Large variations in the use of oral anticoagulants in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation: a Swedish national perspective

Sex differences in stroke

Sex disparities within the field of stroke, including subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAHs), have been in focus during the last 2 decades. It is clear that stroke incidence is higher in men, and also that men have their first stroke earlier than women. On the other hand, women have more severe strokes, mainly because cardioembolic strokes are more common in women. This leads to higher case fatality and worse functional outcome in women. It has often been pointed out that women more often have nontraditional stroke symptoms, and therefore may seek medical help later. After discharge from the hospital, female stroke survivors live alone in many cases and are dependent on external care. Therefore, these women frequently rate their quality of life (QoL) lower than men do. Female spouses more often provide help to their male stroke survivors than the reverse, and they accept a heavier burden. These caregivers are at high risk for depression, low QoL, and low psychologic wellbeing. SAH is a special form of stroke, often caused by a ruptured aneurysm. It is about 20% more common in women. The case fatality is high, but does not differ between the sexes.

Economic evaluation of clinical quality registries: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to examine the existing evidence base for the cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit of clinical quality registries (CQRs).

DESIGN

Systematic review and narrative synthesis.

DATA SOURCES

Nine electronic bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL, in the period from January 2000 to August 2019.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Any peer-reviewed published study or grey literature in English which had reported on an economic evaluation of one or more CQRs.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were screened, extracted and appraised by two independent reviewers. A narrative synthesis was performed around key attributes of each CQR and on key patient outcomes or changes to healthcare processes or utilisation. A narrative synthesis of the cost-effectiveness associated with CQRs was also conducted. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness, in terms of the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), cost savings or return-on-investment (ROI) attributed to CQR implementation.

RESULTS

Three studies and one government report met the inclusion criteria for the review. A study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme (NSQIP) in the USA found that the cost-effectiveness of this registry improved over time, based on an ICER of US$8312 per postoperative event avoided. A separate study in Canada estimated the ROI to be US$3.43 per US$1.00 invested in the NSQIP. An evaluation of a post-splenectomy CQR in Australia estimated that registry cost-effectiveness improved from US$234 329 to US$18 358 per life year gained when considering the benefits accrued over the lifetime of the population. The government report evaluating five Australian CQRs estimated an overall return of 1.6-5.5 times the cost of investment.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data indicate that CQRs can be cost-effective and can lead to significant returns on investment. It is clear that further studies that evaluate the economic and clinical impacts of CQRs are necessary.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018116807.

Non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants have a positive impact on ischaemic stroke severity in patients with atrial fibrillation

Aims

Several studies showed reduced stroke severity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) if the international normalized ratio (INR) was ≥ 2 at stroke onset. There are no respective data for non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The aim of this study was to compare the impact of NOAC or phenprocoumon intake on stroke severity.

Methods and results

In this single-centre observational study, 3669 patients with acute ischaemic stroke were retrospectively analysed regarding AF status and medication immediately before admission. Using multivariable regression, we analysed the association of pre-admission anticoagulation with severe stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥ 11) on admission and poor outcome at discharge (modified Rankin scale score > 2). Before the index stroke, 655 patients had known AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2. While 325 (49.6%) patients were anticoagulated, 159 (24.3%) were prescribed a NOAC and 75 (11.5%) phenprocoumon patients had an INR ≥ 2 on admission. Compared with AF patients without medical stroke prevention, an INR ≥ 2 [OR 0.23 (95% CI 0.10-0.53)] or NOAC intake [OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.27-0.86)] were associated with a lower probability of severe stroke after adjustment for confounders, while an INR < 2 [OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.33-1.16)] was not. Adjusted odds ratios for poor functional outcome at hospital discharge were 0.47 (95% CI 0.27-0.84) for NOAC patients, 0.33 (95% CI 0.17-0.65) for INR ≥ 2 and 0.61 (95% CI 0.32-1.16) for INR < 2.

