1
|
Capp J. Interplay between genetic, epigenetic, and gene expression variability: Considering complexity in evolvability. Evol Appl 2021; 14:893-901. [PMID: 33897810 PMCID: PMC8061278 DOI: 10.1111/eva.13204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic variability, epigenetic variability, and gene expression variability (noise) are generally considered independently in their relationship with phenotypic variation. However, they appear to be intrinsically interconnected and influence it in combination. The study of the interplay between genetic and epigenetic variability has the longest history. This article rather considers the introduction of gene expression variability in its relationships with the two others and reviews for the first time experimental evidences over the four relationships connected to gene expression noise. They show how introducing this third source of variability complicates the way of thinking evolvability and the emergence of biological novelty. Finally, cancer cells are proposed to be an ideal model to decipher the dynamic interplay between genetic, epigenetic, and gene expression variability when one of them is either experimentally increased or therapeutically targeted. This interplay is also discussed in an evolutionary perspective in the context of cancer cell drug resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean‐Pascal Capp
- Toulouse Biotechnology InstituteINSACNRSINRAEUniversity of ToulouseToulouseFrance
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang YK, Krasnopeeva E, Lin SY, Bai F, Pilizota T, Lo CJ. Comparison of Escherichia coli surface attachment methods for single-cell microscopy. Sci Rep 2019; 9:19418. [PMID: 31857669 PMCID: PMC6923479 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55798-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
For in vivo, single-cell imaging bacterial cells are commonly immobilised via physical confinement or surface attachment. Different surface attachment methods have been used both for atomic force and optical microscopy (including super resolution), and some have been reported to affect bacterial physiology. However, a systematic comparison of the effects these attachment methods have on the bacterial physiology is lacking. Here we present such a comparison for bacterium Escherichia coli, and assess the growth rate, size and intracellular pH of cells growing attached to different, commonly used, surfaces. We demonstrate that E. coli grow at the same rate, length and internal pH on all the tested surfaces when in the same growth medium. The result suggests that tested attachment methods can be used interchangeably when studying E. coli physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Kuan Wang
- Department of Physics and Graduate Institute of Biophysics, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan, 32001, Republic of China
| | - Ekaterina Krasnopeeva
- Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Alexander Crum Brown Road, EH9 3FF, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ssu-Yuan Lin
- Department of Physics and Graduate Institute of Biophysics, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan, 32001, Republic of China
| | - Fan Bai
- Biodynamic Optical Imaging Center (BIOPIC), School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
| | - Teuta Pilizota
- Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Alexander Crum Brown Road, EH9 3FF, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Chien-Jung Lo
- Department of Physics and Graduate Institute of Biophysics, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan, 32001, Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spenkelink LM, Lewis JS, Jergic S, Xu ZQ, Robinson A, Dixon NE, van Oijen AM. Recycling of single-stranded DNA-binding protein by the bacterial replisome. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:4111-4123. [PMID: 30767010 PMCID: PMC6486552 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) support DNA replication by protecting single-stranded DNA from nucleolytic attack, preventing intra-strand pairing events and playing many other regulatory roles within the replisome. Recent developments in single-molecule approaches have led to a revised picture of the replisome that is much more complex in how it retains or recycles protein components. Here, we visualize how an in vitro reconstituted Escherichia coli replisome recruits SSB by relying on two different molecular mechanisms. Not only does it recruit new SSB molecules from solution to coat newly formed single-stranded DNA on the lagging strand, but it also internally recycles SSB from one Okazaki fragment to the next. We show that this internal transfer mechanism is balanced against recruitment from solution in a manner that is concentration dependent. By visualizing SSB dynamics in live cells, we show that both internal transfer and external exchange mechanisms are physiologically relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne M Spenkelink
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, 9747 AG, the Netherlands
| | - Jacob S Lewis
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Slobodan Jergic
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Zhi-Qiang Xu
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Andrew Robinson
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Nicholas E Dixon
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Antoine M van Oijen
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ho HN, Zalami D, Köhler J, van Oijen AM, Ghodke H. Identification of Multiple Kinetic Populations of DNA-Binding Proteins in Live Cells. Biophys J 2019; 117:950-961. [PMID: 31383358 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding how multiprotein complexes function in cells requires detailed quantitative understanding of their association and dissociation kinetics. Analysis of the heterogeneity of binding lifetimes enables the interrogation of the various intermediate states formed during the reaction. Single-molecule fluorescence imaging permits the measurement of reaction kinetics inside living organisms with minimal perturbation. However, poor photophysical properties of fluorescent probes limit the dynamic range and accuracy of measurements of off rates in live cells. Time-lapse single-molecule fluorescence imaging can partially overcome the limits of photobleaching; however, limitations of this technique remain uncharacterized. Here, we present a structured analysis of which timescales are most accessible using the time-lapse imaging approach and explore uncertainties in determining kinetic subpopulations. We demonstrate the effect of shot noise on the precision of the measurements as well as the resolution and dynamic range limits that are inherent to the method. Our work provides a convenient implementation to determine theoretical errors from measurements and to support interpretation of experimental data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han N Ho
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Daniel Zalami
- Spectroscopy of Soft Matter, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Jürgen Köhler
- Spectroscopy of Soft Matter, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany; Bavarian Polymer Institute, Bayreuth, Germany; Bayreuth Institute of Macromolecular Research, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Antoine M van Oijen
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, Australia.
| | - Harshad Ghodke
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wickersham CE, Lipman EA. Tracking DNA Synthesis with Single-Molecule Strand Displacement. J Phys Chem B 2018; 122:11546-11553. [PMID: 30284831 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
We have previously shown that double-stranded DNA labeled with a periodic series of fluorescent dyes can be used to track a single helicase. Here we demonstrate how this technique can be adapted to follow processive DNA synthesis. By monitoring strand displacement, we track the motion of a single ϕ29 DNA polymerase without labeling or altering the enzyme or the template strand, and without applying any force. We observe a wide range of speeds, with the highest exceeding by several times those observed in earlier in vitro single-molecule experiments. Because this method enables repeated observations of the same polymerase traversing identical segments of DNA, it should prove useful for determining the effects of sequence on DNA replication and transcription. In addition, future measurements of this type may allow us to examine in detail the interactions of individual DNA polymerases with other components of the replisome.
Collapse
|