One-week ranitidine bismuth citrate in combinations with metronidazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: the RBC-MACH study

Pylera® plus ranitidine vs Pylera® plus esomeprazole in first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: Two pilot studies

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that Pylera^® (three-in-one capsules containing 140 mg bismuth potassium subcitrate, 125 metronidazole, and tetracycline 125 mg) in association with omeprazole or esomeprazole is a good option in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. In particular, the adjunction of a PPI to Pylera^® may be useful to overcome metronidazole resistance. However, omeprazole and its derivatives can promote greater bismuth absorption and enhance its toxicity. The H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) ranitidine seems to induce less bismuth absorption and as a consequence less systemic toxicity.

AIM

To evaluate whether Pylera^® in combination with esomeprazole or with ranitidine is equally effective in the treatment of H. pylori infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two separate groups of patients were treated simultaneously. One group was treated with Pylera^® three capsules qid plus esomeprazole 40 mg bid for 10 days (group A), and the other group was treated with Pylera^® three capsules qid plus ranitidine 300 mg bid for 10 days (group B). H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative result in ¹³ C urea breath test performed at least 8 weeks after the end of treatment with a delta-over-baseline value less than 5.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were recruited for group A and thirty-three patients in group B. Eradication rates were 93.7% (30/32) and 90.9% (30/33), respectively, at intention-to-treat analysis, and 96.6% (29/30) and 93.3% (28/30), respectively, at per-protocol analysis. Adverse events occurred in 26 patients and led to the suspension of treatment in one patient in group A and in one patient in group B.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that Pylera® plus a PPI or ranitidine were equally effective in the population studied. The high cure rates of bismuth triple therapy (without an antisecretory drug) and the lack of susceptibility testing make it impossible to exclude the possibility that the results would have been similar if neither the PPI nor the ranitidine were given.

Second-line and third-line trial for helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcers: A prospective, crossover, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Following standard first-line triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection, up to 20% of patients require further eradication.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of second-line triple therapies and third-line quadruple therapies for the eradication of H pylori.

METHODS

This 7-week, prospective, crossover, controlled, second- and third-line trial was conducted at the Department of Gastroenterology, Ferencváros Health Center (Budapest, Hungary). Patients aged 18 to 80 years with duodenal ulcers and an H pylori infection resistant to first-line triple therapy (pantoprazole 40 mg BID + amoxicillin 1000 mg BID + clarithromycin 500 mg BID [PAC] given as tablets) received a different triple therapy regimen (ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg BID + metronidazole 500 mg BID + clarithromycin 500 mg BID [RBC-MC]) for 7 days (group 1A), and nonresponders after RBC + 2 antimicrobials received the pantoprazole-based regimen (group 1B). After secondary failure, patients were randomized to receive quadruple therapies: pantoprazole, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and either nitrofurantoin or bismuth subsalicylate (groups 2A and 2B).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled in the second-line study (56 men, 78 women; mean [SD] age, 51.1 [12.4] years; group 1A, 68 patients; group 1B, 66 patients). Subsequently, 41 (30.6%) of these patients were randomized to receive quadruple therapies. Using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the eradication rates did not differ significantly (60.3% and 65.2% in groups 1A and 1B, respectively; 61.9% and 55.0% in groups 2A and 2B, respectively). Perprotocol eradication rates did not differ significantly (66.1% and 68.3% in groups 1A and 1B, respectively); however, the rates were significantly different in group 2A (66.7%) versus group 2B (55.5%) (P = 0.03).

Meta-analysis: the effect of antibiotic resistance status on the efficacy of triple and quadruple first-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Information regarding the effects of drug resistance on therapies for Helicobacter pylori is limited.

AIMS

To determine the effect of drug resistance on the efficacy of first-line treatment regimens for H. pylori and identify the most efficacious treatments in the presence of drug resistance.

