Risk factors for complications following resection of large gastric cancer

Impact and effect of preoperative short term preoperative pulmonary-related training on gastric cancer patients: a randomized controlled single center trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of pre- and postoperative pulmonary-related training, including respiratory and aerobic training, on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after radical resection of gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 121 participants who received a systematic, comprehensive, high-intensity pulmonary exercise regimen for 5 days preoperatively and at least 5 days postoperatively. The control group received standard preoperative care. We analyzed the occurrence of PPCs in both groups as the primary outcome RESULTS: 43 out of 121 participants (35.5%) were diagnosed with PPCs, and the incidence of PPCs was markedly lower in the training group than in the control group (26.2%, 16/61 vs. 45.0%, 27/60, P= 0.031). Moreover, the duration of the postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the training group (8.69 ± 1.92 days) compared to the control group (9.57 ± 2.16 days, P=0.020) as well as reduced hospitalization costs, amounting to €9605.1 ± 2556.26 in the training group and €10594.6 ± 2560.7 in the control group (P=0.035).

CONCLUSION

Our study established that a perioperative pulmonary-related training notably diminishes the incidence of PPCs, curtails the duration of hospitalization, and mitigates hospitalization expenses for patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2400081853.

A predictive model for intraabdominal infection after radical gastrectomy in elderly patients

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with a relatively high incidence among the elderly population. Surgical resection is the mainstay treatment for GC and is currently the only cure. However, the incidence of postoperative intraabdominal infections remains high and seriously affects the prognosis. This study aimed to explore the risk factors for intraabdominal infections after radical gastrectomy in elderly patients and to establish and validate a risk prediction model. We collected the clinical data of 322 GC patients, who underwent radical gastrectomy at the General Surgery Department of China Medical University Dandong Central Hospital from January 2016 to January 2023. The patients were divided into an infected group (n = 27) and a noninfected group (n = 295) according to whether intraabdominal infections occurred postoperatively. A nomogram risk prediction model for the occurrence of postoperative intraabdominal infections was developed. All patients were randomized into a training set (n = 225) and a validation set (n = 97) in a 7:3 ratio, and the model was internally validated. Of the 322 patients, 27 (8.3%) experienced postoperative intraabdominal infections. Single-factor analysis revealed associations of intraabdominal infection with body mass index, glucose, hemoglobin, albumin, and other factors. The multifactorial analysis confirmed that body mass index, glucose, hemoglobin, albumin, surgical duration, and bleeding volume were independent risk factors for intraabdominal infections. The nomogram constructed based on these factors demonstrated excellent performance in both the training and validation sets. A nomogram model was developed and validated to predict the risk of intraabdominal infection after radical gastrectomy. The model has a good predictive performance, which could help clinicians prevent the occurrence of intraabdominal infections after radical gastrectomy in elderly patients.

Risk Factors for Esophagojejunal Anastomotic Leakage in Gastric Cancer Patients after Total Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Leakage at the esophagojejunal anastomosis site is an important postoperative complication of total gastrectomy. We analyzed our surgical cases to determine the risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage.

METHODS

This study included 309 patients who underwent total gastrectomy and esophagojejunal anastomosis. The onset of esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage according to age, gender, performance status, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, body mass index, presence or absence of diabetes, invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, histological type, presence or absence of esophageal infiltration, operative duration, amount of blood loss, experience of blood transfusion, procedural approach, and the prognostic nutritional index was analyzed.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses revealed a significant difference in the rate of esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage due to advanced age, male gender, the presence of diabetes, the presence of esophageal infiltration, and blood loss ≥1,100 g. In the multivariate analysis, which included factors identified in the univariate analyses, advanced age, male gender, the presence of diabetes, and blood loss ≥1,100 g were identified as independent risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age (≥68 years), male gender, diabetes, and massive blood loss are risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage.

Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review

The aim of this systematic review is to identify patient-related, perioperative and technical risk factors for esophago-jejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL) in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). A comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases was performed. Studies providing factors predictive of EJAL by uni- and multivariate analysis or an estimate of association between EJAL and related risk factors were included. All studies were assessed for methodological quality, and a narrative synthesis of the results was performed. A total of 16 studies were included in the systematic review, with a total of 42,489 patients who underwent gastrectomy with esophago-jejunal anastomosis. Age, BMI, impaired respiratory function, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), alcohol consumption, chronic renal failure, diabetes and mixed-type histology were identified as patient-related risk factors for EJAL at multivariate analysis. Likewise, among operative factors, laparoscopic approach, anastomosis type, additional organ resection, blood loss, intraoperative time and surgeon experience were found to be predictive factors for the development of EJAL. In clinical setting, we are able to identify several risk factors for EJAL. This can improve the recognition of higher-risk patients and their outcomes.

Clinical Application of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Technology in Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy

Background

This study aimed to observe the application and evaluate the feasibility and safety of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence technology in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (LRG).

Methods

Patients who underwent LRG & D2 lymphadenectomy at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were included between January 2018 and August 2019. According to whether endoscopic injection of ICG was performed, patients were assigned to the ICG group (n=107) and the control group (n=88). The clinicopathologic features, retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative recovery, and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.

Results

Baseline characteristics are comparable. The ICG group had a significantly larger number of lymph nodes retrieved (49.55 ± 12.72 vs. 44.44 ± 10.20, P<0.05), shorter total operation time (min) (198.22 ± 13.14 vs. 202.50 ± 9.91, P<0.05), shorter dissection time (min) (90.90 ± 5.34 vs. 93.74 ± 5.35, P<0.05) and less blood loss (ml) (27.51 ± 12.83 vs. 32.02 ± 17.99, P<0.05). The median follow-up time was 29.0 months (range 1.5-43.8 months), and there was no significant difference between the ICG group and the control group in 2-year OS (87.8% vs. 82.9%, P>0.05) or DFS (86.0% vs. 80.7%, P>0.05).

Conclusions

ICG fluorescence technology in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy has advantages in LN dissection, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss. The 2-year OS and 2-year DFS rates between the two groups were comparable. In conclusion, ICG fluorescence technology is feasible and safe.

Changes in hospital variation in the probability of receiving treatment with curative intent for esophageal and gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Previous studies describe a large variation in the proportion of patients undergoing treatment with curative intent for esophageal (EC) and gastric cancer (GC). Since centralization of surgical care was initiated and more awareness regarding hospital practice variation was potentially present, we hypothesized that hospital practice variation for potentially curable EC and GC patients changed over time.

METHODS

Patients with potentially curable EC (n = 10,115) or GC (n = 3988) diagnosed between 2012-2017 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the differences in the probability of treatment with curative intent between hospitals of diagnosis over time, comparing 2012-2014 with 2015-2017. Relative survival (RS) between hospitals with different probabilities of treatment with curative intent were compared.

