Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on oesophageal acid exposure in patients with reflux oesophagitis

Gastric cancer screening in Western countries: A call to action

Gastric cancer is a major cause of cancer-related death worldwide, despite the reduction in its incidence. The disease is still burdened with a poor prognosis, particularly in Western countries. The main risk factor is the infection by Helicobacter pylori, classified as a class I carcinogen by the IARC, and It is well-known that primary prevention of gastric cancer can be achieved with the eradication of the infection. Moreover, non-invasive measurement of pepsinogens (PGI and PGI/PGII ratio) allows the identification of patients that should undergo upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. Gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma is indeed preceded by a well-defined precancerous process that involves consecutive stages, described for the first time by Correa et al. more than 40 years ago, and patients with advance stages of gastric atrophy/intestinal metaplasia and with dysplastic changes should be followed-up periodically with upper GI endoscopies. Despite these effective screening and surveillance methods, national-level screening campaigns have been adopted only in few countries in eastern Asia (Japan and South Korea). In this review, we describe primary and secondary preventive measures for gastric cancer, discussing the need to introduce screening also in Western countries. Moreover, we propose a simple algorithm for screening that could be easily applied in clinical practice.

Relationship between Helicobacter pylori Eradication and Barrett's Esophagus Elongation

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy may worsen gastroesophageal reflux disease that is a significant risk factor for Barrett's esophagus. However, the relationship between eradication therapy and Barrett's esophagus remains controversial. This study evaluated the impact of Helicobacter pylori eradication on the lengthening of Barrett's esophagus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who successfully underwent Helicobacter pylori eradication between 2004 and 2017. Endoscopic images obtained before and after eradication therapy were compared for Barrett's esophagus length according to the Prague C&M criteria and the presence of reflux esophagitis based on the Los Angeles classification.

RESULTS

A total of 340 patients were analyzed (mean age: 66.9 ± 12.9 years) for a median follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range: 29.8-89.3). At the initial endoscopic assessment, 187 patients (55%) had a hiatal hernia, and all patients had gastric atrophy (C-0 to I: 2%, C-II to III: 47%, O-I to III: 51%). Reflux esophagitis was detected in 7 patients (2%) before eradication and in 21 patients (6%) afterward, which was a significant increase (p = 0.007). Barrett's esophagus was identified in 69 patients (20%) before eradication, with a median length of C0M1. Elongation after treatment was observed in only 2 patients (0.6%). We observed no significant increase in either the prevalence (p = 0.85) or the median length (p = 0.5) of Barrett's esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 0.6% of patients exhibited Barrett's esophagus lengthening after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, suggesting no significant impact of the treatment on the development or elongation of Barrett's esophagus.

Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: The Bhubaneswar Consensus Report of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology

The Indian Society of Gastroenterology (ISG) felt the need to organize a consensus on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and to update the current management of H. pylori infection; hence, ISG constituted the ISG's Task Force on Helicobacter pylori. The Task Force on H. pylori undertook an exercise to produce consensus statements on H. pylori infection. Twenty-five experts from different parts of India, including gastroenterologists, pathologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, pediatricians, and microbiologists participated in the meeting. The participants were allocated to one of following sections for the meeting: Epidemiology of H. pylori infection in India and H. pylori associated conditions; diagnosis; treatment and retreatment; H. pylori and gastric cancer, and H. pylori prevention/public health. Each group reviewed all published literature on H. pylori infection with special reference to the Indian scenario and prepared appropriate statements on different aspects for voting and consensus development. This consensus, which was produced through a modified Delphi process including two rounds of face-to-face meetings, reflects our current understanding and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of H. pylori infection. These consensus should serve as a reference for not only guiding treatment of H. pylori infection but also to guide future research on the subject.

Risk of Reflux-Related Symptoms and Reflux Esophagitis after Helicobacter pylori Eradication Treatment in the Japanese Population

Backgrounds: A meta-analysis of reports primarily from Western countries showed no association between Helicobacter pylori eradication and reflux esophagitis development. The risk of reflux esophagitis may differ among different populations based on H. pylori virulence factors and acid secretion ability. We evaluated the prevalence rates of reflux esophagitis in H.-pylori-positive Japanese subjects and assessed risk factors for reflux esophagitis after eradication. Methods: Among 148 H.-pylori-positive subjects who underwent H. pylori eradication from August 2015 to December 2019, we evaluated the prevalence of reflux esophagitis on endoscopy at 12 months after eradication success and the severity of reflux-related symptoms by the F-scale questionnaire at 2 months after treatment and 12 months after eradication success. Results: The prevalence of reflux esophagitis in H.-pylori-positive patients at entry was 2.0% (3/148). At 12 months after eradication success, the prevalence was 10.8% (16/148) (p < 0.01). In the F scale, the median total score before treatment was 4 (range: 0–49), which significantly decreased to 2 (range: 0–22) (p < 0.01) at 2 months after treatment and 3 (range: 0–23) (p < 0.01) at 12 months after eradication success. Following multivariate analysis, the pretreatment total F-scale score was a risk factor for the development of reflux esophagitis (odds ratio: 1.069, 95% confidence interval: 1.003–1.139, p < 0.01). Conclusions: In this H.-pylori-positive Japanese population, eradication therapy was associated with reflux esophagitis in around 10% of patients, particularly in those with severe reflux-related symptoms at baseline. Reflux-related symptoms may improve throughout the 12 months after successful eradication therapy, irrespective of the development of reflux esophagitis.

Screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori for gastric cancer prevention: the Taipei global consensus

OBJECTIVE

A global consensus meeting was held to review current evidence and knowledge gaps and propose collaborative studies on population-wide screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori for prevention of gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

28 experts from 11 countries reviewed the evidence and modified the statements using the Delphi method, with consensus level predefined as ≥80% of agreement on each statement. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was followed.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached in 26 statements. At an individual level, eradication of H. pylori reduces the risk of GC in asymptomatic subjects and is recommended unless there are competing considerations. In cohorts of vulnerable subjects (eg, first-degree relatives of patients with GC), a screen-and-treat strategy is also beneficial. H. pylori eradication in patients with early GC after curative endoscopic resection reduces the risk of metachronous cancer and calls for a re-examination on the hypothesis of 'the point of no return'. At the general population level, the strategy of screen-and-treat for H. pylori infection is most cost-effective in young adults in regions with a high incidence of GC and is recommended preferably before the development of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia. However, such a strategy may still be effective in people aged over 50, and may be integrated or included into national healthcare priorities, such as colorectal cancer screening programmes, to optimise the resources. Reliable locally effective regimens based on the principles of antibiotic stewardship are recommended. Subjects at higher risk of GC, such as those with advanced gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia, should receive surveillance endoscopy after eradication of H. pylori.

CONCLUSION

Evidence supports the proposal that eradication therapy should be offered to all individuals infected with H. pylori. Vulnerable subjects should be tested, and treated if the test is positive. Mass screening and eradication of H. pylori should be considered in populations at higher risk of GC.

