1
|
Hendrikse MME, Dingemanse G, Goedegebure A. On the Feasibility of Using Behavioral Listening Effort Test Methods to Evaluate Auditory Performance in Cochlear Implant Users. Trends Hear 2024; 28:23312165241240572. [PMID: 38676325 PMCID: PMC11055488 DOI: 10.1177/23312165241240572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Realistic outcome measures that reflect everyday hearing challenges are needed to assess hearing aid and cochlear implant (CI) fitting. Literature suggests that listening effort measures may be more sensitive to differences between hearing-device settings than established speech intelligibility measures when speech intelligibility is near maximum. Which method provides the most effective measurement of listening effort for this purpose is currently unclear. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of two tests for measuring changes in listening effort in CI users due to signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) differences, as would arise from different hearing-device settings. By comparing the effect size of SNR differences on listening effort measures with test-retest differences, the study evaluated the suitability of these tests for clinical use. Nineteen CI users underwent two listening effort tests at two SNRs (+4 and +8 dB relative to individuals' 50% speech perception threshold). We employed dual-task paradigms-a sentence-final word identification and recall test (SWIRT) and a sentence verification test (SVT)-to assess listening effort at these two SNRs. Our results show a significant difference in listening effort between the SNRs for both test methods, although the effect size was comparable to the test-retest difference, and the sensitivity was not superior to speech intelligibility measures. Thus, the implementations of SVT and SWIRT used in this study are not suitable for clinical use to measure listening effort differences of this magnitude in individual CI users. However, they can be used in research involving CI users to analyze group data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje M. E. Hendrikse
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gertjan Dingemanse
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - André Goedegebure
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Y, Callejón-Leblic MA, Picazo-Reina AM, Blanco-Trejo S, Patou F, Sánchez-Gómez S. Impact of SNR, peripheral auditory sensitivity, and central cognitive profile on the psychometric relation between pupillary response and speech performance in CI users. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1307777. [PMID: 38188029 PMCID: PMC10768066 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1307777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite substantial technical advances and wider clinical use, cochlear implant (CI) users continue to report high and elevated listening effort especially under challenging noisy conditions. Among all the objective measures to quantify listening effort, pupillometry is one of the most widely used and robust physiological measures. Previous studies with normally hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners have shown that the relation between speech performance in noise and listening effort (as measured by peak pupil dilation) is not linear and exhibits an inverted-U shape. However, it is unclear whether the same psychometric relation exists in CI users, and whether individual differences in auditory sensitivity and central cognitive capacity affect this relation. Therefore, we recruited 17 post-lingually deaf CI adults to perform speech-in-noise tasks from 0 to 20 dB SNR with a 4 dB step size. Simultaneously, their pupillary responses and self-reported subjective effort were recorded. To characterize top-down and bottom-up individual variabilities, a spectro-temporal modulation task and a set of cognitive abilities were measured. Clinical word recognition in quiet and Quality of Life (QoL) were also collected. Results showed that at a group level, an inverted-U shape psychometric curve between task difficulty (SNR) and peak pupil dilation (PPD) was not observed. Individual shape of the psychometric curve was significantly associated with some individual factors: CI users with higher clinical word and speech-in-noise recognition showed a quadratic decrease of PPD over increasing SNRs; CI users with better non-verbal intelligence and lower QoL showed smaller average PPD. To summarize, individual differences in CI users had a significant impact on the psychometric relation between pupillary response and task difficulty, hence affecting the interpretation of pupillary response as listening effort (or engagement) at different task difficulty levels. Future research and clinical applications should further characterize the possible effects of individual factors (such as motivation or engagement) in modulating CI users' occurrence of 'tipping point' on their psychometric functions, and develop an individualized method for reliably quantifying listening effort using pupillometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Zhang
- Department of Research and Technology, Oticon Medical, Vallauris, France
| | - M. Amparo Callejón-Leblic
- Oticon Medical, Madrid, Spain
- ENT Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain
- Biomedical Engineering Group, University of Sevillel, Sevillel, Spain
| | | | | | - François Patou
- Department of Research and Technology, Oticon Medical, Smørum, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Philips C, Jacquemin L, Lammers MJW, Mertens G, Gilles A, Vanderveken OM, Van Rompaey V. Listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users: a scoping review. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1278508. [PMID: 38020642 PMCID: PMC10656682 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1278508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction In challenging listening situations, speech perception with a cochlear implant (CI) remains demanding and requires high levels of listening effort, which can lead to increased levels of listening-related fatigue. The body of literature on these topics increases as the number of CI users rises. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the existing literature on listening effort, fatigue, and listening-related fatigue among CI users and the measurement techniques to evaluate them. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statements were used to conduct the scoping review. The search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify all relevant studies. Results In total, 24 studies were included and suggests that CI users experience higher levels of listening effort when compared to normal hearing controls using scales, questionnaires and electroencephalogram measurements. However, executing dual-task paradigms did not reveal any difference in listening effort between both groups. Uncertainty exists regarding the difference in listening effort between unilateral, bilateral, and bimodal CI users with bilateral hearing loss due to ambiguous results. Only five studies were eligible for the research on fatigue and listening-related fatigue. Additionally, studies using objective measurement methods were lacking. Discussion This scoping review highlights the necessity for additional research on these topics. Moreover, there is a need for guidelines on how listening effort, fatigue, and listening-related fatigue should be measured to allow for study results that are comparable and support optimal rehabilitation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cato Philips
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Laure Jacquemin
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marc J. W. Lammers
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Griet Mertens
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Annick Gilles
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Education, Health and Social Work, University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Olivier M. Vanderveken
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zekveld AA, Pielage H, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE. The Influence of Hearing Loss on the Pupil Response to Degraded Speech. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2023; 66:4083-4099. [PMID: 37699194 DOI: 10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current evidence regarding the influence of hearing loss on the pupil response elicited by speech perception is inconsistent. This might be partially due to confounding effects of age. This study aimed to compare pupil responses in age-matched groups of normal-hearing (NH) and hard of hearing (HH) listeners during listening to speech. METHOD We tested the baseline pupil size and mean and peak pupil dilation response of 17 NH participants (Mage = 46 years; age range: 20-62 years) and 17 HH participants (Mage = 45 years; age range: 20-63 years) who were pairwise matched on age and educational level. Participants performed three speech perception tasks at a 50% intelligibility level: noise-vocoded speech and speech masked with either stationary noise or interfering speech. They also listened to speech presented in quiet. RESULTS Hearing loss was associated with poorer speech perception, except for noise-vocoded speech. In contrast to NH participants, performance of HH participants did not improve across trials for the interfering speech condition, and it decreased for speech in stationary noise. HH participants had a smaller mean pupil dilation in degraded speech conditions compared to NH participants, but not for speech in quiet. They also had a steeper decline in the baseline pupil size across trials. The baseline pupil size was smaller for noise-vocoded speech as compared to the other conditions. The normalized data showed an additional group effect on the baseline pupil response. CONCLUSIONS Hearing loss is associated with a smaller pupil response and steeper decline in baseline pupil size during the perception of degraded speech. This suggests difficulties of the HH participants to sustain their effort investment and performance across the test session.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana A Zekveld
- Ear & Hearing Section, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, the Netherlands
| | - Hidde Pielage
- Ear & Hearing Section, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, the Netherlands
| | - Niek J Versfeld
- Ear & Hearing Section, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, the Netherlands
| | - Sophia E Kramer
- Ear & Hearing Section, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|