METHODS

We searched for studies using the keywords: 'Helicobacter pylori','resistance' and 'treatment' or 'therapy'. Multilevel meta-regression models were used to determine the effect of drug resistance on treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

We analysed data from 93 studies with 10,178 participants. For triple therapies, clarithromycin resistance had a greater effect on treatment efficacy than nitroimidazole resistance. Metronidazole resistance reduced efficacy by 26% in triple therapies containing a nitroimidazole, tetracycline and bismuth, while efficacy was reduced by only 14% when a gastric acid inhibitor was added to the regimen. Quadruple therapies containing both clarithromycin and metronidazole were the most efficacious; >80% of H. pylori infections were consistently eradicated with these regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug resistance was a strong predictor of efficacy across triple therapies for the eradication of H. pylori in adults. Resistance to either clarithromycin or metronidazole, but not both simultaneously, may be overcome by using quadruple therapies, especially those containing both clarithromycin and metronidazole.

Effective regimens for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Successful Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy remains a challenge in medical practice. Currently, a proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy containing clarithromycin, amoxicillin or nitroimidazole for 7 days is the recommended first-line treatment approach with an expected eradication success rate of approximately 80%. As a second-line treatment option in the case of failure, a ranitidine bismuth citrate-based quadruple therapy is currently recommended curing another 80% of patients, leaving a subset of patients with persistent H. pylori infection. For these patients, promising rescue options have been evaluated including regimens that contain rifabutin, quinolones, furazolidone or high-dose amoxicillin. The role of susceptibility testing is still under discussion. It is not generally recommended prior to first-line treatment but guidelines propose a role for culture and antibiotic sensitivity testing after failure of the second attempt. Meanwhile, data on the geographic distribution of resistance pattern are available and may guide therapeutic decisions with regard to the combination of antibiotics chosen for the individual patients aiming at 100% cure rate in each individual patient.

Does delayed gastric emptying shorten the H pylori eradication period? A double blind clinical trial

AIM: To evaluate the gastric emptying inhibitory effects of sugar and levodopa on H pylori eradication period.

METHODS: A total of 139 consecutive patients were randomized into 6 groups. The participants with peptic ulcer disease or non-ulcer dyspepsia non-responding to other medications who were also H pylori-positive patients either with positive rapid urease test (RUT) or positive histology were included. All groups were pretreated with omeprazole for 2 d and then treated with quadruple therapy regimen (omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole); all drugs were given twice daily. Groups 1 and 2 were treated for 3 d, groups 3, 4 and 5 for 7 d, and group 6 for 14 d. Groups 1 to 4 received sugar in the form of 10% sucrose syrup. Levodopa was prescribed for groups 1 and 3. Patients in groups 2 and 4 were given placebo for levodopa and groups 5 and 6 received placebos for both sugar and levodopa. Upper endoscopy and biopsies were carried out before treatment and two months after treatment. Eradication of H pylori was assessed by RUT and histology 8 wk later.

RESULTS: Thirty patients were excluded. Per-protocol analysis showed successful eradication in 53% in group 1, 56% in group 2, 58% in group 3, 33.3% in group 4, 28% in group 5, and 53% in group 6. Eradication rate, patient compliance and satisfaction were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION: It seems that adding sugar or levodopa or both to anti H pylori eradication regimens may lead to shorter duration of treatment.

Seven-day is more effective than 4-day ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy in eradication of Helicobacter pylori in children: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is common in paediatric population. To date, there is still no universally accepted recommendation on the treatment of this infection in children. Ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy has been shown to be effective in H. pylori eradication in adults but its use has rarely been validated in children.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy in eradication of H. pylori in children and to determine the shortest duration of treatment required.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized study comparing ranitidine bismuth citrate plus amoxicillin plus clarithromycin given for 4 days vs. 7 days in H. pylori-infected children diagnosed by (13)C-urea breath test. Eradication was evaluated by repeat (13)C-urea breath test at 6 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 206 children were recruited (median age 12 years, 97 boys and 109 girls). Ninety-eight (47.6%) and 108 (52.4%) children were randomized to receive 7-day and 4-day regimen respectively. The eradication rate of 4-day treatment arm was 77.8% (both intention-to-treat and per protocol) compared with 88.8% (intention-to-treat, P = 0.036) and 89.7% (per protocol, P = 0.022) of 7-day regimen. There was no statistical difference in terms of side effects between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven-day ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for eradication of H. pylori in children.

