A Simple Method to Obtain Basic Acoustic Measures From Video Recordings as Subtitles

Determining the Mouth-to-Microphone Distance in Rigid Laryngoscopy: A Simple Solution Based on the Newly Measured Values of the Depth of Endoscope Insertion into the Mouth

Mouth-to-microphone (MTM) distance is important when measuring the sound of voice. However, determining the MTM distance for laryngoscope-mounted microphones during laryngoscopic examinations is cumbersome. We introduce a novel solution for such cases, using the depth of insertion of the laryngoscope into the mouth DI as a reference distance. We measured the average insertion depth, DI, in 60 adult women and 60 adult men for rigid laryngoscopes with 70° and 90° view. We found the DI for the 70°/90° laryngoscope to be 9.7 ± 0.9/9.4 ± 0.6 cm in men, 8.9 ± 0.9/8.7 ± 0.7 cm in women, and 9.3 ± 0.9/9.0 ± 0.7 cm in all adults. Using these values, we show that, for microphones fixed at 15-40 cm from the tip of the laryngoscope, the final MTM distances are between 5 and 35 cm from the lips, and the standard uncertainties of these distances are between 16% and 2.5%. Our solution allows laryngologists and laryngoscope manufacturers to set and estimate the MTM distance for any rigid laryngeal endoscope with a microphone attached with reasonable accuracy, avoiding the need to measure this distance in vivo in routine practice.

A Study on Voice Measures in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

OBJECTIVE

As Alzheimer's disease (AD) might provoke certain nerve disorders, patients with AD can acquire sensorimotor adaptation problems, and thus the acoustic characteristics of the speech they produce may differ from those of healthy subjects. This study aimed to (1) extract acoustic characteristics (relating to articulatory gestures) potentially useful for detecting AD and (2) examine whether these characteristics could help identify AD patients.

METHODS

A total of 50 individuals participated in the study, including the AD group (17 cases), the Neurologically Healthy (NH) group (13 cases), the Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) group (11 cases), and the Vascular Cognitive Impairment (VCI) group (9 cases). Voice samples involving three vowels (/i/, /a/, and /u/) and six consonants (/p/, /pʰ/, /t/, /tʰ/, /k/, and /kʰ/) were collected using a digital recorder (TASCAM DR40X). Microphone-to-mouth distance was maintained at 30 cm. Acoustic measures included F0, jitter, shimmer, HNR, F1, F2, F3, and VOT.

RESULTS

One-way ANOVA tests were carried out to compare the acoustic measures among the four groups. F3 of vowel /u/, F2 bandwidth of vowel /a/, VOT of consonant /t/, and male participants' F0 of three vowels (/a/, /i/, and /u/) were found significantly different, while no significant differences were found in the other measures.

CONCLUSION

Some acoustic characteristics can indeed help detect AD patients.