French Health Products Safety Agency (Afssaps). Prescribing antibiotics in odontology and stomatology. Recommendations by the French Health Products Safety Agency

Does anti-inflammatory drugs modify the severe odontogenic infection prognosis? A 10-year's experience

Background

Numerous biochemical datas support the noxious role of anti-inflammatory drugs on immune response. Those observations are often put forward for unfavorable evolution of odontogenic infection but has never been really proven in clinic. The aim of this study is to try to clarify this role based on the collection of the clinical course of odontogenic infections over a 10-year analysis period.

Material and Methods

The investigators implemented a prospective observational study. The sample was composed of patients managed between January 2004 and December 2014 for severe odontogenic infection based on three criteria: hospital admission, intravenous antibiotic therapy, tooth extraction and collections drainage under general anesthesia. Clinical and pharmacological data were collected at admission, during hospitalization until discharged home. The population was first separated into two groups patients with or without anti-inflammatory drugs on admission, then on four groups (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids drugs, both and none on admission). Analysis were performed each time by univariate analysis, multivariate analysis and propensity score matching.

Results

Six hundred and fifty-three patients were included in the study, 329 (50%) patients report orally anti-inflammatory treatment before presenting to hospital, 50 (7.6%) received corticosteroids, 242 (37%) received NSAIDs and 37 (5.6%) both. Evolution is worsening for patients under anti-inflammatory drugs in term of hospitalization in ICU (p=0.016), number of surgeries (p=0.003), risk of tracheotomy (p=0.036), duration of hospitalization (p=0.005) and spaces involved by the infection (p<0.001). When separating patients into 4 groups, dysphonia and odynophagia are more frequent for patients under corticosteroid and NSAID (35.14%, p<0.001), mediastinal erythema is more frequent for patients under corticosteroid (16%, p=0.004), fever is more frequent for patients under NSAID (35.5%, p=0.032), pain is higher for patients under corticosteroids (p=0.024). But, in order to reduce bias, linked to factors of gravity, a regression weighted by propensity scores was performed and any group of patients is different from the others.

Conclusions

Patients under anti-inflammatory drugs have more severe dental infection on admission and their complex evolution seems to be linked to the severity of infection on admission.

Key words:Severe odontogenic infection, anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids.

Five Predictors Affecting the Prognosis of Patients with Severe Odontogenic Infections

Background: Dental cellulitis management is no longer a simple procedure, as more and more patients are needing long-time hospitalization, several surgeries and intensive care follow-up. This prospective study seeks to highlight criteria that can split patients with severe odontogenic infection into two groups: those with simple evolution and those for whom complex management is necessary. Methods: In this observational study, all patients considered with a severe odontogenic infection (which necessitated hospital admission, intravenous antibiotics and general anaesthesia) were enrolled between January 2004 and December 2014 from Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital (France). They were split into two groups: those who needed one surgical intervention with tooth extraction and collection drainage combined with probabilistic antibiotic to treat infection and those who need several surgeries, intensive care unit follow-up or tracheotomy to achieve healing. Results: 653 patients were included, of which 611 (94%) had one surgery, 42 (6%) had more than one surgery before healing. Penicillin allergy (p < 0.001), psychiatric disorders (p = 0.005), oropharyngeal oedema (p = 0.008), floor oedema (p = 0.004), fever (p = 0.04) and trismus (p = 0.018) on admission were the most relevant predictors of complex evolution. A conditional inference tree (CTREE) illustrated the association of prognostic factors and the need of multiple surgery. Conclusions: Besides clinical symptoms of severity, complications of severe odontogenic infection are predicted by measurables and objectives criteria as penicillin allergy, mandibular molar, C-reactive protein level, psychiatric disorders and alcohol abuse. Their specific association potentialize the risks. IRB number: CE-CIC-GREN-12-08.

Are routine microbiological samplings in acute dental infections justified? Our 10-year real-life experience

PURPOSE

Most patients with severe odontogenic infections are successfully treated with large spectrum probabilistic antibioc therapy, drainage of the collections and tooth treatment or extraction and are discharged home before antibiotic sensitivity results were available. The investigators hypothesized whether bacteriological sampling should be systematically performed in the management of patients with severe odontogenic infections.

