Outcome after septic complications in J pouch procedures

Anastomotic Leak after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

There are special considerations when treating anastomotic leak after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The epidemiology, risk factors, anatomic considerations, diagnosis and management, as well as the short- and long-term consequences to the patient are unique to this patent population. Additionally, there are specific concerns such as "tip of the J" leaks, transanal management of anastomotic leak/presacral sinus, functional outcomes after leak, and considerations of redo pouch procedures.

Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications

The ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has revolutionised the surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Despite refinement in surgical technique(s) and patient selection, IPAA can be associated with significant morbidity. As the IPAA celebrated its 40^th anniversary in 2018, this review provides a timely outline of its history, indications, and complications. IPAA has undergone significant modification since 1978. For both UC and FAP, IPAA surgery aims to definitively cure disease and prevent malignant degeneration, while providing adequate continence and avoiding a permanent stoma. The majority of patients experience long-term success, but “early” and “late” complications are recognised. Pelvic sepsis is a common early complication with far-reaching consequences of long-term pouch dysfunction, but prompt intervention (either radiological or surgical) reduces the risk of pouch failure. Even in the absence of sepsis, pouch dysfunction is a long-term complication that may have a myriad of causes. Pouchitis is a common cause that remains incompletely understood and difficult to manage at times. 10% of patients succumb to the diagnosis of pouch failure, which is traditionally associated with the need for pouch excision. This review provides a timely outline of the history, indications, and complications associated with IPAA. Patient selection remains key, and contraindications exist for this surgery. A structured management plan is vital to the successful management of complications following pouch surgery.

Short-term postoperative outcomes following robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis are equivalent

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive approaches have become the standard of care for ileal pouch-anal anastomoses (IPAA). There are few reports comparing outcomes following a laparoscopic versus robotic approach. Our aim was to determine if there were any differences in the 30-day postoperative outcomes following IPAA performed laparoscopically versus robotically.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all laparoscopic and robotic IPAA performed between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2018 was carried out. Patients included were adult patients who underwent a proctectomy and IPAA utilizing either a laparoscopic or robotic approach. Data collected included patient demographics, operative variables, and 30-day postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients had a minimally invasive IPAA; 58 were performed laparoscopically and 74 robotically. Less than half the patients were female (n = 55; 41.7%) with a median age of 37 years (range 18-68 years). The majority of patients had a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (n = 103; 78.0%) with medically refractory disease (n = 87; 65.9%). A greater proportion of patients in the laparoscopic cohort had a prolonged length of stay (n = 27; 46.6% versus n = 18; 24.3%; p < 0.001) and a two-stage approach (n = 56; 96.6% versus n = 37; 50%; p < 0.001), but there were no differences in the rates between the laparoscopic versus robotic cohorts of superficial surgical site infection (6.9% versus 6.8%; p = 0.99), peripouch abscess (15.5% versus 6.8%; p = 0.11), anastomotic leak (6.9% versus 2.7%; p = 0.21), pelvic abscess (15.5% versus 6.8%; p = 0.11), and pelvic sepsis (15.5% versus 6.8%; p = 0.11), readmission (24.1% versus 17.6%; p = 0.35) or reoperation (6.9% versus 5.4%; p = 0.72). On multivariable analysis, only male sex remained predictive of prolonged length of stay, and a robotic approach trended toward a decreased rate of prolonged length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic and robotic IPAA have equivalent postoperative morbidity underscoring the safety of the continued expansion of the robotic platform for pouch surgery.

Endoscopic treatment of leak at the tip of the "J" ileal pouch

Background and study aims The tip of the "J" of the ileal pouch is the vulnerable location for leak after restorative proctocolectomy, which has normally been treated with surgery. We aimed to describe a novel endoscopic method to treat the same. Patients and methods A cohort of 12 consecutive patients with a leak at the tip of the "J" was identified in our prospectively maintained Pouch Registry. The endoscopic over-the-scope clipping (OTSC) system was used for the closure of the leak. Results Eight patients (66.6 %) achieved complete closure of the leak documented by endoscopy confirmed with guidewire and/or contrasted pouchogram, with 6 requiring a single endoscopic session and 2 undergoing a repeat session. Four patients (33.3 %) had a persistent leak and required surgical intervention, of whom 1 developed abscess in the pre-spine region 14 days after the endoscopic procedure and underwent pouch revision surgery. Conclusions OSTC appears to be safe and effective in treating the leak at the tip of the "J" in the majority of patients.

