Current Practices in the Assessment of Voice: A Comparison of Providers Across Different Clinical Settings

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the current assessment practices of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the United States working with adult clients with voice disorders with regard to the frequency, utility, and confidence in the use of five elements of a comprehensive voice evaluation, as well as training, access to instrumentation, and the use of published scales.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to SLPs who currently see adults with dysphonia as part of their caseload. Clinicians in a voice-focused setting were compared to those who worked in a general medical setting.

RESULTS

Nearly all of the 86 participants reported using published validated scales for patient self-assessment and auditory-perceptual ratings. Most respondents had received training in auditory-perceptual voice assessment, acoustic assessment, and videostroboscopy, but a minority reported training in aerodynamic assessment. The majority of SLPs had access to acoustic equipment but a minority had access to the instrumentation for videostroboscopic or aerodynamic assessment. Auditory-perceptual voice evaluation was the procedure most commonly performed and most highly rated for diagnostic utility. Postgraduate training and access to instrumentation were associated with significantly higher frequency of use and confidence with all three instrumental assessment methods. SLPs in voice-focused settings were significantly more likely to have received training in videostroboscopy and perform or interpret it. SLPs in voice-focused settings were also significantly more likely to have access to equipment for all three instrumental techniques and reported significantly higher confidence in their use. Both groups rated the utility of the different components of a voice evaluation similarly and there were no significant differences between the groups in the use of validated patient questionnaires or auditory-perceptual scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Most clinicians in our survey reported following practice guidelines when performing comprehensive voice evaluations across settings, despite barriers of training and access to instrumentation.

Effect of Clinical Expertise on Efficacy of Vocal Function Exercises in Individuals With Typical Voice

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To determine the effect of clinical expertise on efficacy of Vocal Function Exercises (VFEs) as measured by change in percent of maximum phonation time goal attained. The hypothesis was that clinical expertise would result in greater increases in percent of maximum phonation time goal attained.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 19 individuals with typical voice was recruited in a university academic clinic setting. All participants completed baseline assessment and 17 completed all study procedures. Participants were randomized to receive VFEs from an expert voice clinician with more than 40 years' experience (expert group (EG)) or from a master's student in Communication Sciences and Disorders trained in VFEs (novice group (NG)). The primary outcome measure was change in percent of maximum phonation time goal attained during VFE tasks 1 and 4.

RESULTS

Mean change scores for maximum phonation time were 27.71 (P = 0.001) and 25.31 (P = 0.003) for EG and NG, respectively. Both groups improved significantly on the primary outcome measure, but the difference between groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.759). A Hedges'-g effect size of -0.14 [-1.10, 0.81] was obtained comparing EG and NG groups, indicating a small negative effect of limited clinical expertise on VFE outcomes in individuals with typical voice.

CONCLUSIONS

Speech-language pathologists with varied levels of expertise are capable of efficaciously administering VFEs in individuals with typical voice.

Identifying Clinical Behaviors Using the Motor Learning Classification Framework: A Pilot Study

CONTEXT

Although differences in clinical interactions with patients between students and experienced clinicians are well described, differences in therapeutic training behaviors have not been explored, especially in relation to motor learning principles.

AIMS

This pilot study compared clinical behaviors between speech language pathology (SLP) students and experienced SLPs in a voice therapy task, using prepractice variables in the Motor Learning Classification Framework (MLCF).

METHODS

Using a quasi-experimental design, five final-year undergraduate SLP students and four experienced SLPs with a voice therapy caseload taught a standardized patient to produce a vocal siren. Two trained raters categorized the clinicians' behaviors using the MLCF.

RESULTS

High intrarater reliability (91.9%, 92.3%) and interrater reliability (89.6%, 82.1%) were shown across both raters. Both clinician groups used the same percentage of behaviors classified as verbal information but differed in the subtypes of these behaviors. Experienced clinicians used behaviors categorized as problem-solving and only experienced clinicians used repeated behavior sequences that included perceptual training. Both groups used significantly more talking behaviors than doing behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

The MLCF can be reliably used to identify prepractice behaviors during client interactions in voice therapy. Students and experienced clinicians showed similarities in behaviors, but experienced clinicians used more problem solving and perceptual training behaviors than students. These differences have implications for student training. The greater use of talking behaviors than doing behaviors warrants further investigation into whether this impacts the subsequent quality of practice engaged by the client and ultimately treatment effectiveness.

Management of Pediatric Voice Disorders: Perceived Knowledge, Confidence, Attitude and Practice Patterns Among School-based Speech-language Pathologists in Hong Kong

OBJECTIVE

This survey evaluated the levels of self-perceived knowledge, confidence, attitude and practice patterns of school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in Hong Kong regarding their management of pediatric voice disorders.

METHODS

SLPs with experience working in school settings in Hong Kong were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. The survey ascertained SLPs' perception of their knowledge, confidence, attitude and practice patterns regarding their management of pediatric voice disorders. It also explored the barriers and facilitators to effective service provision for children with voice problems in schools.

RESULTS

A total of 85 responses were received, of which 56 respondents with complete responses were selected for analysis. Results showed that respondents in general did not consider themselves having sufficient knowledge on pediatric voice. They did not feel fully confident in managing pediatric voice cases. Even though they exhibited a positive attitude and agreed that pediatric voice management was important, discrepancies were noted between their attitude and practice. Barriers that hinder practice include the lack of professional guidelines, insufficient time and resource as well as difficulties to conduct comprehensive voice assessments with children.

CONCLUSION

The study findings urge the needs of enhancing school-based SLPs' perceived knowledge and competence in managing pediatric voice disorders. The study also identifies strategic directions to improve service provision for children with voice disorders in schools.

