The clinical and economic impact of competing management strategies for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Treatment strategies for reflux esophagitis including a potassium-competitive acid blocker: A cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common condition, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstays of treatment. However, concerns have been raised about the safety of PPIs. A potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), vonoprazan (VPZ), was recently introduced, which may provide clinical benefits. This study was performed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of alternative long-term strategies including continuous and discontinuous treatment with VPZ for the management of reflux esophagitis in Japan.

METHODS

A health state transition model was developed to capture the long-term management of reflux esophagitis. Four different strategies were compared: (a) intermittent PPI using lansoprazole (LPZ); (b) intermittent P-CAB; (c) maintenance PPI using LPZ; and (d) maintenance P-CAB.

RESULTS

Intermittent P-CAB was the most cost-effective, and the number of days for which medication was required with this strategy was fewest. Maintenance PPI was more efficacious, but more costly than intermittent P-CAB. Maintenance P-CAB was more efficacious, but more costly than maintenance PPI. Co-payments were higher for maintenance PPI than for intermittent P-CAB, and for maintenance P-CAB than for maintenance PPI, which were considered reasonable for the majority of patients to improve symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent P-CAB appears to be the strategy of choice for the majority of reflux esophagitis patients in clinical practice. If a patient is not satisfied with the symptom control of the current strategy, switching to a more effective strategy appears to be a reasonable option for the majority of patients.

Structured diagnostic and treatment approach versus the usual primary care approach in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cluster-randomized multicenter study

GOALS

To compare the clinical outcomes of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients treated with an implemented new structured pathway (NSP) or according to existing local clinical practices [old clinical pathway (OCP)].

BACKGROUND

GERD is a major challenge at the primary care level.

STUDY

Primary care centers (n=24) were cluster randomized to handle patients suffering from symptoms suggestive of GERD according to the NSP (n=97) or the OCP (n=134). In the NSP, the GerdQ questionnaire score was used both for diagnosis and management including treatment. We used validated questionnaires to evaluate disease symptoms, quality of life, and costs at inclusion and at follow-up 2 to 6 months later.

RESULTS

On the basis of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire, 56% of the patients treated with the NSP reported total symptom relief at the follow-up compared with 33% in the OCP group (P=0.0013). The reflux symptoms after treatment affected daily activities to a lesser extent in the patients in the NSP group compared with the OCP group (10% vs. 13%, respectively, P=0.01). The utility score of the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire improved more in the NSP group than in the OCP group (0.05 vs. 0.02, respectively, P<0.001). The patients in the NSP group had an approximately 50% lower average total cost for GERD-related health care resources compared with the OCP group [301 Swedish Kronor (SEK) vs. 588 SEK, respectively, NS].

CONCLUSIONS

The management of GERD patients in primary care centers using a structured clinical pathway and the results of the GerdQ improves the clinical outcome compared with prevailing local routines (NCT00842387).

Limited ability of the proton-pump inhibitor test to identify patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The efficacy of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy often is assessed to determine whether patients' symptoms are acid-related and if patients have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), although the accuracy of this approach is questionable. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the PPI test, in conjunction with other tests, for the diagnosis of GERD.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the DIAMOND study, a multinational trial that compared the ability of the reflux disease questionnaire with that of symptom-based clinical diagnosis to identify GERD in primary care patients with frequent upper-gastrointestinal symptoms. Patients (n = 308) were given placebo and further evaluated by endoscopy, wireless esophageal pH-metry, and symptom association monitoring. Those with GERD (n = 197) were identified based on the presence of reflux esophagitis, esophageal pH level less than 4 for more than 5.5% of 24 hours, or positive results from symptom association monitoring (or a positive result from the PPI test in patients with borderline levels of esophageal acidity). All patients then were given single-blind therapy with esomeprazole (40 mg once daily) for 2 weeks and symptoms were recorded daily.

RESULTS

A positive response to the PPI test was observed in 69% of patients with GERD and in 51% of those without GERD. Response to placebo did not influence the diagnostic ability of the subsequent PPI test. More patients with reflux esophagitis had a positive result from the PPI test than patients without GERD (57% vs 35%; P = .002) or patients with GERD but no esophagitis. A clinical diagnosis by the primary care physician of an acid-related disease was not associated with response to PPIs.

CONCLUSIONS

In a well-characterized population of primary care patients with frequent upper-gastrointestinal symptoms of any type, the PPI test has limited ability to identify patients with GERD, diagnosed by current standard tests. (ClinicalTrials.gov Number, NCT00291746.).

