Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: lansoprazole vs. pantoprazole

JP-1366: A novel and potent potassium-competitive acid blocker that is effective in the treatment of acid-related diseases

The global prevalence of GERD is substantially increasing each year, and GERD is a chronic disease that reduces the quality of life of patients. The efficacy of conventional drugs is diverse, and most require long-term or lifetime administration; thus, the development of more effective therapeutic agents is needed. Herein, a more effective treatment for GERD was tested. We investigated whether JP-1366 affected gastric H+/K+-ATPase activity and used the Na+/K+-ATPase assay to confirm the selectivity of H+/K+-ATPase inhibition. To clarify the mechanism of enzyme inhibition, JP-1366 and TAK-438 were analyzed by Lineweaver-Burk. Also, we investigated the effects of JP-1366 in various models involving reflux esophagitis. We found that JP-1366 mediates strong, selective, and dose-dependent inhibition of H+/K+-ATPase. We found that JP-1366 significantly suppressed gastric acid secretion in histamine-treated pylorus-ligated rats in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, we confirmed that JP-1366 inhibited histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion in the HPD model. JP-1366 exhibited a more than 2-fold higher inhibitory effect on esophageal injury than TAK-438 in GERD lesions and had a more potent inhibitory effect in indomethacin- or aspirin-induced gastric ulcer rat models than TAK-438. Additionally, JP-1366 inhibited gastric ulcers. These results support the possibility that JP-1366 is a good candidate drug for treating acid-related diseases.

Evaluation of gastric acid suppression with vonoprazan using calcium carbonate breath test

Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is a new class of acid-suppressing agent. The acid-inhibitory effect of vonoprazan has been well-documented. However, there is no report on the extent to which the amount of gastric acid secretion is suppressed, not pH measurement, by the use of vonoprazan. The aim of this study was to evaluate this suppression effect. This was a single-arm, interventional pilot study involving 7 healthy Japanese men. The subjects were administered 20 mg vonoprazan for 6 days. The amount of gastric acid secretion was determined using the calcium carbonate breath test. The acid outputs were defined as the maximum Δ¹³C‰ (Δ¹³C max) and area under the curve (AUC) during the 30 min sampling period. The Δ¹³C max and AUC values significantly decreased on the administration of 20 mg vonoprazan. The AUC dropped by approximately 78% on day 1 and by 84% on day 6 and subsequently returned to the control level after cessation of vonoprazan therapy (reduction by 68% on day 7 and by 42% on day 8). In conclusion, the amount of gastric acid secretion rapidly decreased by the administration of vonoprazan; this inhibitory effect was found to be potent and long-lasting. (UMIN ID: UMIN000025469).

Comparison of the early effects of vonoprazan, lansoprazole and famotidine on intragastric pH: a three-way crossover study

To promote symptom relief from acid-related diseases, a medicine with a rapid-onset effect is ideal. The aim of this study was to investigate the early inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion after a single oral administration of vonoprazan, which represents a new class of proton pump inhibitors, and to compare this effect with those of lansoprazole and famotidine. Ten Helicobacter pylori (HP)-negative male subjects participated in this randomized, three-way crossover study. A single oral administration of vonoprazan (20 mg), lansoprazole (30 mg) or famotidine (20 mg) was performed, and the intragastric pH was continuously monitored for 6 h. Each drug was administered at least seven days apart. The average intragastric pH during the 6-h period after the administration of famotidine was higher than that after the administration of lansoprazole (median: 4.45 vs 2.65; p = 0.0284). A similar result was observed for vonoprazan and lansoprazole (median: 4.30 vs 2.65; p = 0.0322). In conclusions, oral administration of vonoprazan and famotidine in HP-negative healthy male subjects caused the intragastric pH to rise more quickly than did lansoprazole. (Trial Registration: UMIN000020989)

Acid-inhibitory effects of vonoprazan 20 mg compared with esomeprazole 20 mg or rabeprazole 10 mg in healthy adult male subjects--a randomised open-label cross-over study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for the treatment of acid-related diseases. Vonoprazan is a member of a new class of acid suppressants; potassium-competitive acid blockers. Vonoprazan may thus be an alternative to PPIs.

