Interactive roles of endogenous prostaglandin and nitric oxide in regulation of acid secretion by damaged rat stomachs

Causal associations between gastroesophageal reflux disease and essential hypertension: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies have reported that patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have a higher prevalence of hypertension.

AIM

To performed a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal link between GERD and essential hypertension.

METHODS

Eligible single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected, and weighted median, inverse variance weighted (IVW) as well as MR egger (MR-Egger) regression were used to examine the potential causal association between GERD and hypertension. The MR-Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier analysis was used to detect and attempt to reduce horizontal pleiotropy by removing outliers SNPs. The MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q test and "leave-one-out" sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneities, and stability of single instrumental variable.

RESULTS

IVW analysis exhibited an increased risk of hypertension (OR = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.33-1.59, P = 2.14E-16) in GERD patients. And the same result was obtained in replication practice (OR = 1.002, 95%CI: 1.0008-1.003, P = 0.000498). Meanwhile, the IVW analysis showed an increased risk of systolic blood pressure (β = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.11-1.44, P = 0.021) and hypertensive heart disease (OR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.36-2.08, P = 0.0000016) in GERD patients. Moreover, we found an decreased risk of Barrett's esophagus (OR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.83-0.99, P = 0.043) in essential hypertension patients.

CONCLUSION

We found that GERD would increase the risk of essential hypertension, which provided a novel prevent and therapeutic perspectives of essential hypertension.

Diosmin protects against ethanol-induced gastric injury in rats: novel anti-ulcer actions

Alcohol consumption has been commonly associated with gastric mucosal lesions including gastric ulcer. Diosmin (DIO) is a natural citrus flavone with remarkable antioxidant and anti-inflammatory features that underlay its protection against cardiac, hepatic and renal injuries. However, its impact on gastric ulcer has not yet been elucidated. Thus, the current study aimed to investigate the potential protective effects of DIO against ethanol-induced gastric injury in rats. Pretreatment with DIO (100 mg/kg p.o.) attenuated the severity of ethanol gastric mucosal damage as evidenced by lowering of ulcer index (UI) scores, area of gastric lesions, histopathologic aberrations and leukocyte invasion. These actions were analogous to those exerted by the reference antiulcer sucralfate. DIO suppressed gastric inflammation by curbing of myeloperoxidase (MPO) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels along with nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) p65 expression. It also augmented the anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels. Meanwhile, DIO halted gastric oxidative stress via inhibition of lipid peroxides with concomitant enhancement of glutathione (GSH), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and the total antioxidant capacity (TAC). With respect to gastric mucosal apoptosis, DIO suppressed caspase-3 activity and cytochrome C (Cyt C) with enhancement of the anti-apoptotic B cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) in favor of cell survival. These favorable actions were associated with upregulation of the gastric cytoprotective prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) and nitric oxide (NO). Together, these findings accentuate the gastroprotective actions of DIO in ethanol gastric injury which were mediated via concerted multi-pronged actions, including suppression of gastric inflammation, oxidative stress and apoptosis besides boosting of the antioxidant and the cytoprotective defenses.

Gastroprotective effect of simvastatin against indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in rats: role of nitric oxide and prostaglandins