Primary ileo-anal pouch anastomosis in patients with acute ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) was performed in ulcerative colitis (UC) for emergent or urgent indications in three stages. Since the three-step procedure imposes enormous demands on a patient, there was an attempt to introduce primary IPAA for urgent indications. The aim of this study was to compare early complications after Hartmann's colectomy (HC) and IPAA in a selected group of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medical records of 274 patients who underwent surgery for UC between 1996 and 2010 were retrospectively evaluated. Finally, a group of 77 patients with acute form of UC entered this study.

RESULTS

All patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 32 (42%) patients who underwent HC, whereas group 2 comprised 45 (58%) patients after IPAA. There was no postoperative mortality. Respiratory failure occurred in 8 (24%) patients after HC and in 6 (14%) patients who underwent IPAA. Intra-abdominal sepsis developed in 4 (12%) patients after HC and in 8 (17%) undergoing IPAA. Fascia dehiscence was present in 3 (8%) patients after HC and in 4 (9%) with IPAA. Bowel obstruction occurred in 1 (4%) patient after the former operation and in 3 (6%) patients after the latter one. Wound infection was diagnosed in 6 (20%) patients after HC and in 9 (20%) after IPAA. The differences between the investigated groups of patients were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The IPAA could be performed for urgent indications only in the patients with no critical dilatation of the colon or with active UC but without signs of severe malnutrition.

Minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Despite significant improvements in medical management of inflammatory bowel disease, many of these patients still require surgery at some point in the course of their disease. Their young age and poor general conditions, worsened by the aggressive medical treatments, make minimally invasive approaches particularly enticing to this patient population. However, the typical inflammatory changes that characterize these diseases have hindered wide diffusion of laparoscopy in this setting, currently mostly pursued in high-volume referral centers, despite accumulating evidences in the literature supporting the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. The largest body of evidence currently available for terminal ileal Crohn’s disease shows improved short term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery, with prolonged operative times. For Crohn’s colitis, high quality evidence supporting laparoscopic surgery is lacking. Encouraging preliminary results have been obtained with the adoption of laparoscopic restorative total proctocolectomy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. A consensus about patients’ selection and the need for staging has not been reached yet. Despite the lack of conclusive evidence, a wave of enthusiasm is pushing towards less invasive strategies, to further minimize surgical trauma, with single incision laparoscopic surgery being the most realistic future development.

Surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis in the biologic therapy era

Recently introduced in the treatment algorithms and guidelines for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, biological therapy is an effective treatment option for patients with an acute severe flare not responsive to conventional treatments and for patients with steroid dependent disease. The reduction in hospitalization and surgical intervention for patients affected by ulcerative colitis after the introduction of biologic treatment remains to be proven. Furthermore, these agents seem to be associated with increase in cost of treatment and risk for serious postoperative complications. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgical treatment of choice in ulcerative colitis patients. Surgery is traditionally recommended as salvage therapy when medical management fails, and, despite advances in medical therapy, colectomy rates remain unchanged between 20% and 30%. To overcome the reported increase in postoperative complications in patients on biologic therapies, several surgical strategies have been developed to maintain long-term pouch failure rate around 10%, as previously reported. Surgical staging along with the development of minimally invasive surgery are among the most promising advances in this field.

How I do it: the stapled ileal J pouch at restorative proctocolectomy

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy is the preferred option for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis, indeterminate colitis, and familial adenomatous polyposis. However, it remains a procedure associated with morbidity and mortality. Pelvic sepsis, pouch fistulae, and anastomotic dehiscence predispose to pouch failure. We report our experience with an adaptation for the formation of the stapled ileal J pouch using the GIA™ 100 stapling device (Covidien, Mansfield, Massachusetts, USA). When creating the J pouch, we remove the bevelled plastic protector from the thin fork of the stapling device, allowing the staple line to be completed to the tip of the stapled efferent limb of the pouch, thereby minimizing potential blind ending in the efferent limb and injury to the transverse staple line.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective IPAA at our institution over a 5-year period using this adapted stapling technique for creation of the ileal J pouch were reviewed. Data were collected from a prospectively maintained inflammatory bowel disease database, theater records, and patient chart review.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients underwent IPAA using this technique at our institution during the study period. Postoperative morbidity was encountered in 11 of 41 patients including pelvic sepsis, pouch fistulae, anastomotic stricture, or leak. There was no morbidity observed related to a blind efferent limb or transverse staple line disruption. No mortality was observed in this series.