AIM

To evaluate efficacy, rapidity and duration of acid-inhibitory effects of vonoprazan vs. two control PPIs, esomeprazole and rabeprazole, in 20 healthy Japanese adult male volunteers with CYP2C19 extensive metaboliser genotype.

METHODS

In this randomised, open-label, two-period cross-over study, vonoprazan 20 mg and esomeprazole 20 mg (Study V vs. E) or rabeprazole 10 mg (Study V vs. R) were orally administered daily for 7 days. Primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was gastric pH over 24 h measured as percentage of time pH ≥3, ≥4 and ≥5 (pH holding time ratios; HTRs) and mean gastric pH.

RESULTS

Acid-inhibitory effect (pH4 HTR) of vonoprazan was significantly greater than that of esomeprazole or rabeprazole on both Days 1 and 7; Day 7 difference in pH4 HTR for vonoprazan vs. esomeprazole was 24.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.2-33.1] and for vonoprazan vs. rabeprazole 28.8% [95% CI: 17.2-40.4]. The Day 1 to Day 7 ratio of 24-h pH4 HTRs was >0.8 for vonoprazan, compared with 0.370 for esomeprazole and 0.393 for rabeprazole. Vonoprazan was generally well tolerated. One vonoprazan subject withdrew due to a rash which resolved after discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a more rapid and sustained acid-inhibitory effect of vonoprazan 20 mg vs. esomeprazole 20 mg or rabeprazole 10 mg. Therefore, vonoprazan may be a potentially new treatment for acid-related diseases.

EAES recommendations for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most frequent benign disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Management of GERD has always been controversial since modern medical therapy is very effective, but laparoscopic fundoplication is one of the few procedures that were quickly adapted to the minimal access technique. The purpose of this project was to analyze the current knowledge on GERD in regard to its pathophysiology, diagnostic assessment, medical therapy, and surgical therapy, and special circumstances such as GERD in children, Barrett's esophagus, and enteroesophageal and duodenogastroesophageal reflux.

METHODS

The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) has tasked a group of experts, based on their clinical and scientific expertise in the field of GERD, to establish current guidelines in a consensus development conference. The expert panel was constituted in May 2012 and met in September 2012 and January 2013, followed by a Delphi process. Critical appraisal of the literature was accomplished. All articles were reviewed and classified according to the hierarchy of level of evidence and summarized in statements and recommendations, which were presented to the scientific community during the EAES yearly conference in a plenary session in Vienna 2013. A second Delphi process followed discussion in the plenary session.

RESULTS

Recommendations for pathophysiologic and epidemiologic considerations, symptom evaluation, diagnostic workup, medical therapy, and surgical therapy are presented. Diagnostic evaluation and adequate selection of patients are the most important features for success of the current management of GERD. Laparoscopic fundoplication is the most important therapeutic technique for the success of surgical therapy of GERD.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the background of GERD is multifactorial, the management of this disease requires a complex approach in diagnostic workup as well as for medical and surgical treatment. Laparoscopic fundoplication in well-selected patients is a successful therapeutic option.

1-[5-(2-Fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine monofumarate (TAK-438), a novel and potent potassium-competitive acid blocker for the treatment of acid-related diseases

