Economic analysis of step-wise treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Healthcare costs of GERD and acid-related conditions in pediatric patients, with comparison between histamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and acid-related conditions (GERD/ARC) are common in pediatric practice but their costs have not been well characterized.

AIM

To compare healthcare costs (HCC) and healthcare utilization (HCU) of pediatric GERD/ARC between groups of GERD/ARC patients initiated on histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and matched controls.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children (age < 18 years) diagnosed with GERD or ARC (exploratory category) were identified from a large US claims database (1999-2005) using ICD-9 codes. Costs of pediatric GERD/ARC were estimated by comparing 6-month post-diagnosis HCC between cases and matched controls. GERD/ARC-related HCC and HCU for the year 2005 were further compared between GERD/ARC patients initiated with PPIs vs. H(2)RAs in terms of the cost differences relative to pre-initiation (difference-in-difference) and using multivariate regression to adjust for demographics, pre-treatment health status and pre-treatment costs.

RESULTS

A total of 27 865 matched pairs were identified. GERD/ARC patients incurred on average more 6-month total HCC than controls ($2386). In 2005, 1010 pediatric patients were initiated on H(2)RAs or PPIs. About 61% were initiated on PPIs and incurred 1.8 times higher 6-month post-initiation GERD/ARC-related HCC than H(2)RA-initiated patients ($661 vs. $372, p < 0.001). Although total 6-month GERD/ARC-related HCC increased for both PPI- and H(2)RA-treated patients, the increase was 30% less for PPI-treated patients ($173 vs. $246, p = 0.521) in the difference-in-difference analysis and 69% less in the multivariate analysis ($109 vs. $347, p = 0.040).

LIMITATIONS

The use of an exploratory definition for GERD/ARC, administrative claims data and potential coding errors in diagnosis codes used in selection process may limit the generalizability of the results.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric GERD/ARC patients incurred significantly higher healthcare costs compared to similar children without GERD/ARC. Compared to patients initiated with H(2)RAs, patients initiated with PPIs had more baseline comorbidities, and lower GERD/ARC-related HCC after beginning treatment.

Long-term strategies: a medico-economic perspective

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a chronic medical condition that is associated with substantial morbidity and impairment of quality of life. The long-term management of the disease requires consideration of treatment efficacy and cost and must meet the needs of patients, physicians and third-party payers.

The economic and quality-of-life impact of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common complaints in general medical practice. Symptoms of GERD have a high prevalence, which greatly affects health economics and patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The majority of patients who present with reflux symptoms lack esophageal mucosal injury and thus have symptomatic GERD. There appear to be no differences in either symptoms or HRQOL measures between patients with or without positive endoscopy. Although most pharmacoeconomic and HRQOL assessments have focused on erosive GERD patients, available data suggest that the impact of symptomatic GERD on HRQOL is significant and equivalent to that associated with erosive disease. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) improve HRQOL to a greater extent than either histamine(2)-receptor antagonists or prokinetics in patients with GERD, with PPI-based step-down or "on-demand" strategies yielding the most cost-effective benefit to health. Additional HRQOL and outcomes research focused on patients with symptomatic GERD, ideally using disease-specific assessment tools, is needed. Furthermore, these management strategies must be implemented in real world settings to validate their effectiveness and firmly establish claims of reduced need for diagnostic testing and decreased direct medical costs.

Decision making in gastroesophageal reflux disease. What are the critical issues?

This article has identified several crucial decision points in the management of GERD. Although there seems to be a strong epidemiologic association with esophageal adenocarcinoma, the clinical and economic benefits of screening endoscopy are not clear. Given the low incidence of this cancer, it is conceivable that screening programs in these patients, such as colon cancer screening and breast cancer screening, may provide a greater health benefit at a lower incremental cost. Surveillance endoscopy in BE is another contentious issue, with the surveillance interval and cost-effectiveness hinging on the cancer risk. As more precise estimates of cancer risk, accounting for publication bias, are derived, the economics of surveillance will require further evaluation. Finally, several, management strategies seem to improve outcomes for patients with uninvestigated GERD, but the incremental costs of the more effective step-down approach seem minimal. More important than the initial strategy may be the ability to implement a systematic approach to care that ensures that patients attempt step-down when symptoms are resolved and do not remain on potent therapy indefinitely when it is not necessary. The results of prospective effectiveness trials are anticipated to validate the findings of these economic analyses.

Patient-centred endpoints in economic evaluations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

AIM

To perform a systematic review of the economic literature on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease to evaluate (a) the use of patient-centred effectiveness end-points, or (b) the use of patient-centred economic end-points, and the influence of these end-points on the outcome of the model.

METHODS

Three electronic databases (EMBASE, BIOSIS and Medline) were used, together with a manual search of meeting abstracts for relevant articles. The quality of the studies was determined by the Drummond criteria.