Conclusion

NOAC intake before stroke did reduce the probability of severe stroke on hospital admission and poor functional outcome at hospital discharge as similarly demonstrated for phenprocoumon patients with an INR ≥ 2 on admission.

Who Should Be Referred for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Therapy?

OPINION STATEMENT

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia affecting approximately 7 million individuals in USA. It is one of the most significant arrhythmias, which accounts for a majority of embolic strokes, especially in elderly individuals. Although oral anti-coagulation is beneficial in lowering the risk of stroke, 1 in 10 patients have a contra-indication to warfarin therapy. Among patients who do tolerate either warfarin or novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC), major or recurrent bleeding, intracranial bleeds, etc. often lead to interruption of anti-coagulation. Previous studies have reported that >90% of cardioemboli in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) originate in the left atrial appendage. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is currently covered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) as an alternative for stroke prevention in patients with an elevated stroke risk (CHADS2 ≥2 or CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥3) who have appropriate rational for avoiding long-term oral anticoagulation following a shared-decision making process. In this review, we discuss the currently available LAAO devices and more importantly, appropriate patient selection for this strategy.

Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Prescription of Oral Anticoagulants in Stroke Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are effective against ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Our aim was to investigate differences in the prescribing of OACs after ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation based on age, sex, country of birth, and socioeconomic status.

METHODS

Patients with first-ever ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation without OAC treatment were included from the Swedish stroke register from 2009 to 2012. The outcome was OAC prescribed at discharge. Income, education, country of birth, and risk factors were obtained from official registers. Risk factors and health status were controlled for in multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 12 088 stroke patients, 36.3% were prescribed an OAC. Prescribing was less common with older age and, in patients born in other Nordic countries (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.98) or countries outside of Europe (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.99) compared with those born in Sweden. University education (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36) and highest income (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.33) were associated with higher levels of OAC prescribing compared with those with primary school education or lowest income level.

CONCLUSION

Differences by age, income, education, and country of birth were found in the prescribing of OACs after stroke. Differences were not explained by common risk factors. This indicates socioeconomic inequalities in the prescribing of preventive treatment after stroke.

Pharmacotherapy prior to and in acute ischaemic stroke. The use of pharmacotherapy and drug-associated outcomes in real world practice - findings from the Polish Hospital Stroke Registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stroke is a preventable disease and acute ischaemic stroke can be effectively treated. Specific pharmacotherapy is recommended in either prevention or acute ischemic stroke treatment. We aimed to evaluate the use and the early and late outcomes impact of drugs administered before and in acute ischaemic stroke in a real world practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ischaemic stroke patients hospitalized between 1st March 2007 and 29th February 2008 and reported in Polish Hospital Stroke Registry were analysed. Fully anonymous data were collected with standardized, web-based questionnaire with authorized access. Multivariate regression models were used to adjust for case-mix and evaluate the impact of drugs used prior to or in acute ischaemic stroke on outcomes. The early outcomes were defined as in-hospital mortality or poor outcome (death or dependency - modified Rankin Scale  3) at hospital discharge, while late outcomes covered one-year survival.

RESULTS

A total number of 26 153 ischaemic stroke patients (mean age: 71.8 years; females: 51.6%) was reported. The ana-lysis of pharmacotherapy showed that preventive use of hypo-tensive agents, anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation, antiplatelets and statins is inadequate. Regression models confirmed some expected drug benefits and additionally revealed that antihypertensive drugs or aspirin used prior to stroke and oral anticoagulants or statins used in hospital were associated with better stroke outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevention of ischaemic stroke needs to be monitored and improved. Evidence-based treatment of acute ischaemic stroke requires further promotion. The benefits of acute ischaemic stroke treatment with statins require to be confirmed in randomized controlled settings.