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in the treatment of acid-related diseases. However, several unmet medical needs, such as suppression of night-time acid secretion and rapid symptom relief, remain. In this study, we investigated the pharmacological effects of 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine monofumarate (TAK-438), a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), on gastric acid secretion in comparison with lansoprazole, a typical PPI, and SCH28080 [3-(cyanomethyl)-2-methyl,8-(phenylmethoxy)imidazo(1,2-a)pyridine], a prototype of P-CAB. TAK-438, SCH28080, and lansoprazole inhibited H(+),K(+)-ATPase activity in porcine gastric microsomes with IC(50) values of 0.019, 0.14, and 7.6 μM, respectively, at pH 6.5. The inhibitory activity of TAK-438 was unaffected by ambient pH, whereas the inhibitory activities of SCH28080 and lansoprazole were weaker at pH 7.5. The inhibition by TAK-438 and SCH28080 was reversible and achieved in a K(+)-competitive manner, quite different from that by lansoprazole. TAK-438, at a dose of 4 mg/kg (as the free base) orally, completely inhibited basal and 2-deoxy-d-glucose-stimulated gastric acid secretion in rats, and its effect on both was stronger than that of lansoprazole. TAK-438 increased the pH of gastric perfusate to a higher value than did lansoprazole or SCH28080, and the effect of TAK-438 was sustained longer than that of lansoprazole or SCH28080. These results indicate that TAK-438 exerts a more potent and longer-lasting inhibitory action on gastric acid secretion than either lansoprazole or SCH28080. TAK-438 is a novel antisecretory drug that may provide a new option for the patients with acid-related disease that is refractory to, or inadequately controlled by, treatment with PPIs.

Ninety-six-hour wireless oesophageal pH monitoring following proton pump inhibitor administration in NERD patients

BACKGROUND

Comparative studies of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have revealed that acid reflux is influenced by PPI treatment, formulations and dosing regimens. Wireless pH capsules have circumvented some of the limitations of conventional catheter-based pH testing with the additional advantage of 96-h recording periods.

AIM

To clarify the effectiveness of intra-oesophageal acid suppression by omeprazole, pantoprazole and lansoprazole in non-erosive reflux disease patients through a 4-day monitoring of oesophageal pH and related symptoms.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with typical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were enrolled and administered upper endoscopy and placement of a wireless pH capsule. Patients randomly received omeprazole, pantoprazole or lansoprazole for 3 days after the first 24 h. Symptom-reflux associations were expressed using the symptom index (SI).

RESULTS

All patients completed the study. Significant decrease in acid exposure occurred on day 2 and in each successive day in all groups. Pantoprazole and omeprazole are more effective than lansoprazole at inducing a normalization of intra-oesophageal acid exposure at days 2 and 3. Significant reduction in SI at day 2 was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Four-day ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring is feasible and safe. Omeprazole, pantoprazole and lansoprazole have an equivalent potency for normalizing intra-oesophageal acid exposure after 3 days of treatment in non-erosive reflux disease patients.

Efficacy in intra-oesophageal acid suppression may decrease after 2-year continuous treatment with proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Long-term intra-oesophageal acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors represents a management option for Barrett's oesophagus and severe reflux oesophagitis, but its stability over time has not been adequately assessed.

AIM

Our aim was to evaluate prospectively the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in suppressing intra-oesophageal acidity after 2-year continuous treatment.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with Barrett's oesophagus or severe reflux oesophagitis on a proton pump inhibitor regimen (once or twice daily) that normalised the total percentage acid exposure time were re-evaluated by means of 24-h oesophageal pH-monitoring after 2-year of continuous unmodified treatment.

RESULTS

A significant rise in the total percentage acid exposure time was observed at 2-year follow-up (P=0.029), owing to an increased value in 27 (60%) cases (9 on a twice daily regimen), higher than normal in 10 of them (22% of the whole group) (3 on a twice daily regimen). In 18 patients (40%) the total percentage acid exposure time was stable or decreased. Heartburn remained efficiently suppressed in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in suppressing intra-oesophageal acidity during continuous treatment may decrease over time, up to abnormal levels of oesophageal acid exposure in a minority of cases. This may occur without heartburn recurrence and with both once and twice daily regimens.

Role of pantoprazole in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

The diagnosis and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presents many problems, despite the fact that significant advances have been made in recent years in the understanding of its pathogenesis and symptomatology. GERD affects many people and has a significant negative impact on patient quality of life. Heartburn is the most common symptom of GERD which occurs with and without oesophagitis. The predominant causative factor for symptoms is prolonged contact of oesophageal mucosa with refluxed acid and pepsin. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective treatment for GERD: overall proportions of patients with healing and complete heartburn relief are markedly higher with PPIs than with alternative treatment strategies. Furthermore, the speed of healing and heartburn relief with PPIs is almost twice as rapid as with any other form of therapy. The present review focuses on the effectiveness and safety of the PPI, pantoprazole. The data show that the compound is highly effective in GERD patients with and without oesophagitis. Pantoprazole has an excellent safety record and shows only minor interaction with other drugs.