RESULTS

The range of proportions of patients undergoing treatment with curative intent per hospital of diagnosis for EC was 45-95 % in 2012-2014 and 54-89 % in 2015-2017, and for GC 52-100 % and 45-100 %. The adjusted variation declined for EC with Odds Ratios ranging from 0.50 to 1.72 between centers in the first period to 0.70-1.44 in the second period (p < 0.001) and did not change for GC (Odds Ratios ranging from 0.78 to 1.23 to 0.82-1.23, (p = 1.00)). A higher probability of treatment with curative intent was associated with a better survival for both malignancies.

CONCLUSION

Although substantial variation between hospitals of diagnosis in the probability in receiving treatment with curative intent still exists for both malignancies, it has decreased for EC. A low probability of receiving curative treatment remained associated with worse survival.

Clinicopathological risk factors for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study in China

OBJECTIVE

To examine the potential clinicopathological factors affecting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer after surgical treatment in China.

METHODS

Between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2012, a total of 716 patients aged 22-84 years with gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. Survival analysis techniques including log rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression model were applied to evaluate the prognostic significance of clinicopathological characteristics in terms of survival time.

RESULTS

Of the 24 demographic and pathological variables collected in the data, 16 prognostic factors of gastric cancer were found to have statistically significant influences on survival time from the unadjusted analyses. The adjusted analysis furtherly revealed that age, age square, lymph node metastasis rate group, tumour size group, surgical type II, number of cancer nodules, invasion depth group and the interaction between surgical type II and tumour size group were important prognosis and clinicopathological factors for gastric cancer in Chinese.

CONCLUSION

Our study with relatively large sample size and many potential risk factors enable us to identify independent risk factors associated with the prognosis of gastric cancer. Findings from the current study can be used to assist clinical decision-making, and serve as a benchmark for the planning of future prognosis and therapy for patients with gastric carcinoma.

Risk factors and laboratory markers used to predict leakage in esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy

Objectives

Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakages, which occur in the reconstruction procedures performed after total or proximal gastrectomy, still account for one of the most significant causes of morbidity and mortality in spite of the developments seen in perioperative management and surgical techniques in gastric cancer surgery. The aim of the present study was to ascertain the risk factors for Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakages.

Material and Methods

A total of 80 patients with gastric cancer, who had total gastrectomy +D2 lymph node dissection and Esophagojejunal anastomotic between January 2013 and December 2016, were retrospectively evaluated. Patients who did not have anastomotic leakages during their clinical follow-ups were allocated to Group 1, whereas those who had anastomotic leakages were allocated to Group 2.

Results

A total of 58 (72.5%) out of 80 patients were males, whereas 22 (27.5%) were females. Mean age of the patients was 61.2 ± 11.2 years. There were no demographic differences between the groups. Postoperative recurrent fever (p= 0.001), C-reactive protein values on postoperative days 3 and 5 (p= 0.01), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on postoperative day 5 (p= 0.022) were found to be statistically significant with regard to Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakages and other postoperative complications. The duration of operation (p= 0.032) and combined organ resection (p= 0.008) were ascertained as risk factors for Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakages.

Conclusion

Surgeons should be careful about Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakages which are significant postoperative complications seen especially in cases where the duration of operation is prolonged, and additional organ resections are performed. Recurrent fever, high C-reactive protein levels, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may serve as warnings for complications in postoperative follow-ups.

Infectious Complications after Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery: In Search of Improvable Risk Factors

BACKGROUND

Major resections for esophageal, gastric, hepatic, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer continue to be associated with a high peri-operative morbidity of up to 30%-40%. To a large extent, this morbidity is caused by infectious complications that add up to a considerable burden to patients and hospital costs. The objective of this large retrospective cross-sectional study was to determine independent patient and operation-related risk factors for infectious complications after major abdominal cancer operations to elucidate how infection rates can be reduced and improve health-care quality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 1,389 cancer patients who underwent a major resection procedure between 2009 and 2013, infectious complications and their independent determinants were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Male gender was a risk factor for infections in general, whereas patients ≥65 y (odds ratio [OR] 1.75; p = 0.008), urinary tract infection (OR 0.51; p = 0.004), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (OR 1.55; p = 0.004), overall (OR 1.70; p = 0.037), vascular (OR 1.59; p = 0.020), and neurologic comorbidity (OR 2.22; p = 0.001) were associated significantly with pneumonia. Intra-abdominal drainage (OR 1.41; p = 0.024) and a duration of surgery of ≥180 min (OR 1.85; p = 0.001) were risk factors for surgical site infections. Total parenteral nutrition was significantly associated with intravascular catheter-induced infections (OR 18.09; p < 0.001) and sepsis (OR 6.69; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, several independent risk factors for infectious complications in major abdominal cancer operations were identified, providing opportunities for further reducing peri-operative infections. General awareness and focus on preventing infectious complications may have a significant impact on health-care outcomes and costs.

Hospital of diagnosis and probability of having surgical treatment for resectable gastric cancer

Background

Gastric cancer surgery is increasingly being centralized in the Netherlands, whereas the diagnosis is often made in hospitals where gastric cancer surgery is not performed. The aim of this study was to assess whether hospital of diagnosis affects the probability of undergoing surgery and its impact on overall survival.

Methods

All patients with potentially curable gastric cancer according to stage (cT1/1b–4a, cN0–2, cM0) diagnosed between 2005 and 2013 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Multilevel logistic regression was used to examine the probability of undergoing surgery according to hospital of diagnosis. The effect of variation in probability of undergoing surgery among hospitals of diagnosis on overall survival during the intervals 2005–2009 and 2010–2013 was examined by using Cox regression analysis.

Results

A total of 5620 patients with potentially curable gastric cancer, diagnosed in 91 hospitals, were included. The proportion of patients who underwent surgery ranged from 53·1 to 83·9 per cent according to hospital of diagnosis (P &lt; 0·001); after multivariable adjustment for patient and tumour characteristics it ranged from 57·0 to 78·2 per cent (P &lt; 0·001). Multivariable Cox regression showed that patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 in hospitals with a low probability of patients undergoing curative treatment had worse overall survival (hazard ratio 1·21; P &lt; 0·001).

Conclusion

The large variation in probability of receiving surgery for gastric cancer between hospitals of diagnosis and its impact on overall survival indicates that gastric cancer decision-making is suboptimal.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

To date, it has been unclear whether laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LTG) was a suitable treatment for elderly patients (aged 65 years and older) with gastric cancer. The aim of the present study was to clarify the value of LTG in the elderly using a propensity score matching method.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data from 675 elderly gastric cancer patients who underwent total gastrectomies at our institution between January 2002 and February 2012. Propensity score matching was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to compare the LTG and open total gastrectomy (OTG) groups. The operation results, hospital courses, and survival rates were compared between the matched groups.

