Review article: albumin for circulatory support in patients with cirrhosis

Role of albumin in cirrhosis: from a hospitalist's perspective

Albumin, a negatively charged globular protein encoded on chromosome 4, is one of the most abundant proteins in the plasma and accounts for approximately 75% of plasma oncotic pressure. The role of albumin in the management of various disease states has shown to be beneficial historically. Low serum albumin is a predictor of mortality and poor outcomes. In cirrhotics undergoing paracentesis, albumin infusion prevents rapid re-accumulation of ascitic fluid while simultaneously decreasing the risk of post-paracentesis related circulatory dysfunction. Additionally, albumin is utilized in patients with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Overall, albumin appears to be an effective pharmacological agent in the management of cirrhosis and its complications.

Seven-day triple therapy is a better choice for Helicobacter pylori eradication in regions with low antibiotic resistance

AIM: To investigate whether 7-d triple therapies are still valid in populations with low levels of resistance.

METHODS: A total of 1106 Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-positive patients were divided into three groups, each of which received one type of 7-d triple therapy. Therapeutic outcomes of the patients were assessed by the ¹³C-urea breath test at 8 wk after treatment. The susceptibility of H. pylori to antibiotics was determined by an agar-dilution method. Data analysis was performed by χ² tests.

RESULTS: The eradication rates in groups A, B and C were 90.71% (332/366), 90.46% (313/346) and 90.87% (189/208), respectively (P = 0.986). The resistance rates were 8.91% for clarithromycin, 14.78% for levofloxacin and 0% for amoxicillin. The eradication rate was significantly different between clarithromycin- and levofloxacin-resistant patients (P < 0.05) in group A. Patients whose treatment failed in group A also had a higher clarithromycin resistance rate than did successive patients (P = 0.034). However, levofloxacin resistance had no obvious influence on the eradication rate. Furthermore, three main antibiotics (clarithromycin, levofloxacin and amoxicillin) had lower DID (defined daily dose per 1000 inhabitants per day) in this city.

CONCLUSION: Clarithromycin resistance is the main reason for the failure of 7-d triple therapy. In populations with low levels of resistance, a 7-d triple therapy is a viable choice. The choice of therapy should not be influenced by conditions in high antibiotic resistance regions.

Beta-blockers in cirrhosis and refractory ascites: a retrospective cohort study and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

It is currently discussed if beta-blockers exert harmful effects and increase mortality in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. In this study, we provide an overview of the available literature in this field in combination with a retrospective analysis of 61 patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites in a tertiary unit.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a systematic search of literature in May 2014. In addition, 61 patients with cirrhosis and ascites were identified and followed from development of refractory ascites until death or end of follow-up.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials (9 trials on propranolol, 1 case-control study and 4 retrospective analyses) were identified. One trial suggested an increased mortality in patients treated with beta-blockers and refractory ascites. The results of the remaining trials were inconclusive. No increase in mortality among beta-blocker-treated patients was found in the present retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with beta-blockers may increase mortality in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. However, the current evidence is sparse and high-quality studies are warranted to clarify the matter.

Ascites: pathogenesis and therapeutic principles

Ascites is a classic complication of advanced cirrhosis and it often marks the first sign of hepatic decompensation. Ascites occurs in more than 50% of patients with cirrhosis, worsens the course of the disease, and reduces survival substantially. Portal hypertension, splanchnic vasodilatation, liver insufficiency, and cardiovascular dysfunction are major pathophysiological hallmarks. Modern treatment of ascites is based on this recognition and includes modest salt restriction and stepwise diuretic therapy with spironolactone and loop-diuretics. Tense and refractory ascites should be treated with large volume paracentesis followed by plasma volume expansion or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Ascites complicated by spontaneous bacterial peritonitis requires adequate treatment with antibiotics. New potential treatment strategies include the use of vasopressin V(2)-receptor antagonists and vasoconstrictors. Since formation of ascites is associated with a poor prognosis, and treatment of fluid retention does not substantially improve survival, such patients should always be considered for liver transplantation.

Effect of intravenous albumin on endotoxin removal, cytokines, and nitric oxide production in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

OBJECTIVE

In patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), the use of intravenous albumin has been shown to prevent deterioration of renal function and to decrease the mortality rate, but the mechanisms remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to characterize the mechanisms of action of albumin with the focus on endotoxin and cytokines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty patients with SBP were divided into two groups. Group 1 received antibiotics and albumin infusion (20% 50 cc every day for 3 days) and Group 2 received antibiotic treatment only. Twenty-four cirrhotic patients with sterile ascites were enrolled in Group 3 and received albumin infusion (20% 50 cc every day for 3 days). Plasma and ascitic fluid concentrations of endotoxin, nitric oxide products (NOx), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and interleukin (IL)-6 were analyzed before and after treatments, respectively.