Helicobacter pylori first-line treatment and rescue options in patients allergic to penicillin

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication is a challenge in patients allergic to penicillin, especially those who have failed a first-eradication trial.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of H. pylori first-line treatment and rescue options in patients allergic to penicillin.

METHODS

Prospective single centre study including 40 consecutive treatments administered to patients allergic to penicillin. Therapy regimens: First-line (12 patients) omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole for 7 days; second-line (17 patients) ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline and metronidazole for 7 days; third-line (nine patients) rifabutin, clarithromycin and omeprazole for 10 days; and fourth-line (two patients) levofloxacin, clarithromycin and omeprazole for 10 days.

OUTCOME VARIABLE

a negative (13)C-urea breath test 8 weeks after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

Per-protocol/intention-to-treat eradication rates were: first-line (64/58%); second-line (ranitidine bismuth citrate; 53/47%); third-line (rifabutin; 17/11%) and fourth-line regimen (levofloxacin; 100/100%). Compliance with treatment was generally good, except with the rifabutin-based regimen, which presented adverse effects in 89% of the patients, including four cases of myelotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori-infected patients who are allergic to penicillin may be treated with a first-line treatment combining a proton-pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and metronidazole. Rescue options may include a regimen with ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline and metronidazole. A levofloxacin-based rescue regimen (with proton-pump inhibitor and clarithromycin) may also represent an alternative, even when two or more consecutive eradication treatments have previously failed. However, rifabutin + clarithromycin + proton-pump inhibitor regimen is ineffective and poorly tolerated.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: proton pump inhibitor vs. ranitidine bismuth citrate plus two antibiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the Helicobacter pylori eradication efficacy with ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) and two antibiotics, and to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) vs. RBC with two antibiotics for 1 week.

SELECTION OF STUDIES

Studies evaluating RBC plus two antibiotics were considered. For the meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials comparing PPI vs. RBC plus two antibiotics for 1 week were included.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic and manual bibliographical searches. Assessment of study quality and data extraction: Independently done by two reviewers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

'Intention-to-treat' eradication rate. Meta-analysis was performed, combining the odds ratios (OR) of the individual studies. Subanalysis: Depending on the type of antibiotics and the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

Mean H. pylori eradication with 7-day RBC-clarithromycin-amoxicillin, RBC-clarithromycin-nitroimidazole, and RBC-amoxicillin-nitroimidazole was 83%, 86%, and 71%, respectively. The meta-analysis showed comparable efficacy with RBC and PPI when they were combined with clarithromycin and amoxicillin (OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 0.88-1.40), or with amoxicillin and metronidazole (OR = 0.92; 95%CI = 0.60-1.41). However, when comparing PPI vs. RBC plus clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole, higher cure rates with RBC than with PPI were demonstrated (OR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.15-2.37).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of RBC and PPI-based triple regimens were comparable when using the clarithromycin-amoxicillin or the amoxicillin-metronidazole combination. However, RBC seems to have a higher efficacy than PPI when clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole are the antibiotics prescribed. Therefore, if one prefers to use the clarithromycin-nitroimidazole regimen, RBC should be used instead of a PPI.

Do patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia respond differently to Helicobacter pylori eradication treatments from those with peptic ulcer disease? A systematic review

AIM: It is controversial whether patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) respond differently to Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) eradication treatment than those with peptic ulcer disease (PUD). To review the evidence for any difference in H pylori eradication rates between PUD and NUD patients.

METHODS: A literature search for full articles and meeting abstracts to July 2004 was conducted. We included studies evaluating the efficacy of a proton pump inhibitor (P) or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus two antibiotics of clarithromycin (C), amoxicillin (A), metronidazole (M), or P-based quadruple therapies for eradicating the infection.

RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met the criteria. No significant difference in eradication rates was found between PUD and NUD patients when treated with 7-d RBCCA, 10-d PCA or P-based quadruple therapies. When the 7-d PCA was used, the pooled H pylori eradication rate was 82.1% (431/525) and 72.6% (448/617) for PUD and NUD patients, respectively, yielding a RR of 1.15 (95%CI 1.01-1.29). However, the statistically significant difference was seen only in meeting abstracts, but not in full publications.