RESULTS

The LTG group had a significantly shorter mean operating time (194 vs. 267 min, P < 0.001) and significantly less intraoperative blood loss (92 vs. 204 ml, P < 0.001). The total number of collected lymph nodes was similar in the two groups. Postoperatively, the length of hospital stay was shorter in the LTG group than in the OTG group (median 14.4 vs. 16.6 days; P = 0.001); however, no significant intergroup differences were found in morbidity or mortality. Furthermore, the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was similar between the two groups (P = 0.517).

CONCLUSIONS

LTG for elderly gastric cancer is feasible and safe with acceptable oncologic outcomes. Therefore, patient age alone should not be considered a contraindication in the decision between LTG and OTG treatment options. A high-volume prospective study is needed to confirm this rationale.

Postoperative complications in elderly patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients undergoing gastrectomy are expected to be at high risk of postoperative complications. This retrospective multicenter cohort study assessed complications and long-term outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

A total of 993 patients with GC who had undergone gastrectomy were included, comprising 186 elderly patients (age ≥ 80 y, E group) and 807 nonelderly patients (age ≤ 79 y, NE group). Preoperative comorbidities, operative results, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Clavien-Dindo grade ≥1 postoperative complications, pneumonia (P = 0.02), delirium (P < 0.001), and urinary tract infection (P < 0.001) were more common in the E group. Postoperative pneumonia was associated with mortality in this group (P < 0.001). Three patients (1.6%) died after surgery, each of whom had pneumonia. Severe postoperative complication was independently prognostic of overall (hazard ratio, 4.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.40-9.14; P < 0.001) and disease-specific (hazard ratio, 6.41; 95% confidence interval 2.92-14.1; P < 0.001) survival in the E group.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients with GC, clinical outcomes are strongly associated with severe postoperative complications. Preventing such complications may improve survival.

Numerical and experimental analysis of factors leading to suture dehiscence after Billroth II gastric resection

The main goal of this study was to numerically quantify risk of duodenal stump blowout after Billroth II (BII) gastric resection. Our hypothesis was that the geometry of the reconstructed tract after BII resection is one of the key factors that can lead to duodenal dehiscence. We used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with finite element (FE) simulations of various models of BII reconstructed gastrointestinal (GI) tract, as well as non-perfused, ex vivo, porcine experimental models. As main geometrical parameters for FE postoperative models we have used duodenal stump length and inclination between gastric remnant and duodenal stump. Virtual gastric resection was performed on each of 3D FE models based on multislice Computer Tomography (CT) DICOM. According to our computer simulation the difference between maximal duodenal stump pressures for models with most and least preferable geometry of reconstructed GI tract is about 30%. We compared the resulting postoperative duodenal pressure from computer simulations with duodenal stump dehiscence pressure from the experiment. Pressure at duodenal stump after BII resection obtained by computer simulation is 4-5 times lower than the dehiscence pressure according to our experiment on isolated bowel segment. Our conclusion is that if the surgery is performed technically correct, geometry variations of the reconstructed GI tract by themselves are not sufficient to cause duodenal stump blowout. Pressure that develops in the duodenal stump after BII resection using omega loop, only in the conjunction with other risk factors can cause duodenal dehiscence. Increased duodenal pressure after BII resection is risk factor. Hence we recommend the routine use of Roux en Y anastomosis as a safer solution in terms of resulting intraluminal pressure. However, if the surgeon decides to perform BII reconstruction, results obtained with this methodology can be valuable.

Risk factor evaluation for postoperative complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery by a classic severity grading system

Using the uniform complication grading system to evaluate postoperative complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery is the purpose of the present study. Surgical complications were defined as grades I, II, III, IV, and V recommended by Dindo et al. Patients were categorized into three pairs: complication group (CG) and non-complication group (NCG), minor complication group (MiCG, grades I-II) and non-minor complication group (NMiCG), and major complication group (MaCG, grades III-V) and non-major complication group (NMaCG); of the 570 patients, 431 patients were discharged with no complications, and 174 complications occurred in 119 patients. The percent of grades I, II, III, IV, and V complications were 4.7, 20, 4.7, 0.7, and 0.4 %, respectively. Complications were significantly associated with male gender, larger tumor volume, and more estimated blood loss (EBL). The multivariate analysis revealed that male and EBL ≥150 ml were found to be independent predictors of postoperative complications. In subgroup analysis, patients with larger tumor volume were at significantly higher risk of postoperative major complications, and male gender and EBL ≥150 ml remained independent predictors of developing minor postoperative complications. Patients with postoperative complications would significantly experience longer hospital stay, later fluid intake, and delayed urinary catheter removal. Male, larger tumor volume, and more EBL were significant risk factors for laparoscopic colorectomy.

Identification of risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after gastric surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite the development of the surgical technique and improvements in perioperative management, anastomotic leakage still occurs at esophagojejunal anastomoses after total or proximal gastrectomy. Anastomotic leakage is one of the major complications of concern, chiefly because it can lead to death. The objective of the present study was to identify the risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage.

METHODS

The study was based on retrospective analysis of the data of a total of 1,640 consecutive patients who underwent total, proximal, or completion gastrectomy, including esophagojejunal anastomosis, between 1999 and 2008.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (2.1 %) developed anastomotic leakage. Univariate analysis revealed patient age, pulmonary insufficiency, lymph node dissection, combined resection of other organs, omental resection, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, and postoperative creatinine level were the significant factors influencing anastomotic leakage. Multivariate analysis identified pulmonary insufficiency and the duration of the operation as the predictors of anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid leakage, surgeons should take care in creating the anastomosis in gastrectomy patients, particularly in cases of poor pulmonary function or when the procedure requires a longer operation.

Tumor size as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer patient

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic significance of tumor size for 5-year survival rate in patients with gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1,697 patients with gastric cancer, who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy, were evaluated. Patients were divided into 4 groups as follows, according to the median size of early and advanced gastric cancer, respectively: small early gastric cancer (tumor size ≤3 cm), large early gastric cancer (tumor size >3 cm), small advanced gastric cancer (tumor size ≤6 cm), and large advanced gastric cancer (tumor size >6 cm). The prognostic value of tumor size for 5-year survival rate was investigated.