RESULTS

Combination therapy of albumin and antibiotics can significantly (p<0.01) reduce plasma levels of TNF-alpha and IL-6, and ascitic fluid levels of endotoxin, TNF-alpha and IL-6 in cirrhotic patients with SBP. Without the addition of albumin to an antibiotic regimen, the plasma and ascitic fluid levels of NOx increased significantly in patients with SBP (p=0.005 and p=0.004, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm that the beneficial effects of albumin are related to the reduction of the levels of TNF-alpha and NOx in both plasma and ascitic fluid. The infusion of albumin continuously for 3 days in addition to antibiotic treatment at the time of SBP detection is recommended as an effective therapy for patients with cirrhosis and SBP.

Albumin administration in patients with severe sepsis due to secondary peritonitis

BACKGROUND

To determine whether or not intravenous administration of human albumin can reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis due to secondary peritonitis.

METHODS

Adult patients who were admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) who fulfilled the criteria of severe sepsis due to secondary peritonitis were consecutively included in this retrospective study. Patients who received and those who did not receive at least a daily minimum of 25 g intravenous human albumin for 3 days during their first 7 days of SICU admission were classified as the study group and control group, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients were included in this study. For patients with baseline serum albumin < or = 20 g/L, 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the study group. For patients with baseline serum albumin > 20 g/L, albumin administration had no significant effects on 28-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

For patients with severe sepsis due to secondary peritonitis, albumin administration may reduce 28-day mortality in patients whose baseline serum albumin is < or = 20 g/L, but no such effect was found in patients whose baseline serum albumin was > 20 g/L.

Evaluation and management of patients with refractory ascites

Some patients with ascites due to liver cirrhosis become no longer responsive to diuretics. Once other causes of ascites such as portal vein thrombosis, malignancy or infection and non-compliance with medications and low sodium diet have been excluded, the diagnosis of refractory ascites can be made based on strict criteria. Patients with refractory ascites have very poor prognosis and therefore referral for consideration for liver transplantation should be initiated. Search for reversible components of the underlying liver pathology should be undertaken and targeted therapy, when available, should be considered. Currently, serial large volume paracentesis (LVP) and transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) are the two mainstay treatment options for refractory ascites. Other treatment options are available but not widely used either because they carry high morbidity and mortality (most surgical options) rates, or are new interventions that have shown promise but still need further evaluation. In this comprehensive review, we describe the evaluation and management of patients with refractory ascites from the prospective of the practicing physician.

Pathogenetic background for treatment of ascites and hepatorenal syndrome

Ascites and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) are the major and challenging complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension that significantly affect the course of the disease. Liver insufficiency, portal hypertension, arterial vasodilatation, and systemic cardiovascular dysfunction are major pathophysiological hallmarks. Modern treatment of ascites is based on this recognition and includes modest salt restriction and stepwise diuretic therapy with spironolactone and loop diuretics. Tense and refractory ascites should be treated with a large volume paracentesis, followed by volume expansion or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. New treatment strategies include the use of vasopressin V(2)-receptor antagonists and vasoconstrictors. The HRS denotes a functional and reversible impairment of renal function in patients with severe cirrhosis with a poor prognosis. Attempts of treatment should seek to improve liver function, ameliorate arterial hypotension and central hypovolemia, and reduce renal vasoconstriction. Ample treatment of ascites and HRS is important to improve the quality of life and prevent further complications, but since treatment of fluid retention does not significantly improve survival, these patients should always be considered for liver transplantation.

An evidence-based manual for abdominal paracentesis

The purpose of this study was to provide evidence-based approaches to detect ascites, perform paracentesis, order tests, and interpret the results. A Medline search was performed to identify relevant articles. Of 731 identified articles, 50 articles were used. The most sensitive findings for ascites detection are ankle edema (93%), increased abdominal girth (87%), flank dullness (84%), and bulging flanks (81%). Paracentesis is safe, with bleeding rates and leakage of <1%. An ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cell count >or=250 cells/mm(3) is the most sensitive test (86%-100%) to diagnose spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The serum-ascites albumin gradient is the most useful test in identifying portal hypertension-related ascites. Large-volume paracentesis is effective in the treatment of refractory ascites. We conclude that paracentesis is a safe and vital procedure in patients with new-onset ascites. Once detected, an algorithmic approach to ordering tests and their interpretation is useful to determine etiology and direct further management.

Cardiovascular abnormalities in special conditions of advanced cirrhosis. The circulatory adaptative changes to specific therapeutic procedures for the management of refractory ascites

Advanced liver disease is characterized by decreased arterial blood pressure and peripheral vascular resistances, increased cardiac output and heart rate in the setting of a hyperdynamic circulatory pattern favoured by total blood volume expansion, circulatory overload and overactivity of the endogenous vasoactive systems. Reduced heart responses to stressful conditions such as changes in loading conditions of the heart in presence of further deterioration of liver function such as refractory ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and bleeding esophageal varices have been recently identified and the knowledge of the cirrhotic cardiomyopathy syndrome has gained the dignity of a new clinical entity. Facing the availability of therapeutic interventions (paracentesis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, peritoneovenous shunt, orthotopic liver transplantation) currently employed to manage the life-threatening complications of the most advanced phases of cirrhotic disease, the knowledge of their impact on cardiovascular function is of paramount relevance.

