Helicobacter pylori infection as a risk factor for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients using aspirin to prevent ischaemic heart disease

Pharmacodynamic effects of indobufen compared with aspirin in patients with coronary atherosclerosis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the pharmacodynamic effects of indobufen and low-dose aspirin in patients with coronary atherosclerosis.

METHODS

In the first phase, 218 patients with coronary atherosclerosis were randomly assigned to receive aspirin 100 mg once daily (standard dose); 100 mg once every 2 days; 100 mg once every 3 days; 50 mg twice daily; 75 mg once daily; 50 mg once daily; or indobufen 100 mg twice daily for 1 month. In the second phase, 20 healthy subjects were treated with indobufen 100 mg twice daily for 1 week followed after a 2-week washout by aspirin 100 mg once daily for 1 week. The primary outcome was arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation (PL_AA), and the secondary outcomes included plasma thromboxane B₂ (TXB₂) and urinary 11-dehydro-TXB₂ (11-dh-TXB₂) levels at the end of each treatment.  RESULTS: In the first phase, compared with aspirin 100 mg once daily: all aspirin groups had similar suppression of PL_AA whereas indobufen group had significantly less suppressed PL_AA. Aspirin given every second or third day, and indobufen produced less suppression of plasma TXB₂. All treatment regimens produced similar inhibition of 11-dh-TXB₂. In the second phase, compared with aspirin, indobufen produced less suppression of plasma TXB₂ at 8 h and 12 h after the last dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin 50 mg twice daily, 75 mg once daily, and aspirin 50 mg once daily produce antiplatelet effects that are similar to aspirin 100 mg once daily. Aspirin given less often than once daily and indobufen 100 mg twice daily do not suppress platelets as effectively as aspirin 100 mg once daily.

Gastrointestinal toxicity among patients taking selective COX-2 inhibitors or conventional NSAIDs, alone or combined with proton pump inhibitors: a case-control study

PURPOSE

To assess the risk of gastrointestinal perforation, ulcers, or bleeding (PUB) associated with the use of conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and selective COX-2 inhibitors, with or without PPIs compared with conventional NSAIDs.

METHODS

A case-control study was performed within conventional NSAIDs and/or selective COX-2 inhibitors users identified from the Dutch PHARMO Record Linkage System in the period 1998-2012. Cases were patients aged ≥18 years with a first hospital admission for PUB. For each case, up to four controls were matched for age and sex at the date a case was hospitalized (index date). Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

At the index date, 2634 cases and 5074 controls were current users of conventional NSAIDs or selective COX-2 inhibitors. Compared with conventional NSAIDs, selective COX-2 inhibitors with PPIs had the lowest risk of PUB (adjusted OR 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.73) followed by selective COX-2 inhibitors (adjusted OR 0.66, 95%CI: 0.48-0.89) and conventional NSAIDs with PPIs (adjusted OR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.68-0.92). Compared with conventional NSAIDs, the risk of PUB was lower for those aged ≥75 years taking conventional NSAIDs with PPIs compared with younger patients (adjusted interaction OR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.64-0.99). However, those aged ≥75 years taking selective COX-2 inhibitors, the risk was higher compared with younger patients (adjusted interaction OR 1.22, 95%CI: 1.01-1.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Selective COX-2 inhibitors with PPIs, selective COX-2 inhibitors, and conventional NSAIDs with PPIs were associated with lower risks of PUB compared with conventional NSAIDs. These effects were modified by age. © 2017 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Aspirin for cardioprotection and strategies to improve patient adherence

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in North America. Aspirin therapy has proven clinical effectiveness in the prevention and treatment of CVD and is one of the most widely used drugs nationwide. However, despite the medication's popularity and utility, adherence to a proper aspirin regimen is suboptimal, resulting in adverse health outcomes and increased health care costs. Our review outlines current knowledge on aspirin therapy adherence, causes of nonadherence, and strategies available to increase adherence to aspirin and medications in general. We demonstrate that, indeed, aspirin adherence rates are suboptimal, ranging from 72% to 92%, and that a combination of patient- and medication-related factors contribute to nonadherence. A multidimensional approach involving patient education and medication innovations to reduce aspirin side effects is imperative to improving rates of aspirin therapy adherence.

