DNAJC10 correlates with tumor immune characteristics and predicts the prognosis of glioma patients

The role of HSP40 in cancer: Recent advances

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are a family of proteins involved in protein folding and maturation that are expressed by cells in response to stressors including heat shock. Recent studies have demonstrated that HSPs play major roles in carcinogenesis by regulating angiogenesis, cell proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, apoptosis, as well as therapy resistance to certain anticancer drugs. Despite being the largest and most diverse subgroup of the HSP family, HSP40 (DNAJ) is an understudied family of co-chaperones. HSP40 family members are also known to be involved in various types of cancers. In this article, we review the involvement of human HSP40 family members in various aspects of cancer biology. In addition, we highlight the possible potential of HSP40 as a tumor biomarker or drug target for improving the prognosis and treatment of cancer patients in the future.

Leveraging a disulfidptosis‑related lncRNAs signature for predicting the prognosis and immunotherapy of glioma

BACKGROUND

Gliomas, a prevalent form of primary brain tumors, are linked with a high mortality rate and unfavorable prognoses. Disulfidptosis, an innovative form of programmed cell death, has received scant attention concerning disulfidptosis-related lncRNAs (DRLs). The objective of this investigation was to ascertain a prognostic signature utilizing DRLs to forecast the prognosis and treatment targets of glioma patients.

METHODS

RNA-seq data were procured from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Disulfidptosis-related genes were compiled from prior research. An analysis of multivariate Cox regression and the least absolute selection operator was used to construct a risk model using six DRLs. The risk signature's performance was evaluated via Kaplan-Meier survival curves and receiver operating characteristic curves. Additionally, functional analysis was carried out using GO, KEGG, and single-sample GSEA to investigate the biological functions and immune infiltration. The research also evaluated tumor mutational burden, therapeutic drug sensitivity, and consensus cluster analysis. Reverse transcription quantitative PCR was conducted to validate the expression level of DRLs.

RESULTS

A prognostic signature comprising six DRLs was developed to predict the prognosis of glioma patients. High-risk patients had significantly shorter overall survival than low-risk patients. The robustness of the risk model was validated by receiver operating characteristic curves and subgroup survival analysis. Risk model was used independently as a prognostic indicator for the glioma patients. Notably, the low-risk patients displayed a substantial decrease in the immune checkpoints, the proportion of immune cells, ESTIMATE and immune score. IC50 values from the different risk groups allowed us to discern three drugs for the treatment of glioma patients. Lastly, the potential clinical significance of six DRLs was determined.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel six DRLs signature was developed to predict prognosis and may provide valuable insights for patients with glioma seeking novel immunotherapy and targeted therapy.

A novel signature of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs predicts prognosis in glioma: Evidence from bioinformatic analysis and experiments

Background: Glioma patients often experience unfavorable outcomes and elevated mortality rates. Our study established a prognostic signature utilizing cuproptosis-associated long non-coding RNAs (CRLs) and identified novel prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for glioma. Methods: The expression profiles and related data of glioma patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas, an accessible online database. We then constructed a prognostic signature using CRLs and evaluated the prognosis of glioma patients by means of Kaplan-Meier survival curves and receiver operating characteristic curves. A nomogram based on clinical features was employed to predict the individual survival probability of glioma patients. Functional enrichment analysis was conducted to identify crucial CRL-related enriched biological pathways. The role of LEF1-AS1 in glioma was validated in two glioma cell lines (T98 and U251). Results: We developed and validated a prognostic model for glioma with 9 CRLs. Patients with low-risk had a considerably longer overall survival (OS). The prognostic CRL signature may serve independently as an indicator of prognosis for glioma patients. In addition, functional enrichment analysis revealed significant enrichment of multiple immunological pathways. Notable differences were observed between the two risk groups in terms of immune cell infiltration, function, and immune checkpoints. We further identified four drugs based on their different IC50 values from the two risk groups. Subsequently, we discovered two molecular subtypes of glioma (cluster one and cluster two), with the cluster one subtype exhibiting a remarkably longer OS compared to the cluster two subtype. Finally, we observed that inhibition of LEF1-AS1 curbed the proliferation, migration, and invasion of glioma cells. Conclusion: The CRL signatures were confirmed as a reliable prognostic and therapy response indicator for glioma patients. Inhibition of LEF1-AS1 effectively suppressed the growth, migration, and invasion of gliomas; therefore, LEF1-AS1 presents itself as a promising prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for glioma.