Portal hypertension--old problem, new therapeutic solutions

Portal hypertension is an old problem, but many solutions have been elaborated in recent years, mostly through international cooperation of several research groups. Ultimately, liver transplantation is a solution for all these problems but with the increasing need for liver transplantation and the lack of sufficient donor organs, there is still a high need for better conservative and interventional treatment solutions to portal hypertension. With the rapid improvements in specific therapies for chronic liver disease, especially viral hepatitis, there is hope that there will be a decreasing need for the treatment of the complications of advanced stage liver disease in future years.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a therapeutic update

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is one of the main infectious complications of cirrhosis and occurs in 8-30% of hospitalized patients with ascites. SBP is characterized by infection of the ascitic fluid (AF) in the absence of any primary focus of intra-abdominal infection. The main route by which the AF becomes infected is the hematogenous route. The pathogenic mechanism by which infection develops is bacterial translocation from the intestinal flora to the mesenteric lymph nodes and from there to the bloodstream. Contributing factors are an increased growth of Gram-negative aerobic bacilli in the jejunum, changes in the intestinal barrier and in addition factors which could reduce the local flow of blood. For clinical diagnosis, patients with SBP may present signs of peritoneal irritation and pain, together with changes in gastrointestinal motility, sometimes with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or ileus. Many patients, however, may not present any symptoms or signs as a result of the presence of SBP. Diagnostic paracentesis of the AF must be performed for every patient with cirrhosis, hospitalized with ascites. Laboratory diagnosis of SBP is carried out by polymorphonuclear count in the AF, together with a positive culture from the AF, which is characteristically monomicrobial. Escherichia coli has been the main bacterium isolated from AF as well as other Gram-negative bacteria from the Enterobacteriaceae family and Streptococcus genus. A more rapid diagnosis of SBP can be obtained via the use of leukocyte esterase, which is present in biological fluids and reacts with a component of the dipstick, changing its color. During the acute phase of SBP, antibiotics should be initiated promptly once the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of SBP has been made, before the result of AF culture. Cefotaxime or other third-generation cephalosporins have been considered the first-choice empirical antibiotics in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with SBP, and is efficacious in approximately 90% of cases. Broad-spectrum quinolones, which are almost completely absorbed after oral administration and diffuse rapidly through the AF, are currently used for oral treatment of uncomplicated SBP. Patients who have already had a previous episode of SBP, with a 69% probability of recurrence within a year, will benefit from prophylactic treatment. Cirrhotic patients with a high risk of SBP and other infections, such as those with gastrointestinal bleeding, also benefit from primary prophylaxis and norfloxacin has been used with success.

Review article: current management of renal dysfunction in the cirrhotic patient

The United Network for Organ Sharing database revealed that over the last 4-5 years, an average of 1800 patients were removed from the cadaveric waiting list annually because of patients' death and an additional 400-500 were removed from the list because of the severity of their illnesses. The pre-transplant evaluation process, therefore, requires careful and continued assessment of the patient's pulmonary, cardiac and renal function among others. This article describes a systematic approach to the evaluation and management of renal dysfunction complicating the course of advanced liver disease, the pathogenic mechanisms and current recommendations for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome, and the indications for combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Review article: pathogenesis and pathophysiology of hepatorenal syndrome--is there scope for prevention?

The hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a functional impairment of the kidneys in chronic liver disease caused by a circulatory failure. The prognosis is poor, particularly with type 1 HRS, but also type 2, and only liver transplantation is of lasting benefit. However, recent research into the pathophysiology of ascites and HRS has stimulated new enthusiasm in their prevention and treatment. Patients with HRS have hyperdynamic circulatory dysfunction with reduced arterial blood pressure and reduced central blood volume, owing to preferential splanchnic arterial vasodilatation. Activation of potent vasoconstricting systems, including the sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems, counteracts the arterial vasodilatation and leads to a pronounced renal vasoconstriction with renal hypoperfusion, a reduced glomerular filtration rate, and intense sodium-water retention. Thus prevention of HRS should seek to improve liver function, limit arterial hypotension and central hypovolaemia, and reduce renal vasoconstriction and the renal and interstitial pressures. Portal pressure can be reduced with beta-adrenergic blockers and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Precipitating events, like infections, bleeding, and postparacentesis circulatory syndrome, should be treated to avoid further circulatory failure. Improvement in arterial blood pressure and central hypovolaemia can be achieved with vasoconstrictors, such as terlipressin (Glypressin), and plasma expanders such as human albumin. In the future endothelins, adenosine antagonists, long-acting vasoconstrictors, and antileukotriene drugs may play a role in preventing and treating HRS.