The Onset-Offset N1-P2 Auditory Evoked Response in Individuals With High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Responses to Broadband Noise

Onset-offset cortical auditory evoked potential amplitude differences indicate auditory cortical hyperactivity and reduced inhibition in people with tinnitus

OBJECTIVE

The current study investigates evidence of hypothesized reduced central inhibition and/or increased excitation in individuals with tinnitus by evaluating cortical auditory onset versus offset responses.

METHODS

Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) were recorded to the onset and offset of 3-second white noise stimuli in tinnitus and control groups matched in pairs by age, hearing, and sex (n = 26 total). Independent t-tests and 2-way mixed model ANOVA were used to evaluate onset-offset differences in amplitude, area, and latency of CAEP components by group. The predictive influence of tinnitus presence and associated participant characteristics on CAEP outcomes was assessed by multiple regression proportional reduction in error.

RESULTS

The tinnitus group had significantly larger onset minus offset P2 amplitudes (ΔP2 amplitudes) than control group participants. No other component variables differed significantly. ΔP2 amplitude was best predicted by tinnitus status and not significantly influenced by other variables such as hearing loss or age.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypothesized reduced central inhibition and/or increased excitation in tinnitus participants was partially supported by a group difference in ΔP2 amplitude.

SIGNIFICANCE

This was the first study to evaluate CAEP onset minus offset differences to investigate changes in central excitation/inhibition in individuals with tinnitus versus controls in matched groups.

The Onset-Offset N1-P2 Cortical Auditory Evoked Response in Individuals With High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Responses to High- and Low-Frequency Narrowband Noise

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine whether onset-offset N1-P2 auditory evoked responses differ in amplitude, latency, and offset-to-onset trough-to-peak N1-P2 amplitude ratios (OOAR) between normal hearing (NH) sensitivity and moderate high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (HFSNHL) groups when stimuli target regions of peripheral hearing sensitivity where the groups are in the normal range (i.e., 500 Hz) versus where they differ regarding presence of hearing loss (i.e., 4000 Hz).

METHOD

Onset-offset N1-P2 auditory evoked responses were measured from 10 participants with normal hearing sensitivity and seven participants with moderate HFSNHL using 500-Hz and 4000-Hz narrowband noise (NBN) stimuli. Stimuli were 2000 ms with 40-ms rise-fall times presented at 50 dB SL referenced to stimulus behavioral thresholds. Amplitudes and latencies were analyzed for N1 and P2 onset and offset components via repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). OOARs were compared between groups using one-way ANOVA and across stimuli per group using paired samples t tests.

RESULTS

Despite dB SPL stimulus presentation differences between groups, there were no significant differences in individual/absolute amplitude and latency waveform components between groups for either stimulus. Derived comparative calculations of OOAR for 4000-Hz NBN were significantly larger (p < .025; NH: .39; HFSNHL: .62) for the group with HFSNHL than the group with NH sensitivity; 500-Hz NBN OOAR did not reach significance. OOARs revealed no significant difference between stimuli for the group with normal hearing sensitivity, with .38 OOAR for both stimuli (p = .961). OOAR comparisons for the HFSNHL group across stimuli were significant (p = .012), with the 4000-Hz NBN OOAR being nearly double the size of the 500-Hz NBN OOAR.

CONCLUSIONS

OOARs may provide insight to the balance of excitatory and inhibitory neural firing in the central auditory nervous system (CANS). Larger OOARs may be a biomarker of reduced CANS inhibition, perhaps indicative of a homeostatic central auditory gain mechanism.