METHODS

The investigators implemented a prospective observational study. The sample was composed of patients managed between January 2004 and December 2014 for severe odontogenic infection based on three criteria: hospital admission, intravenous antibiotic therapy, tooth extraction and collections drainage under general anesthesia. The predictor variable was the results of bacteriological sampling, culture and sensitivity. The outcome variable was antibiotic therapy adaptation according to antibiotic sensitivity results.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 653 patients; 386 (59%) were male and 267 (41%) female, with a mean age of 37 years (range 18-88); 378 (58%) patients had been receiving oral antibiotics before admission to hospital, for a mean duration of 4.1 days (range 1 - 30). About 535 (81.9%) patients had swabs taken during surgery. Microorganisms were observed in 477 (89.1%) patients but in 377 (70.5%) they were polymorphic oropharyngeal flora. After culture, at least one antibiogram was obtained for 91 (17%) patients and the results led to antibiotic therapy being adapted in 23 (4.3%) patients.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that bacteriological analysis had an impact on evolution in less than 5% of patients. Future studies will focus on the patients for whom the bacteriological analysis is essential.

Prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy in management protocols of patients treated with oral and intravenous bisphosphonates

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) linked to bisphosphonate treatment has specific characteristics that render its therapeutic management challenging for clinicians. Poor response to standard treatment makes it essential to take special precautions when treating this type of disease; therefore, antibiotic prophylaxis and/or antibiotic therapy have been proposed as effective and helpful tools in these situations.

OBJECTIVES

This article seeks to assess published evidence in order to evaluate the different protocols used for antibiotic prophylaxis and/or antibiotic therapy in the general context of patients treated with bisphosphonates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature review of the last 10 years was carried out in PubMed using the following keywords: "antibiotic prophylaxis and osteonecrosis," "bisphosphonates AND osteonecrosis AND dental management," "bisphosphonate AND osteonecrosis AND antibiotic prophylaxis AND oral surgery." A total of 188 articles were obtained, of which 18 were ultimately selected.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In patients treated with oral and intravenous bisphosphonates without chemotherapy-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw, antibiotic prophylaxis prior to oral surgery is an important tool to avoid osteonecrosis and promote healing of the affected area. If the patient previously exhibited chemotherapy-associated osteonecrosis after tooth extraction, antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated to prevent recurrent osteonecrosis and promote healing of the extraction site. If chemotherapy-associated osteonecrosis is already present, antibiotic therapy is a vital part of conservative management to reduce the symptomatology of MRONJ and keep it from worsening. Finally, a lack of clinical data and randomized controlled trials makes it difficult to choose the most appropriate protocol for the various clinical situations studied. Key words:Bisphosphonates, antibiotic prophylaxis, maxillary osteonecrosis, antibiotic treatment.

Amoxicillin prophylaxis in oral surgery

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative infection is the most common postsurgical oral complication but no double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial has been made yet to assess amoxicillin prophylaxis for oral surgery. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic amoxicillin 3g per os versus placebo in the prevention of postoperative oral infections.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A 5-year, multicentric, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was made on healthy patients undergoing complex oral surgery. Final analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

The 286 patients were randomly assigned to the amoxicillin or placebo group. After a mean follow-up of two weeks, 11 patients in the control group and three patients in the amoxicillin prophylaxis group developed a postoperative infection (P=0.001 in unilateral test). The hazard ratio was 0.27 [95% CI: 0.07-0.94].

CONCLUSION

Amoxicillin prophylaxis seems to be effective in preventing postoperative infection in complex oral surgery, especially when mandibular third molars and multiple avulsions are involved.

Indications of antibiotic prophylaxis in dental practice- review

Antibiotics are frequently used in dental practice. Clinical and bacteriological epidemiological factors determine the indications of antibiotics in dentistry. Antibiotics are used in addition to appropriate treatment to aid the host defences in the elimination of remaining bacteria. It is indicated when there is evidence of clinical sign involvement and spread of infection. Antibiotics are prescribed in dental practice for treating odontoge nic infections, non-odontogenic infections, as prophylaxis against focal and local infection. Special care needs to be addressed to patients with organ transplants, poorly controlled diabetes and pregnancy. Antibiotics should be used only as an adjunct to dental treatment and never alone as the first line of care. The present paper reviews the indications of antibiotics in dental practice.