Endoscopic Reflux Esophagitis and Reflux-Related Symptoms after Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy: Meta-Analysis

Backgrounds: The etiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) including reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease is multifactorial and a recent meta-analysis showed no association between the development of GERD and Helicobacter pylori eradication in both Western and East-Asian populations. However, the problem remains that various inclusion criteria are used in these studies, which hinders meta-analysis. With a focus on reflux esophagitis with endoscopic mucosal injury, we meta-analysed to evaluate the association between eradication and reflux esophagitis and symptoms using a clearly defined set of inclusion criteria. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of studies published up until March 2020, which compared the incidence of reflux esophagitis and symptoms between patients undergoing H. pylori eradication therapy in a randomized placebo-controlled trial (Category A); between patients with successful and failed eradication (Category B); and between patients with successful vs. failed eradication, receipt of placebo, or no-treatment H. pylori-positives (Category C). Results: A total of 27 studies were included. Significant statistical effects were found for development of endoscopic reflux esophagitis [relative risk (RR): 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-1.84, p = 0.01] or de novo reflux esophagitis (RR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.01-2.00, p = 0.03) in the case group that received eradication in all studies, especially in Western populations. There was no significant difference in the incidence of symptoms after eradication between patient and control groups, regardless of category, location of population, or baseline disease. Conclusions: Eradication therapy for H pylori increases the risk of reflux esophagitis, irrespective of past history of esophagitis. In contrast, no effect was seen on reflux-related symptoms.

Helicobacter pylori infection in children: an overview of diagnostic methods

Children differ from adults regarding Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in many terms. H. pylori infection represents a key factor in the pathogenesis of duodenal ulcer and chronic gastritis in children. H. pylori infection causes some extraintestinal diseases as well as gastrointestinal diseases. Although, among these illnesses in children, symptoms like recurrent abdominal pain are not specific. Moreover, the role of the pathogen in the growth faltering, iron deficiency anemia, and asthma still remains controversial. A reliable method to detect H. pylori infection is a crucial issue, sand is still a matter of active debate. The tests applied for H. pylori diagnosis are grouped as either invasive or non-invasive methods. Invasive methods consist of endoscopic evaluation, the rapid urease test (RUT), histology, and bacterial culture. Non-invasive tests include the urea breath test (UBT), stool antigen test (SAT), serology, and molecular diagnostic approaches. Use of endoscopy is a pre-requisite for all invasive methods and poses difficulties in children as it is a difficult procedure and requires patient's cooperation. For this reason, the non-invasive tests have been commonly used in children, although their accuracy is not very reliable in some cases. Invasive tests may be opted to confirm the diagnosis as and when needed. This review presents the diagnostic tests used to detect H. pylori infection in children.

Interactions between Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Interactions between Helicobacter Pylori (HP) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are a complex issue. Several pathophysiological factors influence the development and the course of GERD, HP infection might be only one of these. Many studies emphasize the co-existence of these diseases. HP infection could contribute to GERD through both a protective and an aggressive role. Gastric acid secretion is a key factor in the pathophysiology of reflux esophagitis. Depending on the type of gastritis related to HP, acid secretion may either increase or decrease. Gastritis in corpus leads to hypoacidity, while antrum gastritis leads to hyperacidity. In cases of antral gastritis and duodenal ulcers which have hyperacidity, the expectation is an improvement in pre-existing reflux esophagitis after eradication of HP. In adults, HP infection is often associated with atrophic gastritis in the corpus. Atrophic gastritis may protect against GERD. Pangastritis which leads to gastric atrophy is commonly associated with CagA strains of HP and it causes more severe gastric inflammation. In case of HP-positive corpus gastritis in the stomach, pangastritis, and atrophic gastritis, reflux esophagitis occurs frequently after eradication of HP. Nonetheless, as a predisposing disease of gastric cancer, HP should be treated. In conclusion, as the determinative factors affecting GERD involving in HP, detailed data on the location of gastric inflammation and CagA positivity should be obtained by the studies at future.

Vonoprazan treatment improves gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

The effects of vonoprazan, a new potassium-competitive acid blocker, on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom are not fully elucidated. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of vonoprazan on GERD and associated gastrointestinal symptoms. We retrospectively reviewed 88 Helicobacter pylori negative patients with GERD treated with vonoprazan 10 mg daily. Symptoms were evaluated using the Izumo scale, which reflects quality of life related to various abdominal symptoms. The rates of improvement and resolution of GERD symptoms were 86% (76/88) and 57% (50/88), respectively. Improvement and resolution in patients with erosive esophagitis was higher than in those with non-erosive reflux disease (91% vs 83%, p = 0.260 and 71% vs 47%, p = 0.025, respectively). We attempted to identify factors which predict the effects of vonoprazan. Multivariate analysis identified advanced age (≥60-year-old) (odds ratio [OR] 7.281, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.056-25.776, p = 0.002), obesity (BMI ≥ 24) (OR 3.342, 95%CI 1.124-9.940, p = 0.030) and erosive esophagitis (OR 4.368, 95%CI 1.281-14.895, p = 0.018) as positive predictors of resolution of GERD symptoms. Alcohol use (OR 0.131, 95%CI 0.027-0.632, p = 0.011) and history of H. pylori eradication (OR 0.171, 95%CI 0.041-0.718, p = 0.015) were identified as negative predictors. Vonoprazan also improved epigastric pain (73%), postprandial distress (60%), constipation (58%) and diarrhea (52%) in patients with GERD. In conclusion, vonoprazan 10 mg daily is effective in improving GERD symptoms. Advanced age, obesity, erosive esophagitis, alcohol use and history of H. pylori eradication influence the resolution of GERD symptoms. Treatment with vonoprazan favorably affects gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with GERD.

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ESOPHAGITIS GRADES AND HELICOBACTER PYLORI

Background

The Helicobacter pylori infection (HP) is related to the development of gastric lesions and lymphoma; however, it is not known if there is a relation with gastroesophageal reflux disease and reflux esophagitis.

Aim

To evaluate HP's relationship with esophagitis in patients undergoing upper endoscopy.

Methods

Observational, retrospective and cross-sectional study, being evaluated 9576 patients undergoing outpatient endoscopic examination during the period between January and December 2015. Were included patients with any esophageal alteration at the examination; greater than 18; of both genders; independent of the complaint or the reason for the examination, illness or drug use. Were excluded those with active bleeding during the examination and in use of anticoagulants. The variables gender, age, esophagitis and result of the urease test, were studied. For statistical analysis was used the Epi Info software 7.1.5.2.

Results

Most of the samples consisted of women and the overall average age was 46.54±16.32 years. The presence of infection was balanced for gender: 1204 (12.56%) women and 952 (13.92%) men. Relating degree of esophagitis HP- and HP+ was observed that the type A was the most common (58.79%, n=1460); 604 (24.32%) had grade B; 334 (13.45%) grade C, and 85 (3.42%) grade D. In the relation between the grade of esophagitis with gender, esophagitis A was predominant in women and present in 929 (63.33%), followed by type B, 282 (46.68%), 136 C (40.71%) and D 30 (35.29%). In men 531 (36.36%) showed type A, 322 (53.31%) B, 198 (59.28%) C, and 55 (64.70%) D. Among the groups 40-50 and over 60 years there was a significant difference in whether have or not have HP+.