RESULTS

In a univariate analysis, tumor size is a significant prognostic factor in advanced gastric cancer, but not in early gastric cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size is an independent prognostic factor for 5-year survival rate in advanced gastric cancer (P=0.003, hazard ratio=1.372, 95% confidence interval=1.115~1.690). When advanced gastric cancer is subdivided into 2 groups, according to serosa invasion: Group 1; serosa negative (T2 and T3, 7th AJCC), and Group 2; serosa positive (T4a and T4b, 7th AJCC), tumor size is an independent prognostic factor in Group 1 (P=0.011, hazard ratio=1.810, 95% confidence interval=1.149~2.852) and in Group 2 (P=0.033, hazard ratio=1.288, 95% confidence interval=1.020~1.627), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size is an independent prognostic factor in advanced gastric cancer irrespective of the serosa invasion, but not in early gastric cancer.

Significance of palliative gastrectomy for late-stage gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the significance of palliative gastrectomy for different types of metastatic gastric cancer patients displaying peritoneal dissemination, hepatic metastasis, distant lymph node metastasis occurring locally during late-stage disease, and multi-organ metastases.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 862 patients who were histologically diagnosed as late-stage gastric cancer who could not undergo radical surgery at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 1993 and December 2008. The follow-up lasted until December 2010. Chi-square tests and Kaplan-Meier methods were employed to compare the adverse events and prognoses.

RESULTS

In the peritoneal dissemination and multi-organ metastases groups, palliative gastrectomy has no survival benefit (P = 0.705, 0.331, respectively). In the patients with distant lymph-node metastases, liver metastasis and locally late-stage gastric cancer patients, palliative gastrectomy was a prognostic factor (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.010, respectively). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that palliative gastrectomy was an independent prognostic factor for distant lymph-node metastases, liver metastasis, and local late-stage gastric cancer patients. Palliative gastrectomy combined with hepatectomy proved to be an independent prognostic factor to improve the overall survival of patients with liver metastases who underwent palliative gastrectomy (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

For late-stage gastric cancer patients, palliative gastrectomy should be considered for locally late-stage, distant lymph node metastasis, and resectable liver metastasis patients. Especially among patients with liver metastasis, transfer medicine is essential for potentially curable patients to obtain access to radical surgery to improve the prognosis.

Epidemiology, surgical management and early postoperative outcome in a cohort of gastric cancer patients of a tertiary referral center in relation to multi-center quality assurance studies

The aim of the study was to analyze epidemiologic parameters, treatment-related data and prognostic factors in the management of gastric cancer patients of a university surgical center under conditions of routine clinical care before the onset of the era of multimodal therapies. By analyzing our data in relation with multi-center quality assurance trials [German Gastric Cancer Study - GGCS (1992) and East German Gastric Cancer Study - EGGCS (2004)] we aimed at providing an instrument of internal quality control at our institution as well as a base for comparison with future analyses taking into account the implementation of evolving (multimodal) therapies and their influence on treatment results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data of gastric cancer patients treated at a single institution during a defined 10-year time period with multivariate analysis of risk factors for early postoperative outcome.

RESULTS

From 04/01/1993 through 03/31/2003, a total of 328 gastric cancer patients were treated. In comparison with the EGGCS cohort there was a larger proportion of patients with locally advanced and proximally located tumors. 272 patients (82.9%) underwent surgery with curative intent; in 88.4% of these an R0 resection was achieved (EGGCS/GGCS: 82.5%/71.5%). 68.2% of patients underwent preoperative endoluminal ultrasound (EUS) (EGGCS: 27.4%); the proportion of patients undergoing EUS increased over the study period. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS for T stage was 50.6% (EGGCS: 42.6%). 77.2% of operated patients with curative intent underwent gastrectomy (EGGCS/GGCS: 79.8%/71.1%). Anastomotic leaks at the esophagojejunostomy occurred slightly more frequently (8.8%) than in the EGGCS (5.9%) and GGCS (7.2%); however, postoperative morbidity (36.1%) and early postoperative mortality (5.3%) were not increased compared to the multi-center quality assurance study results (EGGCS morbidity, 45%); EGGCS/GGCS mortality, 8%/8.9%). D2 lymphadenectomy was performed in 72.6% of cases (EGGCS: 70.9%). Multivariate analysis revealed splenectomy as an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity and ASA status 3 or 4 as an independent risk factor for early postoperative mortality. The rate of splenectomies performed during gastric cancer surgery decreased substantially during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative diagnostics were able to accurately predict resectability in almost 90% of patients which is substantially more than the corresponding results of both the EGGCS and the GGCS. In the future, more wide-spread use of EUS will play an increasing role as stage-dependent differentiation of therapeutic concepts gains acceptance. However, diagnostic accuracy of EUS needs to be improved. Our early postoperative outcome data demonstrate that the quality standard of gastric cancer care established by the EGGCS is being fulfilled at our institution in spite of distinct characteristics placing our patients at higher surgical risk. Besides being a valuable instrument of internal quality control, our study provides a good base for comparison with ongoing analyses on future developments in gastric cancer therapy.

Gastric tube reconstruction reduces postoperative gastroesophageal reflux in adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND

The anastomosis of gastric remnant to esophagus after proximal gastrectomy is the traditional surgical treatment procedure for patients with types II and III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. However, the postoperative complications such as gastroesophageal reflux are frequent.

AIMS

To assess the outcome of the intraperitoneal anastomosis of the reconstructed gastric tube to esophagus after proximal gastrectomy for types II and III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.

METHODS

Seventy-six consecutive patients with preoperative diagnosis of type II or type III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction were recruited. Forty-one patients had the traditional anastomosis of gastric remnant to esophagus and 35 patients underwent an anastomosis of esophagus to a gastric tube that was constructed from the gastric remnant after proximal gastrectomy.

RESULTS

Twenty-three (56.1%) versus 12 (28.6%) patients (p = 0.016) complained various discomforts and/or were diagnosed with complications in the traditional group and gastric tube group, respectively, although there were no significant differences between the two groups in demographic data and pathological characteristics. Fourteen (34.1%) versus five (14.3%) patients (p = 0.046) complained of heartburn or acid regurgitation and nine (22.0%) versus two (5.7%) patients (p = 0.045) were confirmed reflux esophagitis in the traditional group and the gastric tube group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The intraperitoneal anastomosis of the reconstructed gastric tube to esophagus demonstrates less complaints of gastroesophageal reflux and reflux esophagitis than the traditional anastomosis of gastric remnant to esophagus in the surgical treatment of types II and III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction in 1-year follow-up.

Non-curative gastrectomy for metastatic gastric cancer: rationale and long-term outcome in multicenter settings

BACKGROUND

Metastatic gastric cancer remains a significant problem as the majority of Western patients are diagnosed with disseminated disease and no routine therapeutic regimen is accepted in such cases.