This study investigated the possible mechanisms underlying the gastroprotective effect of simvastatin against indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in rats. Rats were randomly assigned to vehicle-, simvastatin-, simvastatin+L-arginine- and simvastatin+N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-pretreated groups for two weeks. Pyloric ligation was performed for the collection of gastric juice, and gastric ulceration was induced by a single intraperitoneal injection of indomethacin (30 mg/kg). Gastric juice parameters (total acid output, pepsin activity and mucin concentration) were determined. The stomachs tissues were used for determination of gastric mucosal lipid peroxides, superoxide dismutase, catalase, total nitrites and prostaglandin E(2) levels. Pretreatment with simvastatin (10 mg/kg, orally, for 2 weeks) caused significant reduction in gastric mucosal lesions and lipid peroxides associated with a significant increase in gastric juice mucin concentration. Simvastatin significantly increased the gastric mucosal total nitrite and prostaglandin E(2) levels. Additionally, simvastatin attenuated the elevations in gastric mucosal superoxide dismutase observed with indomethacin. The gastroprotective effect afforded by simvastatin was significantly augmented by coadministration with L-arginine (a nitric oxide precursor) and inhibited by coadministration with L-NAME (a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor). Results confirm a gastroprotective effect for simvastatin, and indicate that the anti-ulcer effect of simvastatin is mediated by scavenging free radicals, increasing nitric oxide and prostaglandin E(2) levels, and increasing gastric juice mucin production. We conclude that simvastatin represents a more suitable antihyperlipidemic therapy for patients who are at risk of gastric ulcers that were induced by the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Gastric antisecretory and antiulcer effects of simvastatin in rats

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recently, statins have appeared to have additional benefits beyond their lipid lowering effects, which has led to the interest in the use of this class of drugs outside the realm of cardiovascular disease. Simvastatin (SIM) is a commonly prescribed statin with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Excessive generation of oxygen-derived free radicals (ODFR) and proinflammatory mediators has been implicated in the pathogenesis of gastric ulcers. This investigation aimed to study the effect of SIM on experimentally induced gastric acid secretion and ulcer formation.

METHODS

Adult Wistar rats were divided into experimental groups containing six animals. Acid secretion studies were undertaken using pylorus-ligated rats pretreated with SIM (20, 40, and 60 mg/kg). The effect of orally administered SIM was also studied on indomethacin- and ethanol-induced gastric ulcers. The levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO), non-protein sulfhydryls (NP-SH), nitric oxide (NO), antioxidant enzymes, and gastric wall mucus were measured in the glandular stomach of rats following ethanol-induced gastric lesions.

RESULTS

Administration of SIM significantly and dose-dependently inhibited the volume of gastric secretion and the acidity. Pretreatment with SIM significantly reduced the formation of indomethacin- and ethanol-induced gastric lesions. The antiulcer activity of SIM was associated with significant attenuation of adverse effects of ethanol on gastric wall mucus, NP-SH and MPO. SIM modified the gastric NO levels and reversed the ethanol-induced decrease in glutathione-S-transferase and increase in superoxide dismutase and catalase.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings clearly suggest the involvement of proinflammatory agents and ODFR in the pathogenesis of gastric lesions. The gastroprotective effects of SIM are mediated by inhibition of neutrophils activity, reduction of oxidative stress, and maintenance of vascular integrity. This study was conducted in rats; its relevance to human gastric ulcers is not known and warrants further study.

A novel gastric lesion model induced in rats by partial gastric vascular ligation

Previous studies have suggested that histamine treatment after gastric vascular ligation induces mucosal damage in the rat stomach. Although ligation of left gastric artery and vein (L-AV) alone did not cause any damage in the stomach within 4 h, but provoked mild lesions due to ischaemia 24 h later. In the present study we demonstrated a new model of gastric lesions induced by L-AV ligation and examined the effects of various anti-ulcer drugs on this lesion model. The gastric lesions induced by L-AV ligation occurred at the corpus and antrum, especially at the corpus-antrum border, when examined 24 h later, and the severity of damage reached maximum 3 days after L-AV ligation. Repeated treatment with omeprazole or sucralfate for 3 days significantly prevented the development of gastric lesions induced by L-AV ligation, in whole mucosa, including the antrum. By contrast, famotidine given for 3 days showed a significant protection against total lesions in the whole mucosa, but had no effect on the antral lesions. Both omeprazole and famotidine dose-dependently decreased gastric acid output while sucralfate raised the intraluminal pH due to the acid-neutralizing action. These results suggest that the pathogenesis of gastric lesions induced by L-AV ligation differs depending on the region, the corpus and the antrum, and the lesions occurred in the latter area seem to be resistant to acid suppression. It is assumed that this new model of gastric lesions is useful for screening the drugs that affect gastric mucosal defense rather than acid secretion.