Conclusion

There is no significant difference between HP infection and the different grades of esophagitis.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on reflux esophagitis therapy: a multi-center randomized control study

Background:

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) frequently colonizes the stomach. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common and costly disease. But the relationship of H. pylori and GERD is still unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of H. pylori and its eradication on reflux esophagitis therapy.

Methods:

Patients diagnosed with reflux esophagitis by endoscopy were enrolled; based on rapid urease test and Warth–Starry stain, they were divided into H. pylori positive and negative groups. H. pylori positive patients were randomly given H. pylori eradication treatment for 10 days, then esomeprazole 20 mg bid for 46 days. The other patients received esomeprazole 20 mg bid therapy for 8 weeks. After treatment, three patient groups were obtained: H. pylori positive eradicated, H. pylori positive uneradicated, and H. pylori negative. Before and after therapy, reflux symptoms were scored and compared. Healing rates were compared among groups. The χ² test and t-test were used, respectively, for enumeration and measurement data.

Results:

There were 176 H. pylori positive (with 92 eradication cases) and 180 negative cases. Healing rates in the H. pylori positive eradicated and H. pylori positive uneradicated groups reached 80.4% and 79.8% (P = 0.911), with reflux symptom scores of 0.22 and 0.14 (P = 0.588). Healing rates of esophagitis in the H. pylori positive uneradicated and H. pylori negative groups were, respectively, 79.8% and 82.2% (P = 0.848); reflux symptom scores were 0.14 and 0.21 (P = 0.546).

Conclusions:

Based on esomeprazole therapy, H. pylori infection and eradication have no significant effect on reflux esophagitis therapy.

Microbiome and potential targets for chemoprevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma

Esophageal cancer is one of the deadliest cancers, with a dismal prognosis. It is increasingly recognized that esophageal cancer is a heterogeneous disease. It can be subdivided into two distinct groups: squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, based on histological appearance. In the Western world, the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma was considerably higher than esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) until the 1990s when, due to a dramatic increase, the incidence of EA surpassed that of squamous cell carcinoma. EA typically follows a well-established stepwise evolution from chronic inflammation due to reflux esophagitis (RE) that progresses to metaplasia (Barrett's esophagus [BE]) to dysplasia, which often culminates in EA. The pathophysiology of EA is complex and involves diverse factors, including gastroesophageal reflux, gastric acid secretion, dysfunction of the antireflux barrier, gastric emptying disturbances, and abnormalities in esophageal defense mechanisms. The current understanding of the etiology of EA is mainly derived from epidemiological studies of risk factors such as cigarette smoking, obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disorders (GERD), and low fruit and vegetable consumption. Numerous studies have been done, but the factors that drive the dynamic increase in the incidence of EA remain elusive. The advent of widespread antibiotic use occurred in the 1950s, preceding the surge of EA. Based on this temporal sequence, it has been hypothesized that antibiotics alter the microbiome to which the esophagus is exposed in patients who have GERD and that chronic exposure to this abnormal microbiome (ie, changes in species diversity or abundance) accounts for the increase in EA. If changes in the proposed factors alter the stepwise progression (RE-BE-dysplasia-EA), they may represent potential targets for chemoprevention. New discoveries will help improve our understanding of the biology and pathogenesis of these cancers, and aid in finding novel therapeutic targets.

The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

It is uncertain whether the Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy makes a role in the progression of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

A meta-analysis was undertaken to investigate the effect of H pylori eradication therapy on the development of GERD.

RESULTS

Overall, 16 cohort studies were included. The authors demonstrated that H pylori eradication had no significant effect on the occurrence of GERD in these cohort studies (odds ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval = 0.66-1.14, I = 32.4%, P = 0.103).

CONCLUSIONS

In general, H pylori eradication has no significant effect on the development of GERD in the long term. However, eradication therapy should be taken once there is H pylori infection, because H pylori infection is acknowledged to be a major cause of acute and chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer diseases and has been established as a definite etiologic factor for gastric cancer.

Does a relationship still exist between gastroesophageal reflux and Helicobacter pylori in patients with reflux symptoms?

Background

The nature of the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and reflux esophagitis (RE) is not fully understood. In addition, the effect of H. pylori eradication on RE and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unclear. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between H. pylori infection and the grade of GERD in patients with reflux symptoms.

Methods

Between January 2010 and July 2013, 184 consecutive patients with daily reflux symptoms for at least one year were evaluated at the ambulatory for functional esophageal disease, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy. All patients underwent a pretreatment evaluation, which included anamnesis, clinical examination, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS) with biopsy, esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH-metry. All statistical elaborations were obtained using Statigraphies 5 plus for Window XP.

Results

There was no statistical difference regarding Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) pressure between patients who were H. pylori-positive and H. Pylori-negative (19.2 ± 9.5 (range: 3.7 to 46.2) and 19.7 ± 11.0 (range: 2.6 to 61), respectively). Further, no significant difference was evidenced in esophageal wave length (mean value: 3.1 seconds in H. pylori-negative patients versus 3.2 seconds in H. pylori-positive patients) or in esophageal wave height (mean value: 72.2 ± 39.3 in H. pylori-negative patients versus 67.7 ± 28.4 in H. pylori-positive patients). We observed that hiatal hernia (P = 0.01), LES opening (P = 0.05), esophageal wave length (P = 0.01) and pathological reflux number (P = 0.05) were significantly related to the presence of esophagitis. However, H. pylori infection was not significantly related to the presence of reflux esophagitis.

Conclusions

Our clinical, endoscopic, manometric and pH-metric data shows no significant role of H. pylori infection in the development of GERD or in the pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis. However, current data do not provide sufficient evidence to define this relationship and further prospective large studies are needed.

The effect of Helicobacter pylori infection and eradication in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: A parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to resolve controversy regarding the effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy and H. pylori infection in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial was performed in patients presenting with reflux symptoms. H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to receive either antibiotics or placebo for 7 days. H. pylori-negative patient controls received placebo. All received esomeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 7 days, followed by 40 mg o.d. to complete an 8-week course, and were followed up for 32 weeks by telephone.

RESULTS

In this study, 198/589 (34%) patients were H. pylori-positive and 113 H. pylori-negative patients served as controls. Baseline endoscopy revealed 63% Los Angeles grade 0A and 37% Los Angeles grade BCD oesophagitis with no difference between patient groups. Symptom improvement on esomeprazole was seen in 89%. H. pylori eradication was successful in 82%. H. pylori eradication had no effect on symptomatic relapse (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% CI 0.74-1.8; p = 0.5). Overall, H. pylori-positive patients had a lower probability of relapse compared to H. pylori-negative controls (hazard ratio 0.6, 95% CI 0.43-0.85; p = 0.004). Relapse hazard was modulated also by oesophagitis grade (BCD vs. 0A, hazard ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-3.0).