METHODS

A cohort of 3141 patients with gastric cancer operated between 1990 and 2005 was evaluated using a multicenter data set held by the Polish Gastric Cancer Study Group to determine potential risks and benefits of non-curative gastrectomy for metastatic disease. Additionally, parameters of Quality of Life (QoL) were evaluated prospectively in 140 patients undergoing gastrectomy using the QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Gastrectomy was carried out in 2258 patients. Distant organ metastases were diagnosed in 951 patients, 415 of which underwent non-curative gastrectomy. The overall mortality rates were significantly higher in patients undergoing non-resectional surgery (10%) than either curative (3%, P < 0.001) or non-curative (4%, P = 0.002) gastrectomy. The overall median survival in patients with metastatic disease was significantly higher for non-curative gastrectomy (10.6 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.3-11.9) than for non-resective operations (4.4 months, 95% CI 4.0 to 4.8, P < 0.001). The hazard ratio of death in patients subject to non-resectional surgery compared to those treated by gastrectomy was 2.923 (95% CI 2.473 to 3.454, P < 0.001). A gradual impairment in QoL parameters was found over 12 months after non-curative resections but changes did not reach statistical significance and individual parameters were similar to gastrectomy without distant metastases.

CONCLUSION

Non-curative gastrectomy for metastatic gastric cancer is associated with significantly better survival compared to non-resective surgery and does not impair quality of life.

The impact of old age on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer

Backgrounds/Aims

To compare surgical results and survival of two groups of patients, age ≥70 vs. age <70, who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and to identify the safety of this procedure for elderly patients for the treatment of distal common bile duct (CBD) cancer.

Methods

Between January 2003 and December 2009, 55 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of distal CBD cancer at Keimyung University Dong San Medical Center were enrolled in our study.

Results

Of 55 patients, 28 were male and 27 female. Nineteen were over 70 years old (older group) and 36 were below 70 years (younger group). The mean ages of the two groups of patients were 73.5 years and 60.5 years respectively. Although patients of the older group had significantly more comorbid diseases, perioperative results including operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, duration of postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complications were not significantly different. A higher level (more than 5 mg/dl) of preoperative initial bilirubin showed significant correlations with operative morbidity by univariate analysis, and age was not an independent risk factor of operative morbidity. Overall 5 year survival of older and younger groups were 45.9% and 39.5% respectively (p=0.671) and disease-free 5-year survival were 31.7% and 31.1%, respectively (p=0.942).

Conclusions

Surgical outcomes of elderly patients were similar to those of younger patients, despite a higher incidence of comorbid disease. This results shows that pancreaticoduodenectomy can be applied safely to elderly patients.

Long-term survival of resected advanced gastric cancer with hepatic and pancreatic invasion

A 64-year-old man was transferred to our division with a suspicion of gastric cancer. Computed tomography showed widespread irregular thickening of the stomach walls close to the liver and pancreas. Gastrointestinal fiberscopy showed a type 5 tumor in the upper to lower stomach, histologically diagnosed as tubular adenocarcinoma. Gastric cancer with hepatic and pancreatic invasion was diagnosed. Distant metastasis was not proven and complete resection was planned. At laparotomy, the tumor showed general expanding growth and invasion through the lateral segment of the liver and pancreas. Total gastrectomy and combined resection of the distal pancreas, spleen and left segment of the liver were performed. Hepatic and pancreatic invasion and lymph node metastasis were microscopically proven. Pancreatic fistula occurred postoperatively. On postoperative days 40, he was discharged. He received two cycles of adjuvant tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil chemotherapy. He has had no sign of recurrence for 7 years and 8 months.

Changes in the surgical approach to hilar cholangiocarcinoma during an 18-year period in a Western single center

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is the only potential curative treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. In this article, we evaluate mortality, survival, prognostic factors, and changes in surgical approach during the last two decades at a Western hepato-biliary center.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients undergoing liver resections constitute the study population. Patients undergoing palliative procedures were considered as a control group for comparison to the resected group. After 1997, a more aggressive surgical approach was applied that is based on the experience of Japanese surgeons.

RESULTS

Curative resections were achieved in 37 (72.5%) patients, and R1 resections were performed in 14 (27.5%). The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 47.3 and 34.1%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year survival rates were 38 and 19% in the R1 resection group, and 15% and 0 in the non-resected group, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that lymph node and perineural invasion, R1 resection, and a bilirubin level >10 mg/dl affected long-term survival. Multivariate analysis showed that only perineural invasion was significant in affecting long-term survival. Univariate analysis showed that the mean preoperative bilirubin levels and mean blood transfusion were related to the mortality rate. The resectability rate significantly increased from 25 to 75.6% after 1997 following implementation of the new surgical approach.

CONCLUSIONS

An aggressive surgical approach increases the resectability rate and may improve long-term survival even after R1 resection. Severe hyperbilirubinemia should be preoperatively drained, possibly by the percutaneous approach.

Gastric cancer surgery: Billroth I or Billroth II for distal gastrectomy?

Background

The selection of an anastomosis method after a distal gastrectomy is a highly debatable topic; however, the available documentation lacks the necessary research based on a comparison of early postoperative complications. This study was conducted to investigate the difference of early postoperative complications between Billroth I and Billroth II types of anastomosis for distal gastrectomies.

Methods

A total of 809 patients who underwent distal gastrectomies for gastric cancer during four years were included in the study. The only study endpoint was analysis of in-patients' postoperative complications. The risk adjusted complication rate was compared by POSSUM (Physiological and operative severity score for enumeration of morbidity and mortality) and the severity of complications was compared by Rui Jin Hospital classification of complication.

Results

Complication rate of Billroth II type of anastomosis was almost double of that in Billroth I (P = 0.000). Similarly, the risk adjusted complication rate was also higher in Billroth II group. More severe complications were observed and the postoperative duration was significantly longer in Billroth II type (P = 0.000). Overall expenditure was significantly higher in Billroth II type (P = 0.000).

Conclusion

Billroth II method of anastomosis was associated with higher rate of early postoperative complications. Therefore, we conclude that the Billroth I method should be the first choice after a distal gastrectomy as long as the anatomic and oncological environment of an individual patient allows us to perform it. However more prospective studies should be designed to compare the overall surgical outcomes of both anastomosis methods.

Post-operative complications of gastric cancer surgery: female gender at high risk

We applied physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of morbidity and mortality (POSSUM) to evaluate overall surgical outcome and investigated the role of gender for early post-operative complications in gastric cancer surgery. The data from a total of 357 patients of gastric cancer were analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Post-operative complications were recorded according to definition of POSSUM. Post-operative complications of male and female patients were compared separately. The observed to estimated morbidity ratio (O:E) was 1.01. Among the pre-operative variables, patient gender was one of the independent risk factors for a higher rate of post-operative complications (risk ratio 1.777, P = 0.024). Post-operative complication was significantly higher in female patients. Similarly, post-operative length of stay was significantly longer and more severe complications were observed in female patients (P = 0.03). In conclusion, POSSUM system is a valid algorithm for risk-adjusted surgical audit. We conclude that a patient's gender influences the early post-operative complications after gastric cancer surgery. A detailed understanding on disparity of early post-operative complications between men and women may provide valuable information to improve surgical outcome of gastric cancer. However, results of this study need further confirmation by a prospective study involving a larger cohort.