Dual action of prostaglandin E2 on gastric acid secretion through different EP-receptor subtypes in the rat

We examined the role of prostaglandin E (EP) receptor subtypes in the regulation of gastric acid secretion in the rat. Under urethane anesthesia, the stomach was superfused with saline, and the acid secretion was determined at pH 7.0 by adding 50 mM NaOH. The acid secretion was stimulated by intravenous infusion of histamine or pentagastrin. Various EP agonists were administered intravenously, whereas EP antagonists were given subcutaneously 30 min or intravenously 10 min before EP agonists. PGE(2) suppressed the acid secretion stimulated by either histamine or pentagastrin in a dose-dependent manner. The acid inhibitory effect of PGE(2) was mimicked by sulprostone (EP(1)/EP(3) agonist) but not butaprost (EP(2) agonist) or AE1-329 (EP(4) agonist). The inhibitory effect of sulprostone, which was not affected by ONO-8711 (EP(1) antagonist), was more potent against pentagastrin- (50% inhibition dose: 3.6 mug/kg) than histamine-stimulated acid secretion (50% inhibition dose: 18.0 mug/kg). Pentagastrin increased the luminal release of histamine, and this response was also inhibited by sulprostone. On the other hand, AE1-329 (EP(4) agonist) stimulated the acid secretion in vagotomized animals with a significant increase in luminal histamine. This effect of AE1-329 was totally abolished by cimetidine as well as AE3-208 (EP(4) antagonist). These results suggest that PGE(2) has a dual effect on acid secretion: inhibition mediated by EP(3) receptors and stimulation through EP(4) receptors. The former effect may be brought about by suppression at both parietal and enterochromaffin-like cells, whereas the latter effect may be mediated by histamine released from enterochromaffin-like cells.

Regulatory mechanism of acid secretion in the damaged stomach: role of endogenous nitric oxide

The present article overviews the regulatory mechanism of acid secretion in the stomach after damage with taurocholate (TC), one of the bile acids. Mucosal exposure of a rat stomach to 20 mmol/L TC for 30 min caused a decrease of acid secretion with a concomitant increase in nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin (PG) E2 (PGE2) as well as Ca2+ in the luminal contents. Prior administration of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), as well as indomethacin, significantly attenuated the reduction of acid secretion by TC and acid secretion was even increased in the presence of L-NAME. The acid stimulatory effect of L-NAME in the damaged stomach was not mimicked by aminoguanidine and was antagonized by co-administration of L-arginine but not D-arginine. Increased NO release in the damaged stomach was suppressed by pretreatment with L-NAME or co-application of EGTA and the latter also inhibited the increase in luminal Ca2+. The enhanced acid secretory response in the presence of L-NAME was also inhibited by cimetidine, FPL-52694 (a mast cell stabilizer) or sensory deafferentation. Mucosal exposure to TC caused an increase in luminal histamine output, together with a decrease in the number of mucosal mast cells in the stomach. These changes were prevented by FPL-52694 and sensory deafferentation and were also partly suppressed by indomethacin. In addition, the acid stimulatory action of L-NAME in the damaged stomach was significantly mitigated when indomethacin was administered together with L-NAME. We conclude that: (i) damage in the stomach may activate acid a stimulatory pathway in addition to a PG-, NO- and Ca2+-dependent inhibitory mechanism, but the latter effect overcomes the former, resulting in a decrease in acid secretion; (ii) acid stimulation in the damaged stomach is mediated by histamine released from the mucosal mast cell, a process interacting with capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves; (iii) the increase in luminal Ca2+ plays a role in increasing NO production and, hence, in regulating acid secretion; and (iv) PG may have a dual role in the regulation of acid secretion in the damaged stomach: an inhibitory effect at the parietal cell and an excitatory effect, probably through enhancing the release of mucosal histamine.