CONCLUSION

Relapse of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms after a course of high dose acid suppression took longer for H. pylori-positive patients than H. pylori-negative controls; however eradication therapy had no effect on the risk of relapse; ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT00574925.

Helicobacter pylori eradication and reflux disease onset: Did gastric acid get "crazy"?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is highly prevalent in the general population. In the last decade, a potential relationship between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication and GORD onset has been claimed. The main putative mechanism is the gastric acid hypersecretion that develops after bacterial cure in those patients with corpus-predominant gastritis. We performed a critical reappraisal of the intricate pathogenesis and clinical data available in this field. Oesophagitis onset after H. pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients has been ascribed to a gastric acid hypersecretion, which could develop following body gastritis healing. However, the absence of an acid hypersecretive status in these patients is documented by both pathophysiology and clinical studies. Indeed, duodenal ulcer recurrence is virtually abolished following H. pylori eradication. In addition, intra-oesophageal pH recording studies failed to demonstrated increased acid reflux following bacterial eradication. Moreover, oesophageal manometric studies suggest that H. pylori eradication would reduce - rather than favor - acid reflux into the oesophagus. Finally, data of clinical studies would suggest that H. pylori eradication is not significantly associated with either reflux symptoms or erosive oesophagitis onset, some data suggesting also an advantage in curing the infection when oesophagitis is already present. Therefore, the legend of “crazy acid” remains - as all the others - a fascinating, but imaginary tale.

Helicobacter pylori infection has no impact on manometric and pH-metric findings in adolescents and young adults with gastroesophageal reflux and antral gastritis: eradication results to no significant clinical improvement

The relationship between Helicobacter pylori (Hp) gastritis and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains controversial. The aim was to investigate the association between Hp infection and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and the impact of Hp eradication on esophageal acid exposure and motility in adolescents and young adults with Hp gastritis and GERD. Sixty-four patients with symptoms suggestive for GERD, of which 40 Hp-positive (group A) and 24 Hp-negative (group B), underwent endoscopy-biopsy, esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH-metry. All group A patients received eradication treatment and were re-evaluated six months later again with 24-hour pH-metry, esophageal manometry, endoscopy-biopsy and clinical assessment. At inclusion, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding sex, age, grade of endoscopic esophagitis, manometric and pH-metry findings. All Hp-positive patients had an antral predominant gastritis. Eradication of Hp was successful in all patients, and gastritis and esophagitis were healed in all patients. The mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) increased significantly from 11.25 mmHg before to 11.71 mmHg after eradication (P<0.05). A significant decrease in reflux index was observed (mean RI 6.02% before versus 4.96% after eradication (P<0.05). However clinical symptoms of GER improved not significantly after 6 months follow up. Conclusively, in children and young adults with GER symptoms and GERD, the presence or absence of Hp has no impact on manometric and pH-metric findings. Eradication of Hp infection results in increase in LESP with a consequent decrease in esophageal acid exposure but not significant clinical improvement.

Effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Helicobacter pylori infection appears to be a protective factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, H. pylori is associated with the subtype of esophageal carcinoma, and long-term proton-pump inhibition usage would cause gastric atrophy in patients with persistent H. pylori infection, which is a precancerous lesion. The relationship between H. pylori infection and GERD is still unclear. We aimed to confirm whether the eradication of H. pylori would worsen or improve symptomatic or endoscopic GERD.

METHODS

A systematic review of the published data was undertaken, and a meta-analysis was performed to determine the effect of H. pylori eradication on the occurrence of symptomatic (heartburn, acid regurgitation) and endoscopically proven erosive (esophagitis) GERD in patients with or without pre-existing GERD.

RESULTS

A total of 11 articles met the inclusion criteria and thus were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the frequency of symptomatic or endoscopically proven erosive GERD after the eradication between patients with H. pylori eradicated and those with persistent infection, regardless of follow-up period, location, or the baseline disease.

CONCLUSION

H. pylori eradication does not aggravate the clinical outcomes in terms of short-term and long-term posteradication occurrence of GERD. There is no association between H. pylori eradication and the development of GERD in the patients with different diseases, even those with GERD.

Symptoms in patients on long-term proton pump inhibitors: prevalence and predictors

BACKGROUND

Symptom control in primary care patients on long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is poorly understood.

AIM

To explore associations between symptom control and demographics, lifestyle, PPI use, diagnosis and Helicobacter pylori status.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey (n = 726) using note reviews, questionnaires and carbon-13 urea breath testing. Determinants of symptom control [Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (LDQ), Carlsson and Dent Reflux Questionnaire (CDRQ), health-related quality-of-life measures (EuroQoL: EQ-5D and EQ-VAS)] were explored using stepwise linear regression.

RESULTS

Moderate or severe dyspepsia symptoms occurred in 61% of subjects (LDQ) and reflux symptoms in 59% (CDRQ). Age, gender, smoking and body mass index had little or no influence upon symptom control or PPI use. Average symptom scores and PPI use were lower in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and gastro-protection than gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and uninvestigated dyspepsia. H. pylori infection was associated with lower reflux symptom scores only in patients with GERD and uninvestigated dyspepsia. EQ-5D was not able to discriminate between diagnostic groups, although the EQ-VAS performed well.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of patients suffered ongoing moderate or severe symptoms. GERD and uninvestigated dyspepsia were associated with poorer long-term symptom control; H. pylori appeared to have a protective effect on reflux symptoms in these patients.

Association of erosive esophagitis with Helicobacter pylori eradication: a role of salivary bicarbonate and glycoprotein secretion

In some populations, Helicobacter pylori eradication is associated with development of erosive esophagitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of salivary bicarbonate and glycoprotein secretion to the pathogenesis of erosive esophagitis developing after H. pylori eradication. Gastroscopy and saliva collection were performed at recruitment and 12 months after completion of eradication therapy. Eighty-eight patients with duodenal ulcer were recruited to the study. Erosive esophagitis was found in 13 patients (grade A, 8 patients; grade B, 4 patients; grade C, 1 patient). Among the 74 subjects who completed the study, erosive esophagitis was detected in 21 patients (grade A, 15 patients; grade B, 6 patients); they all were successfully eradicated. Bicarbonate and glycoprotein secretion was not found to differ significantly between the subjects with and without erosive esophagitis both before and 1 year after H. pylori eradication. However, it was lower in H. pylori-infected (baseline) than in H. pylori-noninfected erosive esophagitis subjects (1 year after successful eradication) (bicarbonate 2.34 [1.29-3.40)]vs. 3.64 [2.70-4.58]micromol/min and glycoprotein 0.23 [0.15-0.31]vs. 0.35 [0.28-0.43] mg/min, P= 0.04 and P= 0.04, respectively). We conclude that changes in salivary bicarbonate and glycoprotein secretion related to H. pylori eradication do not promote the development of erosive esophagitis in duodenal ulcer patients.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: an Asian perspective