CONCLUSION: There is no convincing evidence to suggest that NUD patients respond to H pylori eradication treatments differently from those with PUD, although a trend exists with the 7-d PCA therapy.

First-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori in primary health care based on antibiotic resistance: results of three eradication regimens

AIM

To determine the efficacy of three Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens and factors affecting the eradication results in Finland.

METHODS

A total of 342 H. pylori-positive adult patients from primary health care referred for gastroscopy at 23 centres in different parts of Finland were randomized to receive either (i) lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. (LAM), (ii) lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (LAC), or (iii) ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d., metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. and tetracycline 500 mg q.d.s. (RMT). A (13)C-urea breath test was performed 4 weeks after therapy.

RESULTS

The eradication result could be assessed in 329 cases. Intention-to-treat cure rates of LAM, LAC, and RMT were 78, 91 and 81%. The difference was significant between LAM and LAC (P = 0.01) and between LAC and RMT (P = 0.04). The eradication rates in cases with metronidazole-susceptible vs. -resistant isolates were for LAM 93% vs. 53% (P = 0.00001), for LAC 95% vs. 84%, and for RMT 91% vs. 67% (P = 0.002). Previous antibiotic use, smoking, and coffee drinking reduced the efficacy of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In unselected patients in primary health care, LAC was the most effective first-line eradication.

Clinical evaluation of four one-week triple therapy regimens in eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To evaluate clinical efficacy of four one-week triple therapies in eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS: In this clinical trial, 132 patients with duodenal ulcer and chronic gastritis were randomly divided into four groups, and received treatment with OAC (omeprazole 20 mg + amoxicillin 1000 mg + clarithromycin 250 mg), OFC (omeprazole 20 mg + furazolidone 100 mg + clarithromycin 250 mg), OFA (omeprazole 20 mg + furazolidone 100 mg + amoxicillin 1000 mg) and OMC (omeprazole 20 mg + metronidazole 200 mg + clarithromycin 250 mg), respectively. Each drug was taken twice daily for one week. The ¹³C urea breath test was carried out 4-8 weeks after treatment to determine the success of H pylori eradication.

RESULTS: A total of 127 patients completed the treatment. The eradication rate for H pylori infection was 90.3%, 90.9%, 70.9% and 65.6%, respectively in OAC, OFC OMC and OFA groups.

CONCLUSION: A high eradication rate can be achieved with one-week OAC or OFC triple therapy. Thus, one-week triple therapies with OAC and OFC are recommended for Chinese patients with duodenal ulcers and chronic gastritis.

Risk factors for failure of Helicobacter pylori therapy--results of an individual data analysis of 2751 patients

AIM

To study risk factors for failure of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment.

METHODS

Individual data from 2751 patients included in 11 multicentre clinical trials carried out in France and using a triple therapy, were gathered in a unique database. The 27 treatment regimens were regrouped into four categories.

RESULTS

The global failure rate was 25.8% [95% CI: 24-27]. There was a difference in failure rate between duodenal ulcer patients and non-ulcer dyspeptic patients, 21.9% and 33.7%, respectively (P < 10(-6)). In a random-effect model, the risk factors identified for eradication failure in duodenal ulcer patients (n = 1400) were: to be a smoker, and to have received the group 4 treatment, while to receive a 10 day treatment vs. 7 days protected from failure. In non-ulcer dyspeptic patients (n = 913), the group 2 treatment was associated with failure. In both groups, age over 60 was associated with successful H. pylori eradication. There were less strains resistant to clarithromycin in duodenal ulcer patients than in non-ulcer dyspeptic patients. Clarithromycin resistance predicted failure almost perfectly.

CONCLUSION

Duodenal ulcer and non-ulcer dyspeptic patients should be managed differently in medical practice and considered independently in eradication trials.