The gain in quality-adjusted life months by switching to esomeprazole in those with continued reflux symptoms in primary care: EncomPASS--a cluster-randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but their cost effectiveness is unknown. This is usually determined by cost/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, but whether PPI therapy improves QALYs has not been assessed in a randomized trial. The PPI acid suppression symptom (PASS) test is a five-item questionnaire that identifies patients with persistent acid-related symptoms. We evaluated whether a PASS test-based management strategy of changing GERD therapy to esomeprazole in those with continued symptoms on another PPI or H(2) receptor antagonist therapy would be cost effective. We expressed the data in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life months (QALM), as this was a 4-week trial.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, cluster-randomized, open-label study in primary care physician centers across Canada. Primary care physician centers were randomized to intervention or control arms. Patients on acid-suppressing medication were identified from primary care records and asked to complete the PASS test. PASS test failures at baseline assessment continued current therapy in control practices or switched to esomeprazole 20 or 40 mg daily (the dose was at the clinician's discretion) for 4 weeks in intervention practices. A planned secondary end point was QALM gain, measured using the validated Euroqol (EQ-5D) completed at baseline and 4 weeks. Medication use was also assessed by questionnaire. Canadian unit generic costs were applied to all GERD drugs, except to esomeprazole and lansoprazole, wherein proprietary costs were used (all costs in Canadian $). Data were analyzed using bootstrap sampling.

RESULTS

A total of 1,564 patients were recruited from 134 intervention sites and 92 control sites. Data were evaluable for 808 intervention and 445 control patients. The mean (±standard deviation) QALM at 4 weeks in the intervention group was 0.885±0.164 compared with 0.814±0.179 in the control group, resulting in a mean 0.071 (95% CI=0.091-0.051) QALM gain (P<0.0001). Esomeprazole was cost effective for PASS test failures, with a mean cost of $763 (95% CI=456-1,414) per QALM gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Esomeprazole was associated with a statistically significant gain in QALMs and was cost effective in primary care patients with persistent acid-related symptoms identified by the PASS test.

Treatment strategies for acid reflux: EncomPASSing practical solutions for primary care

Despite a steady diet of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for over three decades, nearly all of our routine clinical decisions remain incompletely supported, or even totally unaddressed, by the burgeoning pile of RCT data. The biomedical literature tends to focus on explanatory RCTs that compare new agents with placebo; it is less common to find pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) that test the risks, benefits, and costs of competing active therapies within the context of usual practice settings. In this issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology, Moayeddi and colleagues report the results of the EncomPASS study-a novel PCT for the primary care management of reflux disease. In this editorial, the results of EncomPASS are discussed, and the study is highlighted as a model for investigators to follow as we continue to emphasize pragmatic trials that address everyday challenges in clinical care.

The patient with sore throat

Sore throat is a common medical complaint seen by the emergency practitioner, internist, pediatrician, and otolaryngologist. The differential for sore throat is vast. However, with a directed history this can often be narrowed down to 2 to 3 possible diagnoses. By paying particular attention to the associated symptoms and duration of symptoms, common self-limited etiologies like viral pharyngitis and nonstreptococcal tonsillitis can be distinguished from those that require more investigation, such as supraglottitis and tonsillar cancer. A sore throat is most commonly caused by an infectious, inflammatory, or neoplastic etiologic factor.

Adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are very effective drugs used largely in acid related disorders. During the last years concern have been raised regarding their overutilisation in benign condition, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease. The debate focussed also on the risk of adverse events related to long term use of PPI. Apart of the case of Helicobacter Pylori (H. Pylori) positive patients, in whose long term acid suppression lead to the development of corpus predominant atrophic gastritis, precursor of cancer; the other assumed adverse events, have never been demonstrated in prospective studies. The attention should move towards the appropriate prescription of PPI, rather than the fear adverse effects of PPI. In fact, in clinical practise, PPI are often prescribed in patients without a specific acid related disease and continued long term based on their safety profile. This review focus on the main adverse events related to long term PPI use.

Acid-related disorders in the elderly

Diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), peptic ulcer and gastric cancer become more common and more severe with advancing age. Older individuals also tend to have a higher prevalence of co-morbid factors, such as Helicobacter pylori infection, presence of other diseases, or use of medications (e.g., nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, bisphosphonates) that increase their risk for acid-related disorders. Unfortunately, in the elderly patient with these disorders symptom presentation may be slight or atypical, resulting in a delayed diagnosis. In general, the treatment of older individuals with peptic ulcer or GERD and its complications is similar to that of younger individuals. Proton pump inhibitors are the basis of therapy for symptom relief, healing of erosive esophagitis and peptic ulceration, reduction of the risk for NSAID induced mucosal damage, and prevention of disease relapses. The strongest prevalence of H.pylori infection in the elderly, as well as the role of H.pylori in the occurrence of gastric lesions, in particular ulcer diseases, gastric precancerous lesions and gastric cancer, make the diagnosis and the eradication of H.pylori in this population of the utmost importance. Strategies to improve the management of upper gastrointestinal diseases in older people will reduce mortality and improve quality of life.