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) ranges from 2.5% to 7.1% in most population-based studies in Asia. There is evidence that GERD and its complications are rising, coinciding with a decline in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Asian GERD patients share similar risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms with their Western counterparts. Possible causes for the lower prevalence of GERD include less obesity and hiatus hernia, a lesser degree of esophageal dysmotility, a high prevalence of virulent strains of H. pylori, and low awareness. Owing to the lack of precise translation for 'heartburn' in most Asian languages, reflux symptoms are often overlooked or misinterpreted as dyspepsia or chest pain. Furthermore, a symptom-based diagnosis with a therapeutic trial of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) may be hampered by the high prevalence of H. pylori-related disease. The risk stratification for prompt endoscopy, use of a locally-validated, diagnostic symptom questionnaire, and response to H. pylori'test and treat' help improve the accuracy of the PPI test for diagnoses. PPI remain the gold standard treatment, and 'on-demand' PPI have been shown to be a cost-effective, long-term treatment. The clinical course of GERD is benign in most patients in Asia. The risk of progression from non-erosive reflux disease to erosive esophagitis is low, and treatment response to a conventional dose of PPI is generally higher. Although H. pylori eradication may lead to more resilient GERD in a subset of patients, the benefits of H. pylori eradication outweigh the risks, especially in Asian populations with a high incidence of gastric cancer.

Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The nature of the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and reflux oesophagitis is still not clear. To investigate the correlation between Helicobacter pylori infection and GERD taking into account endoscopic, pH-metric and histopathological data.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and January 2003 a prospective study was performed in 146 patients with GERD in order to determine the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection at gastric mucosa; further the value of the De Meester score endoscopic, manometric and pH-metric parameters, i.e. reflux episodes, pathological reflux episodes and extent of oesophageal acid exposure, of the patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection were studied and statistically compared. Finally, univariate analysis of the above mentioned data were performed in order to evaluate the statistical correlation with reflux esophagitis.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups, HP infected and HP negative patients, regarding age, gender and type of symptoms. There was no statistical difference between the two groups regarding severity of symptoms and manometric parameters. The value of the De Meester score and the ph-metric parameters were similar in both groups. On univariate analysis, we observed that hiatal hernia (p = 0,01), LES size (p = 0,05), oesophageal wave length (p = 0,01) and pathological reflux number (p = 0,05) were significantly related to the presence of reflux oesophagitis.

CONCLUSION

Based on these findings, it seems that there is no significant evidence for an important role for H. pylori infection in the development of GERD and erosive esophagitis. Nevertheless, current data do not provide sufficient evidence to define the relationship between HP and GERD. Further assessments in prospective large studies are warranted.

Asia-Pacific consensus guidelines on gastric cancer prevention

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastric cancer is a major health burden in the Asia-Pacific region but consensus on prevention strategies has been lacking. We aimed to critically evaluate strategies for preventing gastric cancer.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group developed consensus statements using a Delphi approach. Relevant data were presented, and the quality of evidence, strength of recommendation, and level of consensus were graded.

RESULTS

Helicobacter pylori infection is a necessary but not sufficient causal factor for non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma. A high intake of salt is strongly associated with gastric cancer. Fresh fruits and vegetables are protective but the use of vitamins and other dietary supplements does not prevent gastric cancer. Host-bacterial interaction in H. pylori infection results in different patterns of gastritis and differences in gastric acid secretion which determine disease outcome. A positive family history of gastric cancer is an important risk factor. Low serum pepsinogens reflect gastric atrophy and may be useful as a marker to identify populations at high risk for gastric cancer. H. pylori screening and treatment is a recommended gastric cancer risk reduction strategy in high-risk populations. H. pylori screening and treatment is most effective before atrophic gastritis has developed. It does not exclude the existing practice of gastric cancer surveillance in high-risk populations. In populations at low risk for gastric cancer, H. pylori screening is not recommended. First-line treatment of H. pylori infection should be in accordance with national treatment guidelines.

CONCLUSION

A strategy of H. pylori screening and eradication in high-risk populations will probably reduce gastric cancer incidence, and based on current evidence is recommended by consensus.

Factors associated with the development of reflux esophagitis after Helicobacter pylori eradication

We investigated whether Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication increases the incidence of reflux esophagitis (RE) in patients with peptic ulcers. From 2001-2005 consecutive out patients with peptic ulcers and HP received eradication and were followed endoscopically. HP was cured in 119 and RE developed in 33 of the 153 patients. RE developed in 24 of the 119 HP-eradicated patients and 9 of the 34 HP-persistent patients. The estimated RE occurrence rate within 1 year was higher in the HP-eradicated patients than in the HP-persistent patients, but it was reversed at 2 years by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. In 76 patients follow up for > or = 18 months, hiatal hernia, duodenal ulcer, and eradication failure were significantly associated with the increased RE rate by univariate and multivariate analysis. The follow-up period after HP eradication affected the RE occurrence rate, and eradication failure significantly increased the RE development in patients followed up for > or = 18 months.

Cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori "test and treat" for patients with typical reflux symptoms in a population with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection: a Markov model analysis

OBJECTIVE

Patients with typical reflux symptoms may have underlying peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in a population with a high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. In the present study we sought to compare the cost-effectiveness of the H. pylori "test and treat" strategy with that of empirical proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and endoscopy in patients with typical reflux and a high prevalence of H. pylori infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A Markov model was designed to compare the outcomes of three treatment strategies over 12 months among a hypothetical cohort of patients presenting with typical reflux symptoms. There were four exclusive underlying H. pylori- and PUD-related comorbidities in the hypothetical cohort: (1) H. pylori-related PUD, (2) H. pylori infection without PUD, (3) PUD without H. pylori infection and (4) absence of both PUD and H. pylori infection. The transition probabilities and resource utilization were derived from the literature. Percentage of PUD patients treated, total number of symptom-free patient-years gained and total direct medical cost were estimated.

RESULTS

By comparing each strategy individually with the no therapy strategy, it was found that the incremental costs per ulcer treated for H. pylori "test and treat", endoscopy and empirical PPI therapy were USD 1778, USD 1797 and USD 2158, respectively. The results of the model were sensitive to the prevalence of H. pylori infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the H. pylori "test and treat" and initial endoscopic strategies were shown to be more cost-effective than empirical PPI therapy for treating undiagnosed PUD among patients presenting with typical reflux symptoms. The H. pylori "test and treat" strategy appeared to be only slightly more cost-effective than initial endoscopy in a population with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection.

The incidence of reflux oesophagitis after eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have indicated that Helicobacter pylori eradication develops reflux oesophagitis, others reported that its eradication had a beneficial effect on reflux symptoms. The results are still controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To study whether H. pylori eradication increases the occurrence rate of reflux oesophagitis in patients with peptic ulcers.

METHOD

One hundred and two consecutive patients who had peptic ulcers and were H. pylori-positive by C-urea breath testing were followed prospectively. They all received 1-week triple therapy and underwent endoscopy at 1-year intervals or when relapse of the peptic ulcer or occurrence of reflux oesophagitis was suspected.