RESULTS

Our initial search identified 179 articles and a manual search revealed 78 abstracts and articles. A total of 47 studies (36 fully published articles and 11 abstracts) met the seven Drummond criteria for inclusion in our evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review demonstrates that many of the published economic evaluations available today take the perspective of the third-party payer and focus on pharmaceutical costs relevant to the third-party payer. Our study also demonstrates that there are a number of costs of illness determinations, such that pharmaceutical costs account for only a small proportion of the total costs of managing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Future economic analyses should consider an evaluation of the patient's desire for complete symptom relief by including cost-utility assessments or willingness to pay data.

Review article: cost-effectiveness of different GERD management strategies

Recent data on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease management strategies suggest that the indirect costs of reflux disease are high, and that inadequate treatment is associated with significant out-patient costs for patients. Long-term management strategies now focus on discontinuous therapy for some subgroups of patients. On-demand therapy is particularly attractive for patients who have no mucosal disease.

On-demand and intermittent therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: economic considerations

Since gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a prevalent condition characterised by frequent relapses, long-term costs of management for this disease are high. Thus, strategies to decrease resource expenditures without impairing patient quality of life are desirable. On-demand therapy (one-dose when symptoms occur) and intermittent therapy (short course of medication when symptoms occur) are attractive since pharmaceutical expenditures may be decreased, and many patients self-employ this strategy. The purpose of this paper was to examine the economic implications of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD. A review of selected studies evaluating medication suitable for on-demand or intermittent administration was performed. A complete search for published studies on the cost effectiveness of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD was conducted, and the results discussed in detail. Antacids, alginates, topically active agents, histamine(2)-receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors have all demonstrable efficacy compared with placebo when administered on-demand. Proton pump inhibitors constitute the most effective pharmacological means to treat GORD. Although step-up strategies initially using less potent medication may decrease resource use, cost-effectiveness analysis illustrates that on-demand or intermittent therapy with proton pump inhibitors may be reasonable options. Further work that defines quality of life and patient preferences associated with GORD may allow for proper allocation of resources for the management of this condition.

Step-down management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

As the economic burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is largely weighted to maintenance as opposed to initial therapy, switching from more potent to less expensive medication once symptoms are alleviated (step-down therapy) may prove to be most cost-effective. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the feasibility of step-down therapy in a cohort of patients with symptoms of uncomplicated GERD.

METHODS

Patients whose GERD symptoms were alleviated by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were recruited from outpatient general medicine clinics. After baseline demographic and quality of life information were obtained, PPIs were withdrawn from subjects in a stepwise fashion. Primary outcome was recurrence of symptoms during follow-up that required reinstitution of PPIs. Secondary outcomes included changes in quality of life and overall cost of management. Predictors of nonresponse to step-down were assessed.

RESULTS

Seventy-one of 73 enrolled subjects completed the study. Forty-one of 71 (58%) were asymptomatic off PPI therapy after 1 year of follow-up. Twenty-four of 71 (34%) required histamine 2-receptor antagonists, 5/71 (7%) prokinetic agents, 1/71 (1%) both, and 11/71 (15%) remained asymptomatic without medication. Quality of life did not significantly change, whereas management costs decreased by 37%. Multivariable analysis revealed younger age and a dominant symptom of heartburn to predict PPI requirement.

CONCLUSIONS

Step-down therapy is successful in the majority of patients and can decrease costs without adversely affecting quality of life.

Survey of primary care physicians' approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

Although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition, little is known regarding physicians' approach to the diagnosis and management of GERD in elderly patients.

METHODS

We surveyed by facsimile a random sample of 14,000 practicing primary care physicians throughout the United States. Physicians were questioned using a case-based format about the approach to a symptomatic patient with GERD including the use of empiric therapy, the role of diagnostic testing, and the drugs of choice to treat GERD.

RESULTS

A total of 2241 surveys (16%) was returned and tabulated. Most respondents were either internists (37%) or family practice physicians (56%) in solo or group practice, and 74% had been in practice for 11 or more years. There were 1980 (90%) respondents who evaluated more than 6 patients per week with GERD. Empiric therapy was commonly recommended for the symptomatic patient, most often in a step-up approach beginning with H(2)-receptor blockers. Diagnostic testing, usually endoscopy, was recommended appropriately in patients with alarm symptoms. Proton-pump inhibitors were most often recommended for patients failing to respond to over-the-counter H(2)-receptor blockers and for those with endoscopic esophagitis; the use of cisapride in combination with H(2)-receptor blockers was also commonly recommended in these scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of symptomatic GERD in elderly patients appears similar to the management of GERD in other patients. Empiric therapy was frequently recommended in a step-up approach, and diagnostic testing was appropriate. Combination therapy with cisapride and an acid-reducing agent was commonly recommended.

Nonerosive reflux disease--current concepts and dilemmas

Nonerosive reflux disease is defined as the presence of typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease caused by intraesophageal acid in the absence of visible esophageal mucosal injury at endoscopy. Recent studies demonstrate that it is a chronic disease with a significant impact on quality of life, and it is very common in primary care settings. Treatment with acid inhibitory agents is effective, and proton pump inhibitors are the most effective form of therapy.