Use of oral anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation after stroke: results from a nationwide registry

Background. The knowledge is still sparse about patient related factors, influencing oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) rates, in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Aims. To assess the use of OAC in ischemic stroke patients diagnosed with AF and to identify patient related factors influencing the initiation of OAC. Methods. In the nationwide Danish Stroke Registry we identified 55,551 patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke from 2003 to 2011. Frequency analysis was used to assess the use of OAC in patients with AF, and logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of OAC. Results. 17.1% (n = 9,482) of ischemic stroke patients had AF. OAC prescription rates were increasing, and in 2011 46.6% were prescribed OAC, 42.5% had a contraindication, and 3.7% were not prescribed OAC without a stated contraindication. Younger age, less severe stroke, and male gender were positive predictors of OAC, while excessive alcohol consumption, smoking, and institutionalization were negative predictors of OAC (P values < 0.05). Conclusions. Advanced age, severe stroke, female gender, institutionalization, smoking, and excessive alcohol consumption were associated with lower OAC rates. Contraindications were generally present in patients not in therapy, and the assumed underuse of OAC may be overestimated.

Atrial fibrillation: profile and burden of an evolving epidemic in the 21st century

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents an increasing public health challenge with profound social and economic implications.

METHODS

A comprehensive synthesis and review of the AF literature was performed. Overall, key findings from 182 studies were used to describe the indicative scope and impact of AF from an individual to population perspective.

RESULTS

There are many pathways to AF including advancing age, cardiovascular disease and increased levels of obesity/metabolic disorders. The reported population prevalence of AF ranges from 2.3%-3.4% and historical trends reflect increased AF incidence. Estimated life-time risk of AF is around 1 in 4. Primary care contacts reflect whole population trends: AF-related case-presentations increase from less than 0.5% in those aged 40 years or less to 6-12% for those aged 85 years or more. Globally, AF-related hospitalisations (primary or secondary diagnosis) showed an upward trend (from ~35 to over 100 admissions/10,000 persons) during 1996 to 2006. The estimated cost of AF is greater than 1% of health care expenditure and rising with hospitalisations the largest contributor. For affected individuals, quality of life indices are poor and AF confers an independent 1.5 to 2.0-fold probability of death in the longer-term. AF is also closely linked to ischaemic stroke (3- to 5-fold risk), chronic heart failure (up to 50% develop AF) and acute coronary syndromes (up to 25% develop AF) with consistently worse outcomes reported with concurrent AF. Future projections predict at least a doubling of AF cases by 2050.

SUMMARY

AF represents an evolving, global epidemic providing considerable challenges to minimise its impact from an individual to whole society perspective.

In-hospital case management to increase anticoagulation therapy for stroke patients with atrial fibrillation: a hospital-based registry

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Anticoagulation is underused for stroke patients with atrial fibrillation in Taiwan. An effective preventive measure is in great need of improvement.

METHODS

In-hospital case management was implemented to monitor the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and the use of warfarin. Timely feedback to treating physicians was made. Change in performance after the implementation was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 2754 patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack were included, 1216 before and 1538 after the intervention. The percentage of patients without electrocardiography examination decreased from 8.7% to 2.9% (p < 0.001). The diagnosis of atrial fibrillation increased from 11.5% (n = 140) to 15.9% (n = 244) (p = 0.001). The use of warfarin at discharge increased from 36.9% to 54.7% (p = 0.001). In-hospital case management was significantly related to the use of warfarin (odds ratio = 2.47, p < 0.001). The percentage of warfarin use was still significantly higher in the intervention group at 3 months of follow-up (45.9% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.002) and at 6 months of follow up (49.2% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.004). More patients' international normalized ratio was within the recommended range in the intervention group at 6 months' follow-up (30.5% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that in-hospital case management may be an effective strategy to improve anticoagulation for eligible stroke patients.

Impact of anticoagulation before stroke on stroke severity and long-term survival

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic anticoagulation by vitamin K antagonists is highly effective in reducing stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonist treatment before stroke reduces stroke severity and short-term mortality.

