High-dose prolonged combination therapy in non-responders to interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C

Combination Therapy of Interferon and Ribavirin Versus Interferon Monotherapy in Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials

This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of interferon and ribavirin combination therapy (CT) versus interferon monotherapy (IMT) in inducing sustained response in interferon-naïve, relapser, and nonresponder chronic hepatitis C patients. A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database for clinical trials published in the period between 1995 and 2003. A total of 31 randomized trials and 7 nonrandomized trials comparing CT with interferon alone or comparing different dose regimens of CT were included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcome measure was sustained virological response. The summary estimate of the odds ratio was obtained using the random effect model. The study showed that sustained virological response rate was significantly higher in interferon-naïve, relapser, and nonrespondent chronic hepatitis C patients who were on CT compared to IMT (odds ratio = 3.23, 17.65, and 4.71, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in virological and biochemical responses between different dose regimens of CT. Side effects, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation rates were significantly higher in patients receiving CT compared with IMT. Treatment with interferon plus ribavirin has a significant benefit on the virological and biochemical response in patients with chronic hepatitis C irrespective to the previous treatment, and it should be considered the treatment of choice in naïve, relapser, and nonrespondent chronic hepatitis C patients.

Treatment of chronic HCV infection in special populations

The mainstay of treatment of chronic hepatitis C is pegylated interferon combined with ribavirin and more than 50% of naïve patients will have viral cure with either 6 months (genotypes 2 and 3) or 12 months (genotypes 1,4, and 6) with the initial treatment. However, populations have been defined that respond less well to routine treatment including African Americans, immune suppressed populations, obese patients and cirrhotic patients. These types of patients are enriched in groups of patients who are non-responders to treatment. This article discusses viral kinetics that may impact treatment response, strategies to maximize treatment effectiveness in these populations and the treatment of non-responders in general. Early viral kinetics can be used to define response or non-response and these results can be used to modify subsequent treatment length and dose.

High-dose interferon-α2b induction therapy in combination with ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with non-response or relapse after interferon-α monotherapy

AIM: To evaluate the daily high-dose induction therapy with interferon-α2b (IFN-α2b) in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of patients who failed with interferon monotherapy and had a relapse, based on the assumption that the viral burden would decline faster, thus increasing the likelihood of higher response rates in this difficult-to-treat patient group.

METHODS: Seventy patients were enrolled in this study. Treatment was started with 10 MU IFN-α2b daily for 3 wk, followed by IFN-α2b 5 MU/TIW in combination with ribavirin (1 000-1 200 mg/d) for 21 wk. In case of a negative HCV RNA PCR, treatment was continued until wk 48 (IFN-α2b 3 MU/TIW+1 000-1 200 mg ribavirin/daily).

RESULTS: The dose of IFN-α2b or ribavirin was reduced in 16% of patients because of hematologic side effects, and treatment was discontinued in 7% of patients. An early viral response (EVR) was achieved in 60% of patients. Fifty percent of all patients achieved an end-of-treatment response (EOT) and 40% obtained a sustained viral response (SVR). Patients with no response had a significantly lower response rate than those with a former relapse (SVR 30% vs 53%; P = 0.049). Furthermore, lower response rates were observed in patients infected with genotype 1a/b than in patients with non-1-genotype (SVR 28% vs 74%; P = 0.001). As a significant predictive factor for a sustained response, a rapid initial decline of HCV RNA could be identified. No patient achieving a negative HCV-RNA PCR at wk 18 or later eventually eliminated the virus.

CONCLUSION: Daily high-dose induction therapy with interferon-α2b is well tolerated and effective for the treatment of non-responders and relapsers, when interferon monotherapy fails. A fast decline of viral load during the first 12 wk is strongly associated with a sustained viral response.

Reinforced interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin is more effective than standard combination therapy in the retreatment of chronic hepatitis C previously nonresponsive to interferon: a randomized trial

Interferon-alpha (IFN) monotherapy results in sustained virological clearance in a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a reinforced regimen combining ribavirin and high-dose IFN for 48 weeks compared with a nonreinforced regimen combining a standard IFN regimen and ribavirin for 24 weeks in nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 231 patients with chronic hepatitis C and previous nonresponse to IFN monotherapy were randomized. The reinforced group (n = 114) received IFN-2b 6 million units (MU) thrice weekly (TIW) and ribavirin for 48 weeks, and the nonreinforced group (n = 117) received IFN-2b 3 MU TIW and ribavirin for 24 weeks. The main outcome measure was a sustained virological response, defined as negative serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA 24 weeks following the end of treatment. This endpoint was determined in 98 patients of the reinforced group and 105 patients of the nonreinforced group. At the end of follow-up, a sustained virological response was observed in 29 of the 98 patients (29.6%) in the reinforced group vs 16 of the 105 patients (15.2%) in the nonreinforced group (P = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with a sustained virological response were treated with a reinforced regimen [odds ratio (OR) 2.9; P = 0.06] and genotype 2 or 3 (OR 8.8; P < 0.0002). A total of 160 patients had paired biopsies before and after treatment. Histological activity improvement was observed in 32 of 80 patients (40%) and fibrosis worsening in 26 of 80 patients (33%) in the reinforced group vs 13 of 80 (16%) and 19 of 80 (24%) in the nonreinforced group (P = 0.30 and 0.20, respectively). Hence in nonresponders, a high-dose 48-week regimen of IFN and ribavirin combination was more effective than a regimen with interferon at lower dose and ribavirin for 24 weeks only.

Retreatment with interferon plus ribavirin of chronic hepatitis C non-responders to interferon monotherapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Retreatment with a combination of alpha interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin of patients with chronic hepatitis C who did not respond to IFN monotherapy has not been assessed in large controlled studies.

METHODS

To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of IFN/ribavirin retreatment of non-responders to IFN and to identify predictors of complete (biochemical and virological) sustained response, we performed a meta-analysis of individual data on 581 patients from 10 centres. Retreatment with various IFN schedules (mean total dose 544 mega units) and a fixed ribavirin dose (1000-1200 mg/daily depending on body weight) was given for 24-60 (mean 39.5) weeks.

RESULTS

Biochemical end of treatment and sustained responses were observed in 271/581 (46.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 42.6-50.7%) and in 109/581 (18.7%; 95% CI 15.6-22.0%) cases, respectively. Two hundred and six of 532 patients (38.7%; 95% CI 34.6-42.9%) had an end of treatment complete response to retreatment while a complete sustained response occurred in 88 of 559 (15.7%; 95% CI 12.8-18.8%). Fifty four of 581 patients (9.2%; 95% CI 7.0-11.7%) stopped retreatment due to adverse effects. By logistic regression, complete sustained response was predicted independently by age <45 years (p=0.04), by normal pretreatment gamma-glutamyltransferase levels (p=0.01), and by a second course total IFN dose of at least 432 mega units (p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall low probability of effectiveness argues against indiscriminate retreatment of all IFN monotherapy non-responders with IFN/ribavirin. Patients less than 45 years old with normal gamma-glutamyltransferase levels who were retreated with high dose long course combination therapy had a complete sustained response rate of 30%.