Targeting Heat Shock Proteins in Malignant Brain Tumors: From Basic Research to Clinical Trials

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are conservative and ubiquitous proteins that are expressed both in prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms and play an important role in cellular homeostasis, including the regulation of proteostasis, apoptosis, autophagy, maintenance of signal pathways, protection from various stresses (e.g., hypoxia, ionizing radiation, etc.). Therefore, HSPs are highly expressed in tumor cells, including malignant brain tumors, where they also associate with cancer cell invasion, metastasis, and resistance to radiochemotherapy. In the current review, we aimed to assess the diagnostic and prognostic values of HSPs expression in CNS malignancies as well as the novel treatment approaches to modulate the chaperone levels through the application of inhibitors (as monotherapy or in combination with other treatment modalities). Indeed, for several proteins (i.e., HSP10, HSPB1, DNAJC10, HSPA7, HSP90), a direct correlation between the protein level expression and poor overall survival prognosis for patients was demonstrated that provides a possibility to employ them as prognostic markers in neuro-oncology. Although small molecular inhibitors for HSPs, particularly for HSP27, HSP70, and HSP90 families, were studied in various solid and hematological malignancies demonstrating therapeutic potential, still their potential was not yet fully explored in CNS tumors. Some newly synthesized agents (e.g., HSP40/DNAJ inhibitors) have not yet been evaluated in GBM. Nevertheless, reported preclinical studies provide evidence and rationale for the application of HSPs inhibitors for targeting brain tumors.

The Value of H2BC12 for Predicting Poor Survival Outcomes in Patients With WHO Grade II and III Gliomas

Purpose: Glioma is a common primary malignant brain tumor. Grade II (GII) gliomas are prone to develop into anaplastic grade III (GIII) gliomas, which indicate a higher malignancy and poorer survival outcome. This study aimed to satisfy the increasing demand for novel sensitive biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of GII and GIII gliomas.

Methods: A TCGA dataset was used to investigate the expression of H2BC12 mRNA in GII and GIII gliomas and its relation to clinical pathologic characteristics. Glioma tissues were collected to verify results from the TCGA dataset, and H2BC12 mRNA was detected by RT-qPCR. ROC analysis was employed to evaluate the classification power for GII and GIII. The significance of H2BC12 mRNA GII and GIII gliomas was also investigated. In addition, H2BC12 expression-related pathways were enriched by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). DNA methylation level and mutation of H2BC12 were analyzed by the UALCAN and CBioPortal databases, respectively.

Results: Based on the sample data from multiple databases and RT-qPCR, higher expression of H2BC12 mRNA was found in GII and GIII glioma tissue compared to normal tissue, which was consistent with a trend with our clinical specimen. H2BC12 mRNA had a better power in distinguishing between GII and GIII and yielded an AUC of 0.706 with a sensitivity of 76.9% and specificity of 81.8%. Meanwhile, high H2BC12 levels were associated with IDH status, 1p/19q codeletion, primary therapy outcome, and the histological type of gliomas. Moreover, the overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and progress-free interval (PFI) of GII glioma patients with higher levels of H2BC12 were shorter than those of patients with lower levels as well as GIII patients. In the multivariate analysis, a high H2BC12 level was an independent predictor for poor survival outcomes of gliomas. The Wnt or PI3K-AKT signaling pathways, DNA repair, cellular senescence, and DNA double-strand break repair were differentially activated in phenotypes that were positively associated with H2BC12. H2BC12 DNA methylation was high in TP53 nonmutant patients, and no H2BC12 mutation was observed in gliomas patients.

Conclusion: H2BC12 is a promising biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with WHO grade II and III gliomas.