Gastrointestinal symptoms in low-dose aspirin users: a comparison between plain and buffered aspirin

Background

Aspirin is associated with gastrointestinal side effects such as gastric ulcers, gastric bleeding and dyspepsia. High-dose effervescent calcium carbasalate (ECC), a buffered formulation of aspirin, is associated with reduced gastric toxicity compared with plain aspirin in healthy volunteers, but at lower cardiovascular doses no beneficial effects were observed.

Aim

To compare the prevalence of self-reported gastrointestinal symptoms between low-dose plain aspirin and ECC.

Methods

A total of 51,869 questionnaires were sent to a representative sample of the Dutch adult general population in December 2008. Questions about demographics, gastrointestinal symptoms in general and specific symptoms, comorbidity, and medication use including bioequivalent doses of ECC (100 mg) and plain aspirin (80 mg) were stated. We investigated the prevalence of self-reported gastrointestinal symptoms on ECC compared with plain aspirin using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

A total of 16,715 questionnaires (32 %) were returned and eligible for analysis. Of these, 911 (5 %) respondents reported the use of plain aspirin, 633 (4 %) ECC and 15,171 reported using neither form of aspirin (91 %). The prevalence of self-reported gastrointestinal symptoms in general was higher in respondents using ECC (27.5 %) compared with plain aspirin (26.3 %), but did not differ significantly with either univariate (OR 1.06, 95 %CI 0.84–1.33), or multivariate analysis (aOR 1.08, 95 %CI 0.83–1.41). Also, none of the specific types of symptoms differed between the two aspirin formulations.

Conclusions

In this large cohort representative of the general Dutch population, low-dose ECC is not associated with a reduction in self-reported gastrointestinal symptoms compared with plain aspirin.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12471-014-0522-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Gastroprotection in low-dose aspirin users for primary and secondary prevention of ACS: results of a cost-effectiveness analysis including compliance

PURPOSE

Low-dose aspirin (ASA) increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal (GI) complications. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduce these upper GI side effects, yet patient compliance to PPIs is low. We determined the cost-effectiveness of gastroprotective strategies in low-dose ASA users considering ASA and PPI compliance.

METHODS

Using a Markov model we compared four strategies: no medication, ASA monotherapy, ASA+PPI co-therapy and a fixed combination of ASA and PPI for primary and secondary prevention of ACS. The risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), upper GI bleeding and dyspepsia was modeled as a function of compliance and the relative risk of developing these events while using medication. Costs, quality adjusted life years and number of ACS events were evaluated, applying a variable risk of upper GI bleeding. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

For our base case patients using ASA for primary prevention of ACS no medication was superior to ASA monotherapy. PPI co-therapy was cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] €10,314) compared to no medication. In secondary prevention, PPI co-therapy was cost-effective (ICER €563) while the fixed combination yielded an ICER < €20,000 only in a population with elevated risk for upper GI bleeding or moderate PPI compliance. PPI co-therapy had the highest probability to be cost-effective in all scenarios. PPI use lowered the overall number of ACS.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering compliance, PPI co-therapy is likely to be cost-effective in patients taking low dose ASA for primary and secondary prevention of ACS, given low PPI prices. In secondary prevention, a fixed combination seems cost-effective in patients with elevated risk for upper GI bleeding or in those with moderate PPI compliance. Both strategies reduced the number of ACS compared to ASA monotherapy.

Aspirin in cardiology--benefits and risks

AIMS

To review the current knowledge of the benefits and risks of long-term aspirin therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

Relevant articles published in English between 1996 and 2006 were obtained from the Current Contents Science Edition, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases.

