Review article: long-term use of proton pump inhibitors in GORD--help or hindrance?

Proton pump inhibitor administration in neonates and infants. Lack of consensus - An ASPO survey

OBJECTIVE

Laryngopharyngeal and Gastroesophageal reflux (LPR and GER) are distinct clinical entities that present with a range of non-specific symptoms. The exact prevalence in the pediatric population is unknown. While there has been an increase in the use of PPIs, lack of clear guidelines, conflicting evidence regarding efficacy and safety concerns with long-term use require physicians to use their own anecdotal experience and clinical judgement when treating patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate practice patterns among pediatric otolaryngologists regarding the use of proton-pump inhibitors for reflux-related conditions.

METHODS

A survey was submitted to American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) members to determine practice patterns regarding use of PPIs for reflux-related conditions in the newborn and infant population. Statistical analysis using Fisher's exact test was performed.

RESULTS

37% of respondents would not prescribe PO PPIs in neonates, with 50% not prescribing IV PPIs. 60% would prescribe a PPI as second or third-line treatment for infants (10 weeks to 1-year). Only 10% would prescribe as first-line in this age group. 48% would prescribe PPIs once daily and 19% as BID. No significant practice differences exist based on years of experience, number of relevant patients seen, and setting of practice.

CONCLUSION

There was no agreement regarding dosage, frequency and duration of PPI treatment for reflux disease in neonates and infants. There was also no correlation with experience or practice setting. This emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach and consensus statement to guide management of GER and LPR in this population.

Italian survey on general pediatricians' approach to children with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms

The aim of the present study was to investigate the current approach of Italian general pediatricians to children with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) symptoms, evaluating the implementation of the 2009 North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN)-European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidelines. One hundred randomly identified Italian general pediatricians were asked to complete a case report-structured questionnaire investigating their approach to infants, children, and adolescents with symptoms suggestive of GER. Only 2 % of them showed complete adherence to the guidelines. Thirty-nine percent of them diagnosed GER disease based on clinical symptoms, irrespective of the age of the child; 56 % prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in infants with unexplained crying and/or distressed behavior and 38 % in infants with uncomplicated recurrent regurgitation and vomiting; 57 % prescribed PPIs in children younger than 8-12 years of age with vomiting and heartburn, without specific testing; and 54 % discontinued PPI therapy abruptly. The overall rate of pediatricians over-prescribing PPIs was 79 %.

CONCLUSION

According to our findings, most Italian general pediatricians do not seem to follow the recommendations of the 2009 NASPGHAN-ESPGHAN reflux guidelines and often prescribe PPIs despite a lack of efficacy for the symptoms being treated. We are well aware that the guidelines address the average situation and that the evaluation of individual patients may frequently reveal reasons for opening criteria for exceptions. Nevertheless, the over-diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) places undue burden on both families and national health system which has not been impacted by the publication of international guidelines.

Efficacy of proton-pump inhibitors in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children has increased enormously. However, effectiveness and safety of PPIs for pediatric GERD are under debate.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review to determine effectiveness and safety of PPIs in children with GERD.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for randomized controlled trials and crossover studies investigating efficacy and safety of PPIs in children aged 0 to 18 years with GERD for reduction in GERD symptoms, gastric pH, histologic aberrations, and reported adverse events.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included with data from children aged 0-17 years. For infants, PPIs were more effective in 1 study (compared with hydrolyzed formula), not effective in 2 studies, and equally effective in 2 studies (compared with placebo) for the reduction of GERD symptoms. For children and adolescents, PPIs were equally effective (compared with alginates, ranitidine, or a different PPI dosage). For gastric acidity, in infants and children PPIs were more effective (compared with placebo, alginates, or ranitidine) in 4 studies. For reducing histologic aberrations, PPIs showed no difference (compared with ranitidine or alginates) in 3 studies. Six studies reported no differences in treatment-related adverse events (compared with placebo or a different PPI dosage).

CONCLUSIONS

PPIs are not effective in reducing GERD symptoms in infants. Placebo-controlled trials in older children are lacking. Although PPIs seem to be well tolerated during short-term use, evidence supporting the safety of PPIs is lacking.

Changes of gastric histology in patients with erosive oesophagitis receiving long-term lansoprazole maintenance therapy

BACKGROUND

Changes in gastric histology associated with long-term maintenance therapy with lansoprazole for erosive oesophagitis have not been well described.

AIM

To evaluate the effect on gastric histology of long-term dose-titrated lansoprazole administered as maintenance therapy for up to 82 months in patients with erosive oesophagitis.

METHODS

Sequential gastric biopsy specimens were obtained for evaluation of histological changes and Helicobacter pylori infection status.

RESULTS

Active and chronic inflammation improved from baseline to final visit in a majority of patients receiving long-term therapy with lansoprazole, irrespective of baseline H. pylori infection status. Reductions in active inflammation in the gastric body and antrum were seen in 53% (17/32) and 67% (20/30) of H. pylori-positive patients, respectively, and in 88% (7/8) and 86% (12/14) of H. pylori-negative patients, respectively. Reductions in chronic inflammation in the gastric body and antrum were seen in 38% (12/32) and 47% (15/32) of H. pylori-positive patients, respectively, and in 58% (70/121) and 57% (68/120) of H. pylori-negative patients, respectively. No clinically meaningful increases in hyperplasia, dysplasia, neoplasia, intestinal metaplasia or atrophy were observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Lansoprazole administered as maintenance therapy for up to 6 years in patients with erosive oesophagitis demonstrated gastric mucosal safety and was well tolerated.