RESULTS

Reflux oesophagitis developed in 32 (31.4%) out of 102 patients and they were of grade A (27 patients) and grade B (five patients) by the Los Angeles classification System. H. pylori infection was cured in 77 (75.5%) out of 102 patients. There was no significant difference in age (53.4+/-1.2 vs. 53.9+/-1.4 years, P = 0.43), gender (male/female, 29/3 vs. 53/17, P = 0.14), ulcer location (gastric/duodenal/both, 15/12/5 vs. 35/26/9, P = 0.97), H. pylori status (persistent/cured, 9/23 vs. 16/54, P = 0.57) or length of follow-up time (355+/-32 vs. 348+/-23 days, P = 0.30) between the 32 patients with reflux oesophagitis and the other 70 patients. Only the presence of hiatal hernia before therapy was significant for the prevalence of reflux oesophagitis by the log-rank test (P = 0.002), and the Cox proportional hazard models confirmed these findings (odds ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-7.30; P = 0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

The eradication of H. pylori did not increase the prevalence of reflux oesophagitis, and only the presence of hiatal hernia before therapy was significantly related to the development of reflux oesophagitis.

Helicobacter pylori eradication has the potential to prevent gastric cancer: a state-of-the-art critique

Helicobacter pylori infection continues to play a key role in gastric diseases. Colonization of the gastric mucosa with the bacterium invariably results in the development of chronic gastritis and subsets of patients have a progression of the chronic gastritis to either ulcer or cancer. Epidemiological evidence indicates that the proportion of all gastric cancers attributable to H. pylori infection, and hence potentially preventable upon elimination of this risk factor, is somewhere in the range of 60% to 90%. This portends significant benefit in terms of morbidity and mortality, not least in populations with high prevalence of H. pylori infection coupled with high incidence of gastric cancer. The effect of prophylactic H. pylori eradication on gastric cancer incidence in humans remains unknown, however. Results from randomized trials are eagerly awaited, but availability of strong conclusive results may take many years. A growing number of studies show considerable variation in risk for gastric cancer development, depending on H. pylori strain type and the genetic predisposition of the host. There is also a remote possibility that elimination of the infection may have adverse health implications (e.g., antibiotic resistance), and therefore "simple" risk stratification and targeted chemoprevention is required. Based on "in depth" evidence presented at this workshop, the majority of the scientific task force favored a search-and-treat strategy in first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients and an overwhelming majority felt that a more general screen-and-treat strategy should be focused in the first instance on a population with a high incidence of H. pylori-associated diseases.

Review article: Helicobacter pylori and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Epidemiological studies demonstrate a negative association between Helicobacter pylori infection and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and its complications. This might represent a protective effect because of the tendency for H. pylori infection to lower gastric acid secretion with advancing age. However, studies of the effect of H. pylori eradication on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease have failed to show any worsening of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Several interactions between H. pylori and proton-pump inhibitor therapy used to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux disease need to be considered. Helicobacter pylori infection improves the control of gastric acidity by proton-pump inhibitors and this produces a small advantage in clinical control of reflux disease. The infection prevents rebound acid hypersecretion occurring when proton-pump inhibitor therapy is discontinued. However, concerns have been expressed that the body gastritis induced by proton-pump inhibitor therapy in H. pylori-infected subjects might increase the risk of gastric cancer. At present, it is unclear whether H. pylori should be eradicated in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

Implications of corpus gastritis, atrophy and cyclooxygenase in the development of gastric erosions after curing Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication decreases recurrence of peptic ulcers with marked improvement in histological inflammation, but gastric mucosal injuries may be developed even after eradication.

PURPOSE

To investigate the mechanisms responsible for the development of gastric erosions after eradication, we analysed the relationship between clinicopathological risk factors and the occurrence of gastric erosion after curing H. pylori infection.

PATIENTS

Sixty patients underwent endoscopy before, and 3, 6 and 12 months after the completion of H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

Risk factors associated with the development of gastric erosions after eradication were assessed by multivariate analysis, and cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 immunoreactivity was histologically examined in the gastric mucosa before and after eradication.

RESULTS

The cumulative prevalence of gastric erosions after H. pylori eradication was 38.3% within 1 year. Using multivariate analysis, corpus gastritis scores (inflammation score+activity score), corpus atrophy scores and an age of more than 50 years were found to be independent factors associated with the development of gastric erosion after eradication with odds ratios of 7.39, 0.13 and 5.00, respectively. Cyclooxygenase-2 immunoreactivity of the corpus was decreased for the non-erosion group after eradication, but not for the erosion group.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe gastritis or less severe atrophy in oxyntic glands but not in pyloric glands before eradication may be involved in the development of gastric erosions after curing H. pylori infection.

Clinicians' management strategies for patients with dyspepsia: a qualitative approach

Background

Symptoms from the upper gastrointestinal tract are frequently encountered in clinical practice and may be of either organic or functional origin. For some of these conditions, according to the literature, certain management strategies can be recommended. For other conditions, the evidence is more ambiguous. The hypothesis that guided our study design was twofold: Management strategies and treatments suggested by different clinicians vary considerably, even when optimal treatment is clear-cut, as documented by evidence in the literature. Clinicians believe that the management strategies of their colleagues are similar to their own.

Methods

Simulated case histories of four patients with symptoms from the upper gastrointestinal tract were presented to 27 Swedish clinicians who were specialists in medical gastroenterology, surgery, and general practice and worked at three hospitals in the southern part of Sweden. The patients' histories contained information on the patient's sex and age and the localisation of the symptoms, but descriptions of subjective symptoms and findings from examinations differed from history to history. Interviews containing open-ended questions were conducted.

Results

For the same patient, the management strategies and treatments suggested by the clinicians varied widely, as did the strategies suggested by clinicians in the same speciality. Variation was more pronounced if the case history noted symptoms but no organic findings than if the case history noted unambiguous findings and symptoms. However, even in cases with a consensus in the scientific literature on treatment, the variations in clinicians' opinion on management were pronounced.

Conclusion

Despite these variations, the clinicians believed that the decisions made by their colleagues would be similar to their own. The overall results of this study indicate that we as researchers must make scientific evidence comprehensible and communicate evidence so that clinicians are able to interpret and implement it in practice. Of particular significance is that scientific evidence leads to an evidence-based care which is effective clinical practice and to the promotion of health from the perspective of the patient, together with cost-effectiveness as a priority.

