Effects of trimebutine on sphincter of Oddi motility in patients with post-cholecystectomy pain

Current treatment of biliary Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction

The sphincter of Oddi is a delicate neuromuscular structure located at the junction of the biliary-pancreatic system and the duodenum. Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (SOD) can result in various clinical manifestations, including biliary-type pain and recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis. The management of SOD has been challenging. With the publication of the landmark Evaluating Predictors and Interventions in Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (EPISOD) trial and the Rome IV consensus, our clinical practice in the treatment of SOD has changed significantly in recent years. Currently, the management of type II SOD remains controversial and there is a lack of non-invasive therapy options, particularly for patients not responding to endoscopic treatment. In this mini review, we aimed to discuss the current knowledge on the treatment of biliary SOD.

Post-cholecystectomy syndrome and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: past, present and future

Post-cholecystectomy syndrome and the concept of a causal relationship to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, despite the controversy, has presented a clinically relevant conflict for decades. Historically surgeons, and now gastroenterologists have expended tremendous efforts towards trying to better understand the dilemma that is confounded by unique patient phenotypes. Areas covered: This review encompasses the literature from a century of experience on the topic of post-cholecystectomy syndrome. Relevant historical and anecdotal experiences are examined in the setting of insights from evaluation of recently available controlled data. Expert commentary: Historical observations and recent data suggest that patients with post-cholecystectomy syndrome can be categorized as follows. Patients with sphincter of Oddi stenosis will most often benefit from treatment with sphincterotomy. Patients with classic biliary pain and some objective evidence of biliary obstruction may have a sphincter of Oddi disorder and should be considered for endoscopic evaluation and therapy. Patients with atypical post-cholecystectomy pain, without any evidence consistent with biliary obstruction, and/or with evidence for another diagnosis or dysfunction should not undergo ERCP.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: an evidence-based review

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a painful syndrome that presents as recurrent episodes of right upper quadrant biliary pain, or recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis. It is a disease process that has been a subject of controversy, in part because its natural history, disease course and treatment outcomes have not been clearly defined in large controlled studies with long-term follow-up. This review is aimed at clarifying the state-of-the-art with an evidence-based summary of the current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches and modalities for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Medical treatment for sphincter of oddi dysfunction: Can it replace endoscopic sphincterotomy?

AIM: To report the results of a medical management of sphincter of oddi dysfunction (SOD) after an intermediate follow-up period.

METHODS: A total of 59 patients with SOD (2 men and 57 women, mean age 51 years old) were included in this prospective study. After medical treatment for one year, the patients were clinically re-evaluated after an average period of 30 mo.

RESULTS: The distribution of the patients according to the Milwaukee’s classification was the following: 11 patients were type 1, 34 were type 2 and 14 were type 3. Fourteen patients underwent an endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) after one year of medical treatment. The median intermediate follow-up period was 29.8 ± 3 mo (3-72 mo). The initial effectiveness of the medical treatment was complete, partial and poor among 50.8%, 13.5% and 35%, respectively, of the patients. At the end of the follow-up period, 37 patients (62.7%) showed more than 50% improvement. The rate of improvement in patients who required ES was not significantly different compared with the patients treated conservatively (64.2% vs 62.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that conservative medical treatment could be an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy because, after an intermediate follow-up period, the two treatments show the same success rates.

Effect of four medications associated with gastrointestinal motility on Oddi sphincter in the rabbit

AIM

Modulatory drugs of gastrointestinal (GI) motility are a possibility for use to relieve the main clinical presentation of sphincter of Oddi (SO) dysfunctions which are not easily distinguished from those occurring in high prevalence functional GI disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of GI motility modulators including pinaverium, domperidone, trimebutine, and tegaserod on the contractile activity of SO stimulated by carbachol in the rabbit.

METHODS

The contraction responses precontracted by carbachol (0.1 microM) of in vitro rabbit SO rings were evaluated before and after the addition of a series concentration (10(-13) to 10(-3)M) of pinaverium, domperidone, trimebutine, and tegaserod.