RESULTS

Secondary aspirin prophylaxis is effective in reducing the risk of ischaemic events in patients with cardiovascular disease. However, its utility in reducing primary ischaemic events is more controversial; it appears to reduce the incidence of ischaemic stroke, but increase the incidence of haemorrhagic stroke. Aspirin therapy can also lead to an increased risk of gastrointestinal ulcers, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and other haemorrhagic complications. Lower doses of aspirin are associated with a reduced risk of gastrointestinal side effects and are equally effective in reducing cardiovascular risk. Co-therapy with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, clopidogrel or warfarin increases the risk of gastrointestinal side effects, while co-therapy with proton pump inhibitors reduces it.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the benefits and risks need to be considered carefully when prescribing aspirin, particularly in primary prevention. Patients should be prescribed lower doses rather than higher doses of aspirin in line with prescribing guidelines. Co-prescription of a proton pump inhibitors may be necessary in patients at high risk for upper gastrointestinal complications.

Improving the gastrointestinal tolerability of aspirin in older people

Interventions to reduce mortality and disability in older people are vital. Aspirin is cheap and effective and known to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, many cancers, and Alzheimer dementia. The widespread use of aspirin in older people is limited by its gastrointestinal side effects. Understanding age-related changes in gastrointestinal physiology that could put older people at risk of the side effects of aspirin may direct strategies to improve tolerance and hence lead to greater numbers of older people being able to take this effective intervention.

Chest pain from gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with coronary artery disease

Management of patients with coronary artery disease is a major challenge for physicians, patients, and the healthcare system. Chest pain experienced by patients with coronary disease can be of noncardiac origin, and symptoms frequently related to gastroesophageal etiologies. The distal esophagus and the heart share a common afferent nerve supply, suggesting that location and radiation of perceived pain may be identical. In addition, there is substantial overlap between the prevalence of coronary disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Many physicians, including cardiologists, prescribe acid-reducing therapy to coronary patients. However, no prospective, randomized studies to date have evaluated the potential benefit of such treatments to prevent chest pain symptoms for these patients. We review the studies on noncardiac chest pain demonstrating reflux in patients with and without coronary disease. Also, the association of reflux with exertional chest pain and cardiac syndrome X is discussed. A rationale is presented for prevention of noncardiac chest pain in coronary patients, and the potential role of acid-suppressive therapy in managing these patients is discussed.

[Treatment of NSAIDs related dyspepsia]

NSAIDs-induced dyspepsia occurs in 10 to 30% of patients treated with NSAIDs, leading to discontinuation of treatment in 5 to 15%. Gastrointestinal tolerability of COX-2 selective inhibitors is better than for non-selective NSAIDs. Helicobacter pylori infection does not influence gastrointestinal tolerability of NSAIDs. Therefore, patients should not be tested and treated for H. pylori infection unless they have a history of peptic ulcer. Symptoms of NSAIDs-induced dyspepsia are poorly correlated with gastroduodenal mucosal damage. Therefore, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy should be performed only if symptom relief is not achieved with the first line empirical treatment and/or if symptoms suggestive of complications, such as bleeding, develop. Proton pump inhibitors appear to be the treatment of choice for NSAIDs-induced dyspepsia.

Helicobacter pylori infection and the prevention of peptic ulcer with proton pump inhibitors in elderly subjects taking low-dose aspirin

INTRODUCTION

The role of Helicobacter pylori infection on the risk of low-dose aspirin-related gastroduodenal damage and on the efficacy of the prevention therapy in elderly chronic users of low-dose aspirin is still controversial.