Indicaciones y consecuencias de la erradicación de Helicobacter pylori en la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico

Several epidemiological data indicate that H. pylori infection prevalence in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is lower than that reported in respective controls, which would suggest that the organism plays a protective role against this disease. On the other hand, most studies demonstrate that the presence of the infection in patients with GERD does not negatively affect the therapeutic efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and, in case of negatively influencing it, the effects are not clinically relevant and are easily controllable with standard antisecretory treatment. Therefore, the decision to administer H. pylori eradication treatment to a patient should not be influenced by the concomitant presence of GERD. In most cases, H. pylori eradication does not seem to induce GERD development, and it does not seem to worsen GERD when it was already present. Nevertheless, when the gastritis pattern is unknown before the antibiotic administration, the effect of H. pylori eradication on gastric acid secretion and the incidence of GERD is unpredictable. In the exceptional cases in which H. pylori eradication could have negative effects on GERD, its clinical relevance will be limited, and reflux symptoms or endoscopic esophagitis will favourably respond to the standard PPI antisecretory treatment. Therefore, again, when H. pylori eradication is indicated in a particular patient, the concomitant diagnosis of GERD should not change our attitude. Finally, is has recently been recommended to eradicate H. pylori infection in those patients with GERD needing long-term treatment with PPI, as some studies have reported that these drugs induce, in presence of the organism, an atrophic gastritis, with the consequent risk of gastric cancer. However, most of these studies have important methodological defects, and several authors have reported contrary results. In any case, the appearance in the gastric mucosa of clinically relevant lesions, such as intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia or adenocarcinoma, in patients treated with PPI for several years, has not yet been demonstrated, although this could simply be a problem of time. This question seems to be too controversial to be answered with the available data, and we should wait until new studies clarify this topic. In the meantime, as it occurs with any controversial indication, the decision of the doctor facing a patient infected by H. pylori and needing maintenance therapy with PPIs should be assessed on a case by case basis.

Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with erosive esophagitis is associated with rapid heartburn relief and lack of relapse after treatment with pantoprazole

Previous studies have shown an increased effect of proton pump inhibitors on intragastric pH in Helicobacter pylori (HP)-infected patients suffering from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We evaluated the effect of HP infection on healing and symptom relief in GERD patients with erosive esophagitis treated with pantoprazole. Two hundred twenty-seven patients with endoscopically proven reflux esophagitis were treated for 8 weeks with pantoprazole, 40 mg daily. Patients achieving endoscopic healing at that time were treated for 16 weeks more with pantoprazole, 20 mg daily. Healing and symptom relief rates for HP infection were compared. We found complete relief of heartburn in 72.3% of the HP-positive versus 58.8% of the HP-negative group (P < 0.05). Overall prevalence of heartburn at 8 weeks was higher in the HP-negative group (40.3 vs. 25.8%; P < 0.05), with no significant differences in endoscopic healing (overall 80.4%). At 24 weeks of treatment, the symptomatic relapse rate was higher in the HP-negative group (25.9 vs. 10.2%; P < 0.020). At 8 weeks, patients with erosive esophagitis and HP infection exhibited a significantly better response to pantoprazole through complete heartburn relief, with no differences in endoscopic healing rates between the groups. After 24 weeks, the relapse rate was significantly higher in the HP-negative group.

Systematic review: the effect of Helicobacter pylori and its eradication on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with duodenal ulcers or reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

The effect of Helicobacter pylori in provoking or protecting against gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is unclear and studies have given conflicting results. Recent guidelines recommend H. pylori eradication in patients on long-term proton pump inhibitors.

AIM

To ascertain the effect of H. pylori eradication on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease outcomes (reflux oesophagitis and heartburn) in patients with duodenal ulcer disease, and to ascertain the effect of H. pylori infection on reflux oesophagitis concerning heartburn, pH, severity, healing and relapse rates.

METHODS

A systematic review of electronic databases was undertaken to September 2003. Experts in the field, pharmaceutical companies and journals were contacted about unpublished trials. Studies were reviewed according to predefined eligibility and quality criteria. Twenty-seven studies/trials were included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

Study variation rather than therapy-influenced results in relation to the presence or absence of oesophagitis in patients with duodenal ulcer who underwent H. pylori eradication at 6-48 months follow-up. In patients with reflux oesophagitis no obvious differences were discovered in heartburn scores, 24-h pH values, healing and relapse rates between H. pylori-positive and -negative cases.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence to indicate that H. pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer disease provokes reflux oesophagitis or worsens heartburn; (ii) there are insufficient data to draw firm conclusions about the impact of H. pylori in patients with reflux oesophagitis.

The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The effect of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication on gastroesophageal reflux disease is controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect of H. pylori eradication in this group of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive patients with H. pylori infection and reflux esophagitis (grade 1 or 2) were enrolled into the study. Twenty-four hour intra-esophageal pH recording and esophageal manometry were performed before and 3 months after eradication of H. pylori, which was achieved using lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.i.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. for 14 days. H. pylori was evaluated in biopsy specimens taken from the antrum and corpus by rapid urease test and by histopathologic examination before and 3 months after eradication.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (11 men and 7 women, median age 42 years) completed the study. Three months after the treatment, there was no significant change in any of the 24-hour esophageal pH recording parameters and mean lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (P > 0.05). The percentage of total time esophageal pH <4 increased in 10 patients, and decreased in 8 patients. There was a significant decrease in the scores of heartburn and regurgitation (P < 0.01). Esophagitis persisted in 16 patients and disappeared in 2 patients. Esophagitis score decreased in 6 patients, and did not change in 12 patients (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

H. pylori eradication does not have any effect on gastroesophageal acid reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis 3 months after eradication, but significant improvement is achieved in some reflux associated symptoms.

Randomised controlled trial of effects of Helicobacter pylori infection and its eradication on heartburn and gastro-oesophageal reflux: Bristol helicobacter project

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of Helicobacter pylori infection and its eradication on heartburn and gastro-oesophageal reflux.

DESIGN

Cross sectional study, followed by a randomised placebo controlled trial.

SETTING

Seven general practices in Bristol, England.

PARTICIPANTS

10,537 people, aged 20-59 years, with and without H pylori infection (determined by the (13)C-urea breath test).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of heartburn and gastro-oesophageal acid reflux at baseline and two years after treatment to eradicate H pylori infection.

RESULTS

At baseline, H pylori infection was associated with increased prevalence of heartburn (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.23) but not reflux (1.05, 0.97 to 1.14). In participants with H pylori infection, active treatment had no effect on the overall prevalence of heartburn (0.99, 0.88 to 1.12) or reflux (1.04, 0.91 to 1.19) and did not improve pre-existing symptoms of heartburn or reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

H pylori infection is associated with a slightly increased prevalence of heartburn but not reflux. Treatment to eradicate H pylori has no net benefit in patients with heartburn or gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastroesophageal function

BACKGROUND

To elucidate the cause of possible occurrence of reflux esophagitis after Helicobacter pylori eradication, gastric and esophageal function among H. pylori infected Japanese patients were evaluated both before and after eradication therapy.

METHODS

Nine H. pylori-positive patients were studied before and 6 months after successful H. pylori eradication. Studies included gastric emptying, esophageal manometry, gastric and esophageal pH monitoring as well as measuring serum levels of gastrin, pepsinogen I and pepsinogen II.

RESULTS

Helicobacter pylori eradication was associated with a significant change in serum gastrin and pepsinogen levels, consistent with the improvement in mucosal inflammation. There was no significant change in gastric emptying, fasting or postprandial lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, esophageal primary peristaltic contractions, frequency of transient LES relaxation, or gastroesophageal reflux, as assessed by 24 h pH monitoring. The percent time of the gastric pH>4 at night decreased significantly. A 41-year-old male developed erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (Los Angeles Classification Grade A) after eradication. Physiological studies showed he had abnormal esophageal motility prior to H. pylori eradication.