The effect of Helicobacter pylori retreatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate, clarithromycin, and metronidazole depends on the first-line therapy

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates seem to decrease. This study evaluates the effect of retreatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) 400 mg B.I.D., clarithromycin (C) 500 mg B.I.D., and metronidazole (M) 500 mg every morning and 1,000 mg every evening for 14 days [RBC.C.M].

STUDY

Nine gastroenterologic units included patients with unsuccessful eradication of H. pylori in a preceding randomized trial. Previous treatment was either omeprazole (O) 20 mg, C 250 mg, and M 500 mg [O.C.M] or RBC 400 mg, tetracycline (T) 1,000 mg, and M 500 mg [RBC x T x M]; all drugs were given twice daily for 7 days.

RESULTS

Twenty-six H. pylori-positive patients were included (nine males, 17 females; mean age, 54 years; range, 39-74 years). The eradication rates in the groups previously treated with O.C.M and RBC.T.M were three of nine (33%) (95% CI = 12-65) and 15 of 17 (88%) (95% CI = 66-97) respectively (p = 0.008). The corresponding results in a "per-protocol" analysis were three of eight (38%) (95% CI = 13-69) and 10 of 10 (100%) (95% CI = 72-100), respectively (p = 0.007). A side effect score was 21.8 compared with 8.3 in the previous study (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of a retreatment regimen depends on the preceding treatment. The RBC x C x M regimen is effective in nonresponders to RBC x T x M, but it seems unsuitable after failure of the O x C x M regimen.

Pathogenesis and therapy of gastric and duodenal ulcer disease

Despite the decreasing frequency of Helicobacter pylori-induced peptic ulcers, peptic ulcer disease remains a major clinical problem partly because nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ulcers have increased in frequency. The reduction in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ulcers by use of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors will not eliminate the problem because of increased use of aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis. This article reviews current concepts of peptic ulcer pathogenesis and therapy according to ulcer etiology; discusses potential interactions between etiologies; and considers the therapy for H pylori infection including the effects of antimicrobial resistance, and the role of bismuth quadruple therapy or furazolidone salvage therapy.

Peptic-ulcer disease

The discovery of Helicobacter pylori has greatly changed our approach to peptic ulcer disease. Bacterial, host, and environmental factors all have a role in peptic-ulcer disease. Although the prevalence of uncomplicated peptic ulcers is falling, hospital admissions for ulcer complications associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are rising. Evidence suggests that prescription of NSAIDs along with potent antiulcer agents and the use of highly selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors reduce gastroduodenal ulceration. Whether these therapeutic advances will translate into clinical benefits remains to be seen. The interaction between H pylori and NSAIDs is one of the most controversial issues in peptic ulcer disease. With the fall in rates of H pylori infection, the proportion of ulcers not related to this organism and NSAIDs has risen, which will affect the management of peptic ulcer.

Rescue Therapy for Helicobacter pylori

Up to 35% of patients infected with Helicobacter pylori fail to respond to standard anti-H. pylori therapy. With the rising prevalence antimicrobial resistance, the failure rates of conventional proton pump inhibitor-containing triple therapy are expected to increase. Pretreatment antibiotic resistance testing should be done whenever possible to allow for tailoring of the treatment regimens. The data on second-line or rescue therapy are limited and usually are subjected to various biases and confounding factors. Switching between clarithromycin and metronidazole should be considered if repeated courses of proton pump inhibitor-containing triple therapy are used as second-line therapy in the absence of antimicrobial sensitivity testing. The prolongation of therapy duration with proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is ineffective for clarithromycin-resistant strains. The bismuth-containing quadruple therapy is the best salvage treatment in the absence of pretreatment antibiotic susceptibility. Furazolidone quadruple therapy (where available) and rifabutin triple therapy are salvage therapies of last resort. If these regimens fail, culture and susceptibility testing is required.

Efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies: a single centre observational study

BACKGROUND

Many Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens have been described. There are little data reporting their efficacy or integration in routine clinical practice. The overall results of eradication therapy in a cohort of patients are described and an algorithm for management outlined.

METHODS

469 patients receiving eradication therapy in routine clinical practice were evaluated. The successes of individual regimes as first, second and third line therapy were determined.