Effects of 24 weeks of lansoprazole therapy on asthma symptoms, exacerbations, quality of life, and pulmonary function in adult asthmatic patients with acid reflux symptoms

BACKGROUND

Difficult-to-control asthma has been associated with gastroesophageal acid reflux. Acid-suppressive treatment has been inconsistent in improving asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a proton-pump inhibitor improves asthma control in adult asthmatic patients with acid reflux symptoms.

DESIGN

Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Twenty-nine private practices and 3 academic practices in the United States.

PATIENTS

Two hundred seven patients receiving usual asthma care including an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). Patients had acid reflux symptoms and moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.

INTERVENTION

Lansoprazole, 30 mg bid, or placebo, bid, for 24 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measure was daily asthma symptoms by diary. Secondary asthma outcomes included rescue albuterol use, daily morning and evening peak expiratory flow, FEV1, FVC, asthma quality of life with standardized activities (AQLQS) questionnaire score, investigator-assessed symptoms, exacerbations, and oral corticosteroid-treated exacerbations.

RESULTS

Daily asthma symptoms, albuterol use, peak expiratory flow, FEV1, FVC, and investigator-assessed asthma symptoms at 24 weeks did not improve significantly with lansoprazole treatment compared to placebo. The AQLQS emotional function domain improved at 24 weeks (p = 0.025) with lansoprazole therapy. Fewer patients receiving lansoprazole (8.1% vs 20.4%, respectively; p = 0.017) had exacerbations and oral corticosteroid-treated (ie, moderate-to-severe) exacerbations (4% vs 13.9%, respectively; p = 0.016) of asthma. A post hoc subgroup analysis revealed that fewer patients receiving one or more long-term asthma-control medications in addition to an ICS experienced exacerbations (6.5% vs 24.6%, respectively; p = 0.016) and moderate-to-severe exacerbations (2.2% vs 17.5%, respectively; p = 0.021) with lansoprazole therapy.

CONCLUSION

In adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma and symptoms of acid reflux, treatment with 30 mg of lansoprazole bid for 24 weeks did not improve asthma symptoms or pulmonary function, or reduce albuterol use. However, this dose significantly reduced asthma exacerbations and improved asthma quality of life, particularly in those patients receiving more than one asthma-control medication.

Esomeprazole-Induced Central Fever with Severe Myalgia

OBJECTIVE:

To report a case of central fever associated with severe myalgia following esomeprazole.

CASE SUMMARY:

A 64-year-old man presented with intense cephalalgia; severe, diffuse myalgia; and fever (>40°C) after esomeprazole initiation for treatment of gastritis. Five hours after ingestion of the first esomeprazole pill (40 mg), the patient developed fever associated with cephalalgia and myalgia. This condition lasted about 40 hours and disappeared spontaneously. Symptoms partially responded to acetaminophen. Four days later, the patient received a second dose of esomeprazole 40 mg. Subsequently, 4 hours later, fever (>40°C), headache, and difficulty in the movement of all parts of the body recurred. Neurologic examination was negative except for a minor state of disorientation. All reflexes were normal or slightly decreased. No skin lesions or breathing difficulty was noted. Routine blood tests were normal. Again, symptoms resolved spontaneously about 40 hours later.

DISCUSSION:

The temporal connection between esomeprazole intake and the onset of fever suggests a probable causal link, as confirmed by the Naranjo probability scale. However, the pathogenic mechanism remains unclear. Considering that esomeprazole is able to cross the blood—brain barrier, its peak serum concentration is reached 90–180 minutes after oral administration, and its serum half-life is approximately 2 hours, we assume that the appearance of fever with accompanying neurologic and muscular symptoms might result from the drug interference with the hypothalamic regulatory center of body temperature.