CONCLUSION

Maximizing the length of the efferent fork of the GIA stapling device can reduce the length of redundant efferent J limb of the ileal J pouch. This may reduce the incidence of torsion, volvulus, distension, fistulae/sinuses, and pelvic sepsis/anastomotic leak following IPAA.

Impact of defunctioning loop ileostomy on outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

This study analyzes the impact of a temporary loop ileostomy on postoperative outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in terms of complications and reoperations including ileostomy closure.

METHODS

The records of 122 consecutive patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis during a 12-year period were reviewed. In 89 patients, a defunctioning ileostomy was created, while 33 patients had no ileostomy. Statistics were done with Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Both study groups were comparable concerning age, colitis activity, previous diseases, previous surgery, use of steroids, and immunosuppressives. Pouch-related septic complications (anastomotic dehiscence, pouch leakage, pelvic abscess) were significantly lower in the ileostomy group (5.6% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.031), resulting in a lower rate of emergency laparotomies following restorative proctocolectomy (4.5% vs. 30.3%, p < 0.001). Including all complications associated with scheduled closure of ileostomy, the cumulative frequency of emergency laparotomies was significantly lower in the ileostomy group (13.5% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.032). The cumulative duration of hospitalization, including all hospital stays for complications or closure of the ileostomy, was significantly longer in the ileostomy group [median 22 days (11-92) vs. 14 days (9-109), p < 0.001]. During long-term follow-up, a stricture at the pouch-anal anastomosis was more common in the ileostomy group (24.7% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.021), whereas only one stricture necessitated surgical therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Creation of a defunctioning loop ileostomy reduces pouch-related septic complications and the frequency of emergency second laparotomies after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Reoperative inflammatory bowel disease surgery

With the advent of restorative proctocolectomy or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC), not only has there been potential for cure of UC but also patients have enjoyed marked improvements in bowel function, continence, and quality of life. However, IPAA can be complicated by postoperative small bowel obstruction, disease recurrence, and pouch failure secondary to pelvic sepsis, pouch dysfunction, mucosal inflammation, and neoplastic transformation. These may necessitate emergent or expeditious elective reoperation to salvage the pouch and preserve adequate function. Local, transanal, and transabdominal approaches to IPAA salvage are described, and their indications, outcomes, and the clinical parameters that affect the need for salvage are discussed. Pouch excision for failed salvage reoperation is reviewed as well. Relaparotomy is also frequently required for recurrent Crohn's disease (CD), especially given the nature of this as yet incurable illness. Risk factors for CD recurrence are examined, and the various surgical options and margins of resection are evaluated with a focus on bowel-sparing policy. Stricturoplasty, its outcomes, and its importance in recurrent disease are discussed, and segmental resection is compared with more extensive procedures such as total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. Lastly, laparoscopy is addressed with respect to its long-term outcomes, effect on surgical recurrence, and its application in the management of recurrent CD.

Complications of ileoanal pouches

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgical therapy of choice for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and the majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. It restores gastrointestinal continuity, re-establishes transanal defecation, and avoids a permanent stoma. Although this technically demanding procedure is associated with low mortality rates, it is frequently accompanied by early and late complications. This article will review these complications and discuss the interventions that are needed to provide appropriate treatment.

Surgical site infection following surgery for inflammatory bowel disease in patients with clean-contaminated wounds

BACKGROUND

It is generally believed that the accompanying conditions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are associated with a high incidence of surgical site infection (SSI), and sometimes these patients are classified as compromised hosts without definitive clinical evidence. The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of IBD on the occurrence and features of SSI in patients with clean-contaminated wounds.

METHODS

We conducted prospective SSI surveillance of 580 patients with clean-contaminated wounds who underwent surgery between March 2006 and December 2007 using the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system. Multivariate analyses using stepwise logistic regression were performed to determine risk factors for SSI.

RESULTS

A total of 562 patients with clean-contaminated wounds who underwent surgery for IBD [ulcerative colitis (UC), n = 173; Crohn's disease (CD), n = 122] or colorectal cancer [(CA), n = 267] were identified for evaluation. SSI was observed in 12.6% of all patients and there was no significant difference in infection rate by type of disease (UC, 14.5%; CD, 13.9%; CA, 10.9%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis yielded an ASA score > or =3 [odds ratio (OR) = 2.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-3.93] and rectal surgery (OR = 2.35; 95% CI = 1.28-4.31) as independent risk factors for SSI. IBD surgery was not an independent risk factor for overall SSI (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 0.94-2.80). However, there was a significant difference in the incidence of incisional SSI [IBD, 11.9% (UC, 12.7%; CD, 10.7%); CA, 4.9%, p = 0.003]. In the analysis of rectal surgery, the incidence of incisional SSI was 5.3% in CA patients, 12.0% in UC patients, and 26.3% in CD patients. In contrast to overall SSI data, IBD surgery was found to be an independent risk factor for incisional SSI (OR = 2.59; 95% CI = 1.34-5.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients of surgery restricted to clean-contaminated wounds, IBD was shown to be an independent risk factor for incisional SSI. With the use of proper operative procedures and techniques, the incidence of organ/space SSI should not be high in patients who undergo an uncomplicated IBD surgical procedure.