A comparative study of proton-pump inhibitor tests for Chinese reflux patients in relation to the CYP2C19 genotypes

BACKGROUND

The proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) test has been proposed as a valuable tool for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease in Western populations.

GOALS

We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the PPI test using rabeprazole and pantoprazole in a Chinese population with a higher prevalence of poor PPI metabolization.

STUDY

After diagnostic endoscopy, patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms were randomly assigned to a 2-week test with rabeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.) or pantoprazole (40 mg b.i.d.). Therapeutic response was assessed with a 5-grade daily record. Genotypes of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 polymorphism were determined.

RESULTS

Of the 178 patients who completed the study, 92 (51.7%) had erosive esophagitis and 78 (48.3%) were endoscopy-negative reflux disease. On the basis of 50% reduction of symptoms, there was a nonsignificant difference of diagnostic performances between rabeprazole and pantoprazole. For the CYP2C19 genotypes, 138 (87.3%) were determined to be extensive metabolizers (EMs) and 20 (12.7%) were poor metabolizers (PMs). When comparing the EMs and PMs, the diagnostic specificity in the prediction of erosive esophagitis was higher in the EMs (57.6% vs. 20.0%, P=0.040), as was the accuracy (74.6% vs. 50.0%, P=0.023). There were no differences in the sensitivity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

CYP2C19 genotypic polymorphism was related to a higher possibility of false-positive results for patients who metabolized PPI poorly. High-dose rabeprazole and pantoprazole showed a similar diagnostic performance.

Healthcare costs of GERD and acid-related conditions in pediatric patients, with comparison between histamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and acid-related conditions (GERD/ARC) are common in pediatric practice but their costs have not been well characterized.

AIM

To compare healthcare costs (HCC) and healthcare utilization (HCU) of pediatric GERD/ARC between groups of GERD/ARC patients initiated on histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and matched controls.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children (age < 18 years) diagnosed with GERD or ARC (exploratory category) were identified from a large US claims database (1999-2005) using ICD-9 codes. Costs of pediatric GERD/ARC were estimated by comparing 6-month post-diagnosis HCC between cases and matched controls. GERD/ARC-related HCC and HCU for the year 2005 were further compared between GERD/ARC patients initiated with PPIs vs. H(2)RAs in terms of the cost differences relative to pre-initiation (difference-in-difference) and using multivariate regression to adjust for demographics, pre-treatment health status and pre-treatment costs.

RESULTS

A total of 27 865 matched pairs were identified. GERD/ARC patients incurred on average more 6-month total HCC than controls ($2386). In 2005, 1010 pediatric patients were initiated on H(2)RAs or PPIs. About 61% were initiated on PPIs and incurred 1.8 times higher 6-month post-initiation GERD/ARC-related HCC than H(2)RA-initiated patients ($661 vs. $372, p < 0.001). Although total 6-month GERD/ARC-related HCC increased for both PPI- and H(2)RA-treated patients, the increase was 30% less for PPI-treated patients ($173 vs. $246, p = 0.521) in the difference-in-difference analysis and 69% less in the multivariate analysis ($109 vs. $347, p = 0.040).

LIMITATIONS

The use of an exploratory definition for GERD/ARC, administrative claims data and potential coding errors in diagnosis codes used in selection process may limit the generalizability of the results.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric GERD/ARC patients incurred significantly higher healthcare costs compared to similar children without GERD/ARC. Compared to patients initiated with H(2)RAs, patients initiated with PPIs had more baseline comorbidities, and lower GERD/ARC-related HCC after beginning treatment.

Impact of PPIs on patient focused symptomatology in GERD

About half of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have a normal endoscopy, so symptom assessment is the only appropriate outcome measure for these persons. Symptom assessment is also of great importance in persons with erosive esophagitis. There is currently no fully validated questionnaire to compare symptom response to treatment of patients with GERD. The aim of this review is to consider ReQuest^™ assessment tool to evaluate esophageal, supra-esophageal, and infra-esophageal symptoms, as well as any modification of the patient’s quality of life. The ReQuest^™ may be combined with the Los Angeles classification of esophagitis (LA A–D), to include the normal endoscopic finding in normal endoscopy reflux disease. The ReQuest^™ score declines rapidly towards normal with patient treatment with a proton pump inhibitor. A proportion of patients need more than the usual 8 weeks of therapy. For example, in GERD patients with Los Angeles B–D, the ReQuest^™ score falls more with pantoprazole 40 mg than with esomoprazole 40 mg after 12 weeks of therapy. Now that the simplified ReQuest in Practice^™ is available, this validated brief questionnaire has potential as an instrument for use in GERD patients seen in everyday clinical practice.