Risk factors of survival and surgical treatment for advanced gastric cancer with large tumor size

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical significance of tumor size in advanced gastric cancer and to evaluate the risk factors of survival in advanced gastric cancer with large tumor size.

METHODS

The cut-off point for tumor size, 90th percentile value of tumor size in advanced gastric cancer, was determined to be 10 cm. We retrospectively studied the clinicopathological features and prognosis of 406 patients with advanced gastric tumors measuring 10 cm or more.

RESULTS

Large tumors had a propensity for the following: Borrmann type IV, adjacent organ invasion, lymph node and distant metastasis, and stage IV classification. Tumor size was an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis and survival in advanced gastric cancer. In patients with large advanced gastric cancer, Borrmann type IV, adjacent organ invasion, and N2-3 nodal involvement were independent factors associated with a poorer prognosis. The 5-year survival rate in large gastric cancer patients without any risk factors (65.5%) was similar with those in small gastric cancer patients (59.3%, P = 0.123).

CONCLUSION

Tumor size was a simple predictor for lymph node metastasis and survival in advanced gastric cancer. Radical surgery should be recommended for large advanced gastric cancer patients without risk factors, while large gastric cancer with risk factors may not be a surgically treatable disease.

Computer simulation of flow and mixing at the duodenal stump after gastric resection

AIM: To investigate the flow and mixing at the duodenal stump after gastric resection, a computer simulation was implemented.

METHODS: Using the finite element method, two different Billroth II procedure cases (A and B) were modeled. Case A was defined with a shorter and almost straight duodenal section, while case B has a much longer and curved duodenal section. Velocity, pressure and food concentration distribution were determined and the numerical results were compared with experimental observations.

RESULTS: The pressure distribution obtained by numerical simulation was in the range of the recorded experimental results. Case A had a more favorable pressure distribution in comparison with case B. However, case B had better performance in terms of food transport because of more continual food distribution, as well as better emptying of the duodenal section.

CONCLUSION: This study offers insight into the transport process within the duodenal stump section after surgical intervention, which can be useful for future patient-specific predictions of a surgical outcome.

Omentum-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The omentum has variable functions in surgical procedures. Nevertheless, there is very little information about the effect of omentum on abdominal complications after gastrectomy. The purpose of the present study was to determine the outcome of omentum-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

METHODS

We evaluated 1,116 patients who had a gastrectomy for early gastric cancer between the years 2004 and 2006; 992 patients underwent conventional gastrectomy (CG), and 124 patients had an omentum-preserving gastrectomy (OPG). These cases were analyzed retrospectively. The early and late abdominal complications were compared between the CG and OPG groups.

RESULTS

The results of the study show no significant differences between the early abdominal complications in the CG and OPG groups. However, the late abdominal complication rate in the OPG was significantly lower than the CG (p = 0.026). The most common risk factor associated with early abdominal complications was type of operation. The combination of CG and early abdominal complication represented a statistically significant risk for late abdominal complications (p = 0.026, 0.031 respectively).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study demonstrate that the omentum-preserving gastrectomy in the treatment of early gastric cancer showed a lower rate of abdominal complications compared to the conventional gastrectomy.

Risk factors and management of intra-abdominal infection after extended radical gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

This study elucidated risk factors and management for intra-abdominal infection after extended radical gastrectomy.

METHODS

From 1988 to 2004, 2,076 patients with gastric cancer underwent extended radical gastrectomy at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Risk factors for intra-abdominal infection were determined by analyzing clinicopathological factors, operative procedure, combined organ resection, operative time, blood loss, and associated disease(s). Management modalities were summarized.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate was 18.7%. Eighty (3.9%) patients were found to have intra-abdominal infections. Age, prolonged operation time, and combined organ resection were the precipitating factors. These patients were categorized into 3 groups: intra-abdominal abscess with adequate drainage, intra-abdominal abscess without anastomotic leakage, and intra-abdominal abscess because of leakage. Adequate drainage was the primary treatment. Mortality rate was 22.5% (18), and the most common cause of mortality was intra-abdominal abscess caused by leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

Although expert surgical skills can minimize the incidence of intra-abdominal infection, management also requires experience and training.

Role of gastric bypass in patients with unresectable advanced carcinoma of stomach

CONTEXT

Role of bypass as a palliative surgery for advanced gastric cancer remains controversial.

AIMS

To determine the role of bypass in advanced gastric cancer in comparision to resection as gold standard.

DESIGN

Hospital-based retrospective outcome as study.

METHODS

Patients were divided into three groups: group I (gastric resection), group II (bypass) and group III (exploratory laparotomy alone). The three groups were analysed for palliation of symptoms, operative morbidity and mortality and survival.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Chi-square, Fischer, One-way Anova, Unpaired-t, Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

In-hospital morbidity was 19.38% (19 patients) for the entire study group. Bypass group had a lower morbidity rate as compared to the resection group (p=0.029). In-hospital mortality rate was 6.12% (6 patients) for the entire study group. Mortality rates did not differ between the groups. Patient satisfaction with palliation of symptoms was similar between gastric bypass and resection. Gastric resection group had significantly better survival (p=0.002) compared to the nonresective procedures. However, gastric bypass did not confer any survival benefit over exploratory laparotomy (p=0.501).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric bypass can be done when resection is not possible as it palliates symptoms on par with resection and is associated with low operative morbidity though it does not improve the survival outlook of patients.

Blood transfusion requirement for gastric cancer surgery: reasonable preparation for transfusion in the comprehensive health insurance system

We investigated the necessity of preparation for blood transfusion in gastric cancer surgery to save costs for blood typing, antibody screening, cross-matching, and disposal of the blood product. The subjects of the study were 52 patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery at our department between 2000 and 2004. The requirement for blood transfusion during surgery was investigated in terms of patient characteristics, hemoglobin before surgery, and performance status as well as treatment regimen. Furthermore, economic effects were investigated when typing and screening (T&S) were performed instead of typing and cross-matching (T&X). Of 9 patients who received blood transfusion, 8 had gastric cancer of stage IIIB or higher, or underwent combined resection. Blood transfusion was not used in surgery for patients with early gastric cancer. The volumes of blood prepared, lost, and disposed of in 28 patients who underwent T&X were 831.3+/-249.4, 219.3+/-228.5 and 600+/-333.1 ml, respectively, whereas the blood loss in 24 patients who underwent T&S was 161.1+/-95.6 ml; this difference had a major economic effect. The practice of T&S for patients undergoing gastric surgery in the absence of combined resection for early gastric cancer seems to be a safe and cost-effective practice that abrogates disposal of blood in hospital management.