Long-term outcome 10 years or more after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess quality of life (QOL) in a long-term follow-up of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) 10 years and more after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) to correlate these results with pouch function and to assess the long-term pouch failure rate.

METHODS

In a unicentric study, 294 consecutive patients after IPAA between 1988 and 1996 were identified from a prospective database. QOL was evaluated according to the validated Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI).

RESULTS

Overall median follow-up was 11.5 years. Thirty-seven patients experienced pouch failure (12.6%). The rates of ileal pouch success after 5, 10 and 15 years were 92.3%, 88.7% and 84.5%. According to the GIQLI, patients with a functioning pouch achieved a mean score of 107.8, reflecting a decrease of QOL of 10.8% compared to a healthy population. There were significant negative correlations between QOL and an age of >50 years (p < 0.05), pouchitis, perianal inflammation and increased stool frequency (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

QOL and functional results of patients with UC 10 years or more after IPAA were acceptable; however, those were reduced when compared to a healthy population. Pouch failure rate still increases up to 15.5% 15 years after IPAA. This result represents an important issue in providing patients with comprehensive preoperative information.

Neutrophil-related immunoinflammatory disturbance in steroid-overdosed ulcerative colitis patients

BACKGROUND

There is some evidence that large preoperative doses of steroids are a causative factor for postoperative higher morbidity in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. This study aimed to assess steroid-related changes in functional profiles of neutrophils in UC patients to estimate the immunological changes under surgical stress.

METHODS

Neutrophils were extracted from peripheral blood of 30 UC patients and 30 healthy controls. UC patients whose neutrophils were isolated were divided into two subgroups according to their total preoperative dosage of prednisolone: group H, > or =10,000 mg; group L, <10,000 mg. Expression of neutrophil surface antigens was analyzed and neutrophil phagocytosis was evaluated. Patterns of cell death of neutrophils were evaluated by co-culturing with Escherichia coli. Production of inflammatory mediators in cultured neutrophils was assessed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the expression rates of TLR4, CD11b, and CD16b on neutrophils (CD15(+) cells) between the two patient groups and controls. There was also no significant difference in neutrophil phagocytosis between the two patient groups and controls. The neutrophil necrosis rate in group H was higher than that in group L and the controls 3 h after exposure to E. coli. Neutrophils from group H released the highest levels of proinflammatory cytokines following interleukin-1beta or lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Neutrophils from group H also released the highest levels of proteolytic enzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroid-overdosed UC patients may have a functional deficit in neutrophils, which may cause a postsurgical systemic "storm" of inflammatory mediators.

Factors predicting postoperative infectious complications and early induction of inflammatory mediators in ulcerative colitis patients

BACKGROUND

Positive outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy are compromised by a number of specific septic complications. However, there is no useful perioperative marker predicting postoperative infectious complications (PICs) in steroid overdosed patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

To determine factors associated with PICs and their relation to circulating levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and neutrophil elastase (NE), we obtained perioperative blood samples from 60 UC patients.

RESULTS

Postoperative infectious complications were identified in 47% of cases. Patients who developed PICs had significantly longer disease duration, had been administered a greater total preoperative dosage of prednisolone, and had a higher body mass index. Logistic regression analysis showed that the total preoperative dosage of prednisolone was independently associated with the development of PICs. These patients showed suppressed systemic inflammation and pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine induction. An early increase in the NE level was found to be predictive of PICs in the high-dose group, whereas there was no significant difference in neutrophil counts between the high- and low-dose groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating NE levels in the early postoperative period might be a useful predictor of PICs in immune-controlled UC patients who received high doses of steroids.