Overutilization of proton pump inhibitors: a review of cost-effectiveness and risk [corrected]

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are superior to histamine-2 receptor antagonists for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis. Antisecretory therapy (AST), however, accounts for significant cost expenditure in the United States including over-the-counter and prescription formulations. Moreover, emerging data illustrate the potential risks associated with long-term PPI therapy including variations in bioavailability of common medications, vitamin B12 deficiency, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, community-acquired pneumonia, and hip fracture. For these reasons, it is imperative to use the lowest dose of drug necessary to achieve desired therapeutic goals. This may entail the use of step-down, step-off, or on-demand PPI therapy for the treatment of GERD. In addition, PPIs are the most commonly used medications for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), despite little evidence to support their use. Compounding this problem is evidence that patients erroneously administered SUP are often discharged on long-term PPI therapy. Pharmacy-driven step-down orders, limitation of the use of PPIs for SUP in non-ICU settings, and meticulous chart review to ensure that hospitalized patients are not discharged home on a PPI without an appropriate indication are interventions that can ensure proper PPI utilization with minimal of risk and optimization of cost-effectiveness.

The proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test in GERD: does it still have a role?

The proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test is a short course of high-dose PPI, used to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This diagnostic strategy is commonly used globally, primarily because of its availability, simplicity, and high sensitivity. The PPI test has been proven to be a sensitive tool for diagnosing GERD in noncardiac chest pain patients and in preliminary trials in extraesophageal manifestations of GERD. Several recent meta-analyses reevaluated the value of the PPI test in patients with classic GERD-related symptoms and noncardiac chest pain. Although the results were conflicting, the PPI test remains a popular tool for determining the presence of GERD. Attempts to challenge the PPI test without offering attractive alternatives are unlikely to alter clinical practice.

Rabeprazole: a second-generation proton pump inhibitor in the treatment of acid-related disease

Rabeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) presenting a very advantageous pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile over older PPIs. In particular, this drug has a very fast onset of action, due to a short activation time and a very high pKa, and may therefore be defined as a 'second generation' PPI. The aim of this article is to provide an update on the pharmacology and clinical profile of rabeprazole and its use in acid-related disorders, with a particular focus on its role in gastroesophageal reflux disease; in the treatment and prevention of duodenal and gastric ulcers and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; in the therapy of the extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (in particular the respiratory and ear, nose and throat ones); and in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

Comparing resource utilization and gastrointestinal outcomes in patients treated with either standard-dose or high-dose proton pump inhibitors: a matched cohort study

The use of double-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for initial management of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms is common, though little evidence supports this practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether initial prescription of double-dose PPIs in outpatients with UGI complaints is superior to standard-dose PPIs prescription in reducing resource utilization. Patients in the Manitoba Health database prescribed double-dose PPIs were matched to individuals prescribed PPIs at standard doses. UGI-related inpatient and outpatient resource utilization and prescription drug usage were compared for both groups over the following year. Cases and controls had a similar duration of PPI use, and no difference in either UGI-related outpatient visits or UGI-related hospital admissions. Twelve-month UGI related costs were higher for double-dose PPI users. Initial therapy with double-dose PPIs does not reduce GI-related resource utilization. Prescription of double-dose PPIs as initial therapy for upper gastrointestinal symptoms should be discouraged.

Management strategy for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparison between empirical treatment with esomeprazole and endoscopy-oriented treatment

OBJECTIVES

Whether patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and without alarm features should be treated empirically or undergo endoscopy first is a debated issue. In this study, our aim was to assess the efficacy, and to compare the direct costs and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL), of two treatment strategies (empirical vs endoscopy-oriented treatment) in a large population of patients with GERD.

METHODS

In total, 612 patients were randomized to either empirical treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg once daily (od) (group 1, N = 309) or endoscopy and treatment according to endoscopic findings (group 2, N = 303, esomeprazole 40 mg od in patients with reflux esophagitis and esomeprazole 20 mg od in patients without esophagitis) for 4 wk, followed by esomeprazole 20 mg od maintenance treatment in both groups. Direct costs and HRQL were analyzed in both treatment arms.