AIMS

This study analyses vitamin K antagonists, used in patients with atrial fibrillation diagnosed before the index stroke. We also focus on the impact of preadmission antithrombotic medication on long-term survival.

METHODS

We analyzed 2390 stroke patients consecutively admitted to the Department of Neurology, Charité Berlin, Germany between 2003 and 2004. Mean follow-up was 38 months (range 0-68). Using univariable and multivariable regression models, we identified factors for preadmission anticoagulation in patients with known atrial fibrillation and analyzed the impact of antithrombotic therapy preadmission on functional disability and long-term survival after stroke.

RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 534 (22·3%) of the 2390 stroke patients. In 348 (65·2%) of all atrial fibrillation patients, atrial fibrillation was already known before the index stroke. Three hundred twenty-five (93·4%) atrial fibrillation patients were amenable to anticoagulation, according to guidelines, 75 (23·1%) received vitamin K antagonists, and 20 (6·2%) had an international normalized ratio of 2-3 at the time of stroke onset. Males and younger patients were more likely to receive anticoagulation preadmission, while previous stroke had no significant impact on vitamin K antagonist prescription. Age (odds ratio 1·02 (95% confidence interval 1·00-1·04) per year), history of coronary artery disease (odds ratio 1·51 (95% confidence interval 1·01-2·26)), and therapeutic anticoagulation (odds ratio 0·28 (0·09-0·84)) were independent predictors of stroke severity. Age (hazard rates 3·11 (95% confidence interval 1·47-6·59), 4·65 (95% confidence interval 2·27-9·57), and 11·1 (95% confidence interval 4·90-25·1) for age categories 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years), preadmission antiplatelet therapy (hazard rate 1·85 (95% confidence interval 1·21-2·82)), and stroke severity on admission (hazard rate 1·60 (95% confidence interval 1·03-2·46) and hazard rate 3·23 (95% confidence interval 1·88-5·55) for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale categories 6-15 and >15 points) were associated with risk of death during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients in which atrial fibrillation was diagnosed prior to the index stroke, about 23% received anticoagulation according to guideline recommendations. Therapeutic anticoagulation at stroke onset significantly decreased the risk of moderate to severe stroke on admission but showed no significant association with long-term survival.

Development of clinical-quality registries in Australia: the way forward

Australia is developing a national performance framework aimed at measuring health outcomes across the health system. Clinical registries provide a clinically credible means of monitoring health care processes and outcomes, yet only five Australian registries currently have national coverage. At a national level, clinical registry development should be prioritised to target conditions or procedures that are suspected of being associated with large variations in processes or outcomes of care and that impact significantly on health care costs and patient morbidity. Registries should also aim to capture information across care interfaces and to monitor the medium and long-term safety and effectiveness of specific devices, procedures and drugs.

Quality Monitoring of Acute Stroke Care in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, 2001–2006

Background and Purpose— Quality monitoring projects are useful tools to improve the quality and to assess temporal trends of stroke care in larger populations.

Methods— In Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, a statewide, hospital-based, acute stroke care quality monitoring project was started in 2001. Initially, participation was mandatory for all hospitals with dedicated stroke units and from 2006 onward was mandatory for all hospitals. Quality monitoring included a structured data assessment and quality indicators for procedural measures.

Results— Between 2001 and 2006, the numbers of patients registered annually (N=6389 vs N=10 610), admission <3 hours after stroke onset (28.2% vs 34.6%), admission via emergency medical systems (38.1% vs 50.3%), and treatment in stroke units (44.3% vs 59.5%) increased significantly ( P <0.0001, respectively). In ischemic stroke, use of thrombolytic therapy increased (for patients admitted <3 hours after onset, 6.5% vs 14.1%), whereas therapy with high-dose heparin declined (24.5% vs 6.0%, P <0.0001). Several quality indicators (performance of neuroimaging and Doppler/duplex sonography, neuroimaging <3 hours after admission) showed stable results at a high level; more patients received echocardiography (62.2% vs 74.0%), but fewer patients were rapidly examined by extracranial Doppler/duplex sonography (68.7% vs 62.8%, P <0.0001). Diagnosis and treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, use of aspirin and combined aspirin/dipyridamole, and diagnosis of atrial fibrillation increased ( P <0.0001, respectively). Use of oral anticoagulation remained stable at ≈38% of patients with cardioembolism.