RESULTS

Pinaverium induced a concentration-dependent relaxation of isolated SO rings (10(-13) vs. 10(-7) vs. 10(-3)M = 16.6 +/- 4.8 vs. 47.1 +/- 5.5 vs. 81.2 +/- 6.2%, p < 0.001 by ANOVA) precontracted with carbachol (0.1 microM). Tegaserod did not significantly effect (10(-13) vs. 10(-7) vs. 10(-3)M = 2.3 +/- 2.2 vs. 6.7+/- 2.1 vs. 10.1 +/- 2.3%, p > 0.05 by ANOVA) SO motility, but domperidone seemed to stimulate SO contractions (10(-12) vs. 10(-7) vs. 10(-3)M = -2.2 +/- 1.5 vs. -13.9 +/- 2.0 vs. -21.0 +/- 2.7%, p < 0.05 by ANOVA). At low doses (10(-13) to 10(-7)M), trimebutine stimulated SO contraction (-8.7 +/- 1.4 vs. -9.3 +/- 2.0%); however, high doses (10(-6) to 10(-3)M) of trimebutine inhibited SO motility (-5.9 +/- 1.7 vs. 14.5 +/- 2.0%, p < 0.05 by ANOVA).

CONCLUSION

Pinaverium totally inhibits contractions induced by carbachol and tegaserod has no effect on carbachol-induced contractions. Domperidone stimulates contractions induced by carbachol. Trimebutine could either stimulate or inhibit SO contractions depending on its dosage.

Is endoscopic sphincterotomy avoidable in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction?

AIM

Endoscopic sphincterotomy is an efficient means of treating sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD), but it is associated with a morbidity rate of 20%. The aim of this study was to assess how frequently endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed to treat SOD in a group of patients with a 1-year history of medical management.

METHODS

A total of 59 patients, who had been cholecystectomized 9.3 years previously on average, were included in this study and they all underwent biliary scintigraphy. Medical treatment was prescribed for 1 year. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was proposed for patients whose medical treatment had been unsuccessful.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were rated group 1 on the Milwaukee classification scale, 34 group 2 and 14 group 3. The hile-duodenum transit time (HDTT) was lengthened in 32 patients. The medical treatment was efficient or fairly efficient in 45% of the group 1 patients, 67% of the group 2 patients, and 71.4% of the group 3 patients (P=0.29). Only 14 patients out of the 21 whose medical treatment was unsuccessful agreed to undergo endoscopic sphincterotomy. HDTT was lengthened in 11 of the 14 patients undergoing endoscopic sphincterotomy and in 21 of the 45 non-endoscopic sphincterotomy patients (P=0.03). Twelve of the 14 patients who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy were cured.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective series of patients with a 1-year history of medical management, only 23% of the patients with suspected SOD underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy although 54% had an abnormally long HDTT.

Is sphincter of Oddi manometry a risk factor for pancreatitis? A different view

Studies suggest a causal relationship between sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) and acute pancreatitis, presumably due to water instillation in the ductal system. In this article, critical analysis of the existing studies attributes the high risk of acute pancreatitis with SOM to "association due to confounding" rather than to "causation." This conclusion is based on two pieces of evidence: The first is lack of biologic plausibility: Biologic evidence is lacking to support the hypothesis that water instillation during SOM can induce acute pancreatitis. The second is confounding evidence: Manometric studies show considerable variation in the risk of post-procedure pancreatitis (4% to 30%), which suggests that other important factors besides SOM influence the adverse outcome. These studies did not control for other variables, which are well known to predispose to pancreatitis and therefore may act as confounding factors. Two studies that assessed the independent role of SOM in causation of acute pancreatitis showed that SOM is not an independent predictor of acute pancreatitis. It is the underlying disorder sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and not the "SOM" procedure, that predisposes patients to post-procedure acute pancreatitis.