RESULTS

Overall success after one, two and three courses of therapy were 73% (95% confidence intervals 69-77%), 94% (91-96%) and 98% (97-99%) respectively. 10 different regimens, including many non-recommended ones were used as primary therapy. Ranitidine bismuth citrate-amoxicillin-clarithromycin triple therapy (94.8%, 90-99%) was significantly more effective than any other combination as primary therapy, including all proton pump inhibitor based triple therapies. Quadruple therapy with bismuth chelate-proton pump inhibitor-tetracycline and a nitroimidazole (70%, 52-88%) and ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy (73%, 56-90%) where more effective second line combinations than proton pump inhibitor-triple therapies (37.5%, 12-58%). Third line therapy directed by the results of sensitivity testing improved eradication compared to further empirical antibiotics. The use of a proton pump inhibitor with clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole as initial therapy was associated with a significantly worse overall eradication rate than other combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates can be maximised by using ranitidine bismuth citrate-clarithromycin-amoxicillin containing triple therapy, followed by bismuth and nitroimidazle containing second-line therapy, with third line combinations directed by sensitivity testing. Proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-metronidazole combinations should be avoided.

High efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole twice daily for only five days in Helicobacter pylori Eradication

AIM

The combination of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or ranitidine-bismuth-citrate (Rbc) and two antibiotics for 7-10 days are, at present, the preferred treatments in Helicobacter pylori eradication. However, therapies for fewer than 7 days have been scarcely evaluated and it is unknown whether the length of treatment can be shortened, without a lost of efficacy, if three instead of two antibiotics are used. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of Rbc plus three antibiotics for only 5 days in H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 80 patients (34% duodenal ulcer, 66% functional dyspepsia) infected by H. pylori. At endoscopy, biopsies were obtained for histological study and rapid urease test, and a 13C-urea breath test was carried out. Urea breath test was repeated 4 weeks after completing eradication treatment with Rbc [400 mg twice a day (bid)], amoxicillin (1 g bid), clarithromycin (500 mg bid) and metronidazole (500 mg bid). All drugs were administered together after breakfast and dinner for 5 days only, and no treatment was administered thereafter. Compliance with therapy was determined from the interrogatory and the recovery of empty envelopes of medications.

RESULTS

In 79 out of the 80 patients, H. pylori eradication success or failure was assessed after therapy (one patient was lost from follow-up). All but one of these 79 patients took all the medications (one patient stopped treatment on the day 3 due to nausea/vomiting). Per protocol eradication was achieved in 72/78 (92%; 95% CI, 84-96%) and in 72/80 (90%; 81-95%) by intention-to-treat. Therapy was more effective in patients with duodenal ulcer than in those with functional dyspepsia [100% (87-100%) vs. 85% (73-92%) by intention-to-treat; p <.05]. Adverse effects were described in ten patients (12%), and included the perception of a metallic taste (eight patients), nausea/vomiting (two patients, one of them abandoned the treatment due to this), and diarrhea (two patients).

CONCLUSION

The combination of Rbc, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole for only 5 days represents a promising therapy for H. pylori infection, due to its high efficacy, simple posology, low cost and excellent tolerance.

Correlation between Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric inflammation and serum homocysteine concentration

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies have suggested a link between chronic Helicobacter pylori infection and ischemic heart disease but the underlying mechanism remains elusive. We hypothesized that H. pylori-associated chronic gastritis causes impairment of absorption of vitamin cofactors that are essential in the metabolism of homocysteine and results in hyperhomocysteinemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-nine dyspeptic patients were studied. H. pylori infection was defined by rapid urease test and histology. Fasting serum homocysteine level, which was measured by a validated commercial fluorescence polarization immunoassay, was correlated with H. pylori infection statuses and gastric histology. H. pylori-infected patients were followed up for 24 weeks post eradication for changes in serum homocysteine concentration.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses showed that serum homocysteine level correlated with increasing age (p <.001), male sex (p =.003) and smoking habit (p =.025). There was no significant difference in serum homocysteine levels between H. pylori infected and uninfected subjects (median 10.5 vs. 10.2 micromol/l). After successful eradication of the bacterium, there was no significant reduction in homocysteine level. Moreover, there was no correlation between homocysteine level and gastric histology including H. pylori density, activity and inflammation scores, presence of atrophy or intestinal metaplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The postulated link between H. pylori infection and ischemic heart disease, if it actually exists, is unlikely to be mediated through hyperhomocysteinemia.