Conclusions— Although these results reflect high standards of acute stroke care and improvements regarding early admission, thrombolytic therapy, and several secondary preventive measures, there is still the potential for further improvement regarding thrombolysis, use of oral anticoagulation and statins, and admission to stroke units, for example.

Knowledge of stroke risk factors among primary care patients with previous stroke or TIA: a questionnaire study

Background

Survivers of stroke or transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) are at risk of new vascular events. Our objective was to study primary health care patients with stroke/TIA regarding their knowledge about risk factors for having a new event of stroke/TIA, possible associations between patient characteristics and patients' knowledge about risk factors, and patients' knowledge about their preventive treatment for stroke/TIA.

Methods

A questionnaire was distributed to 240 patients with stroke/TIA diagnoses, and 182 patients (76%) responded. We asked 13 questions about diseases/conditions and lifestyle factors known to be risk factors and four questions regarding other diseases/conditions ("distractors"). The patients were also asked whether they considered each disease/condition to be one of their own. Additional questions concerned the patients' social and functional status and their drug use. The t-test was used for continuous variables, chi-square test for categorical variables, and a regression model with variables influencing patient knowledge was created.

Results

Hypertension, hyperlipidemia and smoking were identified as risk factors by nearly 90% of patients, and atrial fibrillation and diabetes by less than 50%. Few patients considered the distractors as stroke/TIA risk factors (3-6%). Patients with a family history of cardiovascular disease, and patients diagnosed with carotid stenosis, atrial fibrillation or diabetes, knew these were stroke/TIA risk factors to a greater extent than patients without these conditions. Atrial fibrillation or a family history of cardiovascular disease was associated with better knowledge about risk factors, and higher age, cerebral haemorrhage and living alone with poorer knowledge. Only 56% of those taking anticoagulant drugs considered this as intended for prevention, while 48% of those taking platelet aggregation inhibitors thought this was for prevention.

Conclusions

Knowledge about hypertension, hyperlipidemia and smoking as risk factors was good, and patients who suffered from atrial fibrillation or carotid stenosis seemed to be well informed about these conditions as risk factors. However, the knowledge level was low regarding diabetes as a risk factor and regarding the use of anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors for stroke/TIA prevention. Better teaching strategies for stroke/TIA patients should be developed, with special attention focused on diabetic patients.

The effect of atrial fibrillation on stroke-related inpatient costs in Sweden: a 3-year analysis of registry incidence data from 2001

OBJECTIVE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important risk factor for stroke. It is prevalent in approximately one-fourth of stroke patients, and predictive of worse outcomes. This study aimed to analyze the effect of AF on stroke-related inpatient costs among first-ever stroke patients in Sweden.

METHODS

Hospitalizations and death records were monitored for 3 years in 6611 first-ever stroke patients. For stroke as primary diagnosis, inpatient costs were calculated on the basis of length of stay at different wards. For stroke as secondary diagnosis, costs were based on diagnosis-related groups.

RESULTS

Patients with AF (24% of all patients) were older (80 years vs. 73 years), had a higher prevalence of hypertension (49% vs. 41%) and/or diabetes (22% vs. 19%), higher risk of experiencing a restroke, and higher case fatality rate (43% vs. 25%) than patients without AF. The average cost per patient over 3 years was 9004 euros, with no statistically significant difference between AF and non-AF patients. However, a multiple regression analysis showed that the presence of AF resulted in higher costs after considering a number of background factors. Among patients surviving the index event, AF patients had on average 818 euros higher inpatient costs over 3 years than non-AF patients (10,192 euros vs. 9374 euros, P < 0.01). The difference in costs was highest for patients aged <65 years, with a difference of 4412 euros (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

AF-related strokes are associated with higher 3-year inpatient costs than non-AF strokes when controlling for factors such as case fatality rates, other risk factors for stroke, and age.