Effect of surgical work volume on postoperative complication: superiority of specialized center in gastric cancer treatment

PURPOSE

We investigated the risk factors for early postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data from a total of 273 patients with gastric cancer were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. We applied physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of morbidity and mortality (POSSUM) to compare risk-adjusted surgical outcomes among different surgical units.

RESULTS

Among the preoperative variables, patient gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, surgical unit, and intraoperative blood loss were independent risk factors for a higher rate of postoperative complications. There were significant differences in complication rates among different surgical units (P = 0.001). The observed-to-expected morbidity ratio (O-to-E ratio) ranged from 0.81 to 1.63. Units with low surgical work volume had higher complication rates. Postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter (P = 0.000) and the rate of moderate and severe complications was significantly lower (P = 0.001) in specialized unit.

CONCLUSIONS

POSSUM is a valid system for risk-adjusted evaluation of surgical outcomes. We conclude that surgical experience and work volume greatly influence the outcome, with overall surgical outcome in specialized centers superior to that in other units. Hence, gastric cancer surgery should be performed in specialized centers. Risk factors identified in this study need further confirmation by a prospective study involving a larger cohort.

Role of gastric bypass in patients with unresectable advanced carcinoma of stomach

CONTEXT

Role of bypass as a palliative surgery for advanced gastric cancer remains controversial.

AIMS

To determine the role of bypass in advanced gastric cancer in comparision to resection as gold standard.

DESIGN

Hospital based retrospective outcome study

METHODS

Patients were divided into three groups: group I (gastric resection), group II (bypass) and group III (exploratory laparotomy alone). The three groups were analysed for palliation of symptoms, operative morbidity & mortality and survival.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Chi-square, Fischer, One-way Anova, Unpaired-t, Kaplan-Meier analysis

RESULTS

In-hospital morbidity was 19.38% (19 patients) for the entire study group. Bypass group had a lower morbidity rate as compared to the resection group (p=0.029). Inhospital mortality rate was 6.12% (6 patients) for the entire study group. Mortality rates did not differ between the groups. Patient satisfaction with palliation of symptoms was similar between gastric bypass and resection. Gastric resection group had significantly better survival (p=0.002) compared to the non resective procedures. However, gastric bypass did not confer any survival benefit over exploratory laparotomy. (p=0.501)kw]Conclusions Gastric bypass can be done when resection is not possible as it palliates symptoms on par with resection and is associated with low operative morbidity though it does not improve the survival outlook of patients.

Multivariate prognostic study on large gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although many authors investigate the prognostic factors of gastric cancer, there are few comprehensive studies on the prognosis of patients with large gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic factors of large gastric cancer using multivariate analysis.

METHODS

The study included 95 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer measuring 10 cm or more in diameter. We examined 24 clinicopathologic factors based on patient, operation, and tumor findings. Survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier and Mantel-Cox method, and multivariate analysis was done using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Overall 5-year survival rate was 22%, and median survival period was 15 months. The 5-year survival rate was influenced by the tumor size, gross type, serosal invasion, extragastric lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, peritoneal dissemination, stage of disease (I, II vs. III, IV), resection margin, and operative curability (R0 vs. R1, R2). Of these, independent prognostic factors were three tumor findings: serosal invasion (absent vs. present, odds ratio 3.06, P < 0.01), extragastric lymph node metastasis (absent vs. present, odds ratio 2.13, P < 0.05), and liver metastasis (absent vs. present, odds ratio 3.77, P < 0.05). The survival was not significantly associated with any of the patient factors or operation factors including the extent of lymph node dissection.

CONCLUSION

In patients with large gastric cancer, independent prognostic factors were serosal invasion, extragastric lymph node metastasis, and liver metastasis. Prognosis after gastectomy was determined by these tumor factors and was not associated with the patient or operation factors.

Risk factors for mortality and postoperative complications after gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Predictors of a poor surgical outcome are numerous, of which some are well-defined. We aimed to assess risk factors predictive of poor surgical outcome across different gastrointestinal operations related to the patient, the disease, the treatment, and the organization of care.

METHODS

Data from 5,255 unselected patients undergoing open gastrointestinal surgery from 1995 through 1998 was prospectively recorded in a clinical database and validated. The database embraced variables related to patient history, preoperative clinical condition, operative findings and complexity, and the surgeon's training. Variables predictive of mortality and complications occurring within 30 days after surgery were assessed by multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

After elective operation, the 30-day mortality was 2.8% and major complications occurred in 11.5% of the patients. The corresponding figures in emergency surgery were 13.8% and 30.1%. Independent of elective or emergency surgery, dependent functional status, and type of operation were associated with postoperative mortality. Comorbidity, type of operation, blood loss, and reoperation were predictors of complications regardless of elective or emergency operation. In elective surgery, predictors of poor surgical outcome were high age, comorbidity, malignancy, and the surgeons training, whereas abnormal vital signs values and peritonitis were predictors of poor outcome after emergency surgery.

CONCLUSION

Premorbid factors, characteristics of the disease, the patients' preoperative condition, operative factors, and the surgeon's training are all associated with surgical outcome across different gastrointestinal operations and should be assessed when auditing surgical outcome.

Improved operative and survival outcomes of surgical treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to assess whether an aggressive surgical approach in the management of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma was associated with improved operative and survival outcomes.

METHODS

Eighty-two patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma treated between 1989 and 1998 (period 1), and 60 patients treated between 1999 and 2004 (period 2), were evaluated. Modifications to management in period 2 primarily included percutaneous biliary drainage instead of endoscopic drainage for relief of obstructive jaundice, preoperative right portal vein embolization before right-sided hepatectomy, routine total caudate lobectomy and radical lymphadenectomy during surgical resection of the tumour.

RESULTS

The surgical resection rate was significantly higher in period 2 than in period 1 (45 versus 16 per cent; P < 0.001). All patients in period 2 underwent major hepatectomy with concomitant caudate lobectomy. The operative morbidity and hospital mortality rates decreased significantly in period 2 compared with period 1, with significantly better survival outcomes. In multivariate analysis, resection of the tumour in period 2 and operative blood loss of 1.5 litres or less were the significant independent factors associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSION

An aggressive surgical approach was associated with improved operative and survival outcomes for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Standard D2 versus extended D2 (D2+) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: an interim safety analysis of a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial

BACKGROUND

A multicenter, randomized, clinical trial was initiated to evaluate the possible benefits of extended D2 (D2+) lymphadenectomy after potentially curative resection of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Standard D2 lymphadenectomy was defined according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association classification. D2+ lymph node dissection additionally included the removal of para-aortic nodes.