RESULTS

At the end of the acute treatment phase (week 4), 267 patients in group 1 (86.4%) and 265 patients in group 2 (87.5%) were considered responders to treatment (intention-to-treat analysis, P= 0.878). Empirical treatment proved to be cost-effective by saving 38.72 euros per treated patient. At the end of the maintenance phase (week 24), a similar proportion of patients responded to treatment in the two groups (71.8%vs 68.3%, P= 0.389). HRQL improved from baseline to week 24 in both groups (difference between study groups not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with GERD, empirical treatment with esomeprazole proved to be cost-effective compared with endoscopy-oriented treatment, and did not negatively affect patient HRQL. These results should be taken into account in the management of GERD patients in clinical practice.

Reflux, Dyspepsia, and Disorders of the Foregut

Disorders of the foregut are an increasingly common cause of symptoms in Western populations. This review summarizes recent advances in the understanding and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, dyspepsia and celiac disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and physical activity

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common disorders in the general population. In recent years, a marked increase in the occurrence of the disease worldwide has been noted. Intense exercise belongs to factors that are known to exacerbate symptoms of GERD. Episodes of reflux seem to be associated with the length and the intensity of the physical activity undertaken. Experimental studies suggest that the gastroesophageal reflux may be increased in athletes due to: decreased gastrointestinal blood flow; alterations of hormone secretion; changes in the motor function of the oesophagus and the ventricle; and the constrained body position during exercise. Disturbances of the balance between two areas of opposite pressure: intra-abdominal and intrathoracic, have also been proven to influence GERD events. GERD is found in sportspeople of various disciplines, but specific types of exercise may have significantly different impacts on the gastroesophageal reflux.Basic prevention of GERD comprise lifestyle and dietary interventions. Adjustments of the exercise load and avoiding meals and drinks about the time of physical effort may ease the symptoms. Unfortunately, in most patients, pharmacological measures are necessary. These include occasional application of antacids and blockers of histamine H2 receptors in mild forms of the disease, and a regular therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in the majority of other cases. An average dose of PPI varies from 20 to 40 mg/day and should be continued for 4-8 weeks. Unfortunately, symptoms of GERD frequently return and in these situations long-term acid suppression with PPI is usually necessary. As regular physical activity exerts beneficial health effects, the necessity of establishing associations between moderate, recreational exercise and GERD is needed.

Management of chest pain: exploring the views and experiences of chiropractors and medical practitioners in a focus group interview

BACKGROUND

We report on a multidisciplinary focus group project related to the appropriate care of chiropractic patients who present with chest pain. The prevalence and clinical management, both diagnosis and treatment, of musculoskeletal chest pain in ambulatory medical settings, was explored as the second dimension of the focus group project reported here.

METHODS

This project collected observational data from a multidisciplinary focus group composed of both chiropractic and medical professionals. The goals of the focus group were to explore the attitudes and experiences of medical and chiropractic clinicians regarding their patients with chest pain who receive care from both medical and chiropractic providers, to identify important clinical or research questions that may inform the development of 'best practices' for coordinating or managing care of chest pain patients between medical and chiropractic providers, to identify important clinical or research questions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of chest pain of musculoskeletal origin, to explore various methods that might be used to answer those questions, and to discuss the feasibility of conducting or coordinating a multidisciplinary research effort along this line of inquiry. The convenience-sample of five focus group participants included two chiropractors, two medical cardiologists, and one dual-degreed chiropractor/medical physician. The focus group was audiotaped and transcripts were prepared of the focus group interaction. Content analysis of the focus group transcripts were performed to identify key themes and concepts, using categories of narratives.

RESULTS

Six key themes emerged from the analysis of the focus group interaction, including issues surrounding (1) Diagnosis; (2) Treatment and prognosis; (3) Chest pain as a chronic, multifactorial, or comorbid condition; (4) Inter-professional coordination of care; (5) Best practices and standardization of care; and (6) Training and education.

CONCLUSION

This study carries implications for chiropractic clinical training relative to enhancing diagnostic competencies in chest pain, as well as the need to ascertain and improve those skills, competencies, and standards for referrals and sharing of clinical information that may improve cross-disciplinary coordination of care for chest pain patients.

Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--the health economic implications

For the vast majority of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease appropriate care involves the management of symptoms with lifestyle advice and drugs. However, there is dissension about the appropriate use of endoscopy, whether drugs should be stepped up or down according to potency, how long drugs should be used for, the role of lifestyle advice, and, related to this, the role of patients' lifestyle choices. This exploration of the economics of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease reviews its cost burden to the UK, assesses published economic models for their strengths and weaknesses and examines current recommendations for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease management from a socioeconomic perspective. Drugs prescribed predominantly for dyspepsia cost the UK National Health Service a projected pound sterling 625 million in 2004, 7% of the primary care prescribing budget. When general practitioners consultations, endoscopies, over-the-counter sales and sickness absences are included the UK cost rises to pound sterling 1.5 billion: approximately half of this cost can be ascribed to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Emphasis upon regular review and stepping down treatment (while maintaining adequate symptom relief) is both clinically appropriate and resource efficient. Other cost-effectiveness issues largely lack objective answers because investment in treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease depends upon how much more, at the margin, society wishes to invest for further but diminishing symptom relief.