Treatment for Barrett's oesophagus

BACKGROUND

Treatments for Barrett's oesophagus, the precursor lesion of adenocarcinoma, are available but whether these therapies effectively prevent the development of adenocarcinoma, and in some cases eradicate the Barrett's oesophagus segment, remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise, quantify and compare the efficacy of pharmacological, surgical and endoscopic treatments for the eradication of dysplastic and non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus and prevention of these states from progression to adenocarcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2004, issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing medical, endoscopic or non-resectional surgical treatments for Barrett's oesophagus. The primary outcome measures were complete eradication of Barrett's and dysplasia at 12 months, and reduction in the number of patients progressing to cancer at five years or latest time point.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the trials included in the analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen studies, including 1074 patients, were included. The mean number of participants in the studies was small (n = 49; range 8 to 208). Most studies did not report on the primary outcomes. Medical and surgical interventions to reduce symptoms and sequelae of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) did not induce significant eradication of Barrett's oesophagus or dysplasia. Endoscopic therapies (photodynamic therapy (PDT with aminolevulinic acid or porfimer sodium), argon plasma coagulation (APC) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)) all induced regression of Barrett's oesophagus and dysplasia. The data for photodynamic therapy were heterogeneous with a mean eradication rate of 51% for Barrett's oesophagus and between 56% and 100% for dysplasia, depending on the treatment regimens. The variation in photodynamic therapy eradication rates for dysplasia was dependent on the drug, source and dose of light. Radiofrequency ablation resulted in eradication rates of 82% and 94% for Barrett's oesophagus and dysplasia respectively, compared to a sham treatment. Endoscopic treatments were generally well tolerated, however all were associated with some buried glands, particularly following argon plasma coagulation and photodynamic therapy, as well as photosensitivity and strictures induced by porfimer sodium based photodynamic therapy in particular.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite their failure to eradicate Barrett's oesophagus, the role of medical and surgical interventions to reduce the troubling symptoms and sequelae of GORD is not questioned. Whether therapies for GORD reduce the cancer risk is not yet known. Ablative therapies have an increasing role in the management of dysplasia within Barrett's and current data would favour the use of radiofrequency ablation compared with photodynamic therapy. Radiofrequency ablation has been shown to yield significantly fewer complications than photodynamic therapy and is very efficacious at eradicating both dysplasia and Barrett's itself. However, long-term follow-up data are still needed before radiofrequency ablation can be used in routine clinical care without the need for very careful post-treatment surveillance. More clinical trial data and in particular randomised controlled trials are required to assess whether or not the cancer risk is reduced in routine clinical practice.

Long-term efficacy of lansoprazole in preventing relapse of erosive reflux esophagitis

In a phase III study of lansoprazole treatment, patients with healed or unhealed erosive esophagitis entered a titrated open-label treatment period and received lansoprazole for <or=6 years to assess long-term maintenance therapy. Doses were adjusted depending on symptom response. Endoscopy was performed yearly. One hundred ninety-five subjects received lansoprazole for <1 to 72 months; most received daily doses of <or=30 mg. Lansoprazole maintained erosive esophagitis remission in 75% of subjects receiving treatment for <or=72 months, with 39 subjects experiencing 50 recurrences. Most subjects (94-95%) had no or mild symptoms of day or night heartburn at study end, and 77% were asymptomatic at first erosive esophagitis recurrence. The most common treatment-related adverse events included diarrhea (10%), headache (8%), and abdominal pain (6%), and were mild or moderate in severity. Long-term lansoprazole is effective and well tolerated when used to maintain erosive esophagitis remission for <or=6 years.

The clinical safety of long-term lansoprazole for the maintenance of healed erosive oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

The clinical safety of long-term lansoprazole therapy for the maintenance of healed erosive oesophagitis has not been extensively studied in clinical trials.

AIM

To assess the long-term clinical safety of dose-titrated lansoprazole as maintenance therapy for up to 82 months in subjects with healed erosive oesophagitis.

METHODS

Clinical safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), laboratory data including serum gastrin levels, and endoscopy.

RESULTS

Mean duration (+/- s.d.) of lansoprazole treatment during the titrated open-label period was 56 +/- 24 months (range <1-82 months). Overall, 189 of 195 (97%) subjects experienced a total of 2825 treatment-emergent AEs. Most AEs occurred during the first year of treatment, were mild-to-moderate in severity and resolved while on treatment. Of 155 serious AEs (in 74 subjects), only two (colitis and rectal haemorrhage in one subject) were considered treatment-related. Sixty-nine of 195 subjects (35%) experienced 187 treatment-related AEs, with diarrhoea (10%), headache (8%) and abdominal pain (6%) being the most common. Gastrin levels > or = 400 pg/mL were seen in 9% of subjects; hypergastrinemia was not associated with gastro-intestinal AEs or nodules/polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

Lansoprazole maintenance therapy for up to 6 years is safe and well tolerated in subjects with healed erosive oesophagitis.