AIM

To evaluate in symptomatic elderly chronic users of low-dose aspirin: (1) the association between H. pylori infection and the prevalence of upper gastrointestinal lesions; and (2) the effect of H. pylori infection on the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in the prevention of aspirin-related gastroduodenal lesions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and forty-five symptomatic elderly who were taking aspirin 75-300 mg daily, at least during the last 3 months, were evaluated by endoscopy. A structured interview was carried out to evaluate gastrointestinal symptoms and the use of proton pump inhibitors. H. pylori infection was diagnosed according to histology and the rapid urease test on gastric biopsies.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve patients were H. pylori-positive and 133 patients were H. pylori-negative. A significantly higher prevalence of peptic ulcers was observed in H. pylori-positive than in H. pylori-negative subjects (36.6% versus 15.8%, P = 0.0002). The use of proton pump inhibitors was associated with a significant decreased risk of peptic ulcer both in H. pylori-positive (absolute risk reduction, ARR = -36.2, 95% confidence interval: -51.2 to -21.3, P < 0.001) and H. pylori-negative patients (ARR = -12.6, 95% confidence interval: -23.9 to -1.2, P = 0.03). However, the number of patients who needed to be treated in order to gain a reduction of one peptic ulcer (number needed to treat, NnT) was lower in H. pylori-positive than in H. pylori-negative patients (NnT = 3 versus 8).

CONCLUSIONS

In symptomatic elderly chronic users of low-dose aspirin, H. pylori infection may influence the prevalence of peptic ulcers and the cost-effectiveness of the proton pump inhibitor prevention therapy.

Health-related quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease--the effect of upper gastrointestinal symptom treatment

BACKGROUND

Upper gastrointestinal discomfort decreases the already impaired health status of patients with cardiovascular disease.

AIM

To evaluate whether acid suppressive therapy improves health-related quality of life in patients who developed upper gastrointestinal symptoms after starting low-dose acetylsalicylic acid.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trail, cardiac patients using low-dose (80 mg) acetylsalicylic acid with (n = 142) and without (n = 90) upper gastrointestinal symptoms were included. Patients with symptoms were treated with rabeprazole or placebo for 4 weeks. At baseline and 4 weeks information about gastrointestinal symptoms and health-related quality of life was assessed.

RESULTS

The 73 patients assigned to rabeprazole when compared with 69 patients given placebo reported the same quality of life scores 4 weeks after randomization. The differences in quality of life scores between patients with and without symptoms at baseline remained after 4 weeks. Patients in whom treatment led to complete symptom relief or those who remained symptom-free reported significantly higher scores for Physical Component Summary (P < 0.01) and Mental Component Summary (P < 0.01), when compared to those with persistent symptoms or new onset symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Proton-pump inhibitor therapy did not improve quality of life. Upper gastrointestinal symptom relief in itself considerably increased quality of life.

N/A

N/A

Review article: the ageing bowel and intolerance to aspirin

Aspirin has a role in the prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer's dementia and several cancers. Encouraging all 50 year olds to take low-dose aspirin doubles their chances of living a healthy life into their nineties. The widespread use of aspirin, however, is limited as many older subjects are currently unable to take aspirin because of gastrointestinal side-effects. This review explores why gastrointestinal events occur with aspirin use and how a net benefit from prophylactic aspirin might be achieved in older subjects. It is suggested that, by understanding the age-related changes in upper gastrointestinal physiology and the mechanisms by which aspirin leads to the risk reductions associated with its use, it may be possible to direct interventions to improve tolerability in older subjects. This would allow greater numbers of older subjects to gain the benefits associated with aspirin use.

