Discontinuous leading-strand synthesis: a stop-start story

Understanding the Human RECQ5 Helicase-Connecting the Dots from DNA to Clinics

RECQ5, a member of the conserved RECQ helicase family, is the sole human RECQ homolog that has not been linked to a hereditary developmental syndrome. Nonetheless, dysregulation of RECQ5 has emerged as a significant clinical concern, being linked to cancer predisposition, cardiovascular disease, and inflammation. In cells, RECQ5 assumes a crucial role in the regulation of DNA repair pathways, particularly in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks and inter-strand DNA crosslinks. Moreover, RECQ5 exhibits a capacity to modulate gene expression by interacting with transcription machineries and their co-regulatory proteins, thus safeguarding against transcription-induced DNA damage. This review aims to provide an overview of the multifaceted functions of RECQ5 and its implications in maintaining genomic stability. We will discuss the potential effects of clinical variants of RECQ5 on its cellular functions and their underlying mechanisms in the pathogenesis of cancer and cardiovascular disease. We will review the impact of RECQ5 variants in the field of pharmacogenomics, specifically their influence on drug responses, which may pave the way for novel therapeutic interventions targeting RECQ5 in human diseases.

A structural view of bacterial DNA replication

DNA replication mechanisms are conserved across all organisms. The proteins required to initiate, coordinate, and complete the replication process are best characterized in model organisms such as Escherichia coli. These include nucleotide triphosphate-driven nanomachines such as the DNA-unwinding helicase DnaB and the clamp loader complex that loads DNA-clamps onto primer-template junctions. DNA-clamps are required for the processivity of the DNA polymerase III core, a heterotrimer of α, ε, and θ, required for leading- and lagging-strand synthesis. DnaB binds the DnaG primase that synthesizes RNA primers on both strands. Representative structures are available for most classes of DNA replication proteins, although there are gaps in our understanding of their interactions and the structural transitions that occur in nanomachines such as the helicase, clamp loader, and replicase core as they function. Reviewed here is the structural biology of these bacterial DNA replication proteins and prospects for future research.

Frequent exchange of the DNA polymerase during bacterial chromosome replication

The replisome is a multiprotein machine that carries out DNA replication. In Escherichia coli, a single pair of replisomes is responsible for duplicating the entire 4.6 Mbp circular chromosome. In vitro studies of reconstituted E. coli replisomes have attributed this remarkable processivity to the high stability of the replisome once assembled on DNA. By examining replisomes in live E. coli with fluorescence microscopy, we found that the Pol III* subassembly frequently disengages from the replisome during DNA synthesis and exchanges with free copies from solution. In contrast, the DnaB helicase associates stably with the replication fork, providing the molecular basis for how the E. coli replisome can maintain high processivity and yet possess the flexibility to bypass obstructions in template DNA. Our data challenges the widely-accepted semi-discontinuous model of chromosomal replication, instead supporting a fully discontinuous mechanism in which synthesis of both leading and lagging strands is frequently interrupted.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21763.001

New cells are created when an existing cell divides to produce two new ones. During this process the original cell must copy its DNA so each new cell inherits a full set of genetic material. DNA is made up of two strands that twist together to form a double helix. These strands need to be separated so they can be used as templates to make new DNA strands. An enzyme called DNA helicase is responsible for separating the two DNA strands and another enzyme makes the new DNA. These enzymes are part of a group of proteins collectively called the replisome that controls the whole DNA copying process.

The replisome must be extremely reliable to avoid introducing mistakes into the cell’s genes. Previous research using replisomes extracted from cells indicated that replisomes are effective at copying DNA because the proteins they contain are strongly bound together and remain attached to the DNA for a long time. However, the behavior of replisomes in living cells has not been closely examined.

Beattie, Kapadia et al. used microscopy to observe how the replisome copies DNA in a bacterium called Escherichia coli. The experiments revealed that most of the proteins within the replisome are constantly being replaced during DNA copying. The exception to this is DNA helicase, which stays in place at the front of the replisome, providing a landing platform for all the other parts of the machine to come and go.

Future work will investigate why the parts of the replisome are replaced so frequently. This may allow us to alter the stability of the bacterial replisome, which may lead to new medical treatments and biotechnologies.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21763.002

Replicative DNA polymerase δ but not ε proofreads errors in Cis and in Trans

It is now well established that in yeast, and likely most eukaryotic organisms, initial DNA replication of the leading strand is by DNA polymerase ε and of the lagging strand by DNA polymerase δ. However, the role of Pol δ in replication of the leading strand is uncertain. In this work, we use a reporter system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to measure mutation rates at specific base pairs in order to determine the effect of heterozygous or homozygous proofreading-defective mutants of either Pol ε or Pol δ in diploid strains. We find that wild-type Pol ε molecules cannot proofread errors created by proofreading-defective Pol ε molecules, whereas Pol δ can not only proofread errors created by proofreading-defective Pol δ molecules, but can also proofread errors created by Pol ε-defective molecules. These results suggest that any interruption in DNA synthesis on the leading strand is likely to result in completion by Pol δ and also explain the higher mutation rates observed in Pol δ-proofreading mutants compared to Pol ε-proofreading defective mutants. For strains reverting via AT→GC, TA→GC, CG→AT, and GC→AT mutations, we find in addition a strong effect of gene orientation on mutation rate in proofreading-defective strains and demonstrate that much of this orientation dependence is due to differential efficiencies of mispair elongation. We also find that a 3′-terminal 8 oxoG, unlike a 3′-terminal G, is efficiently extended opposite an A and is not subject to proofreading. Proofreading mutations have been shown to result in tumor formation in both mice and humans; the results presented here can help explain the properties exhibited by those proofreading mutants.

Many DNA polymerases are able to proofread their errors: after incorporation of a wrong base, the resulting mispair invokes an exonuclease activity of the polymerase that removes the mispaired base and allows replication to continue. Elimination of the proofreading activity thus results in much higher mutation rates. We demonstrate that the two major replicative DNA polymerases in yeast, Pol δ and Pol ε, have different proofreading abilities. In diploid cells, Pol ε is not able to proofread errors created by other Pol ε molecules, whereas Pol δ can proofread not only errors created by other Pol δ molecules but also errors created by Pol ε molecules. We also find that mispaired bases not corrected by proofreading have much different likelihoods of being extended, depending on the particular base-base mismatch. In humans, defects in Pol δ or Pol ε proofreading can lead to cancer, and these results help explain the formation of those tumors and the finding that Pol ε mutants seem to be found as frequently, or more so, in human tumors as Pol δ mutants.