Heartburn-dominant, uninvestigated dyspepsia: a comparison of 'PPI-start' and 'H2-RA-start' management strategies in primary care--the CADET-HR Study

BACKGROUND

There are few data on empiric, stepped therapy for heartburn relief or subsequent relapse in primary care.

AIMS

To compare heartburn relief produced by a proton pump inhibitor-start or an H(2)-receptor antagonist-start with step-up therapy, as needed, followed by a treatment-free period to assess relapse.

METHODS

Heartburn-dominant uninvestigated dyspepsia patients from 46 primary care centres were randomized to one of two active treatment strategies: omeprazole 20 mg daily (proton pump inhibitor-start) or ranitidine 150 mg bid (H2-receptor antagonist-start) for the first 4-8 weeks, stepping up to omeprazole 40 or 20 mg daily, respectively, for 4-8 weeks for persistent symptoms. Daily diaries documented heartburn relief (score < or = 3/7 on < or = of 7 prior days) and relapse (score > or = 4 on > or = 2 of 7 prior days).

RESULTS

For 'proton pump inhibitor-start' (n = 196) vs. 'H2-receptor antagonist-start' (n = 194), respectively, heartburn relief occurred in 55.1% vs. 27.3% (P < 0.001) at 4 weeks and in 88.3% vs. 87.1% at 16 weeks. After therapy, 308 patients were heartburn-free (159 vs. 149); median times to relapse were 8 vs. 9 days and cumulative relapse rates were 78.6% vs. 75.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

An empiric 'proton pump inhibitor-start' strategy relieves heartburn more effectively than an 'H2-receptor antagonist-start' strategy up to 12 weeks but has no effect on subsequent relapse, which is rapid in most patients.

Gambling with gastroesophageal reflux disease: should we worry about the QALY?

Gastroenterologists mainly deal with chronic organic and functional illnesses that are not life threatening but can be expensive to treat. How this compares with the management of other diseases that cause significant mortality is an important question to answer if health-care resources are to be allocated appropriately. Comparing health care in terms of cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained is one approach to this problem although there are concerns about whose values should be elicited and how QALYs are measured.

[Reflux esophagitis]

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most prevalent diseases in the industrialized countries. Approximately 15-25% of adults suffer from reflux symptoms, characterized mainly by heartburn and/or regurgitation. Currently, antisecretory medication with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or antireflux surgery are the established options for GERD-treatment. PPI are the therapeutic gold standard in acute, long-term or on-demand therapy of GERD. Since PPI do not restore the antireflux barrier but merely suppress acid secretion a life-long tablet adherence is required in most cases. In view of limitations of PPI and the potential risks of laparoscopic surgery, several endoscopic antireflux techniques were developed and may evolve as a valuable third option. However, so far objective long-term data are lacking for choosing the appropriate patient who will benefit most from endoluminal antireflux therapy.

Review article: diagnosis and management of night-time reflux

Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) range from mild to severe and, when they occur during night-time hours, can interfere with sleep patterns and reduce overall quality of life. The clinical presentation of GERD is characterized by oesophageal as well as supra-oesophageal symptoms, including otolaryngologic and pulmonary complications. However, GERD may be overlooked as the cause of a patient's supra-oesophageal symptoms because these complaints can occur in the absence of oesophageal symptoms or endoscopic changes. The role of available tools used for GERD diagnosis, including endoscopy, oesophageal pH monitoring and an empirical course of proton pump inhibitor therapy, is discussed. Interventions available to achieve the therapeutic goals of symptom relief and prevention include specific lifestyle modifications and over-the-counter as well as prescription pharmacological agents. Patient-initiated, as-needed treatment may not be the best choice for managing persistent night-time reflux because it requires patient arousal from sleep. Proton pump inhibitor therapy remains the treatment of choice for patients with more severe symptoms and those with erosive oesophagitis. Few studies have specifically evaluated the role of pharmacological agents in the management of night-time reflux and comparisons are difficult due to the variability in study design and endpoints assessed.