CONCLUSIONS:

Hyperpyrexia of central origin associated with intense cephalalgia and myalgia may occur as an adverse effect of esomeprazole therapy.

Review article: diagnosis and management of night-time reflux

Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) range from mild to severe and, when they occur during night-time hours, can interfere with sleep patterns and reduce overall quality of life. The clinical presentation of GERD is characterized by oesophageal as well as supra-oesophageal symptoms, including otolaryngologic and pulmonary complications. However, GERD may be overlooked as the cause of a patient's supra-oesophageal symptoms because these complaints can occur in the absence of oesophageal symptoms or endoscopic changes. The role of available tools used for GERD diagnosis, including endoscopy, oesophageal pH monitoring and an empirical course of proton pump inhibitor therapy, is discussed. Interventions available to achieve the therapeutic goals of symptom relief and prevention include specific lifestyle modifications and over-the-counter as well as prescription pharmacological agents. Patient-initiated, as-needed treatment may not be the best choice for managing persistent night-time reflux because it requires patient arousal from sleep. Proton pump inhibitor therapy remains the treatment of choice for patients with more severe symptoms and those with erosive oesophagitis. Few studies have specifically evaluated the role of pharmacological agents in the management of night-time reflux and comparisons are difficult due to the variability in study design and endpoints assessed.

Therapeutic choices in reflux disease: defining the criteria for selecting a proton pump inhibitor

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, with symptoms affecting a substantial proportion of the US population on a daily basis. Heartburn and related symptoms arise from a number of pathophysiologic mechanisms, including dilated intercellular spaces, increased duration of acid reflux, greater proximal extent of reflux, and esophageal sensitivity. Chronic reflux may result in serious complications, such as esophageal erosions or ulceration, stricture, and Barrett esophagus. The goals of GERD therapy are to relieve patients' symptoms and prevent complications. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represent the most effective treatment option for GERD, relieving symptoms, healing erosions, and maintaining a healed mucosa. Differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics among the PPIs may result in differences in intragastric pH holding time as well as the onset of symptom relief. Lansoprazole and esomeprazole produce similar degrees and onset of symptom relief, with both providing greater symptom relief as compared with omeprazole. Although manufactured as capsules containing enteric-coated granules, lansoprazole, omeprazole, and esomeprazole maintain their high level of pharmacologic efficacy when the capsule contents are emptied into soft foods or various liquids. Lansoprazole and pantoprazole also are manufactured as intravenous formulations, and lansoprazole is available as strawberry-flavored granules for oral suspension and as an orally disintegrating tablet. These alternative routes of administration are particularly beneficial in the management of acid-related disorders in infants, children, the elderly, and patients of all ages who have difficulty swallowing or are unable to swallow intact capsules or tablets and those in the critical care setting.

Different patterns of oesophageal acid exposure distinguish complicated reflux disease from either erosive reflux oesophagitis or non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The reason why less than one-half of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease develop complicated reflux disease (ulcerative oesophagitis, oesophageal strictures and Barrett's oesophagus) and erosive reflux oesophagitis is not fully understood. Supine nocturnal oesophageal acid reflux is considered to be critically involved in this phenomenon, but reliable data are lacking.

AIM

To clarify whether high levels of supine nocturnal oesophageal acid exposure are associated with complicated reflux disease.

METHODS

Ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring was performed in 220 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (56 with complicated reflux disease, 76 with erosive reflux oesophagitis and 88 with non-erosive reflux disease). The total, supine nocturnal and upright diurnal percentage acid reflux times were calculated.

RESULTS

The total percentage acid reflux time was significantly greater in complicated reflux disease than in either erosive reflux oesophagitis (P = 0.024) or non-erosive reflux disease (P = 0.000). These differences were entirely due to a greater supine nocturnal percentage acid reflux time (P = 0.038 and P = 0.000, respectively), whereas no difference was observed in the upright diurnal percentage acid reflux time.

CONCLUSIONS

Complicated reflux disease is characterized by high levels of supine nocturnal percentage acid reflux time. Prospective studies would be appropriate to clarify whether the normalization of this parameter is relevant to the effective management of this subset of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.