Functional outcome 3 months after stroke predicts long-term survival

BACKGROUND

When reporting stroke survival and prognostic factors with a possible effect on outcome, the starting point for the observation of a clinical cohort usually is the onset of stroke or the acute admission of a patient. Thus, acute and early mortality inflict prognosis on long-term outcome. In order to give a more robust analysis of long-term survival after the acute period we chose to start our observation with 3-month survivors.

METHODS

We used data from Riks-Stroke, the Swedish quality register for stroke care, together with survival information from the Swedish population register to explore the influence of disability level 3 months after stroke on long-term survival. The main analysis included 15,959 stroke patients, registered during 2001-2002, who had been independent in primary activities of daily living before stroke, had suffered an ischaemic or a haemorrhagic stroke and reported no previous stroke.

RESULTS

Impaired functional outcome after stroke was an independent predictor of poor survival. Patients with modified Rankin scale (mRS) grades 3, 4 and 5 had hazard ratios of 1.7, 2.5 and 3.8, respectively, as compared with patients with lower mRS grades. In addition to high mRS, male sex, high age, diabetes, smoking, hypertension therapy at stroke onset, atrial fibrillation and depressed mood were also recognized as significant predictors of poor survival using a multiple Cox regression model.

CONCLUSION

The influence of disability on survival is stronger than that of several other well-known prognostic factors. This finding indicates that any intervention in the acute phase that may improve functional status at 3 months will also have favourable secondary effects on survival in the long term.

Improved aetiological diagnosis of ischaemic stroke in a Vascular Medicine Unit--the significance of transesophageal echocardiogram

BACKGROUND

The TOAST study estimates that 34% of ischaemic strokes are of undetermined aetiology. Improvements in the diagnosis of the pathogenetic mechanism of ischaemic stroke would translate into a better care, in analogy to other fields of vascular and internal medicine.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the reduction of undetermined aetiology strokes performing a set of additional diagnostic tests.

DESIGN

Consecutive case series with historical controls.

SETTING

Internal Medicine Ward with a stroke area (SA) admitting most stroke patients of a large hospital in Italy.

SUBJECTS

A total of 179 ischaemic stroke patients admitted to SA in 2004-2005 compared with 105 ischaemic stroke patients admitted to the whole department in 2001.

INTERVENTION

To perform more diagnostic tests, including transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), in the greatest possible number of ischaemic stroke inpatients admitted in SA of the Internal Medicine Department, in the years 2004-2005.

RESULTS

More diagnostic tests were performed during the study period than in 2001, especially TEE (56% of patients in 2004-2005 vs. 3% of patients in 2001). We observed a significant reduction of undetermined aetiology from 38% in 2001 to 16% in 2004-2005 (p < 0.0001), largely for an increased identification of cases of cardio-embolic mechanism (from 18% to 40%, p = 0.0002). In the years 2004-2005 the fraction of patients on anticoagulant treatment at discharge was 21% vs. 12% in 2001 (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Performing more tests, particularly TEE, brought improvements in the aetiological diagnosis of stroke, increasing cardio-embolism diagnosis and anticoagulant treatment.

Misuse of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients: frequent, pervasive and persistent