Non-pharmacologic treatment strategies in gastroesophageal reflux disease

In the West, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common and well-recognized disease. Lately, it has been described as an emerging problem in the East as well. While it is not a rapidly fatal illness, it causes a myriad of disturbing symptoms that remarkably reduce the patients' quality of life (QOL). The economic impact that results from multiple consultations, diagnostic investigations, and administration of a variety of treatment regimens, including surgery, is enormous. The operative management for GERD is fundoplication, for example Toupet (270 degree wrap of the distal esophagus) and Nissen (360 degree wrap of the distal esophagus). These surgical procedures are aimed at permanently controlling acid reflux by reconstructing the gastroesophageal junction. Currently, the ease, aesthetic advantages, and the comparable outcomes achieved by minimally invasive laparoscopic fundoplication have rekindled interest in the operative alternatives of GERD management. Fundoplication controls or diminishes considerably the severity of the symptoms associated with GERD. However, appearance of new symptoms i.e. dysphagia, 'gas-bloat syndrome', etc. as postoperative events have been reported. Recently, several innovative endoluminal treatment modalities have been introduced, namely; endoscopic plicator/suturing devices, bulking injections, and radiofrequency treatment. They are focused on enhancing the performance of a malfunctioning lower esophageal sphincter. While results of several case series reflect substantial improvements in GERD-HRQL scores, lack of long-term durability data is a major concern when recommending these novel, relatively simple, peroral techniques to a long suffering patient. It is clear that these therapies are still evolving and long-term outcomes of properly designed comparative efficacy trials are awaited.

The quality of published health economic analyses in digestive diseases: a systematic review and quantitative appraisal

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Health economic analyses are increasingly common in the digestive diseases literature and often are cited to frame practice guidelines. Although clinical trials are subjected routinely to critical appraisal, there has been no attempt to appraise the quality of health economic analyses with a validated instrument. We sought to appraise the quality of health economic analyses in digestive diseases, and to identify predictors of study quality.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to identify digestive disease health economic analyses published since 1980. We assessed these studies using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES), a validated quality-scoring instrument (score range = 0-100; >75 = high quality). We conducted regression analysis to identify predictors of high quality.

RESULTS

Of 186 identified analyses, 29% were high quality, 71% failed to address potential model biases, 52% failed to disclose conflicts of interest, and 74% failed to describe methods for deriving the model assumptions. Four factors predicted high quality in logistic regression: (1) one or more authors had an advanced degree in health services or a related field (odds ratio for high quality, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-9.3); (2) the study used decision-analysis software package (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.7); (3) the study was federally funded (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.1); and (4) the study cited the National Panel on Cost Effectiveness guidelines (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than one third of health economic analyses in digestive diseases meet criteria for high quality. Study quality is limited by factors that potentially can be remedied. These data may be used to focus the attention of journal editors and peer reviewers to ensure the future high quality of health economic analyses in digestive diseases.

Cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses: how did we get here and where are we going?

Cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses are currently the only tools available for evaluating whether the cost of an intervention is a good use of resources when compared with other ways that money could be spent on health care (allocative efficiency). Cost-utility analyses assess health in terms of length and quality of life using the quality adjusted life year whilst cost-benefit analyses measure health in monetary terms. The measurement of health gain with either approach has a number of problems and the accuracy of these measures is uncertain. Cost-benefit analysis has certain advantages when measuring improvements in mild diseases such as irritable bowel disease and dyspepsia, which are common problems in gastroenterology. The results of cost-benefit analysis may provide more transparent guidance for policy makers, doctors and patients.

GERD 2004: issues from the past and a consensus for the future

In the early 1900's, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was an almost unknown entity with less than 200 cases reported worldwide. Currently the disease is regarded as almost endemic with as much as 25% of the population in some countries exhibiting signs or symptoms of reflux. Early therapies directed at chemical neutralization (milk drip, antacids) were of modest effect and required constant administration for efficacy. The introduction of histamine 2 receptor antagonists in the 1970's dramatically improved the management of GERD, but was limited by problems of tachyphylaxis and adverse events. The advent of the PPI class of drugs revolutionized medical care of GERD, given their efficacy and safety profile. As a consequence, the surgical approach with its pronounced dependence on individual operator skill and its high morbidity and even mortality has fallen into disregard. Thus, modest surgical outcome results as compared to the efficacy of PPIs has led to the widespread recognition that pharmacological therapy for GERD represents the platinum standard of care and the current consensus is that the PPI class of drugs provide the safest and most effective form of therapy for GERD. Furthermore, it is apparent based on acid suppression, symptom relief and healing rates, that all PPIs are on a milligram for milligram basis similarly efficacious for the management of GERD. While a consensus exists in regard to the current management of GERD with PPIs there is little agreement as to the management of the associated mucosal metaplastic process. At this time there is inadequate understanding of the biological basis of the mucosal transformation and minimal information about the mechanistic regulation of this event and its perpetuation. A future consensus thus requires the identification of the appropriate tools to detect Barrett's early, identify the specific molecular markers associated with neoplastic transformation and establish a definitive therapeutic algorithm.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Globally, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a common and important clinical disorder. This review summarizes the major advances in the understanding and treatment of GERD that have been made in the past 12 months. Epidemiologic studies have yielded additional data on the clinical presentation and natural history of GERD in the East. Further insights have been presented on the pathogenesis of GERD, including the immunoregulatory environment of GERD, the neurophysiology of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR), the mechanics of the esophagogastric junction as well as the influence of Helicobacter pylori. Diagnostically, a new acid exposure sensor may be a helpful cost-effective tool. Developments have been made in pharmacotherapy for TLESR. There is ongoing interest in endoscopic therapy and further developments have been made in laparoscopic fundoplication. The cost-effectiveness of several management strategies has been evaluated, aiming to reduce the cost impact of GERD on the health care system.

