Framing Disparities in Access to Medical Speech-Language Pathology Care in Rural Alabama

PURPOSE

Rural-living residents of Alabama depend on rural hospitals and clinics staffed with physicians and allied health professionals including speech-language pathologists (SLPs). The purpose of the exploratory study was to examine the speech-language pathology workforce in health care facilities in nonmetropolitan Alabama counties to determine potential disparities in access and identify medical SLP deserts for rural Alabamians.

METHOD

The hospitals, rural health clinics, nursing homes, and rehabilitation centers for each of the 37 nonmetropolitan counties were identified through the 2020 Alabama Department of Public Health directories, and phone surveys were completed to determine medical SLP staffing at each facility. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

The initial review yielded 229 rural health care facilities with 223 ultimately included in the analysis and 176 facilities completing a phone inquiry (76.68%). Sixty-one (35.88%) reported employing at least one SLP and no facility stated staffing SLP assistants. Linear regression indicated a positive, yet moderate effect size between the reported number of SLPs staffed within each county and specific population of the county (r ² = .519). Anecdotally, facilities reported difficulty in hiring and retaining SLPs due to rural geographical location.

CONCLUSIONS

The exploratory findings suggest disparities in access to behavioral communication and swallowing care for rural residents in the state. The methodology employed for data collection and analysis may be applied to other states and U.S. territories, in an effort to frame the issue nationally and support rural health care policy across the United States. Further investigation regarding the cost effectiveness of telepractice, the availability of broadband Internet access, the efficacy of community-based service delivery, and the effectiveness of incentivized rural SLP graduate programs is warranted to mitigate the disparities in access.

Interdisciplinary Telemedicine in the Management of Dysphagia in Head and Neck

The study considered the feasibility and impact of interdisciplinary telemedicine discussions in the management of post-treatment dysphagia in patients with head and neck tumors. This is a retrospective analysis of patients with persistent dysphagia after treatment for head and neck pathology, at an institute in India. The cases were discussed in the telemedicine meeting conducted between host institute and a second unit in the United States. A monthly meeting was organized, using an internet-based video conference system. The ongoing swallowing problems and management were presented, and through discussions, a plan for further management was formulated and carried out. The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) was measured before and after the implementation of the plan. Twenty-six patients were discussed, out of which, 22 were head and neck malignancies. The recommendations concurred with that of the host unit in 18, differed for three and additive in five patients. The pre-treatment mean FOIS was 1.46 with a standard deviation of 0.989 and post-treatment mean improved to 3.92 with a standard deviation of 1.809 (p < 0.0001). The present study supports the success of an interdisciplinary telemedicine meeting to manage difficult cases of dysphagia in head and neck. The outcome in terms of the FOIS score improved significantly after implementing them. In addition to the direct patient benefits, the meeting helped to facilitate interdepartmental collaboration between two units treating similar sets of patients across the globe, in specialized clinical areas like dysphagia management.