RESULTS

Of 781 patients screened, 275 were randomized to standard D2 (n = 141) or extended D2+ (n = 134) lymphadenectomy. The overall morbidity rates were comparable in D2 (27.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20.3-35.1) and D2+ (21.6%; 95% CI, 13.7-29.5) groups (P = .248). Pre-existing cardiac disease, splenectomy, and excessive blood loss were identified as risk factors for overall and nonsurgical complications. Postoperative mortality rates were 4.9% (95% CI, 1.4-8.5) and 2.2% (95% CI, 0-4.7), respectively (P = .376).

CONCLUSIONS

The interim safety analysis failed to show any significant difference with regard to the extent of lymph node dissection. The surgical outcome was not different between the 2 surgeries.

The efficacy of gastrectomy for large gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Large gastric cancer (LGC) is frequently associated with extended disease, and the role of surgical resection has been debated. We investigated the efficacy of surgical treatment for LGC.

METHODS

The size of LGC was defined as 8 cm or greater. Four hundred and fifteen patients with LGC who underwent gastrectomy were included. The clinicopathological features, the status of the residual tumor, the incidence and patterns of relapse, and the survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Macroscopically, diffuse-type tumors were dominant (60%). The numbers of patients with tumors of T3 or greater, lymph node involvement, and peritoneal metastases were 356 (86%), 359 (87%), and 126 (30%), respectively. One hundred and eighty-eight patients (45%) underwent incomplete tumor resection (R2). The R2/R0 (no residual tumor) ratio was greater than 1 in patients with type 4 tumors and N1 or greater metastasis and in those with type 3 tumors and N2 or greater metastasis. In contrast, T2, type 2, and type 5 tumors were more likely to be completely resected. The 5-year survival for all 415 patients was 26%. The survival rates were inversely related to the tumor type, size, and lymph node metastasis. In the 216 patients with R0, the 5-year survivals of those with pN (International Union Against Cancer [UICC] classification) 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 66%, 56%, 36%, and 5%, respectively (P = 0.001). In 96 of these 216 patients (44%) the tumor recurred, and peritoneal metastasis was the most frequent mode of recurrence (48%). By Cox's proportional hazard model, the tumor size was an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

The chance of achieving R0 resection for LGC is low, except for T2, type 2, or type 5 tumors. Primary resection should be avoided for other types of LGC.

Risk factors related to operative morbidity in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to analyze postoperative morbidity and mortality of patients operated on for gastric cancer in a single institution during the last twenty years, and to define risk factors for complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out on 434 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 1983 and December 2002. Analysis of main medical and surgical complications and analysis of morbidity risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 38.4% and 2.7% respectively. The most frequent complications were pneumonia (13%) and intra-abdominal abcesses (12%). The main cause of death was anastomotic dehiscence with abdominal sepsis. The last ten years mortality rate dropped from 4.7% to 0.8%. Risk factors for complications were gender (male, p = 0.01) and resection of spleen (p = 0.02) or pancreas (p = 0.002). A significantly lesser rate of complications was found in patients who had underwent gastrectomy during the previous five years (p = 0.001) or with tumors located in the lower third of the stomach (p = 0,01).

CONCLUSION

Morbidity of gastrectomy for gastric cancer in our institution is still high but mortality has decreased significantly over the last ten years due to the specialization of the hospital and the surgical team. The main risk factor for complications was pancreatosplenectomy in the multivariate analysis.

Insufficiency risk of esophagojejunal anastomosis after total abdominal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The outcome and quality of surgical treatment in gastric cancer are closely associated with specific postoperative morbidity and mortality, in addition to an oncosurgically adequate resection status. In this context, a preventive concept of decreasing the insufficiency rate of esophageal anastomosis may have a great impact.

METHOD

Over a time period of 12 months (from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2002), 1,199 patients (from 80 East German hospitals) with gastric carcinoma, carcinoma of the esophagogastral junction, or gastrointestinal stroma tumor (GIST) were enrolled in this prospective multicenter observational study with the aim of evaluating their early postoperative outcome. By means of a logistic regression analysis, independent variables, which alter significantly the healing of esophagojejunal anastomosis, were determined; in addition, their clinical impact on preventive management to lower the insufficiency rate of esophageal anastomosis was investigated.

RESULTS

In 1,139 patients, histological investigation revealed gastric carcinoma. Out of these patients, 1,031 subjects underwent surgical intervention (90.5%) and 891 individuals underwent resection (86.4%). In 813 patients, radical resection (subtotal resection and gastrectomy) was executed (78.9%), whereas in 726 cases, R(0) resection was achieved (81.5%). Gastrectomy was the preferred procedure in 649 patients, resulting in a gastrectomy rate of 62.9% relating to all patients who underwent operation (curative and palliative intention, 80.3% and 19.7%, respectively). The insufficiency rate of esophagojejunal anastomosis was 5.7% (37/649). Neither the comparison between the various procedures for the reconstruction of the esophagojejunal passage and anastomosing techniques after gastrectomy nor that between gastrectomies with curative and palliative intention revealed any significant difference. Dysphagia and gastric outlet syndrome due to a stenosis were determined as independent variables by a logistic regression analysis of all preoperative and intraoperative variables. In all patients with gastric carcinoma, both parameters were recorded in 9.9% (113/1,139) and 6.7% (76/1,139), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Dysphagia and gastric stenosis, which significantly influence the healing of esophagojejunal anastomosis after gastrectomy, are considered characteristics of an advanced tumor growth and a pretherapeutic lack of an adequate nutrition. This emphasizes the necessity of an early diagnosis of gastric cancer in order to lower perioperative morbidity. In addition, dysphagia is commonly associated with an obstruction of the upper gastrointestinal tract, which can lead to nutritional deficits, and thus deserves specific care during preventive management.

Clinicopathological study of cholelithiasis following gastric cancer surgery

The purpose of this study was to compare liver function tests preoperatively and postoperatively in 2 cohorts of patients, those that developed gallstones after gastrectomy for cancer and those that did not develop gallstones. The cohorts were taken from 698 consecutive patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer between April 1980 and March 1995. In comparison with 698 patients, the gallstone group was characterized by the findings that the incidence of cholelithiasis was significantly higher in totally-gastrectomized patients and patients with upper stomach cancer. Comparison of the perioperative status revealed a significantly higher rate of complications in the gallstone patients. Analysis of the changes in liver function showed significantly higher values of glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, glutamic pyruvic transaminase, and alkaline phosphatase at time points of 1 and 3 months after surgery in the gallstone patients. The results suggest that the postoperative development of liver dysfunction and complications is associated with the formation of gallstones.