What Is Clinical Evidence in Speech-Language Pathology? A Scoping Review

Long-Term Voice Change in Presbylarynges Patients With and Without Intervention

PURPOSE

To explore long-term patient experience of treated and untreated presbylarynges patients two or more years after their previous clinic visit by their responses to a probe about the changes in voice (better, stable, or worse) and standardized rating scales either by phone or from clinic records. Congruences of rating differences between visits and probe responses were assessed.

METHODS

Thirty-seven participated prospectively and seven retrospectively. Better, stable, or worse probe responses and treatment follow-through were obtained. Self-rating scales, completed verbally or obtained from charts, were compared to the previous visit so differences between visits could be converted to be congruent with probe responses.

RESULTS

After a mean of 4.6 years, 44% (63% untreated) reported stable, 36% (38% untreated) worse, and 20% (89% untreated) better. Significantly greater proportions of untreated reported better/stable probe responses while treated reported worse (χ2; P = 0.038). Significantly better means for all ratings were found at follow-up for those with better probe responses, but mean ratings were not significantly worse for those with worse probe response. No significant congruences of rating differences between visits and probe responses were found. In untreated reporting stable probe response, a significantly greater proportion of those with previous clinic ratings within normal limits (WNL) maintained ratings WNL at follow-up (z-statistic; P = 0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

Ratings WNL at the initial evaluation, especially voice-related quality of life and effort, were found to still be WNL after several years. Little congruence was found between rating differences and probe responses, especially for worse, suggesting need for developing more sensitive rating scales.