Using Telepractice to Deliver Pediatric Voice Care in a Changing World: Breaking down Challenges and Learning from Successes

For children with voice disorders, access to care has long been a challenge. Reasons for this include the challenge of qualifying children with isolated voice disorders for services within the public-school system as well as a family's geographic proximity to experienced clinicians who are in the healthcare system. Over the past decade, there have been both formal and informal investigations into the use of telepractice to deliver services to communicatively disordered children and adults, including those with voice disorders. Although barriers and obstacles existed, use of telepractice to deliver such services demonstrated both feasibility and, in some studies, effective outcomes. However, prior to spring of 2020, use of telepractice to deliver speech pathology services was not mainstream. This changed when the nation was forced to shut down many of its in-person healthcare and educational delivery due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This article summarizes select relevant literature pertaining to the use of telepractice in speech language pathology over the past decade and provides a case-based discussion of how it was and is currently being used to deliver pediatric voice care.

Stuttering Practice Self-Assessment by School Speech-Language Practitioners

Purpose The purpose of this study was to survey school speech-language practitioners' self-perceptions of their confidence, knowledge, and need for support for working with school-age students who stutter (SWS). Method A total of 120 school-based speech-language practitioners from 27 Nashville, Tennessee, area counties completed an online, 35-item survey examining caseloads, coursework, continuing education, experience, and perceived levels of skill and confidence in service provision to SWS. They also rated their need for consultation from speech-language pathologists who specialize in stuttering to improve their skills with SWS. Results Respondents were least confident in and needed most support for providing intervention to SWS. Those who needed most support for intervention rated themselves as less knowledgeable about stuttering theory, assessment, and intervention and were less confident about working with students who only stutter and with SWS who have concomitant communication concerns. Greater practitioner confidence in stuttering intervention skills was positively correlated with the number of SWS on caseloads; continuing education credits in stuttering; and knowledge of stuttering theory, assessment, and intervention. Respondents who completed a graduate course on stuttering had greater confidence in stuttering intervention and were less likely to identify a need for support from specialists. Conclusions School speech-language practitioners continue to report needing additional education, practice opportunities, and support, especially with intervention, and desiring specialized guidance to serve SWS. Those with more experience, education, and knowledge about stuttering are more confident and skillful, reflecting the potential positive impact of increased opportunities to learn about and work with SWS. These needs may be addressed through increased availability of specialists in stuttering to consult with school practitioners; opportunities for school-based practitioners to become peer mentors; and provision of readily available, intervention-focused continuing education experiences and resources.

One-Year Follow-Up of a Vocal Hygiene Program for School-Age Children

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the effects of a school-based vocal hygiene education program "Green Voice for School" on promoting knowledge of healthy voice use for primary school students.

METHODS

Thirty-nine grade 4 and 5 students from local primary schools participated in the "Green Voice for School" program. Students received 6 weekly vocal hygiene training sessions with the aim of enhancing their voice care knowledge. Their voice care knowledge was assessed by a 15-item questionnaire. Students' voice care knowledge was examined before training, immediately after, and 1 year after completion of the program.

RESULTS

Students showed significant improvements in their voice care knowledge immediately after they received the vocal hygiene training sessions. Such improvements were maintained 1 year after the students completed training.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that "Green Voice for School", a school-based vocal hygiene education program, can be effective in promoting long-term improvements of voice care knowledge in school-age children.

Practice Patterns of Speech-Language Pathologists in Pediatric Vocal Health

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate current practices of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the management of pediatric vocal health, with specific analysis of the influence of clinical specialty and workplace setting on management approaches.

METHOD

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association-certified clinicians providing services within the United States (1%-100% voice caseload) completed an anonymous online survey detailing clinician demographics; employment location and service delivery models; approaches to continuing professional development; and specifics of case management, including assessment, treatment, and discharge procedures.

RESULTS

Current practice patterns were analyzed for 100 SLPs (0-42 years of experience; 77 self-identifying as voice specialists) providing services in 34 U.S. states across a range of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan workplace settings. In general, SLPs favored a multidisciplinary approach to management; included perceptual, instrumental, and quality of life measures during evaluation; and tailored intervention to the individual using a combination of therapy approaches. In contrast with current practice guidelines, only half reported requiring an otolaryngology evaluation prior to initiating treatment. Both clinical specialty and workplace setting were found to affect practice patterns. SLPs in school settings were significantly less likely to consider themselves voice specialists compared with all other work environments. Those SLPs who considered themselves voice specialists were significantly more likely to utilize voice-specific assessment and treatment approaches.

CONCLUSION

SLP practice largely mirrors current professional practice guidelines; however, potential exists to further enhance client care. To ensure that SLPs are best able to support children in successful communication, further research, education, and advocacy are required.

Multiple Perspectives on the Barriers to Identification and Management of Pediatric Voice Disorders

Pediatric voice disorders are typically a low-incidence population in the average caseload of clinicians working within school and general clinic settings. This occurs despite evidence of a fairly high prevalence of childhood voice disorders and the multiple impacts the voice disorder may have on a child's social development, the perception of the child by others, and the child's academic success. There are multiple barriers that affect the identification of children with abnormal vocal qualities and their access to services. These include: the reliance on school personnel, the ability of parents and caretakers to identify abnormal vocal qualities and signs of misuse, the access to specialized medical services for appropriate diagnosis, and treatment planning and issues related to the Speech-Language Pathologists' perception of their skills and competence regarding voice management for pediatric populations. These barriers and possible solutions to them are discussed with perspectives from the school, clinic and university settings.