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of gastric pH at night, most patients did not experience a significant change in gastric or esophageal function after H. pylori eradication. Development of GERD post H. pylori eradication likely reflects an increase in the acidity of the refluxate superimposed on pre-existing abnormalities in gastroesophageal motility.

Meta-analysis: the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and its treatment and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is controversial.

AIMS

To establish if H. pylori infection is associated with the presence of GERD and if anti-H. pylori treatment leads to de novo GERD or rebound/exacerbation of GERD.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was made. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated for de novo GERD and rebound/exacerbated GERD after anti-H. pylori therapy in case-control studies and in therapeutic trials.

RESULTS

Fourteen case-control studies and 10 clinical trials were included. Among case-control studies, pooled OR for the association between H. pylori negative status and GERD was 1.34 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.55]. Among therapeutic trials, pooled OR for the association anti-H. pylori therapy - GERD was 2.54 (95% CI 1.92-3.37). The OR for de novo GERD was 3.25 (95% CI 2.09-5.33), and for rebound/exacerbated GERD was 2.39 (95% CI 1.75-3.34). Associations were higher among Asian studies than among North American and European studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis shows significant association between absence of H. pylori infection and GERD symptoms, and a positive association between anti-H. pylori therapy and occurrence of both de novo and rebound/exacerbated GERD. The significance of these associations appears to have been inflated by the effect of single trials and by geographical variations.

Active and inactive gastroesophageal reflux diseases related to Helicobacter pylori therapy

We systematically reviewed the literature on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) related to Helicobacter pylori therapy, and classified the GERD according to various aspects. Preexisting GERD is active GERD before H. pylori therapy, and a substantial proportion of the GERD patients improve after successful H. pylori therapy. If the GERD does not persist or recur after cessation of acid-suppressive therapy combined with H. pylori therapy, it may have been cured (cured GERD). If it recurs, it may have been masked by acid-suppressive therapy and unmasked with cessation of the therapy (pharmacologically masked and unmasked GERD). Newly developed GERD after successful H. pylori therapy is a kind of unmasked GERD arising after cure of infection (de novo unmasked GERD). The possible mechanism of the improvement of cured GERD is normalized hyperacidity associated with an improved cytokine-somatostatin-gastrin system followed by normalized G-cell activity and parietal cell mass. Preexisting GERD is not a reason to avoid eradication therapy. De novo unmasked GERD develops in a substantial proportion of patients with cured infection. The possible mechanism is increased acid exposure in the esophagus due to gastric acid increase, which is caused by a loss of neutralizing effect by ammonia, normalized cytokine-acid suppression and improvement of corpus atrophy. De novo unmasked GERD is important because GERD is recurrent and may induce adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. However, it is expected that cure of infection lowers gastric cancer incidence. Eradication therapy is recommended irrespective of the possibility that de novo unmasked GERD may have a slight increase of the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Pharmacotherapy for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's oesophagus

Over the last two decades there have been major advances in the medical treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and Barrett's oesophagus. Motility agents, H(2)-receptor antagonists and proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) have all been evaluated in short- and long-term studies. Symptomatic response needs to be differentiated from healing of oesophagitis and maintenance of remission. Clinical trials have convincingly demonstrated the superiority of PPIs to motility agents and H(2)-receptor antagonists for all clinical aspects of GORD. Barrett's oesophagus requires lifelong acid suppression. Treatment with standard doses of PPIs is often insufficient and higher doses are frequently required. Medical treatment does not appear to result in clinically significant regression of Barrett's oesophagus.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Globally, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a common and important clinical disorder. This review summarizes the major advances in the understanding and treatment of GERD that have been made in the past 12 months. Epidemiologic studies have yielded additional data on the clinical presentation and natural history of GERD in the East. Further insights have been presented on the pathogenesis of GERD, including the immunoregulatory environment of GERD, the neurophysiology of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR), the mechanics of the esophagogastric junction as well as the influence of Helicobacter pylori. Diagnostically, a new acid exposure sensor may be a helpful cost-effective tool. Developments have been made in pharmacotherapy for TLESR. There is ongoing interest in endoscopic therapy and further developments have been made in laparoscopic fundoplication. The cost-effectiveness of several management strategies has been evaluated, aiming to reduce the cost impact of GERD on the health care system.

Review article: Helicobacter pylori and reflux disease

The falling prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and related diseases (peptic ulcer disease, gastric cancer) in developed countries has been paralleled by an increased recognition of gastro-oesophageal reflux and its complications. These epidemiological data do not support a role for H. pylori in the pathogenesis of reflux disease, but suggest a negative association with the increasing incidence of oesophageal diseases. This has led some investigators to propose a 'protective' role of H. pylori infection against the development of oesophageal diseases. In these patients, pre-existing lower oesophageal sphincter dysfunction, susceptibility to reflux, unmasking of latent reflux and the patterns and severity of gastritis are probably important factors contributing to the development of oesophageal diseases. The most likely mechanism by which H. pylori infection may protect against reflux is by decreasing the potency of the gastric refluxate in patients with corpus-predominant gastritis. The prevalence of H. pylori infection in patients with reflux disease is probably no greater than that in those without reflux, and there are conflicting data indicating that reflux symptoms or erosive oesophagitis develop after H. pylori eradication. It is also unclear whether H. pylori augments the antisecretory effects of proton pump inhibitors or accelerates the development of atrophic gastritis.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on development of erosive esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a post hoc analysis of eight double blind prospective studies

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the development of erosive esophagitis, the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms in patients without prior symptomatic or endoscopic GERD, and the worsening of GERD symptoms in patients with prior symptomatic GERD in a post hoc analysis of eight double-blind prospective trials of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) therapy in 1165 patients.

METHODS

Patients with active or past duodenal ulcer and without baseline erosive esophagitis had end of study endoscopies 4-30 wk after completion of therapy. A total of 533 patients had heartburn and regurgitation scores assessed at baseline and 4 wk after end of therapy, and were divided into two groups: 1) no prior GERD symptoms (N = 127) and 2) prior GERD symptoms (N = 406). H. pylori was assessed at baseline and > or = 4 wk after therapy by rapid urease test, histology, and culture.

RESULTS

Erosive esophagitis developed in 24 (4%) of 621 patients with cure versus 14 (3%) of 544 with persistent H. pylori (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 0.78-2.97). In the longest study (28-30-wk follow-up), esophagitis developed in two (7%) of 28 patients with cure versus five (7%) of 76 with persistent infection. New GERD symptoms developed in 13 (14%) of 92 patients with cure versus seven (20%) of 35 with persistent infection (OR = 0.66,95% CI = 0.24-1.82). GERD worsened in 20 (7%) of 269 with cure vs 20 (15%) of 137 with persistent H. pylori (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.24-0.91; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not support the hypothesis that H. pylori eradication in patients with duodenal ulcer disease leads to the development of erosive esophagitis, the development of new symptomatic GERD, or worsening of symptoms in patients with pre-existing GERD.