A systematic comparison of triple therapies for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection with proton pump inhibitor/ ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or a nitroimidazole

BACKGROUND

Triple therapies with proton pump inhibitor/ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC), clarithromycin (C) and either amoxicillin (A) or a nitroimidazole (I) are widely accepted as treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. However, it is not clear which of these antibiotic combinations should be preferred.

AIM

To evaluate whether there is a difference in efficacy between triple therapies with proton pump inhibitor/RBC, clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or a nitroimidazole.

METHODS

The literature was examined for randomized trials comparing proton pump inhibitor/RBC-C-A and proton pump inhibitor/RBC-C-I. Studies were grouped according to the type of acid inhibitor used (proton pump inhibitor or RBC) and differences between pooled cure rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were identified: seven using RBC, 39 using proton pump inhibitor, one using both. RBC-C-I was somewhat superior to RBC-C-A, although this difference only reached statistical significance in intention-to-treat analysis. Overall, proton pump inhibitor-C-I and proton pump inhibitor-C-A were equally effective, but in nitroimidazole-susceptible strains, proton pump inhibitor-C-I performed better, in nitroimidazole-resistant strains, proton pump inhibitor-C-A performed better. No serious side-effects were reported and pooled drop-out rates were equal.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, proton pump inhibitor-C-I and proton pump inhibitor-C-A are equally effective and therefore other factors such as local prevalence of resistant strains, cost of therapy and options for second-line treatment should determine which regimen should be preferred. When using RBC, the RBC-C-I combination is somewhat superior to RBC-C-A.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori causes several gastroduodenal diseases. Various antibiotic regimens are available that eradicate H. pylori in 80 to 90% of patients, but no regimen cures all patients. Dual therapy is now obsolete. Triple therapy with two antibiotics and either a proton pump inhibitor or bismuth is the regimens of choice. Metronidazole and clarithromycin are the two key antibiotics. Antibiotic resistance against these two drugs is becoming more problematic and should be taken into consideration when choosing a regimen. Antibiotic resistance is usually induced after failure. Quadruple therapy has been used as a salvage regimen in failed cases but it is also the most complicated regimen. Several new agents are being studied including a single capsule that contains bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline.

Helicobacter pylori

H. pylori infection is now recognized as causing serious and life threatening disease in 20% to 30% of those infected. Reliable therapy is problematic. This article addresses the current approach to diagnosis and therapy and new considerations regarding whom to treat. The emphasis of the association of the gastric cancer phenotype of H. pylori infection (cagA positive H. pylori corpus gastritis) and protection against gastroesophageal reflux disease is an example of epidemiology without regard to the biology. Improvements in health and diet and an increase in body mass have accompanied the natural loss of H. pylori from the population. The search for virulence factors to help direct therapy to those who would most benefit has, to date, proved fruitless. Whenever H. pylori is diagnosed, it should be treated.

Helicobacter pylori eradication: proton pump inhibitor vs. ranitidine bismuth citrate plus two antibiotics for 1 week-a meta-analysis of efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor vs. ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) with two antibiotics for 1 week in Helicobacter pylori eradication.

METHODS

Randomized trials comparing 1-week regimens with (i) proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics [clarithromycin (C) and amoxycillin (A) or a nitroimidazole (N)]; or (ii) RBC plus the same antibiotics. Eradication was confirmed by histology or 13C-urea breath test at least 4 weeks after therapy. Data sources included PubMed database and abstracts from congresses until October 1999. Statistical analysis was by meta-analysis combining the odds ratios (OR) of the individual studies in a global OR (Peto method).