Proton-pump inhibitor therapy for acetylsalicylic acid associated upper gastrointestinal symptoms: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Patients using acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) have an increased risk of upper gastrointestinal discomfort. The aim of this study was to assess whether gastric acid suppression improves upper gastrointestinal symptoms in patients using low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial, 150 patients using low-dose (80 mg) acetylsalicylic acid with upper gastrointestinal symptoms who had been admitted at the Coronary Care Unit of the University Medical Center Nijmegen were assigned to treatment with rabeprazole (20 mg once daily) or placebo for 4 weeks. Treatment success, defined as complete upper gastrointestinal symptom relief, could be evaluated in 143 patients.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks after randomization, 34 of the 73 patients assigned to rabeprazole therapy (47%) as compared with 30 of the 70 patients given placebo (43%) reported complete upper gastrointestinal symptom relief (P = 0.54). Rabeprazole therapy did lead to a 52% improvement of heartburn symptoms [25% vs. 16%; odds ratio (OR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-0.97]. Epigastric pain, regurgitation, bloating and nausea symptoms did not statistically change after treatment. Patients with a history of dyspepsia more often reported treatment success in comparison to those without (75% vs. 40%; OR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Proton-pump inhibitor therapy significantly reduced heartburn, but not other acetylsalicylic acid associated symptoms.

The impact of gastrointestinal symptoms on health status in patients with cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Drugs for the management of cardiovascular disease may provoke gastrointestinal discomfort and complications.

AIM

To evaluate whether upper gastrointestinal symptoms affect the health status of patients with cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

Two weeks after discharge, 958 consecutive patients, who had been admitted to the Coronary Care Unit of the University Hospital Nijmegen between January and September 2001, were sent a questionnaire for the evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms and health status.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was returned by 632 patients (66%), with 334 patients (53%) reporting gastrointestinal symptoms. The self-rated health status (mean and 95% confidence interval), evaluated by visual analogue scale, was 70 (68-72) for patients without and 61 (59-63) for patients with gastrointestinal symptoms (P = 0.001). Patients with gastrointestinal symptoms reported significantly higher rates of problems with mobility (50% vs. 37%), self-care (19% vs. 10%), usual activities (70% vs. 52%), pain/discomfort (96% vs. 38%) and anxiety/depression (41% vs. 20%) when compared with those without gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Upper gastrointestinal symptoms strongly impaired the health status of patients with cardiovascular disease.

Helicobacter pylori infection in geriatrics

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection increases with age worldwide. However, the percentage of H. pylori-positive elderly patients who are tested and treated for their infection remains very low. We now have data that demonstrate the benefit of curing H. pylori infection in elderly patients with H. pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease and severe chronic gastritis. Furthermore, the cure of H. pylori may prevent progression of intestinal metaplasia and gastric atrophy. Studies are needed to clarify the role of eradication for elderly patients who have nonulcer dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux disease and who use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. H. pylori infection may be easily diagnosed by histological evaluation, rapid urease test or culture performed on gastric biopsies taken during endoscopy. However, the biopsy site must be carefully selected in elderly patients. For noninvasive monitoring of H. pylori infection after treatment, the 13C-urea breath test has significantly higher accuracy than serology in the elderly. The role of the H. pylori stool antigen test in old age still needs to be clarified. One-week PPI-based triple therapy regimens including clarithromycin, amoxycillin and/or nitroimidazoles are highly effective and well tolerated in elderly patients. Low doses of both PPIs and clarithromycin (in combination with standard doses of amoxycillin or nitroimidazoles) are sufficient. Antibiotic resistance and low compliance are the main factors related to treatment failure at any age.

Peptic ulcer disease

The introduction of the "Maastricht 2-2000" document provides some guidance with regard to the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in both primary and specialist practice settings, albeit primarily in the European setting. The putative role of H. pylori in gastric carcinogenesis was supported by a further study. Studies on the natural history of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) highlight the particular vulnerability of the elderly patient to PUD and its complications, and focus attention on targeted intervention in this group, particularly the avoidance of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID). Little has evolved with regard to the introduction of new NSAID, but reports indicate the potential association of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX 2)-selective agent use with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. The role of H. pylori and NSAID as risk factors for peptic ulcer disease and its complications is again explored, and both meta-analysis and clinical studies provide some evidence of their synergistic effect. The introduction of esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole, has widened the clinician's therapeutic choice; the true value of this agent remains to be determined.