The oestrogen receptor in the rat hypothalamus: nuclear responses to oestrogen administration [proceedings]

The unoccupied nuclear oestradiol receptor in the rat uterus and hypothalamus during the oestrous cycle

The nuclear oestrogen receptor population in the rat uterus contained an unoccupied receptor component that bound oestradiol with the high affinity (Kd congruent to 0.5 nM) characteristic of oestrogen receptors. This unoccupied receptor was present at all phases of the oestrous cycle. Its content changed in parallel with that of the total nuclear receptor during the cycle. Oestradiol administration to the immature rat resulted in increases in the uterine content of long-term nuclear receptors (i.e., those still present 8 h after administration); these increases were due to occupied oestrogen receptors, since the content of unoccupied receptor was unchanged. Our previous experiments [White & Lim (1980) Biochem. J. 190, 833-837] have shown in contrast, that oestradiol administration results in an increase in the content of unoccupied nuclear receptor in the hypothalamus. However, as in the uterus, similar cyclic changes in the content of unoccupied nuclear receptor occurred in parallel with those of the total nuclear receptor population in the hypothalamus. Differences and similarities between the unoccupied nuclear receptor of the uterus and hypothalamus are briefly discussed.

Unoccupied nuclear oestrogen receptors in the female rat hypothalamus. Increases on oestrogen administration

A major proportion of the hypothalamic nuclear oestrogen receptors were available for complexing with radioactive oestradiol in vitro at 4 degrees C and were apparently unoccupied . At 6 h after oestradiol administration the content of unoccupied nuclear receptors had increased 2.5-fold and represented 71% of the total nuclear receptor content. These results suggest that unoccupied receptors may be active elements in the 'long-term' receptor population of the hypothalamus. Androgenized females had lower contents of these receptors.

A comparison of the relationships between progestin receptors and oestrogen receptors in neural and non-neural target tissues of the rat during the oestrous cycle

Similar cyclic changes in the content of nuclear oestrogen receptor occurred in the hypothalamus, cerebral cortex, uterus and pituitary during the oestrous cycle. The relationship of the unoccupied to the total nuclear oestrogen receptor at each phase was similar in all these tissues. However, cyclic changes in the content of the cytosol progestin receptor occurred only in the uterus and pituitary (where they paralleled changes in the nuclear oestrogen receptor), but not in the hypothalamus or cerebral cortex.

Nucleo-cytoplasmic relationships of oestrogen receptors in rat liver during the oestrous cycle and in response to administered natural and synthetic oestrogen

Oestrogen receptors were measured in the cytosolic and purified nuclear fractions of rat liver. Both cytosolic and nuclear receptors bind oestrogen with high affinity (Kd = 1.47 and 2.28 nM respectively) and specificity similar to that of receptors in order oestrogen-target tissues such as the uterus. During the 4-day oestrous cycle the receptor content and distribution between cytosol and nucleus did not vary; in particular, the content of nuclear receptor did not appear to fluctuate in concert with known cyclic changes in the concentration of plasma oestrogen. Injection of 50 micrograms of oestradiol-17 beta or 10 micrograms of ethynyloestradiol resulted in a 4--6-fold increase in the nuclear receptor content, with a concomitant decrease in the unoccupied-receptor content of cytosol 1 h after injection. The nuclear receptors present after injection bind oestrogens with similar affinity (Kd = 2.78 nM) and specificity to receptors present in uninjected animals. The administration of lower doses of either oestrogen was less effective in producing increases in nuclear receptor content. Hence there is apparently substantial translocation of receptor to the nucleus in response to hyperphysiological doses of oestrogen, but not to the physiological changes in plasma oestrogen concentrations during the oestrous cycle. The response to exogenous oestrogens is discussed in relation to the clinical use of synthetic oestrogens and progestogens.