Insight into the structural requirements of proton pump inhibitors based on CoMFA and CoMSIA studies

In the present study, a series of 179 quinoline and quinazoline heterocyclic analogues exhibiting inhibitory activity against Gastric (H+/K+)-ATPase were investigated using the comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices (CoMSIA) methods. Both the models exhibited good correlation between the calculated 3D-QSAR fields and the observed biological activity for the respective training set compounds. The most optimal CoMFA and CoMSIA models yielded significant leave-one-out cross-validation coefficient, q(2) of 0.777, 0.744 and conventional cross-validation coefficient, r(2) of 0.927, 0.914 respectively. The predictive ability of generated models was tested on a set of 52 compounds having broad range of activity. CoMFA and CoMSIA yielded predicted activities for test set compounds with r(pred)(2) of 0.893 and 0.917 respectively. These validation tests not only revealed the robustness of the models but also demonstrated that for our models r(pred)(2) based on the mean activity of test set compounds can accurately estimate external predictivity. The factors affecting activity were analyzed carefully according to standard coefficient contour maps of steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic, acceptor and donor fields derived from the CoMFA and CoMSIA. These contour plots identified several key features which explain the wide range of activities. The results obtained from models offer important structural insight into designing novel peptic-ulcer inhibitors prior to their synthesis.

Effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the safety and efficacy of omeprazole in Japanese patients with recurrent reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

The polymorphic enzyme cytochrome P450 2C19 affects omeprazole metabolism. This influence on metabolism might affect serum gastrin levels, and safety, during long-term treatment of reflux oesophagitis.

AIM

To examine the relationship between cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype and the safety profile of long-term omeprazole treatment.

METHODS

A total of 119 Japanese patients with recurrent reflux oesophagitis underwent cytochrome P450 2C19 genotyping prior to receiving daily omeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg for 6-12 months, during which adverse event frequency, serum gastrin levels and endoscopic findings were monitored.

RESULTS

The incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events and adverse events leading to withdrawal did not differ between homozygous extensive metabolizer (n = 46), heterozygous extensive metabolizer (n = 53) or poor metabolizer (n = 20) groups. In all genotype groups, serum gastrin increased during the first 3 months of dosing but stabilized thereafter. No significant differences were seen either in the rate of reflux oesophagitis healing or symptom improvement among genotype groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment with omeprazole was well-tolerated in Japanese patients, irrespective of their cytochrome P450 2C19 metabolic genotype, indicating that dose adjustment depending on metabolic genotype is not required during treatment with omeprazole.

Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of omeprazole in irritable infants with gastroesophageal reflux

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of omeprazole in treating irritable infants with gastroesophageal reflux and/or esophagitis.

STUDY DESIGN

Irritable infants (n=30) 3 to 12 months of age met the entry criteria of esophageal acid exposure >5% (n=22) and/or abnormal esophageal histology (n=15). They completed a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of omeprazole. Cry/fuss diary (minutes/24 hours) and a visual analogue scale of infant irritability as judged by parental impression were obtained at baseline and the end of each 2-week treatment period.

RESULTS

The reflux index fell significantly during omeprazole treatment compared with placebo (-8.9%+/-5.6%, -1.9%+/-2.0%, P<.001). Cry/fuss time decreased from baseline (267+/-119), regardless of treatment sequence (period 1, 203+/-99, P<.04; period 2, 188+/-121, P<.008). Visual analogue score decreased from baseline to period 2 (6.8+/-1.6, 4.8+/-2.9, P=.008). There was no significant difference for both outcome measures while taking either omeprazole or placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, omeprazole significantly reduced esophageal acid exposure but not irritability. Irritability improved with time, regardless of treatment.

A randomized, double-blind trial of the efficacy and safety of 10 or 20 mg rabeprazole compared with 20 mg omeprazole in the maintenance of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease over 5 years

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has a chronic course, and often requires long-term treatment. Proton pump inhibitors are the treatment of choice for both acute and maintenance treatment, but little is known from randomized controlled trials of their effects beyond 1 year.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of two doses of rabeprazole with 20 mg omeprazole in the maintenance treatment of erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease over 5 years.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-three patients who had previously responded to acute treatment for erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were prospectively randomized to receive 5 years of treatment with rabeprazole (10 or 20 mg daily) or omeprazole (20 mg daily). The primary outcome measure was endoscopically confirmed relapse of erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-three patients (51%) completed all 5 years of the study, with similar completion rates in the three groups. Relapses occurred in nine of 78 (11.5%), eight of 82 (9.8%) and 11 of 83 (13.3%) patients in the rabeprazole 20 mg, rabeprazole 10 mg and omeprazole 20 mg groups, respectively. Gastric biopsy showed no evidence of any harmful effects. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Rabeprazole 10 mg, rabeprazole 20 mg and omeprazole 20 mg all had similar efficacy in the maintenance treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. All three were safe and well tolerated during 5 years of treatment.