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the selection criteria. Nine compared proton pump inhibitor vs. RBC plus C and A, and five compared proton pump inhibitor vs. RBC plus C and N. With RBC, C and A, mean H. pylori eradication efficacy by intention-to-treat analysis (pooled data) was 76.6% (95% CI: 72-81%) and 73.7% (95% CI: 69-78%) with proton pump inhibitor, C and A. The OR for the effect of RBC vs. proton pump inhibitor (plus C and A) on H. pylori eradication was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.8-1.64%). Mean H. pylori eradication with RBC, C and N was 87. 2% (95% CI: 83-91%), and 74.9% (95% CI: 74-84%) with proton pump inhibitor plus these two antibiotics. The OR for the effect of RBC vs. proton pump inhibitor (plus C and N) on H. pylori eradication was 1.76 (95% CI: 1.08-2.85%).

CONCLUSION

RBC and proton pump inhibitor have similar efficacy for H. pylori eradication when given with C and A for 1 week, but RBC seems to have a higher efficacy than proton pump inhibitor when C and N are the co-prescribed antibiotics.

Clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori, a Gram-negative organism that survives in the deep mucus layer and attaches to the gastric surface cells, is estimated to be present in up to one-half of the US population. Chronic H. pylori infection causes chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer diseases and even gastric cancer. Cure of the infection leads to healing of gastric inflammation, prevention of development of peptic ulcer, as well as accelerated healing of peptic ulcers, and prevention of ulcer recurrence. Treatment of H. pylori has undergone substantial evolution over the past decade. Despite the in vitro susceptibility, results from single or even dual drug therapy is typically unsatisfactory and the best therapy is yet to be defined. The best current therapies for H. pylori infection consist of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or ranitidine bismuth citrate and two antibiotics (triple therapies), or bismuth, tetracycline, metronidazole and a PPI (quadruple therapy). Clarithromycin is one of the most useful antimicrobials against H. pylori. It is an acid-stable macrolide with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity, well absorbed with a wide tissue distribution and with mild side effects. Clarithromycin has a low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC50) for H. pylori and its effect is potentiated by acid inhibition. When combined with a PPI or ranitidine bismuth citrate and amoxicillin or metronidazole, eradication rates of more than 95% can be achieved with susceptible organisms. However, the prevalence of primary and acquired clarithromycin resistance, which is due to mutations within a conserved loop of 23S rRNA of H. pylori, is increasing. In practice, the presence of clarithromycin resistance usually implies reduced success when clarithromycin-containing regimes are used. There is a need for improved therapies for H. pylori where antibiotic resistance is less of a problem.

Salvage therapies after failure of Helicobacter pylori eradication with ranitidine bismuth citrate-based therapies

BACKGROUND

Salvage therapies after initial Helicobacter pylori eradication failure of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based regimens remain undefined.

AIM

To test the efficacy of 1-week omeprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin as a second-line treatment and 1-week quadruple therapy after repeated failures of RBC- and proton pump inhibitor-based regimens.

METHOD

Patients were recruited from a recently published prospective randomized study if confirmed to have failed H. pylori eradication with RBC-based regimens. They were given omeprazole 20 mg, amoxycillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg (OAC) b.d. for 1 week. 13C-urea breath test was performed 4 weeks after the conclusion of medication. Those who failed to respond to OAC were given 1-week quadruple therapy (bismuth subcitrate 120 mg, tetracycline 500 mg and metronidazole 400 mg q.d.s. plus omeprazole 20 mg b.d.).

RESULTS

Among 398 patients receiving RBC-based therapies, 40 (10%) had failed eradication (RAC=7, RC-2=12, RMC=7, and RMT=14). OAC was prescribed to 31 patients (RAC=4, RC-2=9, RMC=6, and RMT=12) and 68% had successful eradication. Nine out of 10 patients with failed second treatment received quadruple therapy; successful eradication occurred in 83% (5 out of 6) after repeated failures of clarithromycin-based regimens.

CONCLUSION

One-week OAC is not an optimal second-line therapy when RBC-clarithromycin combinations fail. Quadruple therapy appears to be effective despite repeated failures of clarithromycin-based RBC or proton pump inhibitor therapies.