The economic and quality-of-life impact of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common complaints in general medical practice. Symptoms of GERD have a high prevalence, which greatly affects health economics and patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The majority of patients who present with reflux symptoms lack esophageal mucosal injury and thus have symptomatic GERD. There appear to be no differences in either symptoms or HRQOL measures between patients with or without positive endoscopy. Although most pharmacoeconomic and HRQOL assessments have focused on erosive GERD patients, available data suggest that the impact of symptomatic GERD on HRQOL is significant and equivalent to that associated with erosive disease. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) improve HRQOL to a greater extent than either histamine(2)-receptor antagonists or prokinetics in patients with GERD, with PPI-based step-down or "on-demand" strategies yielding the most cost-effective benefit to health. Additional HRQOL and outcomes research focused on patients with symptomatic GERD, ideally using disease-specific assessment tools, is needed. Furthermore, these management strategies must be implemented in real world settings to validate their effectiveness and firmly establish claims of reduced need for diagnostic testing and decreased direct medical costs.

Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Therapeutic modalities for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continue to evolve despite the introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), the most successful antireflux class of drugs. On-demand modalities such as antacids and alginates as well as histamine type-2 receptor antagonists continue to be popular with GERD patients who seek temporary relief of symptoms. The PPIs have revolutionized the treatment of patients with severe erosive esophagitis, complications of GERD, and atypical or extraesophageal manifestations of GERD. Antireflux surgery, commonly performed via laparoscopy, remains popular among patients who do not wish to take medications long term. In addition, the recent introduction of various endoscopic techniques offers GERD patients a long-term solution with less morbidity and lower cost than antireflux surgery.

Decision making in gastroesophageal reflux disease. What are the critical issues?

This article has identified several crucial decision points in the management of GERD. Although there seems to be a strong epidemiologic association with esophageal adenocarcinoma, the clinical and economic benefits of screening endoscopy are not clear. Given the low incidence of this cancer, it is conceivable that screening programs in these patients, such as colon cancer screening and breast cancer screening, may provide a greater health benefit at a lower incremental cost. Surveillance endoscopy in BE is another contentious issue, with the surveillance interval and cost-effectiveness hinging on the cancer risk. As more precise estimates of cancer risk, accounting for publication bias, are derived, the economics of surveillance will require further evaluation. Finally, several, management strategies seem to improve outcomes for patients with uninvestigated GERD, but the incremental costs of the more effective step-down approach seem minimal. More important than the initial strategy may be the ability to implement a systematic approach to care that ensures that patients attempt step-down when symptoms are resolved and do not remain on potent therapy indefinitely when it is not necessary. The results of prospective effectiveness trials are anticipated to validate the findings of these economic analyses.

Oesophageal disorders: future developments

Elicitation of the characteristic symptom patterns remains the primary approach to the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and this may be enhanced by developments in the use of high-resolution endoscopy and oesophageal biopsy. For future therapy, proton pump inhibitors and anti-reflux surgery may compete with reversible acid pump blockers, reflux inhibitor drugs and diverse luminally delivered physical anti-reflux therapies. Short-segment Barrett's oesophagus is known to be highly prevalent, but its impact on the risk of adenocarcinoma remains poorly defined. Biomarkers for Barrett's oesophagus have been proposed to aid in the stratification of cancer risk, and cytology may assume more importance in the future. Endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus is widely practised, but more data are needed to demonstrate cost-effectiveness and a positive impact on mortality. Animal and limited human studies suggest that chemoprevention may become an important strategy in reducing the risk of adenocarcinoma. The ablation of Barrett's epithelium results in a reversal of Barrett's epithelium, albeit with an uncertain long-term outcome.