Implications of urinary basic fibroblast growth factor excretion in patients with urothelial carcinoma

The clinical significance of molecular markers to bladder cancer

Stage and grade of transitional cell carcinoma are currently the most useful tools for taking therapeutic decisions and evaluating the prognosis of bladder cancer patients. However, as there are remarkable differences in biological behavior and "biological potential" of tumors classified in the same stage, it is very difficult to predict which superficial tumors will recur and which tumors will give distant metastases. During the last two decades, the better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression has provided a large number of molecular markers of bladder cancer, with a potential diagnostic and prognostic value. This article reviews comprehensively the molecular role and evaluates the clinical significance and the perspectives of these molecular markers. We concluded that, although at the moment there is not a single marker able to predict with accuracy the biological potential of bladder cancer, the most promising markers, at this point, are deletions of chromosome 9, and the tumor suppressor gene p53. Clinical studies are in progress for the assessment of other biological molecules with prognostic potential, such as the E-cadherin, the protein p120, and the telomerase.

Biomarkers for the detection of bladder cancer

In this subject review, a series of morphology-based and molecular markers were compared with urinary cytology for the detection of recurrent urothelial neoplasia. Among the various biomarkers reviewed, the average published sensitivity and specificity for the Bard BTA test was 60% and 77%; the NMP22 Test was 67% and 72%; the telomerase assay was 77% and 85%; and the microsatellite assay was 89% and 100%. DNA ploidy measurements and immunoassays designed to detect keratins, proteins, hyaluronidase, growth factors, cell adhesion molecules, fibrinogen degradation products, cell cycle regulators, and molecular markers were also included. Although the performance features of these biomarkers have varied and the cytologic methods to which they have been compared have not been standardized, several of the procedures have received considerable support from urologists as assisting them in the management of their patients.

Basic fibroblast growth factor in experimental and clinical bacterial meningitis

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), a neurotrophic factor in the CNS, is expressed at high levels in response to seizures or strokes. We examined the expression of bFGF during experimental bacterial meningitis and the levels of bFGF in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of children with bacterial meningitis. For the experimental study, a mouse model of meningitis was established by intracranial injection of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Twenty-four hours after induced meningitis, the brains were sectioned and stained immunohistochemically for bFGF. Neutrophils and macrophages infiltrating the leptomeninges and the ventricles exhibited strong bFGF immunoreactivity. The neurons in the areas adjacent to the inflamed ventricles also showed enhanced bFGF expression. For the clinical study, we used an enzyme immunoassay to measure bFGF in CSF in 18 children with bacterial meningitis, 12 with aseptic meningitis, and 18 controls. The CSF levels of bFGF were twice as high in children with bacterial meningitis (medians 6.75-7.21 pg/mL) compared with those who had aseptic meningitis (2.9 pg/mL) or in control subjects (2.65 pg/mL, p < 0.0001, respectively). In patients with bacterial meningitis who survived, CSF bFGF decreased significantly after 24-50 h of antibiotic therapy (p < 0.0005). Patients who developed major sequelae or died had much higher levels of CSF bFGF than those without (134.9 pg/mL versus 7.38 pg/mL, p < 0.05). These findings of enhanced immunoreactivity of bFGF in experimental bacterial meningitis and an association of CSF levels of bFGF with disease severity in childhood bacterial meningitis suggest a biologic role for this neurotrophic factor in the pathophysiology of bacterial meningitis.

Positive and negative regulation of angiogenesis: from cell biology to the clinic

Virtually every subspecialty in medicine in one way or another deals with angiogenesis-associated physiological or pathological processes and, without exception, every organ system in the body has many diseases in which angiogenesis is an important component. This in itself makes the study of angiogenesis mandatory, in both basic science and clinical settings. Yet the study of angiogenesis does not require this justification. As a biological process it is extraordinarily rich, touching on virtually every aspect of modern cell biology, making it almost impossible for molecular biologists, biochemists and morphologists to ignore. Considerable therapeutic benefit can now be obtained through positive or negative manipulation of the angiogenic process, and this is due in large part to the rapid transfer to the clinical setting of knowledge acquired through a cell biological approach.

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in normal liver and hepatocellular carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study

Angiogenesis is of vital importance during the development and progression of solid tumors. To examine the role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in hepatocarcinogenesis, we evaluated the expression of peptide in normal human liver (n = 6) and in 36 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Immunoreactivity for VEGF was present in the extracellular matrix of the portal tracts in the normal and nontumor part of liver, but not in hepatocytes and bile duct epithelium. For HCC, variable amounts of VEGF were expressed in 13 cases (36.1%) of tumor cells. Using a logistic regression model, expression of VEGF was significantly associated with a higher proliferative index (P = .01) and sonographic portal vein thrombosis (P = .05). However, VEGF expression did not correlate with a biochemical liver profile, alpha-fetoprotein levels, histological grading, gender, or clinical stage of cirrhosis (P > 0.1, respectively). Log-rank test showed that evaluation of VEGF did not provide more prognostic information (P > .5) than that from tumor volume and portal vein thrombosis (P < .01, respectively). In addition, VEGF was always present in the fibrovascular stroma or pericellular matrix of HCC, although no strong relationship was observed with the expression of VEGF in tumor cells (P > .5). Our data suggested that expression of VEGF may characterize a progression toward higher proliferation in hepatocarcinogenesis in vivo. The relevance of VEGF existing in the extracellular matrix of the normal liver and HCC remains to be clarified.

Manipulating angiogenesis. From basic science to the bedside

Considerable progress has been made recently in understanding the molecular mechanisms of angiogenesis, which like most other biological processes is the result of subtle and often complex interactions between molecules that have regulatory (eg, cytokines and their receptors) and effector (eg, extracellular matrix, integrins, and proteases) functions. The title of this review was chosen to reflect a recent trend in which knowledge acquired through a molecular/cell biological approach is being rapidly transferred to the clinical setting. As a result, by manipulating angiogenesis either positively or negatively, considerable therapeutic benefit can now be envisaged in physiological and pathological settings in which neovascularization is a prominent component.