA (miR)-421 in breast cancer tissues and MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were evaluated to elucidate therapeutic targets in breast cancer cells. The putative targets of miR-421 were predicted by bioinformatics approaches, and the expression levels of miR-421 were measured in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis following miR-421 knockdown. The rates of cell proliferation, migration capacity, invasiveness and apoptosis were determined in miR-421 inhibitor-transfected MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. The expression levels of target proteins regulated by miR-421 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were analyzed by western blot analysis. miR-421 was increased significantly in breast cancer tissues and cells, and was regulated by miR-421 antisense oligonucleotides. The knockdown of miR-421 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells decreased cell proliferation, migration capacity and invasiveness, and promoted apoptosis compared with control groups. The expression of target protein programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) were decreased in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with miR-421 inhibitors. These results suggested a correlation between miR-421 and PDCD4, and physiological functions of breast cancer cells, suggesting that miR-421 may be a potential strategy in the therapy of breast cancer.

Transcriptionally inducible Pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 1, attenuates ErbB receptor activity by inhibiting receptor oligomerization

Feedback control is a key mechanism in signal transduction, intimately involved in regulating the outcome of the cellular response. Here, we report a novel mechanism by which PHLDA1, Pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 1, negatively regulates ErbB receptor signaling by inhibition of receptor oligomerization. We have found that the ErbB3 ligand, heregulin, induces PHILDA1 expression in MCF-7 cells. Transcriptionally-induced PHLDA1 protein directly binds to ErbB3, whereas knockdown of PHLDA1 increases complex formation between ErbB3 and ErbB2. To provide insight into the mechanism for our time-course and single-cell experimental observations, we performed a systematic computational search of network topologies of the mathematical models based on receptor dimer-tetramer formation in the ErbB activation processes. Our results indicate that only a model in which PHLDA1 inhibits formation of both dimers and tetramer can explain the experimental data. Predictions made from this model were further validated by single-molecule imaging experiments. Our studies suggest a unique regulatory feature of PHLDA1 to inhibit the ErbB receptor oligomerization process and thereby control the activity of receptor signaling network.

Defined spatiotemporal features of RAS-ERK signals dictate cell fate in MCF-7 mammary epithelial cells

Signals conveyed through the RAS-ERK pathway are essential for the determination of cell fate. It is well established that signal variability is achieved in the different microenvironments in which signals unfold. It is also known that signal duration is critical for decisions concerning cell commitment. However, it is unclear how RAS-ERK signals integrate time and space in order to elicit a given biological response. To investigate this, we used MCF-7 cells, in which EGF-induced transient ERK activation triggers proliferation, whereas sustained ERK activation in response to heregulin leads to adipocytic differentiation. We found that both proliferative and differentiating signals emanate exclusively from plasma membrane-disordered microdomains. Of interest, the EGF signal can be transformed into a differentiating stimulus by HRAS overexpression, which prolongs ERK activation, but only if HRAS localizes at disordered membrane. On the other hand, HRAS signals emanating from the Golgi complex induce apoptosis and can prevent heregulin-induced differentiation. Our results indicate that within the same cellular context, RAS can exert different, even antagonistic, effects, depending on its sublocalization. Thus cell destiny is defined by the ability of a stimulus to activate RAS at the appropriate sublocalization for an adequate period while avoiding switching on opposing RAS signals.

Immunohistochemical analysis of phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin and its downstream signaling components in invasive breast cancer

The present study aimed to investigate whether the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is activated in invasive breast cancer. The expression levels of phosphorylated (p)‑mTOR at ser2448 were detected, as well as the expression levels of its downstream signaling molecules: Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E‑binding protein 1 (4E‑BP1), and p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1). The correlation between p‑mTOR, p‑4E‑BP1, p‑S6K1, and the clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer were also determined. p‑mTOR, p‑4E‑BP1 and p‑S6K1 expression was detected in 285 breast cancer tumor samples and adjacent normal tissue samples using immunohistochemistry. The expression levels and the location of the proteins were analyzed and compared in the various tissue samples. Multivariate Cox regression was used to analyze the clinicopathological factors and prognosis associated with the tissue samples. The disease‑free survival rate was examined using survival analyses and Log‑rank tests. The results of the present study indicated that the expression levels of p‑mTOR, p‑4E‑BP1, and p‑S6K1 were significantly higher in breast cancer tissue, as compared with normal tissue (P<0.01). p‑mTOR was predominantly expressed in the cytoplasm, whereas p‑4E‑BP1 and p‑S6K1 were predominantly co‑expressed in the cytoplasm and the nucleus. In addition, p‑4E‑BP1 and p‑S6K1 were more likely to be expressed in the cytoplasm in breast cancer tissue samples, as compared with normal tissue samples (P<0.001). Positive p‑mTOR was not significantly correlated with positive p‑4E‑BP1 and p‑S6K1 expression. The survival analyses of the patients with positive p‑mTOR, p‑4E‑BP1, and p‑S6K1 tissue samples were not significantly different from those of the patients with negative tissue samples (P>0.05). Thus suggesting that these markers are not adequate risk factors for disease free survival (P>0.05). In conclusion, the results of the present study suggested that p‑mTOR, p‑4E‑BP1, and p‑S6K1 are activated in invasive breast cancer. In addition, the exclusive expression of p‑4E‑BP1 and p‑S6K1 in the cytoplasm may be characteristic of progressive breast cancer. However, p‑mTOR, p‑4E‑BP1, and p‑S6K1 are not prognostic factors for breast cancer.