Ileal pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a relapsing and remitting disease characterised by chronic mucosal and submucosal inflammation of the colon and rectum. Treatment may vary depending upon the extent and severity of inflammation. Broadly speaking medical treatments aim to induce and then maintain remission. Surgery is indicated for inflammatory disease that is refractory to medical treatment or in cases of neoplastic transformation. Approximately 25% of patients with UC ultimately require colectomy. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for patients with ulcerative colitis who ultimately require colectomy. This review will examine indications for IPAA, patient selection, technical aspects of surgery, management of complications and long term outcome following this procedure.

Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited

Since restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) removes the entire diseased mucosa, it has become firmly established as the standard operative procedure of choice for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Many technical controversies still persist, such as mesenteric lengthening techniques, close rectal wall proctectomy, endoanal mucosectomy vs. double stapled anastomosis, loop ileostomy omission and a laparoscopic approach. Despite the complexity of the operation, IPAA is safe (mortality: 0.5-1%), it carries an acceptable risk of non-life-threatening complications (10-25%), and it achieves good long-term functional outcome with excellent patient satisfaction (over 95%). In contrast to the high incidence in patients operated for ulcerative colitis (UC) (15-20%), the occurrence of pouchitis after IPAA seems to be rare in FAP patients (0-11%). Even after IPAA, FAP patients are still at risk of developing adenomas (and occasional adenocarcinomas), either in the anal canal (10-31%) or in the ileal pouch itself (8-62%), thus requiring lifelong endoscopic monitoring. IPAA operation does not jeopardise pregnancy and childbirth, but it does impair female fecundity and has a low risk of impairment of erection and ejaculation in young males. The latter can almost completely be avoided by a careful "close rectal wall" proctectomy technique. Some argue that low risk patients (e.g. <5 rectal polyps) can be identified where ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) might be reasonable. We feel that the risk of rectal cancer after IRA means that IPAA should be recommended for the vast majority of FAP patients. We accept that in some very selected cases, based on clinical and genetics data (and perhaps influenced by patient choice regarding female fecundity), a stepwise surgical strategy with a primary IPA followed at a later age by a secondary proctectomy with IPAA could be proposed.

Pouch reconstruction in the pelvis

ILEAL POUCH RECONSTRUCTION: Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice in mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Because the disease is cured by surgical resection, functional results, pouch survival prognosis, and disease or dysplasia control are the major determinants of success. There is controversy as to whether the IPAA should be handsewn with mucosectomy or stapled, preserving the mucosa of the anal transitional zone. Crohn's disease is a contraindication for IPAA, but long-term outcome after IPAA is similar to that for MUC in patients with indeterminate colitis who do not develop Crohn's disease. As development of dysplasia and cancer in the ileal pouch have been reported, a standardized surveillance program is mandatory in cases of MUC, FAP, and chronic pouchitis. COLONIC POUCH RECONSTRUCTION: Construction of a colonic pouch is a widely accepted technique to improve functional outcome after low or intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Several randomized studies comparing colo-pouch-anal anastomosis (CPA) with straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) have found the pouch functionally superior. Most controlled studies cover only 1-year follow-up, but randomized studies with 2-year follow-up show similar functional results of CPA and CAA. Evacuation difficulty as initially observed was related to pouch size, and the results with smaller pouches (5-6 cm) are more favorable, showing adequate reservoir function without compromising neorectal evacuation. The transverse coloplasty pouch may offer several advantages to J-pouch reconstruction. Current series question whether the neorectal reservoir is the physiological key of the pouch, but rather the decreased motility. The major advantage reported with colonic pouch reconstruction is the lower incidence of anastomotic complications.

Surgery for inflammatory bowel diseases

Surgery is required in many patients with inflammatory bowel disease at some point in their disease. In patients with ulcerative colitis, surgery is potentially curative whereas recurrence of Crohn's disease following surgery is a common occurrence. As a result, the indications and surgical management of the two diseases may be quite different. Surgery is usually reserved for the management of complications or failure of medical treatment in Crohn's disease. Resection of the diseased segment is the usual procedure performed. While surgery usually results in an improvement in quality of life, recurrence of disease occurs frequently with reported rates of 5-90% at 1 year, depending on the criteria used. To date, there have been no surgical maneuvers which have been shown to decrease the risk of recurrence. Over the past few decades, several advances have been made in the surgical management of Crohn's disease: use of strictureplasty for extensive disease; use of laparoscopic techniques to perform surgery and the performance of the ileal pouch procedure in very selected patients. Significant advances in the surgical management of ulcerative colitis have been made in the past 50 years. Although there are several options available to patients, the preferred option now is the ileal pouch procedure. With technical modifications and with experience, this procedure can now be performed with a low complication rate, with good functional results and quality of life and excellent long-term outcome.