PURPOSE

To assess the use of antithrombotic therapy among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients in a Brazilian University Heart Hospital (InCor).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a cross-sectional study we analyzed the charts of all patients treated at InCor in five separate days of 2002 (Phase 1). To assess the impact of admission to a cardiology hospital, a follow-up of the AF patients selected in Phase 1 was carried out after 1 year (Phase 2). The prevalence of AF in the 3,764 assessed charts was 8.0% (301 patients). In Phase 1, antiplatelets were prescribed to 21.2% and anticoagulant therapy (ACT) to 46.5% of AF patients; in Phase 2, to 19.9 and 57.8%, respectively. Thus, 32.2% (Phase 1) and 22.2% (Phase 2) of AF patients were not receiving any antithrombotic drug. Among AF patients with previous ischemic stroke (17.6%), only 49% (Phase 1) and 60.4% (Phase 2) were receiving ACT. As many as 34 and 22.6%, respectively, were not receiving any antithrombotic drug. After follow-up, a new acute embolic event was documented in 5.6% of patients, 17% died.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation is underused in AF patients and neither the fact of being treated by cardiologists in a University Hospital, nor the learning time-window of 1 year seemed to improve the antithrombotic care significantly.

Secondary Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Factors Influencing the Prescription of Oral Anticoagulation at Discharge

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the only treatment that has shown a significant benefit to reduce the risk of recurrence in patients with ischemic stroke and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, OAC is still underused, even at discharge from neurological centers. The objective of this study was to identify the reasons underlying the prescription of OAC at discharge after an ischemic stroke in patients with NVAF.

METHODS

We investigated the reasons why ischemic stroke patients with NVAF were not treated with OAC at discharge from 40 centers located in 5 European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Italy, and Portugal).

RESULTS

Of 320 ischemic stroke survivors at discharge, 186 (58.1%) received OAC, while 260 (81.3%) patients were theoretically eligible according to guidelines and the absence of contraindications. There were significant differences between countries and the logistic regression analysis found being already under OAC before stroke, having no leukoaraiosis, having no potential contraindication, being younger than 75 years, being married and suffering from angina pectoris as independent predictors of being discharged under OAC.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that besides patient-related factors, the prescription of OAC is also significantly influenced by the social environment and national practices.

Frequency and effect of optimal anticoagulation before onset of ischaemic stroke in patients with known atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The aims of the study were (i) to examine which antithrombotic therapy patients with known atrial fibrillation use at the point of time when they suffer an ischaemic stroke, (ii) to evaluate the effects of optimal antithrombotic treatment on outcome and severity of the stroke.

METHODS

Patients with known atrial fibrillation before onset of acute ischaemic stroke, and age >60 years were included. Antithrombotic therapy on admission was classified into four groups: no antithrombotic therapy, aspirin, sub-optimal anticoagulation (warfarin and international normalized ratio, INR<2.0) and optimal anticoagulation (warfarin and INR>or=2.0).

PRIMARY OUTCOME

modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 5 or 6 at day 7 poststroke.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

(i) death or discharge to a nursing home, (ii) death, (iii) stroke severity on admission assessed by Scandinavian Stroke Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 394 patients were included. On admission 109 (28%) patients used no antithrombotic therapy, 169 (43%) aspirin, 52 (13%) warfarin and had an INR<2.0, and 64 (16%) used warfarin and had an INR>or=2.0. The proportion of patients with an mRS 5 or 6 and the corresponding odds ratios were: in the warfarin group with INR<2.0, 16 (31%), OR 3.1 (CI: 1.2-8.0), (P=0.019), in the group with no antithrombotic therapy 29 (27%), 2.5 (1.1-5.9), (P=0.034), and in the aspirin group 41(24%), 2.2 (1.0-5.1) (P=0.054), compared with the warfarin group with INR>or=2.0, where eight (13%) patients had a poor outcome. A significantly higher proportion of patients died or were discharged to a nursing home in the warfarin group with an INR<2.0 (P=0.014), in the aspirin group (P=0.018) and in the no-treatment group (P=0.035), compared with the warfarin group with an INR>or=2.0. No significant differences were found regarding death alone and stroke severity on admission.

DISCUSSION

Few patients with known atrial fibrillation who suffer an ischaemic stroke receive optimal antithrombotic therapy prior to the onset of stroke. Optimal anticoagulation does not only reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke, but also appears to reduce death and severe dependency as well as the need for nursing home care, if an ischaemic stroke occurs.