High-Fidelity Simulation Improves Long-Term Knowledge of Clinical Swallow Evaluation

Student perspectives of simulated learning to improve their dysphagia management

BACKGROUND

 The use of simulation to enhance knowledge translation and bridge the theoretical-clinical gap to enhance clinical training and competency in health professions has received mixed reviews in the literature.

OBJECTIVES

 This research examined student perspectives of a simulation laboratory in speech therapy to improve students' clinical competency when working with adults with communication and dysphagia impairments.

METHOD

 An exploratory descriptive pilot study was conducted in 2022 with 16 third-year speech-language therapy students. This mixed-methods study involved students completing purposefully developed pre-and post-surveys to explore their experiences with simulated teaching and learning and their perceptions of confidence. Data were analysed using an independent t-test. Following the surveys, the students participated in a focus group discussion about their simulation experience, and data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

 Student ratings of clinical skills improved from pre to post-simulation significantly overall and across six out of the eight items. The focus group revealed insights into students' experiences, highlighting increased confidence, the benefits of making mistakes in a safe environment and improved preparedness to work with dysphagia in patients.

CONCLUSION

 While simulation serves as a valuable tool in enhancing clinical skills and building confidence, it must be used as an adjunct to real-life exposure and not as a replacement.Contribution: The integration of both simulated and real-life experiences is essential to provide a comprehensive and practical learning environment for students.

Nursing students' perceptions and satisfaction with a self-learning methodology in simulated environments: A mixed-methods study

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions and satisfaction of last-year nursing students with the Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES©).

BACKGROUND

As a learning method, clinical simulation uses elements that replicate real clinical practice scenarios and facilitates the acquisition of competencies and learning objectives. Simulations promote critical thinking, knowledge, techniques and teamwork in nursing students. The Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES©) is a method that integrates problem-based learning with realistic clinical simulation.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional mixed-method study implemented a simulation learning method as part of the mandatory nursing training practice; that was registered in Open Science Framework (Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R89PZ).

METHODS

Students were invited to complete a cross-sectional questionnaire about satisfaction with the simulation and were asked to participate in an interview about their perceptions on the simulation. All data were collected in December 2023 in a mid-sized southern Spanish university. A total of 69 last-year nursing students were enrolled in the simulation course and were selected using eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

Satisfaction measures showed no significant differences across gender, university access, or age (p>0.05 each). However, strong correlations were found between students' preference for the simulation method and perceived effort value (p<0.001 each). Qualitative analysis identified key themes in different stages of simulation (prebriefing, scenario, briefing, debriefing), simulation benefits (learning, usefulness, positive emotions) and challenges (difficulty, realism, time constraints). Despite some realism concerns, overall, students viewed the methodology positively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study underscore the vital role of simulation-based learning in nursing education. As the field of nursing continues to evolve, so too must the educational methods we employ, with simulation-based learning standing at the forefront of this transformative journey.

Read the Feed: High-Emotion Simulation of Preterm Feeding to Enhance Graduate-Level Training

PURPOSE

Therapeutic bottle feeding is a critical skill for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) managing the increasing and medically complex neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and early intervention caseloads. Thus, we explored the role of a high-emotion preterm simulator, known as "Paul," to increase knowledge, skills, and confidence related to infant feeding management for speech-language pathology graduate students.

METHOD

A randomized controlled study compared learning outcomes of 27 participants following either a 1-hr lecture or 1-hr training with a preterm simulator. Outcomes included knowledge demonstrated on written examination, accuracy in identifying stress cues during simulated feeding, and self-reported anxiety levels related to clinically assessing infant feeding.

RESULTS

No baseline group differences were found on written examination or during a simulated bottle feeding. Both groups improved in written examination scores and identification of stress cues (p < .001). Gains in written examination scores did not significantly differ between groups; however, after training, the simulator group correctly identified more stress cues during a simulated bottle feeding (p < .001), and the lecture group reported reduced anxiety related to clinically evaluating infant feeding compared to simulator-trained students (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

All students demonstrated gains in written knowledge and identification of stress cues; however, simulation-based training was superior in developing the feeders' ability to identify stress cues during a hands-on simulated bottle-feeding scenario. Lecture-based training may have inflated students' perceptions in their clinical skills as they were less accurate in identifying stress cues during a simulated feeding but reported significantly reduced anxiety for administering a clinical evaluation of infant feeding compared to simulation-trained students. Hands-on training using high-fidelity simulation may capitalize on experiential learning to better build clinical feeding skills for future SLPs who may serve in NICU and early intervention settings, while eliminating the risk of potential errors during learning that could affect fragile neonates.

Promoting critical thinking through simulation-based healthcare training (SBHT): A scoping review

Background. Critical thinking (CT) is an essential graduate attribute for health professions (HP) students. Yet, achieving a higher level of CT in HP students through education is often difficult for educators. SBHT has proven to be an effective strategy to promote CT, but it is not clear how this educational pedagogy should be implemented to achieve higher levels of CT.Objective. To identify and describe the use of simulation-based healthcare training (SBHT) strategies to promote CT in HP students. Methods. Based on the revised methodology of Levac et al., a scoping review was conducted on studies reporting an improvement in CT through simulation-based healthcare education published between January 2010 and August 2021.Results. Twenty articles were included. Through thematic analysis, three main themes were identified: contact simulations, computer-based simulations, and debriefing. The focus was on how these approaches were used to promote CT. Various subthemes were also identified. Conclusion. Correctly planning and implementing a simulation-based experience that relates to the relevant learning activities, combined with repeat practice and guided reflection during the debriefing stage, improves the CT skills of HP students.

Increasing Student Confidence With Medically Complex Infants Through Simulation: A Mixed Methods Investigation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare student knowledge and confidence, related to the assessment and management of oral feeding readiness in medically complex infants, following a written case study versus a high-fidelity human patient simulation (HPS).

METHOD

A sequential, two-phase, embedded mixed methods design was conducted. Participants were two sequential cohorts of second-year speech-language pathology graduate students enrolled in a didactic Pediatric Dysphagia course. At the end of the course, students completed the same case scenario presented as a written case study (control group; N = 28) or as an HPS (experimental group; N = 24). Pre- and post-knowledge assessment results and self-assessments of confidence conducted at three time points were compared.

RESULTS

All students made gains in knowledge, regardless of intervention (written case study or HPS). Despite different baselines, the percent change in knowledge was significant with the control group improving 33% and the experimental group improving 76% from baseline. Students in the experimental group demonstrated significantly greater gains in confidence with skills enhanced by the hands-on, immersive experience of HPS. Qualitative analysis further identified factors contributing to increased confidence with all students reporting that experience significantly contributes to their confidence in their ability to treat patients.

CONCLUSIONS

While knowledge outcomes were similar between the groups, the confidence that the experimental group gained through the hands-on experiences of HPS fosters student development as confident professionals in assessing feeding readiness and managing medically complex infants. Results support integration of simulation into the graduate curriculum to support student learning.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19233504.